I. THE TEACHING OF THE NOVEL
All will agree that the novel is one of the most important forms of literature for high school study. The fact that almost every boy and girl who is at all interested in reading likes the novel, gives the teacher an excellent opportunity to stimulate the pupil's love for literature and to help him to discriminate between what is true and what is false; between what is cheap and what is worth while. Moreover, the study of the novel is the study of life and character. It is of great human interest, and it may be made an important factor in developing the pupil's ambition, judgment, ideals, and character. Good stories grow in meaning with the growth of mental power. The Iliad and The Odyssey are full of delightful stories for boys and girls, but these same stories, securely fixed in the youthful mind, gain a deeper meaning from experience as the child develops into the man or the woman. Furthermore, interest in a good story leads to other interests. It may encourage a love of nature, stimulating to closer observation. It may awaken a love of history, or of travel, or of some of the innumerable interests of human activity.
Unfortunately, young people's delight in the reading of the novel is a source of danger. The drama and the essay appear so full of difficulties that the student regards their study seriously, as a task, and finds it necessary to apply himself vigorously in order to master them. On the other hand, the novel is so delightful, so easy, that he looks upon it as a pastime. A superficial reading often gives him knowledge of many of the main facts, and a mistaken idea that he knows the story. It is the task of the teacher to get him to read with careful attention and with imagination keenly alive. When a fair mastery of the facts of the story has been gained, and clear mental images of the scenes portrayed and suggested have been formed, studies of plot, character, interpretation, etc., should follow. These studies, if they appeal to the class as reasonable, will stimulate thought and imagination and will help to form a basis for sound judgment and a habit of just criticism.
The practical plan here presented for the accomplishment of these ends involves three steps: first, preparation of the class for taking up the work; second, reading and study for the purpose of getting the facts; third, comprehensive study of the book as a whole, in addition to a comparison of it with other books. The purpose of the first step is to arouse an interest in approaching the story, and to prepare the pupil for an intelligent reading. In the case of some books it is of little importance, but in the case of others it is almost essential for success. Appreciation of the difficulties of the book and of the limitations of his pupils will enable the teacher to make the wisest choice of his material.
The second step is certainly the most important because it is fundamental. Students often read a book without any adequate conception of the facts of which it treats. Even after honest endeavor they frequently have gross misconceptions and fail to see much that was intended for their observation. To keep the class alert and interested, and at the same time to see that the work has been well done, requires patience, tact, and ingenuity. Sometimes difficulties and consequent discouragement are avoided by assigning with the lesson a few general questions to aid the pupil in getting a connected idea of essential details. Sometimes the same result is reached by requiring the class to write in their notebooks brief summaries of each chapter. The recitation period gives the teacher an opportunity to arouse in the class a thorough interest in the work in hand. This can be done in a variety of ways. Different parts of the story may be told by the students; questions may be asked to test the understanding of certain passages, to enable the pupil to read between the lines, and to awaken curiosity; supplementary facts may be given by the teacher, or by members of the class, to throw light on certain parts of the story.
For the third step,—the study of the book as a whole,—the following topics are suggested:
Setting and situation, plot, characters, interpretation, method of narration, style, life and character of the author, comparison with other books. Although some of these topics may have been taken up in connection with previous study, they will be found none the less valuable at this more advanced stage of the work. Certain ones are of course more important than others. The method of narration and the style, for example, should always be treated lightly, if at all, since their consideration is rather for the maturer student. To reach the best results every topic that is studied should send the pupil again and again to the book to find definite answers to the questions given and to establish the proof of his opinions.
Outline for the Study of Ivanhoe
I. Preparation
The class will probably be able to recall from their previous study of Scott some interesting facts about the author. They will understand the book better, too, if they are somewhat familiar with the following topics:
The Norman Conquest.
Ideals of Chivalry.
Conditions of the Church.
The Crusades.
Story of King Richard up to his return from the Crusades.
II. Reading and Study
There are advantages in a first rapid reading of the book before the more careful reading and class study, but for pupils unused to reading long books this is too much to ask in the case of Ivanhoe. The essential result to be attained in any event is familiarity with the details of the story.
III. Study of the Book as a Whole
Setting and Situation.—When did the events of the story take place?
Locate upon some map or, better, draw a map to indicate the position of Sheffield, Ashby, York, and the other places connected with the story. In the opening chapters there are various details of the situation that are more important than the actual time and place, for example, condition of the country, and the relations of the people. Make a list of them.
Compare Ivanhoe with some other novel in regard to the definiteness and importance of the setting.
