Transcriber’s Note:
Errors which can be attributed to printer’s mistakes have been corrected, as noted below. Lapses in punctuation are corrected with no further mention.
In Volume II, the author has included as Fig. [173] a table of alphabets used on Greek vases.
Inscriptions using archaic Greek characters which do not exist in the unicode character set are provided as inline images, and as such are not searchable. For instance, the character for pi (Π) resembles the modern gamma (Γ). The character upsilon (Υ) frequently appears as a modern Roman V. On occasion, sigma appears in the form of a modern C (the lunate sigma Ϲ).
Footnotes, which were numbered sequentially on each page, have been resequenced to be unique across the text. Cross-references to those numbers in the text have been changed to reflect this. The notes themselves have been moved to the end of each chapter.
Internal links have been provided for ease of reference.
Many references refer to the second volume of this work, and when viewed in a browser, the links will guide you to the locations in Volume II on the Project Gutenberg site.
Each plate was followed by a blank page on its verso, which have been removed here. The position of each plate, as well as that of all other figures, has been adjusted slightly to avoid falling in mid-paragraph. The pages devoted to plates were not counted in pagination.
The following anomalies regarding footnotes were observed:
On p. [153], the reference to the third footnote ([521]), referring the reader to “Pottier Louvre Cat., p. 381 ff.” does not appear in the text. The section discusses “Les vases à reliefs de style archaique en Italie et en Sicile”. The reference has been added following the paragraph ending with “designs of Oriental character”.
On p. [158], the reference to footnote ([531]) is missing from the text. The reference has been added at the end of the sentence beginning “Falkner found at Pompeii...”.
On p. [210], the sole footnote is missing its number, which is added here as [770].
On p. [214], the reference to the first footnote ([775]), referring the reader to Alexandre Brongniart’s Traité des arts céramiques: ou des poteries, i., p 552, does not appear in the text. The passage discusses the analysis of the glaze, and it seems appropriate to add the reference at the end of the paragraph beginning “This lustrous glaze...”.
On p. [427], footnote [1314] refers to a series of items, the last of which (‘270’) seems either out of order, or a misprint for ‘470’.
The following table contains those textual issues which are readily attributed to printer’s errors:
| p. 96 | which[,] were so light | Removed |
| p. 204 | It has been noted by J[o/a]hn | Corrected. |