LV.
Kepe the wele fro the serpent Gorgon; |f. 39.|
Be ware that thou looke not hyr[[344]] opon;
Haue good sadde mynde opon Percyualle,[[345]]
And he shall the tell the story all.
Gorgon, as the fable seith, was a gentylvoman of souereyne beaute; but because that Phebus[[346]] lay by hyr in the temple of Diane, the godes was so sore meved and grevyd that she schawnged hir into a serpent of ryght orribil figure. And þat serpent hade sich a propirte þat euery man that [be]helde hir was changed sodeynely into a ston; and for the harme that folwed of hire Percyvale, the worthi knyght, went for to fyght with that fers beste. And he behelde hym selfe in the bryghtnes of his shelde, the whiche was all golde, because he shulde not beholde the evill serpent, and he dide so mych þat he smote of hir[[347]] hede. Many exposicions may be made of this fable, and Gorgon may be vndirstonden for a cete or a towne þat was wonte to be of grete bounte, but throw the vicis of the duellers þerin it become a serpent and venemus; that is to vnderstonde, þat it dede mych harme in the marches to there neygburs, as to robbe and to pyll holy chirche,[[348]] all tho þat thei myghte gete, and merchawndys and othir passeris forby were takyn and holden and put in streyte presonys and thus were thei chawnged into stones. Percivale, that behelde hym selfe in his chelde, þat is to sey, in his strynght and knyghode, and went to fyght ayens the cite, he tooke it and tooke the power fro it, þat it dede no more harme.[[349]] It myght be that some man myght take a full feyre lady of evyll dedys, þe which bi hire couetise put many from there goodes, but he put hir from þat wyll; and many othir vndirstondynges may be sette herein. Therefor it is seide to þe good knyght that he kepe hym fro behaldyng evill thyngges, þe which myght drawe hym to evyll. And Aristotil seith, “Fle peple full of wikydnes and befolowe wyse men and stody in there bookes and beholde thy selfe in theire dedes.”
How that Gorgon shulde notte be beholden, þat is to sey þat þe good sperite shuld not behold no thyng in no maner delyte, but beholde[[350]] hym in þe childe[[351]] of þe state of perfeccion, and þat is for to fle delites. Aristotyl[[352]] seithe þat, as it is impossibyl þat [fire shuld burn in water, so it is impossibyl þat] compunccion[[353]] of herte is among wor[l]dly delites, for thei be .iio. contrary thynges þat distroyith iche of them othir, for compunccion is modir of terres and delites engenderyth laughynges, compunccion restreynyth the |f. 40.| hert and delites enlargeth it. To thys purpose seyth Holy Scripture, “They þat sowyn in wepyng shal repyn in lawyng.”[[354]]