What do we know from the story of the means of traveling? (pp. 14-16, 192-195, etc.); of the conditions of the clergy? (pp. 17-20, 468-474, etc.); of the relations of the Normans and Saxons? of the habits of the people? of the feudal system?
Plot.—How long a time is involved from the beginning to the end of the story?
Are there frequent surprises, or do the events occur as we expect them? Illustrate.
How does Scott arouse our interest in the development of an action? Take the Tournament, for example, and show how he arouses our expectation before he relates the event.
When do you first suspect that the Palmer is a person disguised? How does the author keep us in suspense as to his identity? (pp. 60-62, 90, etc.).
Find other instances of this device for maintaining our interest in the story (see p. 134).
Point out several events that appear, upon second thought, to be improbable. How has Scott tried to make them seem probable, so that the reader's interest will not be lost?
Give an illustration of the way in which Scott links together the various groups of characters. If the author has succeeded in so combining the interests of each group that the outcome of the main action—the success or failure of the hero and heroine—means the success or failure of the other groups, then he has secured unity of plot. Is there unity of plot here?
After the opening scene in the forest, the next important one is in the dining-room at Rotherwood. Point out in detail the incidents that lead to this scene.
In the dining-room scene what suggestions are given for the further development of the plot?
What is the next scene of importance? What incidents lead up to it?
There are, in all, eight or nine important scenes. Make a list of them, note the train of incidents that leads up to each, and also the germs of future development that each contains.
Each of these scenes marks a climax of interest. Is any one so much more important than the others, that you can say it is the climax of the book? Are any of them merely episodes that might be omitted without making the action incomplete?
How far does Brian de Bois-Guilbert influence the course of events? How far does Isaac influence them? Richard? Rebecca?
Characters.—Who is the hero? Why?
Who is the heroine? Why?
Arrange the important characters (there are from fifteen to twenty) in three or four groups according to the way they seem to be associated in the development of the story. Which characters are historical? Which, if any, are intended to represent types or classes of men?
Are any of them to be contrasted with each other?
Are the characters of King Richard and Prince John represented here as they are shown in history?
Note the chief traits of Cedric, Athelstane, and Gurth. Remember that Scott was trying to portray Saxon character. What are the individual traits of each? What have they in common?
What, if anything, in Rowena compels your admiration of her? What, if anything, is lacking to make her truly a heroic figure?
How does Rebecca compare with Rowena in the latter particular?
Do the principal characters remain the same from beginning to end, or do they show development?
Do we become acquainted with these characters by what they say and do; by what the author says of them; or by what they say of one another?
Interpretation.—It is fair to suppose in every novel that the author has had a more or less distinct purpose in writing it. It may be to present in life-like pictures some dramatic events in history; or to paint vivid scenes that illustrate the spirit of an age; or to hold up ideals of bravery, patriotism, patience, devotion, or some other virtue; or to show the working out of some great truth or principle of life.
What seems to you the purpose of the author in Ivanhoe? What ideals of character does he hold up? What service has he done for the reader of history?
Method of Narration.—Who tells the story? Would it be difficult to rearrange the plan so that Ivanhoe or some other character should tell it? Why?
Does the narrator speak from the standpoint of one who somehow or other knows all that the characters do and think and feel, or of one who recounts merely his own feelings and what he sees and hears?
Compare Ivanhoe in this respect with The Vicar of Wakefield, or with some other novel.
Style.—Does Scott attempt to reproduce the language of a time other than his own? Does he introduce dialect? Do the characters talk naturally as we should expect persons of different birth and education to talk, or do they talk alike?
Note how Scott describes an outdoor scene (p. 6); a man (p. 7); a scene of action (pp. 300-306). Try to imitate his methods in descriptions of your own.
Note the parts of the story where the movement of events is very rapid (pp. 322-330), and others where the author introduces description or exposition (pp. 148-152) to retard the movement.
Do you find the sentences natural and easy, or formal and hard to read? Are there many unfamiliar words?
The Life and Character of the Author.—What are the main facts of Scott's boyhood? his education? his professional career? his success as a poet? his change from poetry to prose? his success as a novelist? his financial distress? his struggle to meet the demands of the law and of his own honor?
Would you judge from Ivanhoe that the author was a man of learning? a lover of nature? fond of social life? fond of animals? fond of children?
Write what you think we have reason to believe of Scott's character from reading this book.
