The Journal of Ophthalmology, Otology and Laryngology. Vol. XII. July, 1900. Part 3.
Transcriber’s Note:
The cover image was created by the transcriber and is placed in the public domain.
EDITOR,
CHARLES DEADY, M. D.
ASSOCIATE EDITOR,
A. W. PALMER, M. D.
BY WM. WOODBURN, M. D., DES MOINES, IA.
I do not propose to treat this subject technically or theoretically, further than to simply say, I consider the first a mild form of the second, and both a reflex neurosis. I shall relate my experience and treatment of some half dozen cases illustrating my subject.
Case I.—Mrs. H., a farmer’s wife, æt. thirty-five, had been troubled for a number of years with hay fever from harvest time until frost came in the fall. Inspection of the nose in June, 1899, showed the lower right and both middle turbinated bodies greatly hypertrophied. Removal of the anterior and lower half of the middle and cauterization of the lower, gave complete immunity for the entire season. This patient could not, at any time, sweep the floor or ride behind horses against the wind, without violent paroxysms of sneezing, but since the operation has had no further trouble on this score.
Case II.—Mr. D., æt. about thirty-five, a traveling man, the patient of our secretary, consulted me on August 28 last, in the midst of his annual attack of hay fever. Examination showed the entire nasal mucous membrane greatly engorged, as it always is during an attack. On the right side of the septum, near the floor, was a sharp septal spur, projecting at right angles about three-eighths of an inch, prodding the tumefied lower turbinated body. The removal of this spur under cocaine anæsthesia greatly modified the symptoms immediately, but a grateful frost, following in a few days, prevented an exact estimate of the benefit to be ascribed to the removal of this offending appendage.
This year, however, will furnish opportunity to determine how permanent the effect will be.
Case III.—Wm. S., æt. four years, a great sufferer from asthma, at times when having a slight cold, to which he was very prone, to such an extent that he could not lie down for several days and nights. Relief had been sought in the higher altitudes of the Rockies and a residence of one year at Denver, but none came. I was consulted on November 25, 1899. An examination showed the post-nasal space almost occluded with adenoid vegetations. Of course I advised their removal, which advice was accepted, and their thorough removal, under the local application of cocaine, accomplished the purpose. This was the child of a brother practitioner, and in April this year I had a letter from the doctor, in which was the very gratifying sentence, “William has not had the asthma since you removed his adenoids, and is much better in every way.” This was especially pleasing since his suffering had always been more severe and constant during his previous winters.
Various
---
NASAL OBSTRUCTION AS A CAUSE OF HAY FEVER OR ASTHMA.
DETACHMENT OF THE RETINA—A CASE.
CLINICAL CASES.
THREE KALI CARBONICUM CASES.
ATROPHIC RHINITIS.
THE PATHOGENIC AND THERAPEUTIC ACTION OF RHUS TOX. UPON THE EYE.
TREATMENT OF SARCOMA WITH THE MIXED TOXINS OF ERYSIPELAS AND BACILLUS PRODIGIOSUS.
THE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISEASE.
DESCRIPTION OF CASES.
THE TREATMENT.
THE MORBID ANATOMY.
ÆTIOLOGY.
THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION.
THE MADDOX ROD OR THE PHOROMETER; WHICH?
ABSTRACTS FROM CURRENT LITERATURE.
BOOK REVIEW.
BOOKS RECEIVED.
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES