Variation in Coloration and Molt
In all American weasels (subgenus Mustela) the color, at least in summer, is brown with more or less white or whitish on the underparts. In one species, Mustela africana, there is a longitudinal stripe of brown on the middle of the light-colored underparts; this stripe is absent in each of the other three American species. Two species, M. erminea and M. frenata, always have a black tip on the tail. Of the other two species, M. africana lacks the black tip and M. rixosa may or may not have a few black hairs in the tip of its tail. White or light yellowish facial markings occur in subspecies of M. frenata from the southwestern United Stated to Central America. Subspecies having the most extensive light-colored facial markings have the remainder of the upper part of the head black. In weasels without light facial markings the upper parts of the head all are brown. In the two species, M. erminea and M. frenata, the extent to which the light color of the underparts extends down the insides of the legs and out on the underside of the tail, or the absence of light color on these parts, is a matter of geographic variation. The same can be said for M. rixosa except that first its tail is unicolored and second individual variation as well as geographic variation accounts for the color pattern on the underparts and legs in animals from the southeastern part of the range of the species.
The most remarkable feature of the coloration of weasels is the winter whitening. This occurs in the northern part of North America in each of the three species of weasels found on that continent. The black tip of the tail in M. erminea and M. frenata remains black in winter. If an individual of M. rixosa has black hairs on the tip of its tail in summer, there are thought to be black hairs there also in winter. Otherwise the winter pelage is all white in northern areas in each of the three species. In this white winter coat the animal is known as ermine.
The underlying cause seems to be protective coloration. At any rate, weasels are always white in winter if they are from areas where snow lies on the ground all winter, every winter, or almost every winter; and they are always brown if from areas where there is never, or rarely, snow in winter. The changes in color are effected by molt, one in autumn and one in spring. Animals that are brown in winter undergo the same two molts as do those that are white in winter. The capacity to acquire a white coat or a brown coat in winter is an hereditary matter just as one man grows red hair and another grows black hair. In the weasels, however, all individuals in the north turn white in winter and if one that was born there is kept through successive winters in the warmer south where there is no snow, he will still turn white each winter. A weasel born in a southern area, where all are brown in winter, molts into a brown (not white) winter coat even when kept in a cold, snowy, northern area where native weasels of the same species all turn white. Obviously, therefore, neither snow nor temperature is an immediate cause and, as we have said, the color in winter is a matter of heredity. The time of the molt, we now know, is determined by the amount of light. When nights grow longer and days shorter, a point is reached at which the lesser light received through the eyes causes the pituitary gland to cease producing a gonadotropic hormone. Directly or indirectly, the lack of this hormone stimulates molt and, probably enzyme action, or the lack of it, causes the melanoblasts of the cells in the hair follicle to be without pigment. Hence the hair grown from a follicle under such conditions lacks pigment (melanin) and is white. In spring, as the days grow longer and the nights shorter, the increasing amount of light received day by day through the eyes stimulates the pituitary gland to produce the gonadotropic hormone which directly or indirectly, stimulates molt and, probably by enzyme action, the melanoblasts are caused to be present in cells of the hair follicle and the melanoblasts provide granules of melanin pigment which are incorporated in cells of the growing hair. These granules of pigment give the hair its color.
Evidence in support of this hypothesis is given below.
Along the Pacific Coast from British Columbia southward, M. erminea (see fig. [25] on page [95]) is brown in winter. This is an area where snow rarely falls and the temperature in winter ordinarily is above freezing. In the remaining part of the American range of this species the temperature in winter is below freezing much of the time and snow remains throughout the winter or for long periods. In this colder part of the animal's range, only white coats occur in winter. M. frenata likewise has a white coat in winter in the part of its geographic range where snow and freezing temperatures prevail throughout most of the winter and a brown coat in warmer, snowless areas to the southward and along the Pacific Coast. The third species, M. rixosa, exhibits a corresponding correlation between coat color and climate. On the Asiatic continent, several species, including M. erminea, provide parallel correlations and nowhere are there any exceptions for the subgenus Mustela. These data are an important part of the material on which we have based the induction that the underlying cause of seasonal change in color is a need for protective coloration.