Outline for the Study of the Vicar of Wakefield
I. Preparation
It is well to suggest to pupils who have read Ivanhoe and now turn to the Vicar of Wakefield that the latter is not a romance, but a novel of life and manners; not an exciting story of heroic deeds and wonderful escapes, but a story that paints clear pictures of simple life, quiet humor, and true sentiment. A few facts of Goldsmith's boyhood and young manhood should be dwelt on in order to show his familiarity with the country, the church, and with other matters treated in the story. Other topics of interest are the circumstances that led to the publication of the book; the comparative newness of the novel in literature; eighteenth century essays, like the De Coverley Papers; similarity between such essays and this novel.
II. Reading and Study
To become familiar with the details of this story is simple, but students are likely to overlook little references to the customs and manners of the time, and to fail to use their imaginations in picturing the beautiful but simple scenes of country life.
III. Study of the Book as a Whole
Setting and Situation.—Find five or six references in the story that throw light on the time when the events are supposed to have taken place. (See customs of travel in Chapter III, of dress in IV and XII and of the punishment of criminals in XXX and XXXI.) Draw as definite a conclusion as you can from these references, and be prepared to defend it.
Where is Wakefield? Do we know whether the places described are English or French or Irish? Give reasons.
Could the scene have been laid in some other country or some other century without radically changing the story? What alterations would be necessary?
What do we learn from this book about customs in dress? means of travelling? education? other customs?
Plot.—How long a time is involved from the beginning to the end of the story?
At what point did you discover the identity of Mr. Burchell? Could you have discovered it earlier if you had read more closely?
Are there frequent surprises, or do events occur as we expect them to?
Are all the events probable? Has the author succeeded in making them seem probable?
Is the plot simple or complex? How many chapters are used to introduce the story? What is the climax?
Is there, as in Ivanhoe, a series of scenes closely connected? Are there incidents that might have been omitted as superfluous? If so, would the story have been more, or less, interesting without them?
How far does Mr. Burchell influence events? How far does Mr. Jenkinson influence them? Squire Thornhill?
Characters.—Does the author make us acquainted with the various characters by what he says of them; or by what they say and do themselves; or by what they say of one another; or by all of these methods? Examine Chapters I, III, VII, and XI.
Is the Vicar a man of intelligence? of sincerity? of good judgment? Name his chief traits. Would he command our respect if he were our neighbor? Account for the fact that people have been charmed with his character ever since the book was written.
Do the characters seem true to life? Do they remain the same kind of persons from first to last, or do they show development?
Contrast the Vicar and his wife; Olivia and Sophia; Squire Thornhill and Sir William.
Interpretation.—The writer of a historical novel aims to give a vivid picture of certain dramatic events in history. The writer of a novel of life and manners usually has some ideal of life or character, more or less clearly defined, that he endeavors to picture. Try to frame a statement of some truth the Vicar's life may fairly be said to illustrate which seems to you the central idea of the story.
Method of Narration.—Who tells the story?
Would the effect have been essentially different if someone else had told it, perhaps Mrs. Primrose, or the author himself?
Does the narrator speak from the standpoint of one who somehow or other knows all that the characters do and think and feel, or of one who recounts merely what he himself feels and sees and hears? Compare with Ivanhoe in this respect.
To what extent does the author use dialogue?
Style.—Is there any attempt to use dialect?
Do the characters talk as we should expect them to talk, or do they all talk like the author?
Note a few passages that express humor; some that express pathos. Find a few descriptions that present vividly a scene of beauty. Are the sentences easy and natural, or formal and dignified?
The Life and Character of the Author.—What do we know of Goldsmith's childhood? his family? his education? his professional training? his travels? his friends in London? his literary enterprises?
What can you find in the experiences and character of Dr. Primrose, of Mr. Burchell, or of George Primrose to suggest Goldsmith's own experiences and character, or those of his father?
What characteristics of Goldsmith do you think you have a right to infer from this story? Give reasons.
Comparison.—Does the charm of this novel lie in the setting? in the plot? in the characters? in the style? in the lesson it teaches? or in all of these factors together?
Compare this book, topic by topic, with Ivanhoe or with some other novel recently studied.
Outline for the Study of Cranford
I. Preparation
It is important that a young student before he begins to study Cranford should have some idea of the kind of story that it is. Otherwise he is likely to be disappointed and to fail to appreciate its charm. Several ways are suggested for approaching the first reading. Let the teacher, or if possible one of the class, give an account of a small English village, using photographs, if they are available, to show some characteristic features. Let the class write an account of some country place that they know well with definite details of the houses, the people, and the customs. Have the best accounts read in class. Present to the class, or have them study from the introduction, the brief facts of the history of this story: who Mrs. Gaskell was; her connection with Knutsford; the original purpose of the Cranford sketches.
