Tics and Their Treatment

by Henry Meige; E. Feindel

THE CURABILITY OF TICS

TICS are commonly held to be trivial affections of but passing medical interest, while in addition they have gained the notoriety of being peculiarly rebellious to treatment. Such undeserved criticism is at once too superficial and too severe. As far as life is concerned, the prognosis is favourable, but they often contrive, quite as forcibly as many graver diseases, to render existence intolerable. To neglect them or to consider them a priori incurable is entirely unwarranted. Some degree of amelioration is practically always attainable, and even complete cures may be effected.

It is an old doctrine this of the incurability of tic, but the sufferers have not always been left to their fate. Forecasts of methods of treatment likely to ensure success were made long ago. In the "Dictionary in Sixty Volumes" of the year 1821 will be found a definition of tic, a little out of date perhaps, but affording a glimpse of therapeutic possibilities: "The word tic is ordinarily employed to designate certain unnatural habits, bizarre attitudes, peculiar gestures, etc., whose correction demands a painstaking perseverance that is not always sufficient to procure the desired result."

Trousseau later introduced an element of precision into current therapeutic measures by the application of a sort of gymnastic exercise to the muscles involved. He declared his opinion, however, that the arrest of one tic would soon be followed by the development of a second, which would in turn give place to a third, and so on; for the disease was essentially chronic, and in a sense formed part of the constitution of its subject. Subsequent observation has frequently borne witness to the truth of this remark, though the expression is too absolute.

For the majority of the older writers, nevertheless, the incurability of tic was axiomatic.

Pujol held non-dolorous facial tic to be most intractable. In the hands of Duchenne of Boulogne faradisation of the muscles was followed by only transient improvement. Axenfeld considered idiopathic facial convulsions hopeless from the point of view of treatment.

It has been remarked already that many of the earlier observers failed to discriminate between tic and spasm. In the article "Face" in the Encyclopædic Dictionary, for instance, Troisier includes every sort of facial movement under the term "convulsive tic," among them reflex spasms from dental caries or buccal ulceration, and muscular contractions occasioned by peripheral or nuclear irritation. His opinions as to the curability or otherwise of these movements are sufficiently dogmatic: "Convulsive tic is not a serious condition, yet it is in a majority of cases incurable and as a consequence most distressing. One can hope for success only if the tic is of reflex origin, where extraction of a tooth, or local treatment of an ulcer, or resection of part of the trigeminal nerve may be indicated."

Here the confusion is obvious.

Gilles de la Tourette's description of the disease known as convulsive tic accompanied with echolalia and coprolalia is couched in equally pessimistic terms.

"It is no menace to existence, and the patient may well attain a ripe old age, but in revenge he stands very little chance of escaping from it. A radical cure is yet to be found. Isolation, hydrotherapeutics, electricity, and constitutional treatment cannot do much more than retard its evolution."

In Guinon's article on convulsive tic in the Encyclopædic Dictionary of the Medical Sciences of 1887 thirty pages were devoted to description and the following few lines to treatment:

"This chapter will of necessity be brief.... In presence of this affection the physician is unfortunately helpless. During exacerbations any nerve sedative may be tried. In severe cases or if the symptoms become aggravated, the sole treatment likely to be accompanied by improvement, scarcely by success, is a combination of hydrotherapeutics with isolation."

Nor is Charcot much more encouraging[194]:

We cannot say that cure is certain, but we may count on longer or shorter intervals of arrest, either spontaneous or as a sequel to the employment of serviceable measures such as hydrotherapy or rational gymnastics.

It should be said that the cases which Charcot, Tourette, and Guinon had more especially in mind were of a graver nature, such as the disease of generalised convulsive tics with echolalia and coprolalia, and peculiarly resistant to treatment. Patients suffering from these forms of tic present in the most advanced degree psychical instability and volitional fickleness, and betray an irresistible tendency to impulsion and obsession, calculated to render the institution of any methodical treatment futile. In their case patience and perseverance may be rewarded, but they never consent to undergo for a sufficiently long period the discipline indispensable for their cure.

Fortunately, these severer varieties are exceptional. The vast majority of cases are certainly more amenable to modern therapeutic measures, and the results obtained so far place the disease in a much more favourable light. Letulle had already remarked, in 1883, that the most tenacious of co-ordinated tics might be amended, mitigated, and even wholly inhibited.