As regards molt, most naturalists who have written upon the subject regard it as responsible for the change from the white winter coat to the brown summer coat. However, the change from brown summer coat to white winter coat has been thought by several writers to be effected by change in coloration of the individual hairs. Among those holding this opinion there may be cited Bell (1874:197) in reference to Mustela erminea, and Coues (1877:123) in reference to American specimens to which he applied the same name. More lately Hadwen (1929) has taken this same view, and Gunn (1932) also discusses the possibility of the hairs changing color. Bachman (1839:228-232), Macgillivary (1843?:158), Audubon and Bachman (1851 (vol. 2):62), Schwalbe (1893:538), Pearson et al. (1913:447), Miller (1930, 1931A), Hamilton (1933:300) and Rothschild (1942), among others, have been inclined to the opinion, or positively affirm, that the color change in autumn is the result of a molt. The papers cited above contain, in turn, references to many other printed accounts dealing with this question.
To my mind, it has not so far been demonstrated that the change in color of weasels in autumn is accomplished without a molt. Also so far as I am aware, no explanation has been given of how the pigment may disappear from the hair of weasels. Metchnikoff's (1901:156) idea that the senile whitening of the hair in man is accomplished by phagocytes which remove the pigment granules would hardly seem to explain the relatively sudden and complete autumnal change occurring in weasels. Anyhow, Danforth (1925:108), and some other students have thought that the action of these phagocytes was at most a factor of slight importance in the whitening of hair. Whatever be the complete answer to the question of how the weasel changes color in autumn, at least one specimen of long-tailed weasel, which is in process of color change in autumn, presents clear evidence of molt of the overhairs. This specimen of M. f. longicauda is no. 188408, U. S. Nat. Mus., taken on November 12, 1897, at Rapid City, South Dakota. Other specimens of M. erminea which were taken in autumn similarly show molt to be in progress. For these and other reasons, I am inclined to the opinion that the autumnal change in color, like the one in spring, is effected by molt. During the period of the autumnal color change, Noback (1935:27) had a captive M. f. noveboracensis and, each morning, found clumps of brown hair on the floor of its cage; this was strong indication that molt was responsible for the color change in this instance.
However, I freely admit that the evidence does not prove that the change from brown to white can be accomplished only by molt; in the present state of knowledge it would be unscientific to deny that the change were possible of accomplishment by other means. Also, it is true that the fifteen specimens before me of Mustela frenata, subspecies included, in process of change from brown to white, with the exception of the one from Rapid City, South Dakota, if taken individually, do not, in macroscopic examination, show definite molt lines or other absolutely convincing evidence of molt. However, these same specimens, insofar as examined microscopically, do show overhairs all white, or overhairs pigmented throughout. The lighter color of the proximal parts of the overhairs in itself should not be accepted as evidence of color change, for in the fresh summer pelage, the same condition exists. Also, careful macroscopic examination suffices to show that in the transitional pelage of autumn, the brown overhairs generally are longer than the intermixed white overhairs.
Whether the underfur behaves in exactly the same way as the overhair, I have not myself definitely ascertained, but I assume that the underfur is molted twice each year, at least in the northern populations of Mustela frenata and in the other species of more northern distribution. Schwalbe's (1893) work, including sectioning of the skin and study of the hair follicles, led him to conclude that the underfur was molted twice each year in Mustela erminea.
In Mustela frenata noveboracensis, M. f. nevadensis, and M. f. nigriauris, measurements taken on adult males show the overhairs to be longer in the winter pelage than in the summer pelage of specimens from the same locality. For example, in M. f. nigriauris from Berkeley, California, the overhairs of the summer coat (July and August) average 8 millimeters in length on the hinder back and 7 mm. on the belly, but average 9.5 mm. and 8 mm. respectively in January-taken specimens possessing the full winter coat. At Ann Arbor, Michigan, in the summer coat, the longest hairs on the hinder back average approximately 12 mm., and those on the belly, 9.5 mm., against 13 mm. and 9.5 mm. respectively in winter. Although general observations initially led me to believe that the black, terminal hairs of the tip of the tail are longer in the winter pelage than in the summer pelage, actual measurements fail to show a difference in length.
The change from one coat to the other in the long-tailed weasel has been described among others by Miller (1930, 1931A), Hamilton (1933) and Glover (1942) on the basis of captive specimens. In a general way, the progress of the molt in their specimens agrees with that which I have been able to make out from examination of skins taken in the wild. There is, however, this difference: Their specimens show a more spotted pattern when in process of hair-change than do specimens taken in the wild. Probably the more or less unnatural conditions under which these captive animals lived modified the normal progress of molt.
