FOOTNOTES:
[138] Vol. VIII, pp. 321-341. The article is a criticism of Huxley's essay with the same title.
[139] Ibid., p. 337. Italics mine.
[140] Op. cit., p. 338.
[141] Ibid., p. 340.
[142] Ibid.
[143] Ibid. It should be observed that this conclusion is reached on a purely theoretical basis.
[144] Printed in the Psychological Review, Vol. VII, 1900, pp. 105-124.
[145] Ibid., p. 123.
[146] Ibid., p. 124.
[147] Vol. XI, pp. 107-124; 353-371.
[148] Ibid., p. 108.
[149] Ibid., p. 109.
[150] Ibid.
[151] Op. cit., p. 110.
[152] Ibid., p. 111.
[153] Op. cit., p. 112.
[154] Ibid., p. 113.
[155] Op. cit., p. 114.
[156] Ibid., p. 116.
[157] Ibid., p. 118.
[158] Op. cit., p. 355.
[159] Ibid., p. 356.
[160] See Bosanquet's Logic, second edition, Chapter VII, and especially page 240.
[161] Philosophical Review, Vol. XI, p. 357.
[162] Ibid., p. 360.
[163] Ibid., p. 358.
[164] Op. cit., p. 364 f.
[165] Op. cit., p. 370.
[166] Vol. IX, pp. 465-489.
[167] Op. cit., p. 465.
[168] Ibid., p. 486 f.
[169] Ibid., p. 487.
[170] Ibid.
[171] Ibid.
[172] Op. cit., p. 489.