II. Reading and Study
Oral reading is more than usually important in a book like Cranford, for much of the enjoyment of the story comes from an appreciation of its wit and humor, and these qualities can best be brought out by oral reading. Some part of each day's recitation period might well be devoted to the reading of choice passages. Of special value in securing appreciation of the story is the preparation of compositions based on the students' own knowledge of country life. They may be descriptions, both real and imaginative, of some country village; accounts of small social gatherings or card parties; dialogues to show the characteristics of the people, etc.
In addition to these exercises there will, of course, be need for cross-questioning to make sure that the important facts relating to the scene, the characters, and the events are clearly understood. Some care will be necessary to see that students understand the virtues as well as the foibles of the characters.
III. Study of the Book as a Whole
Setting and Situation.—Does Cranford seem like a real place? Give reasons for your answer.
When are the events related supposed to have taken place?
Why does Mrs. Gaskell pay so little attention to the details of time and place?
Could the scene of this story be changed to some other place and time without difficulty? Give reasons. Compare Cranford with some place that you know in respect to the poverty, aristocracy, social etiquette, employments, and peculiar ways of the people.
Plot.—What relation does Chapter I bear to the rest of the book? Are there suggestions in it that make you expectant of what is to come in the ensuing chapters?
What connection has Chapter II with the preceding chapter? with the following?
Are Chapters III and IV connected? Are they connected with what follows?
Group the remaining chapters to show which belong together.
How many separate stories do you find with no connection except for the presence of the same characters?
We are told that a good story has a beginning, a middle, and an end. What seems to be lacking in Cranford?
If we were to consider as complete stories the incident of Miss Matty's love affair or of Poor Peter, should we find the same lack?
Characters.—What are the chief motives that prompted the Cranford ladies to do the things that they did, and to do them in the way they did?
How did Captain Brown differ from them in the motives that prompted his actions?
Show how the incident of Miss Jenkins's argument with Captain Brown on the relative merits of Mr. Boz and Dr. Johnson, illustrates one side of Miss Jenkins's character. What is her other side? Illustrate. Compare Miss Matty and her sister to show the strength and weakness of each. What was there in Miss Matty that made the other ladies help her so generously in her trouble?
What sort of woman was Mrs. Jamieson? Were her neighbors blind to her faults? Why did they treat her as they did? Do you think they were insincere?
What other characters in the story have a distinct personality?
Interpretation.—What purpose do you think the author had in writing this book?
From this story, what would you judge were her ideas on sincerity? on the treatment of one's neighbors? on conformity to custom? on social rank? and on other matters of everyday life?
Method of Narration.—Who tells the story?
Does the narrator tell us only of the things that she sees and hears, or of other things as well? How is it in Ivanhoe? Would the story have to be changed essentially if it were told by Miss Matty, Miss Pole, or some other of the characters? Give your reasons.
Has Mrs. Gaskell succeeded in avoiding the awkwardness in the use of "I" so common in stories told in the first person? If so, how? Compare it in this respect with one of your own narratives in the first person.
Point out, if you can, some ways in which the author has made her dialogues smooth and natural. Compare with one of your own.
Style.—Note a few of the most humorous passages; of the most pathetic. In the humorous passages is the author laughing at her characters, or laughing with them? Compare in this respect her treatment of Mrs. Jamieson, Miss Barker, and Miss Pole with Scott's treatment of Prior Aymer, Friar Tuck, and Athelstane.
The Life and Character of the Author.—What facts do we know of Mrs. Gaskell's girlhood? her education? her married life? her great sorrow? her first literary success? her acquaintance with the literary men of her day? the regard of her neighbors for her?
Comparison.—Does the value of this book lie in its setting? in its plot? in its characters? in its style? in its teaching? or in all of these factors?
Compare Cranford in respect to each of the above topics with the other novels that you have studied.
Outline for the Study of Silas Marner
I. Preparation
A few facts about George Eliot's early life will help to show how she could write as she did about country people—their ideas, habits, and manner of life.
II. Reading and Study
A rapid reading, followed by a second and more careful one, is quite practicable with so short and interesting a story as Silas Marner. It is especially to be recommended for this book, since the chapters are so full of suggestions of character, of customs of a by-gone time, and of hints for the further development of the story, that it is difficult for a young reader, urged on by his interest in the plot, to stop long enough to grasp all the essential features. So many important lessons for the beginner may be drawn from the structure of this book, from its teaching, and from its representation of life, that it especially repays thorough study.