In wild-taken specimens of the species Mustela frenata, subspecies included, the spring molt begins on the mid-dorsal line and proceeds laterally, producing, at almost any given time, a relatively sharp molt line separating the white winter hair from the incoming brown summer coat. However, in autumn the change takes place first on the belly, then on the sides, and finally makes its appearance over all the upper parts at about the same time, with the result that the upper parts have a salt-and-pepper appearance without at this time any sharply defined molt lines. In general, the molt pattern can be said to be reversed in the two seasons; in spring, it begins on the back and in autumn, on the belly. The difference in spring and autumn color pattern is better illustrated on plate [39] than by additional description. Swanson and Fryklund (1935:123) have observed that the "spring molt proceeds differently" than the fall one in Mustela rixosa, and Barrett-Hamilton (1903:309) in commenting on the European hare (and the stoat?) remarks, "In spring the moult, and with it the brown colour, progresses in exactly the opposite order . . ." as compared with the white color of autumn, which that particular writer thought resulted from removal of pigment from the hairs rather than from molt.
The tail, excepting the black tip, lags in the molt in many instances, with the result that, especially in spring, it may retain a few white hairs as late as does the belly. In autumn it is less tardy and so far as I have observed, becomes white at about the same time that the general area of the back changes color. On the tail, the black tip itself, as clearly shown in more than a score of specimens, is molted at approximately the same time in autumn as is the pelage of the body. However, the long black hairs, which appear in, say, November, appear to increase in length until January. In spring, the long black hairs of the tip of the tail seem not to be shed at the same time as the rest of the winter pelage, but remain approximately six weeks longer and then are replaced by long black hairs of the summer coat. At any rate, this is the picture presented by a half dozen specimens of M. f. nevadensis and M. f. longicauda which do show a spring molt to be in progress on the black tip of the tail. Schwalbe similarly (1893:536-537) has suggested that the black tip of the tail in Mustela erminea in spring is not molted until about two months after the pelage on the rest of the body is changed. Schwalbe (loc. cit.) thinks also that in M. erminea studied by him, the black tip of the tail in autumn is replaced approximately one month in advance of the pelage on the rest of the body. As indicated above, my specimens of Mustela frenata, subspecies longicauda and nevadensis, do not show this discrepancy in autumn. I have considered the possibility that the black tip of the tail, in some species of Mustela, is molted only once while the remainder of the coat was undergoing two molts. My inconclusive data lend but little support to this possibility.
The difference in pattern of color between specimens taken in autumn and spring is known to some fur-trappers of my acquaintance who have suggested that molt occurs in spring, whereas the individual hairs change color in autumn. Reference to plate [39] will show how gross comparisons might lead one to this erroneous explanation of the color change.
As to time of molt: In eight subspecies of Mustela frenata, namely, noveboracensis, occisor, primulina, spadix, longicauda, arizonensis, nevadensis and effera, material is available to indicate that the autumnal molt begins in October and is completed in November, and that the spring molt occurs in March or April. A condensed list of specimens providing basis for this statement is as follows:
M. f. noveboracensis: 26 specimens in transitional pelage taken in autumn and 14 taken in spring; M. f. occisor: One topotype has acquired one-fifth of the winter pelage on October 22, 1896; M. f. primulina: 2 in November, one in March, and 2 in April are in process of change; M. f. spadix: 6 autumnal specimens and one in April show pelage change; M. f. longicauda: 7 autumnal specimens and one in April show pelage change; M. f. arizonensis: 12 specimens in autumn and 3 in spring are in process of molt; M. f. effera: One November-taken male has acquired four-fifths of the winter coat and another taken on April 21 at Fort Rock, Oregon, is half finished with the spring molt.
It may be added that no marked difference in time of either autumnal or spring molt is apparent as between the more northern and more southern localities from which the mentioned specimens come. With more complete material I would expect to find a difference in this regard.
The material of the other, more southern, subspecies of Mustela frenata has not been adequate to show the time of molting or the number of molts which occur in one year.
Animals in the northern part of the range of Mustela frenata acquire a white winter coat, whereas those in the southern part acquire a brown winter coat, and in an intervening area the winter coat may be either brown or white. By plotting on a map the localities of capture of all specimens examined in the winter coat, it was possible to outline this intervening area as shown in figure [10] on page [37]. However, Dearborn (1932:36) shows that in Michigan some animals have a brown coat in winter at places farther north than figure [10] shows to be the case. Hamilton's (1933-306) map for New York shows the same to be true in that state. Accordingly, the boundaries of the area shown in figure [10], in which both brown and white long-tailed weasels occur in winter, are known to be only approximate; with full information available the belt would be represented as wider.
