FOOTNOTES
[1] Cf. B. 1, 29, 33, 74-5, 75, 92-4; M. 1, 18, 21, 45-46, 57.
[2] B. 29, M. 18
[3] For the sake of uniformity Vorstellung has throughout been translated by 'representation', though sometimes, as in the present passage, it would be better rendered by 'presentation'.
[4] B. 74-5, M. 45-6.
[5] Cf. p. 29, note 1.
[6] Kant's account implies that he has in view only empirical knowledge; in any case it only applies to empirical conceptions.
[7] This distinction within perception is of course compatible with the view that the elements so distinguished are inseparable.
[8] See p. 29, note 1.
[9] Cf. B. 1, M. 1.
[10] Cf. B. 1 init., M. 1 init.; B. 34, M. 21 sub fin.
[11] E. g. B. 1 init., M. 1 init., and B. 75 fin., M. 46, lines 12, 13 [for 'the sensuous faculty' should be substituted 'the senses'].
[12] E. g. B. 42, lines 11, 12; M. 26, line 13; A. 100, Mah. 195 ('even in the absence of the object'). Cf. B. 182-3, M. 110-1 (see pp. 257-8, and note p. 257), and B. 207-10, M. 126-8 (see pp. 263-5).
[13] B. 74-5, M. 45-6; cf. pp. 27-9.
[14] B. 160 note, M. 98 note.