ANTHROPOLOGICAL PAPERS
OF
THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
VOLUME XXXVIII, PART I
TEXTILE FIBERS USED IN EASTERN
ABORIGINAL NORTH AMERICA
By A. C. Whitford
By Order of the Trustees
of
THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
New York City
1941
THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
PUBLICATIONS IN ANTHROPOLOGY
In 1906 the present series of Anthropological Papers was authorized by the Trustees of the Museum to record the results of research conducted by the Department of Anthropology. The series comprises octavo volumes of about 350 pages each, issued in parts at irregular intervals. Previous to 1906 articles devoted to anthropological subjects appeared as occasional papers in the Bulletin and also in the Memoir series of the Museum. Of the Anthropological Papers 35 volumes have been completed. A complete list of these publications with prices will be furnished when requested. All communications should be addressed to the Librarian of the Museum.
The current volume is:—
VOLUME XXXVIII
I. Textile Fibers used in Eastern Aboriginal North America. By A. C. Whitford. Pp. 1-22. 1941. Price, $.25.
II. (In preparation.)
TEXTILE FIBERS USED IN EASTERN ABORIGINAL NORTH AMERICA
By A. C. Whitford
CONTENTS
| Page | |
| INTRODUCTION | [5] |
| MONOCOTYLEDONOUS SPECIES | [7] |
| DIOCOTYLEDONOUS SPECIES | [9] |
| OBJECTS FROM SPIRO MOUND, OKLAHOMA | [15] |
| SUMMARY | [17] |
| FIBER PLANTS AS IDENTIFIED | [17] |
| TABLE OF IDENTIFICATIONS | [19] |
INTRODUCTION
The author of this paper has studied the vegetable fibers used in fabricating objects in the ethnological and archaeological collections from the Indian tribes of the Mississippi drainage and eastward, now in the American Museum. The first task was to identify them and view them against the background of existing textile knowledge. The present paper reports these identifications and comments upon fiber samples from collections in other museums.
The writing of this paper would have been impossible without the generous and whole-hearted coöperation of many institutions and individuals. This assistance has ranged from the furnishing of specimens for determination, to advice as to methods, classifications, and the supplying of modern material for comparison. For specimens of classified plants to be used in the comparative work thanks are due to The New York Botanical Garden in Bronx Park, the Botanical Departments of the University of Wisconsin, the University of Oklahoma, and the University of Georgia.
The standard histological microscopic methods were used for the determination of the fiber. Slides were made of both cross-sections and longitudinal sections and these were compared with previously prepared and classified modern material. When the specimen was too colored for microscopic examination it was bleached in a solution of Sodium perborate until clear enough for study. In charred material, when sufficient detail was preserved for identification the fiber sample was treated with Schultz Maceration solution, washed, dried, and fortified by saturating in a collodion solution. Occasionally, it was found necessary to stain the material and in this either Delafield’s Haematoxylon or Methylene Blue was used. In the differentiation of certain species, it was found necessary to make microscopic measurements of the length and width of the cells, but generally the shape, distribution, medullation, and other constant characters were sufficient for the identifications.
In the text and tables the following abbreviations are used for the names of the coöperating institutions:—
| American Museum of Natural History | AMNH |
| Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation | MAIHF |
| Milwaukee Public Museum | MPM |
| McGill University Archaeological Museum | McGU |
| Ohio State Historical and Archaeological Museum | OSHAM |
| Peabody Museum, Harvard University | PMHU |
| Rochester Museum of Arts and Science | RMAS |
| University of Kentucky Museum | UKM |
| United States National Museum | USNM |
MONOCOTYLEDONOUS SPECIES
The fibers from monocotyledonous plants, as identified, are listed here. Approximately five hundred objects were sampled, so the frequencies for the several species should be given that denominator.