CONTENTS.
[Part I. The Palaeography of the Morgan Fragment. By E. A. Lowe.]
[Contents, size, vellum, binding]
[Ruling]
[Relation of the six leaves to the rest of the manuscript]
[Original size of the manuscript]
[Disposition]
[Ornamentation]
[Corrections]
[Syllabification]
[Orthography]
[Abbreviations]
[Authenticity of the six leaves]
[Archetype]
[The Date and Later History of the Manuscript]
[On the dating of uncial manuscripts]
[Dated uncial manuscripts]
[Oldest group of uncial manuscripts]
[Characteristics of the oldest uncial manuscripts]
[Date of the Morgan manuscript]
[Later history of the Morgan manuscript]
[Conclusion]
[Part II. The Text of the Morgan Fragment. By E. K. Rand.]
[The Morgan Fragment and Aldus’s Ancient Codex Parisinus]
[The Codex Parisinus]
[The Bodleian volume]
[The Morgan fragment possibly a part of the lost Parisinus]
[The script]
[Provenience and contents]
[The text closely related to that of Aldus]
[Editorial methods of Aldus]
[Relation of the Morgan Fragment to the Other Manuscripts of the Letters]
[Classes of the manuscripts]
[The early editions]
[Π a member of Class I]
[Π the direct ancestor of BF with probably a copy intervening]
[The probable stemma]
[Further consideration of the external history of P, Π, and B]
[Evidence from the portions of BF outside the text of Π]
[Aldus’s methods; his basic text]
[The variants of Budaeus in the Bodleian volume]
[Aldus and Budaeus compared]
[The latest criticism of Aldus]
[Aldus’s methods in the newly discovered parts of Books VIII, IX, and X]
[The Morgan fragment the best criterion of Aldus]
[Conclusion]