Fig. 10. Map showing the region (in black) where both the brown and white winter pelage is found in the long-tailed weasel, Mustela frenata.
Hamilton (1933:302) has pointed out that "Where half of the weasels remain brown, these brown winter specimens are always males." The results of my own examination of specimens not studied by Hamilton, in a general way provide confirmatory data. More exactly, my examination reveals that at the most northern localities where brown specimens occur, only males are in this coat. In explanation, it may be said that in plotting on a map localities of capture of specimens in the winter coat, thirteen places were found where both sexes were represented and where both brown and white winter coats were found. With the two sexes, it is theoretically possible to have nine different combinations of coat color. With males all brown, there might occur females (1) all brown, (2) all white, or (3) some brown and some white. In addition to these three combinations, we might have three more by finding the mentioned types of female coat color repeated where all males are white, and three more, or nine in all, by substituting a population of males some of which were brown and some of which were white. Seven of these possible combinations actually were found. The two combinations not found were all white males with all brown females, and all white males with females both brown and white. In the three instances where the males all were brown and the females all were white, the localities of capture were in the northern part of the variable area. This indicates that where the brown winter coat occurs at northern localities, the brown individuals are all males. Farther south, of course, the females, too, acquire the brown winter coat.
Stated in another way, there is a broad belt across North America from the Atlantic to the Pacific in which males of Mustela frenata at any one locality may be either brown or white in winter. Inside this broad belt there is a narrower one, approximately half as wide, in which females at any one locality may be either brown or white.
In support of the idea that color of the winter coat is an hereditary matter and that it is not dependent on temperature, the following evidence derived from my transplanting specimens of Mustela frenata supports the idea that color of the winter pelage is dependent on heredity and not on temperature or snowfall.
A male captured on June 24, 1937, in the brown summer coat in Salt Lake City, Utah, was received by me at Berkeley, California, five days later and kept in captivity almost six months. On November 17, 1937, half the pelage was white and on December 27, 1937, when next examined, the animal was in the full, white, winter coat as it was on January 25, 1938, when it died. Native weasels all turn white in winter in Salt Lake City, but in Berkeley native weasels always are brown in winter.
A juvenile or young animal, a male, captured in May, 1936, at Lafayette, Contra Costa County, California, was kept there until August 13, 1936, when transferred to Calneva at the north end of Lake Tahoe, California. The weasel was kept at Calneva until its death on December 23, 1937. In both the winter of 1936-'37 and in that of 1937-'38, the winter coat was brown as in animals from its place of origin (Contra Costa County) and unlike weasels of the Tahoe region nearly all of which turn white in winter.
Two females, each approximately two months old, captured on May 1, 1936, at James Landing, 4 miles northwest of San Pablo, Contra Costa County, California, were kept in Berkeley, California, until August 13, 1936, when they were transferred to the mouth of Blackwood Creek, on the west side of Lake Tahoe, California. On October 25, 1936, both weasels escaped. On December 25, 1936, the headless body of one of these was found approximately 300 yards south of the mouth of Blackwood Creek. The animal had been dead at most a few days when found and was in the brown winter coat. At the place of its origin all weasels are brown in winter but at the mouth of Blackwood Creek only 2 of 60 weasels caught there in the winter coat were brown; the other 58 were white. The headless weasel was identified, as one of the two formerly in captivity, by means of certain short toes, the ends of which had been clipped off when the animal was a captive. No trace of the second female was found.
A female of unknown age, in white winter pelage, captured 4 miles southeast of Tahoe City, California, and kept there until April 3, 1937, on which date it was brought to Berkeley, California, molted to brown in the spring. The first signs of the brown coat were noted on April 14. On May 24 or 25 she gave birth to 4 young which lived less than ten days. In the following winter this animal acquired a white coat. As previously noted, weasels native to the Berkeley area, where this female was kept, have brown coats in winter.
The weasels were in every instance kept in cages out-of-doors. The sides of the cages were open to the elements. A nest box in each cage provided shelter. All were of the species Mustela frenata.
The significant results, it seemed to me, were that the winter coat was the kind found in the area where the weasel originated instead of the kind found in weasels native to the areas in which the specimens were held in captivity.