III. Study of the Book as a Whole
Setting and Situation.—What means does the author take in Chapters I and III to acquaint us with the time of the story? How definitely can you fix it? (See p. 47, l. 22.)
What sort of place was Lantern Yard? Describe the people who worshiped there. What was their social life? Why was their church called a chapel?
Compare this place, where Silas first lived, with Raveloe in respect to location, people, religious beliefs, wealth, social life, etc.
Although Raveloe is not on the map, in what part of England is it supposed to be?
Do the descriptions, for example, of the company at the Rainbow or of the party at the Red House, seem like caricatures or like pictures from real life? Give reasons.
Has the author been true to the life of a certain place and time? (See Introduction, p. 34.) Is the setting closely interwoven with the story, or could the scene have been changed without loss of interest to New England, or to some other place, fifty or a hundred years later? Give reasons.
Plot.—Make a list of the most important scenes (seven or eight in all), note the train of incidents that leads to each, and the suggestions in each that prepare us for the further development of the story. Show that there are two distinct stories separately introduced, but finally woven together.
Note in what places these distinct stories touch each other and how they are knitted together. In the arrangement of the scenes is there any attempt at contrast? (See Introduction, p. 40.) Are any of them merely episodes that might be omitted without loss to the story? Most of the scenes mark a climax. Is there any one scene so interesting and important by reason of the characters brought together and the facts unfolded that we may call it the climax of the story?
Is there unity in the plot?
What use is made of Marner's cataleptic fits in the development of the plot?
How are we prepared for the explanation of the mystery of the lost gold? (See p. 94, ll. 24-29; p. 97, ll. 17-20; p. 241, l. 29; p. 242, l. 3; p. 268, ll. 3-21.)
Why does the author cause Marner to go back to Lantern Yard and fail to learn anything of his former friends and the results of their injustice?
How many of the principal characters are brought into the last chapter?
Is what is said of them, and what they say themselves, characteristic?
Has the scene any beauty in itself?
Sum up the features that make it a fitting conclusion.
Characters.—From what classes of society does the author take her characters? Is she equally successful in dealing with the different classes?
Contrast Nancy and Priscilla. Which is the more interesting? Why?
Trace the changes that take place in the characters of Silas Marner and Godfrey Cass.
Do the other characters change too, or are they essentially the same throughout the story?
Do you think Marner's sudden loss of faith seems probable in view of his religious devotion?
What is the significance of the Sally Oates incident (p. 65) in Marner's life?
What effect did the gold have upon him? Contrast this with the influence of Eppie.
In the development of Marner's character, what is the significance of the scene at the Rainbow when Marner tells his neighbors of the loss of his gold?
What sort of man was Godfrey at the beginning of the story? Was there any excuse for him in his lack of manliness? State the struggle going on within him the night before he told his father about taking Fowler's money. What was the effect on him of telling only a little of his secret? Why did he at last tell Nancy all? What was his punishment?
Interpretation.—What idea does the development of Silas Marner's character illustrate?
Does the author's devotion to this idea mar at all your interest in the book as a story?
What truth does Godfrey Cass's life illustrate?
What satire do you find on people or customs?
Method of Narration.—Who tells the story?
Could the author have made one of the characters tell the story just as well? Give reasons.
Does the narrator write as though in some mysterious way she knew all about the characters, or does she write only what she might have seen and heard?
To what extent does she use dialogue?
How do we become acquainted with the characters?
Find several passages where the author interrupts the flow of her story to make explanations for our benefit (for example, pp. 100-101).
Style.—Does the author use the language of her own time?
To what extent does she make use of dialect?
Is the language of the characters consistent with the author's description of them? Note the difference in choice of words and grace of expression when the author speaks in her own person, and when she speaks through the mouth of one of her characters.
Find passages that express humor (pp. 201-203), pathos (pp. 67-69), satire (pp. 184-185).
The Life and Character of the Author.—What do we know of George Eliot's early home? education? religious experiences? life while manager of the house at Griff? life at Coventry? early literary work? first attempt at novel writing? success as a novelist?
Would you judge from this book that she was fond of social life? simple country life? animals? children? books? Give your reasons.
How do you suppose she knew how to describe the horse sale? the evening at the Rainbow?
Comparison.—Is our interest in this book chiefly in the setting? in the plot? in the characters? in the idea? in the style? or in all of these factors equally?
Compare Silas Marner in these five particulars with Ivanhoe and with The Vicar of Wakefield.