A Harmony of the Gospels for Students of the Life of Christ / Based on the Broadus Harmony in the Revised Version

Based on the Broadus Harmony in the Revised Version
BY
CHAIR OF NEW TESTAMENT INTERPRETATION SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY
Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me.
HARPER & BROTHERS PUBLISHERS NEW YORK AND LONDON
COPYRIGHT, 1922, BY HARPER & BROTHERS PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO ELIZA S. BROADUS ELDEST DAUGHTER OF JOHN A. BROADUS AN ELECT LADY BELOVED IN MANY LANDS

It is now just thirty years since one day his young assistant suggested to Dr. John A. Broadus that he prepare a harmony of the Gospels that should depart from the old plan of following the feasts as the turning points in the life of Jesus. He acted on the hint and led the way that all modern harmonies have followed. The book has gone through a dozen large editions and has become the standard harmony for many thousands of students all over the world. Broadus was concerned to bring out the inner movements of the history, towards that long-delayed, but foreseen and inevitable collision, in which, beyond all other instances, the wrath of man was made to praise God. This he succeeded in doing with marvelous power.
A generation has passed by and it is meet that the work of Broadus should be reviewed in the light of modern synoptic criticism and research into every phase of the life of Christ. So I have made a new analysis that preserves Broadus's real purpose, but with new sections and new notes. The notes at the end of the old volume, written by me for the first edition, have been thoroughly revised and brought up to date. The Old Testament passages referred to in the Gospels are given in the text. The Gospel of Mark appears in the first column, then Matthew, Luke, and John. It is now known that Matthew and Luke made use of Mark for the framework of their Gospels. This change simplifies amazingly the unfolding of the narrative.
There is still dispute concerning the historical worth of the Gospel of John, but the Johannine authorship is not disproved. It still holds the field in my opinion. Dr. C. F. Burney's theory of an Aramaic original is already giving a new turn to Johannine criticism.