That the time of molt is determined by the amount of light has clearly been shown by Bissonnette (1944:223) for American weasels of the two species Mustela erminea and M. frenata. In his words (op. cit.:246) "Reducing the daily periods of light induced molting and regrowth of new fur. . . . In the Bonaparte weasels [Mustela erminea], white replaced brown. . . . Increasing daily light-periods caused molting and change to dark brown. . . . Incomplete molts in both directions (toward white or toward brown) were produced as a result of early reversal of increase or decrease of daily light-time. . . . That this stimulus is received through the eyes and acts through the anterior pituitary gland is indicated by Bissonnette's [1935:159] studies on ferrets, a nearly related animal. That the thyroids and sex-glands are not essential is at least suggested . . . by Lyman's (1942) study on the varying hare [Lepus americanus]." It can be added that Lyman (1943:451) demonstrated in Lepus americanus that the effect of light is received through the eyes. He demonstrated this by masking the animals. To Wright (1942B:109) who studied the two American weasels, M. erminea and M. frenata, it seemed likely that the pituitary produced or released gonadotropic hormone at about the time of the spring molt and that this molt and the spring changes in the reproductive tracts of the weasels might be caused by a stimulus from a common source. Later, Wright (1950:130) injected a gonadotropic hormone into long-tailed weasels which had recently acquired their white winter pelage and thereby caused them to lose the white pelage and acquire the brown pelage. It is Lyman (1943:450) who says, in relation to Lepus americanus, "When in the physiologically white condition, the melanoblasts of the regenerating guard- and pile-hair follicles contain no melanin-forming enzyme (dopa-oxidase), which may be the reason for the lack of pigment." Schwalbe (1893) by sectioning the skin and microscopically examining the hair-follicles of M. erminea learned that the basal cells producing hairs lacked pigment granules in autumn when the European ermine (M. erminea) was acquiring its white winter coat and that the cells contained granules of pigment in spring when, as we know, the granules are incorporated in the growing hair and give it its color.
The above material, then, is basis for the account on pages 31 and 32 of what causes the weasel of northern areas to have a white coat in winter. The discerning student will instantly perceive that although some parts of the account on pages 31 and 32 are precisely accurate, other parts are the result of inferences which need to be proved. More careful work of the kind that Schwalbe (1893) and Wright (1942B) did is needed. The account on pages 31 and 32 is merely the best that can be given with the information now available.
Many writers have commented on the yellowish color, sometimes with a greenish tinge, found on the fur of weasels in the white winter coat. The stain is more often found on the tail and hinder-parts of the body than elsewhere. Possibly, partly on this account, some have ascribed this color to the smearing of the fur with urine. Still others have thought it resulted from the smearing of the fur with secretions from the anal scent glands. Schumacher (1928) takes this point of view, and while it may be that he has not proved his point, still his conclusions fit the known facts and seem sound to me. Schumacher points out that the same soiling of the fur is present in summer as well as in winter, but that on the summer pelage the stain can be detected only on the light-colored underparts. It is from this point of view that he criticizes the systematic worth of white versus yellowish-white underparts in the summer pelage of geographic races of Mustela erminea and Mustela nivalis. Although in the long-tailed weasels (Mustela frenata) the underparts of all the races are pigmented with some form of red, orange or yellow, it seems probable to me that the additional color resulting from the soiling effect of this glandular secretion explains the greater variation, found at a single locality, in the color of underparts than of upper parts in the summer pelage.
I have neither seen nor heard of a black weasel in any part of the New World or of the Old World. I have found only one albino among American specimens. It is an adult female, no. 121424, American Museum of Natural History, of Mustela erminea richardsonii, taken on August 30, 1935, at Hot Springs, Northwest Territory. This place, I am told by G. G. Goodwin who obtained the animal, is on the "Nahanni River where the rugged mountain ridges rise abruptly from the low mud flat lands, latitude 61, longitude 125." The shortness and coarseness of the hair corresponds to that of the summer pelage and not winter pelage. The pelage is everywhere white, even the tip of the tail. True, all except the nape and top and sides of the head has a faint yellowish-green tinge which has been supposed to result from staining by secretion of the anal scent glands but there is no pigment in the hair as in erythristic specimens. From the Old World, Farurick (1873:17) has recorded what he regards as an albino of Mustela vulgaris since it had no black hairs on the tip of its tail. Flintoff (1935:228, 229) records what may have been an albino Mustela vulgaris from Yorkshire and an albino M. erminea from an unstated locality. Jäckel (1873:459) mentions specimens of Mustela erminea and Mustela vulgaris, which were partly "albinistic" or "erythristic." Among the American specimens of M. erminea I have not recorded any which appeared to be either partly or wholly erythristic or only partly albinistic. Among the 1550 skins of M. frenata which were in summer pelage or brown winter pelage, five, described below, show marked abnormalities in color.
