XIII. Personal Injuries to Seamen and Recoveries for Death
Prior to the passage of the recent Merchant Marine Act (1920) recovery by a seaman for injuries received by him in the service of the ship was subject to the maritime law under which (except in case of the unseaworthiness of the vessel, where full recovery might be claimed) the seaman was entitled to, but only to, his maintenance and cure, and to wages so long at least as the voyage continued, regardless of his own negligence (unless it amounted to willful misconduct) or of that of any other person. Where his contract extended beyond the voyage or there was fault on the part of the ship, recovery of wages was allowable even beyond the termination of the voyage.
This liability could not be enlarged or diminished by any law of the states on the subject of employer's liability or workmen's compensation.
The Seamen's Act of 1915 undertook to enlarge the protection of seamen by providing that in suits to recover damages for injuries received on board a vessel, or in its service, seamen "having command," e.g., masters, etc., should not be held to be fellow servants with those under their authority, but this was held not to affect those cases covered by the general rule of the maritime law above stated, under which the fellow servant question is immaterial.
A more successful effort at extending the seaman's right, however, was made in the recent Merchant Marine Act, which permits any seaman who suffers injury in the course of his employment, to maintain, at his election, an action for damages at law, with the right of trial by jury, and in such case to have the benefit of the United States statutes modifying or extending the rights of railroad employees in analogous cases.
The same act also covers the question of actions for the death of seamen, giving to their personal representatives the right to sue for damages at law and the benefit of a trial by jury, and the similar benefit of the laws covering actions for death in the case of railroad employees.
This provision, it is observed, is in sharp contrast, and perhaps in some conflict with the provision of an act passed at the same session of Congress, on March 30, 1920, giving a general right to maintain actions for all deaths occurring on the high seas by some wrongful act or neglect. This law, which in its broad terms covers also the case of seamen, permits suits to be brought in the admiralty courts and fixes the recovery at the amount of pecuniary loss sustained by the persons for whose benefit suit is brought. It further provides that in such action the fact that the decedent has been guilty of contributory negligence is not to be considered a bar to recovery, but is to be taken into consideration by the court in fixing the degree of negligence and in reducing the recovery accordingly.
A discussion of the technical questions involved in the relations of these two acts is beyond the scope of this summary.