Gandhi and Anarchy
Transcriber's Note.
Variations in the spelling of words associated with the Muslim religion have been retained. Other apparent typographical errors have been corrected.
The tables in Appendix XXII were originally printed sideways. In order to fit into the format of this edition the first three columns of each table (that list the province, date, and place of each riot or incident) have been combined.
By SIR C. SANKARAN NAIR
Published by TAGORE & CO., MADRAS
First Published March 1922 Second Edition July 1922
All Rights Reserved Right of Translation not Reserved
THE TATA PRINTING WORKS : : MADRAS
The struggle for Indian Home Rule which was started with the inauguration of the Indian National Congress has many difficulties to encounter, has strong and powerful opponents and has received many checks. But its strongest opponent is Mr. Gandhi and perhaps the most severe check it has received is the adoption by the National Congress at his instance in Calcutta and Nagpur of the so-called-Non-violent Non-co-operation. Non-co-operation as advocated by Mr. Gandhi may be a weapon to be used when constitutional methods have failed to achieve our purpose. Non-violence and passive suffering will lead to bloodshed or be unfruitful of any satisfactory results. Moreover, nothing shows the lack of statesmanship more than practically basing the claim for Swaraj upon the Punjab and the Khilafat grievances. As representing Asia against Europe, the fair against the white race, the Hindus regarded the Turkish Empire with sympathy and were disposed to support the Mahomadens as Asiatic representatives. But when by Gandhi and Khilafatist that claim was abandoned; when the Arabs perhaps the noblest of the Mahomadan races who fought as our allies and helped us to defeat Turkey were sought to be brought under Turkish dominion, when other Asiatic races freed by the war were asked to accept Turkish sovereignty on grounds based on the Mahomaden religion which had already produced such baneful result in India, the situation became entirely different. It was rightly realised by many, and the sequel has proved that they were right, that the path of the progress of the Gandhi movement fused with the Khilafat element will be bloody. The claim for Indian Home Rule rests upon very different grounds. The Hindus have nothing to do with the Khilafat agitation. The Mahomadans themselves are not agreed as to the claims advanced on behalf of the Calif. It is even questionable, to put it mildly, whether that claim has the support of the majority of the Mahomadans. While the claim itself rested on such slender grounds, the means first adopted to enforce the claim were grotesque. The methods advocated by Mr. Gandhi and the Congress are directed against Western civilization; against the class which fought for and won the reforms; and the Montague reforms scheme of constitutional progress. They have failed miserably and as was natural more violent methods leading to direct conflict with the forces of Government have been advocated which would in all probability have been carried out but for the arrest and imprisonment of Mr. Gandhi. He belongs to a class of thought which has attracted some of the noblest minds in this world, but in applying his the gospel of life to politics, he has shown himself a babe and his interference has been generally mischievous. In South Africa he is responsible for creating a situation which makes a peaceful and satisfactory solution practically impossible. His factious policy in India stands in the way of further reforms. The opposition to Gandhi was however not strenuous. The so-called Moderates only whispered their protests against his policy so as not to be heard beyond a few feet. They are loud however, in their denunciation of Government action to check the illegal activities of Mr. Gandhi and his followers. It can hardly be doubted that their cautious attitude has contributed to the growth of the Gandhi movement. But the inexplicable conduct of a certain—I won't say class—body of gentlemen has still more contributed to that result.
Sir C. Sankaran Nair
---
GANDHI AND ANARCHY
CONTENTS
PREFACE
HIS PHILOSOPHY
THE NON-CO-OPERATION RESOLUTION
THE KHILAFAT QUESTION
THE PUNJAB ATROCITIES
SWARAJ OR HOME RULE
EDUCATION
VAKILS AND COURTS
BOYCOTT OF COUNCILS
BOYCOTT OF FOREIGN GOODS
NON-VIOLENT NON-CO-OPERATION
INDIVIDUAL CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE
Effect of violent preaching
The Leader of the Movement
Its inevitable result
The Failure of the Programme
Experiment in youthful sacrifice
The Lawyer-Failure
A Foul Atmosphere
Revise the Programme
Enter the Councils
N.C.O. Concession
Suggested Modifications
Civil Disobedience
Violent Agitators
Soul Force
Criminal Intimidation
The Arrests
Khilafat Agitators
The Arrests
The Mob breaks Loose
His Excellency's Speech at the St. Andrew's Day Dinner, on 30th November 1920
His Excellency's Speech at the St. Andrew's Dinner, on 30th November 1921
His Excellency's speech at the Legislative Council on 19th December 1921
On the Defensive
The Critics Answered
The Lesson of Chauri Chaura
The Issue
North and South of the Ganges
The Giridih Riots
"Volunteers" Recruited from Criminal Classes
The question of Counter-Propaganda
The Aims of the League
The League an Old Calendar
An Indian "Republic"
Hindus and Muslims
The Mopla Rebellion
A National Parliament.
Governmental Policy
Duty of Muslims
The Muslim Demands
A Compact Between Congress and League
A new and dangerous situation
More drastic Measures
A statement disproved
The proposed conference
Impossible Requests.
Issue—Law versus lawlessness
The Pledge
Volunteer corps
Mahatma the dictator
WRITTEN STATEMENT