The high school failures
FRANCIS P. OBRIEN
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Philosophy, Columbia University
PUBLISHED BY Teachers College, Columbia University NEW YORK CITY 1919
Copyright, 1919, by FRANCIS P. OBRIEN
Grateful acknowledgment is due the principals of each of the high schools whose records are included in this study, for the courteous and helpful attitude which they and their assistants manifested in the work of securing the data. Thanks are due Dr. John S. Tildsley for his generous permission to consult the records in each or any of the New York City high schools. But the fullest appreciation is felt and acknowledged for the ready criticism and encouragement received from Professor Thomas H. Briggs and Professor George D. Strayer at each stage from the inception to the completion of this study.
F.P.O.
As the measuring of the achievements of the public schools has become a distinctive feature of the more recent activities in the educational field, the failure in expected accomplishment by the school, and its proficiency in turning out a negative product, have been forced upon our attention rather emphatically. The striking growth in the number of school surveys, measuring scales, questionnaires, and standardized tests, together with many significant school experiments and readjustments, bears testimony of our evident demand for a closer diagnosis of the practices and conditions which are no longer accepted with complacency.
The American people have expressed their faith in a scheme of universal democratic education, and have committed themselves to the support of the free public high school. They have been liberal in their financing and strong in their faith regarding this enterprise, so typically American, to a degree that a secondary education may no longer be regarded as a luxury or a heritage of the rich. No longer may the field be treated as either optional or exclusive. The statutes of several of our states now expressly or impliedly extend their compulsory attendance requirements beyond the elementary years of school. Many, too, are the lines of more desirable employment for young people which demand or give preference to graduates of a high school. At the same time there has been no decline in the importance of high school graduation for entering the learned or professional pursuits. Accordingly, it seems highly probable that, with such an extended and authoritative sphere of influence, a stricter business accounting will be exacted of the public high school, as the great after-war burdens make the public less willing to depend on faith in financing so great an experiment. They will ask, ever more insistently, for facts as to the expenditures, the finished product, the internal adjustments, and the waste product of our secondary schools. Such inquiries will indeed seem justifiable.
F. P. O'Brien
THE HIGH SCHOOL FAILURES
PREFACE
CONTENTS
1. THE RELEVANCE OF THIS STUDY
2. THE MEANING OF 'FAILURE' IN THIS STUDY
3. THE SCOPE AND CONTENT OF THE FIELD COVERED
4. SOURCES OF THE DATA EMPLOYED
5. THE SELECTION AND RELIABILITY OF THESE SOURCES OF DATA
A SUMMARY OF CHAPTER I
REFERENCES:
1. A DISTRIBUTION OF ALL ENTRANTS IN REFERENCE TO FAILURE
2. THE LATER DISTRIBUTION OF PUPILS BY SEMESTERS
3. THE DISTRIBUTION OF FAILURES
5. DISTRIBUTION OF PUPILS DROPPING OUT—SEMESTERS—AGES
SUMMARY OF CHAPTER II
REFERENCES:
1. ATTENDANCE, MENTAL OR PHYSICAL DEFECTS, AND SIZE OF CLASSES ARE POSSIBLE FACTORS
2. THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE SCHOOL ENTERING AGE FOR PROGNOSIS
3. THE AMOUNT OF FAILURE AT EACH AGE AND ITS RELATION TO THE POSSIBILITY OF FAILING FOR THAT AGE
4. THE INITIAL RECORD IN HIGH SCHOOL FOR PROGNOSIS OF FAILURE
5. THE PROGNOSIS OF FAILURES BY THE SUBJECT SELECTION
6. THE TIME PERIOD AND THE NUMBER OF FAILURES
7. SIMILARITY OF FACTS FOR BOYS AND GIRLS
A SUMMARY OF CHAPTER III
REFERENCES:
1. COMPARISON OF THE FAILING AND THE NON-FAILING GROUPS IN REFERENCE TO GRADUATION AND PERSISTENCE
2. THE NUMBER OF FAILURES AND THE YEARS TO GRADUATE
3. THE NUMBER OF FAILURES AND THE SEMESTER OF DROPPING OUT FOR THE NON-GRADUATES
4. THE PERCENTAGES THAT THE NON-GRADUATE GROUPS FORM OF THE PUPILS WHO HAVE EACH SUCCESSIVELY HIGHER NUMBER OF FAILURES
5. TIME EXTENSION FOR THE FAILING GRADUATES
A SUMMARY OF CHAPTER IV
REFERENCES:
THE DISPOSITION MADE OF THE SCHOOL FAILURES
1. REPETITION AS A REMEDY FOR FAILURES
2. DISCONTINUANCE OF SUBJECT OR COURSE, AND THE SUBSTITUTION OF OTHERS
3. EMPLOYMENT OF SCHOOL EXAMINATIONS
4. THE SERVICE RENDERED BY THE REGENTS' EXAMINATIONS IN NEW YORK STATE
5. CONTINUATION OF SUBJECT WITHOUT REPETITION
A SUMMARY OF CHAPTER V
REFERENCES:
1. SOME ARE EVIDENTLY MISFITS
2. MOST OF THE FAILING PUPILS LACK NEITHER ABILITY OR EARNESTNESS
3. THE SCHOOL EMPHASIS AND THE SCHOOL FAILURES ARE BOTH CULMINATIVE IN PARTICULAR SCHOOL SUBJECTS
4. AN INDICTMENT AGAINST THE SUBJECT-MATTER AND THE TEACHING ENDS, AS FACTORS IN PRODUCING FAILURES
SUMMARY OF CHAPTER VI
REFERENCES:
1. ORGANIZATION AND ADAPTATION IN RECOGNITION OF THE INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN ABILITIES AND INTERESTS
2. FACULTY STUDENT ADVISERS FROM THE TIME OF ENTRANCE
3. GREATER FLEXIBILITY AND DIFFERENTIATION REQUIRED
4. PROVISION FOR THE DIRECTION OF THE PUPILS' STUDY
5. A GREATER RECOGNITION AND EXPOSITION OF THE FACTS AS REVEALED BY ACCURATE AND COMPLETE SCHOOL RECORDS
SUMMARY OF CHAPTER VII
REFERENCES:
VITA