Two of these five are partly albinistic. One is an adult male, no. 223880, U. S. Nat. Mus., from Billy's Island, Okefinokee Swamp, Georgia, which has the nose as well as the area between the eyes white. Also there is a tuft of white hairs at the anterodorsal margin of each ear, scattering white hairs suggesting a postorbital bar on each side of the head, and a patch of white hairs on the mid-dorsal line behind the ears. Markings of this kind are not abnormal in M. f. peninsulae, the subspecies adjoining on the south, except for the white nose which clearly is an instance of partial albinism. The second specimen is a subadult male, of M. f. noveboracensis, no. 177679, U. S. Nat. Mus., in process of acquiring the brown winter coat, taken on November 27, 1911, at Gaylordsville, Connecticut. It has white markings on the nose, on the right side of the neck, on the right hind foot and right forefoot, and on the tip of the tail. The white area of the nose on the left side extends back to the eye, but on the right side barely encircles the nose-pad. On the right side of the neck, all that area between the foreleg and ear is white from the mid-dorsal line (including 7 or 8 millimeters to the left of the mid-dorsal line) down to the throat, which is white as it is also in normal individuals. The toes of the right hind foot are more extensively white than in normal specimens of noveboracensis, and all of the right forefoot as well as the wrist is white. The tail is of striking appearance because of its tricolor pattern. The proximal part is of the normal brown color. The black terminal part commences proximally at the usual place, but the distal 11 millimeters of the fleshy part of the tail bear only pure white hairs producing a terminal white pencil 35 millimeters long.
The three other specimens abnormally colored are erythristic individuals. An adult male of M. f. latirostra, no. 7574, coll. D. R. Dickey, taken on April 14, 1918, at Covina, Los Angeles County, California, has the color of the upper parts greatly restricted, and, in addition, has spots and blotches of the color of the underparts distributed over the back and rump. A spot of this same color occurs above each ear. Incidentally, this and other subspecies of Mustela frenata from the Pacific Coast of North America obviously have the factor for erythrism operating over a larger part of the body than it does in M. erminea or than in M. f. noveboracensis, where the underparts sometimes are white. In M. f. latirostra and in other subspecies from the Pacific Coast the light color of the underparts always is tinged with this reddish color.
Another erythristic specimen is a young male of M. f. nevadensis, no. 23493, U. S. Nat. Mus., taken on August 6, 1890, at Birch Creek, Idaho. It has all of each foreleg, the axillary regions, and a saddle-shaped area over the shoulders of the same buff-yellow color as the underparts.
The third erythristic specimen is a subadult female, of M. f. oregonensis, no. 47149, Mus. Vert. Zoöl., taken on December 20, 1930, at Carlotta, Humboldt County, California. This specimen appears to be white and initially was thought to be merely an individual in the white winter coat. Closer examination, however, shows that it has a light wash of ochraceous or faint reddish color. Also, other specimens taken in winter at Carlotta show that weasels there do not acquire a white winter coat. The only normally brown area is approximately three millimeters in diameter at the anterodorsal margin of the pinna of the right ear. The tip of the tail is black as in a normal specimen. The specimen in question is actually pure white only on top of the head from a short distance behind the ears on over the forehead nearly to the eyes, and on the inside of the ears. In a normally colored animal this area is the dark area of the head. In this freak, the other parts of the head, which, in individuals of normal coloration are the white or light orange facial markings, have the reddish cast of the remainder of the body, although the color is less intense than on the back. The collector noted that the specimen had eyes of normal color. A possible explanation for the coloration of this specimen is that this species has three factors for color, one for the black tail tip, one for the reddish color, and a third, missing in the specimen in question, for the blackish brown.
For some more exact knowledge concerning this erythristic type of coloration, we are indebted to Pitt (1921:99), who describes a population of polecats, Mustela putorius, in Cardiganshire, England, in which this erythristic variation is maintained in a state of nature. In ferrets, Mustela furo, Pitt (op. cit.:114) notes that ". . . erythrism is certainly dependent on a Mendelian factor, being dominant to albinism and recessive to the black-brown coloration. Both in the ferret and polecat, erythrism seems to be correlated with increased size, and certainly in the ferret is usually accompanied by a quick temper and general increase in vitality."