| 1. | Historical development of the theory as to the localization of the germ-plasm in the nucleus | [174] |
| 2. | Nägeli’s ‘idioplasm’ is not identical with Weismann’s ‘germ-plasm’ | [180] |
| 3. | A retransformation of somatic idioplasm into germ-idioplasm does not take place | [183] |
| 4. | Confirmation of the theory as to the significance of the nuclear substance afforded by Nussbaum’s and Gruber’s experiments on regeneration in Infusoria | [185] |
| 5. | The nucleoplasm changes during ontogeny according to a certain law | [186] |
| 6. | The identity of the daughter-nuclei produced by indirect nuclear division, as assumed by Strasburger, is not necessary for my theory | [187] |
| 7. | The gradual decrease in complexity of the structure of the nucleus during ontogeny | [190] |
| 8. | Nägeli’s view on the germs (‘Anlagen’) in the idioplasm | [192] |
| 9. | The manner in which germ-cells arise from somatic cells | [194] |
| 10. | ’Embryonic’ cells in the mature organism | [196] |
| 11. | The rule of probability is against a retransformation of somatic idioplasm into germ-plasm | [198] |
| 12. | The regular cyclical development of the idioplasm founded upon phylogeny by Nägeli | [199] |
| 13. | It follows from phyletic considerations that the germ-cells have not arisen at the end of ontogeny | [201] |
| 14. | They originally arose at the beginning of ontogeny, but at a later period the time of their origin was displaced | [202] |
| 15. | A continuity of the germ-cells does not now exist in most cases | [205] |
| 16. | But there is a continuity of the germ-plasm | [205] |
| 17. | Strasburger’s objection to my supposition that the germ-plasm passes along distinct routes | [209] |
| 18. | The cell-body may remain unchanged when the nucleus is changed | [210] |
| 19. | It is conceivable that all somatic nuclei may contain some germ-plasm | [211] |
| 1. | The phenomena exhibited in the maturation of the egg are identical in parthenogenetic and sexual development | [225] |
| 2. | The difference between parthenogenetic and sexual cells must be of a quantitative nature | [226] |
| 3. | The quantity of the germ-plasm determines development | [227] |
| 4. | The expulsion of polar bodies depends upon the antagonism between germ-plasm and ovogenetic nucleoplasm | [230] |
| 5. | Fertilization does not act dynamically | [231] |
| 6. | An insufficient quantity of germ-plasm arrests development | [232] |
| 7. | Relation of the nucleus to the cell | [234] |
| 8. | The case of the bee does not constitute any objection to my theory | [234] |
| 9. | Strasburger’s views upon parthenogenesis | [237] |
| 10. | Parthenogenesis does not depend upon abundant nutrition | [239] |
| 11. | The indirect causes of sexual and parthenogenetic reproduction | [241] |
| 12. | The direct causes | [242] |
| 13. | Explanation of the formation of nutritive cells | [243] |
| 14. | Identity of the germ-plasm in male and female germ-cells | [246] |