Crimes of Preachers in the United States and Canada

Illustrated with Pictures of the Instruments of Torture used upon Heretics, Auto-de-fe Scenes, etc.
CONTENTS
Large 12mo. 750 pages. Cloth, $2.00
Crimes of Preachers
in the United States and Canada
TENTH EDITION. Transcribed out of the Original Newspapers, and with Previous Transcriptions Diligently Compared and Revised. “THESE BE THY GODS, O ISRAEL.” “By their fruits shall ye know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?” New York THE TRUTH SEEKER COMPANY 62 Vesey Street

In the year 1906 the Young Men’s Christian Association of Pittsburgh, in Pennsylvania, rejected the application of an actor for membership on the ground that one of his profession could not be a moral person. Viewing the action as a slur cast on the whole theatrical profession, Mr. Henry E. Dixey, the well-known actor, offered to give one thousand dollars to charity if it could be shown that actors, man for man, were not as good as ministers of the gospel. No champion of the cloth appearing to claim Mr. Dixey’s money on that proposition, he went further and offered another thousand dollars if there could not be found a minister in jail for every state in the Union. This second challenge was likewise ignored by the clergy and the association which had provoked it, but Mr. Dixey made a few inquiries as to the proportion of ministers to actors among convicts. His research, which was far short of being thorough, discovered 43 ministers and 19 actors in jail. The investigation, so far as the ministers were concerned, could have touched only the fringe of the matter, for in eight months of the year 1914 the publishers of this work counted more than seventy reported offenses of preachers for which they were or deserved to be imprisoned, and of course the count included only those cases reported in newspapers that reached the office through an agency which scans only the more important ones. There had been nothing like a systematic reading of the press of the country for these cases. Judged by 1914, the clerical convicts in 1906 must have far exceeded the number developed by Mr. Dixey’s census.