K. K. K. sketches, humorous and didactic

Humorous and Didactic, TREATING THE MORE IMPORTANT EVENTS OF THE KU-KLUX-KLAN MOVEMENT IN THE SOUTH. WITH A Discussion of the Causes which gave Rise to it, and the Social and Political Issues Emanating from it.
BY JAMES MELVILLE BEARD.
PHILADELPHIA: CLAXTON, REMSEN & HAFFELFINGER, 624, 626 & 628 MARKET STREET. 1877.
Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1876, by CLAXTON, REMSEN & HAFFELFINGER, in the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington.
J. FAGAN & SON, STEREOTYPERS, PHILAD’A.
Selheimer & Moore, Printers, 501 Chestnut Street.
INSCRIBED TO Messrs. Geo. C. Reeler and H. R. and J. M. Park, BOTH AS A MARK OF THE AUTHOR’S ESTEEM AND A TESTIMONIAL OF GENEROUS AID RENDERED DURING THE PROGRESS OF THE “SKETCHES.”

These sketches are placed before the public without other apology for their appearance than may be found in that demand for information on the subject treated which renders a work of the character a positive necessity of the times. The secret political movement here introduced to the reader has contributed more to the sensational character of American politics, and, at the same time, proven a more influential factor in those political questions with which we have dealt as a people, than any or all contemporaneous issues. And yet nothing has been written on the theme bearing a just proportion thereto,—absolutely nothing,—if we subtract the unknown quantity in the news problem of the day from this estimate, and for reasons as varied as obvious. We shall not weary the reader with a statement of the latter, nor a recitative of the conditions upon which they are or may have been based. It is enough that we know that no consecutive nor reliable history of the Order could have been written at an earlier period; and even at this date, so broken and fragmentary are those passages referring to its active career, compiled during months of arduous labor, that the author has been necessitated to group them in a series of historical sketches, or pen-pictures, and in treating the subject to adopt the style of the romancist, rather than that of the historian. He flatters himself, however, that while the reliability of his historical information is not impaired by this method, that the work will thereby be rendered more attractive to a large class of readers; and, on the other hand, as to facts connected with the morale of the weird subject, he is not hampered by these considerations, but is enabled to present them in such a concise form, and as sententiously as regards style, as their share of the task’s importance renders peremptory.