CONCLUSION.
No attempt has been made in this bulletin to deal exhaustively with the woodlot problem. The desire has been to point the way for the improvement of the woodlots in Kentucky. Individual cases deserve specific consideration, and only the main features of the proposition have been touched upon. The State Forester will cheerfully answer by mail all questions relating to this subject so far as it is possible to do so, and will give such personal advice and direction as the time at his disposal and the circumstances warrant. A list of books, bulletins and articles treating this subject is appended for those who desire to go more deeply into the matter than is possible in a publication of this character. The illustrations are from photographs loaned by the Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Akerman, A. Practical protection and improvement of the farm woodlot, illustrated. (Bailey, L. H. Cyclopedia of American Agriculture, 1907, v. 2: 330–33.)
Akerman, Alfred. Spring work in the woodlot; planting white pine seedlings. (New England Farmer, Montpelier, Vt., April 7, 1906, v. 85, No. 14: 4.)
Akerman, Alfred. Spring work in the woodlot. (New England Farmer, Montpelier, Vt., April 28, 1906, v. 85, No. 17: 6.)
Akerman, Alfred. Winter work in the woodlot. (New England Farmer, Montpelier, Vt., March 3, 1906, v. 85, No. 9: 6.)
Akerman, Alfred. Farm forestry. 22 p. Athens. Ga., 1909. (Georgia Forest Association. Publication.)
Ames, G. W. Practical forestry for farmers. (Society for Protection of New Hampshire Forests. 7th annual report, 1909, p. 42–6.)
Atkeson, T. C. The farmer’s woodlot. (West Virginia State Board of Agriculture Report, 1908, p. 97–103.)
Ayres, P. W. The care of the woodlot. (Society for the protection of New Hampshire Forests. Fourth annual report, 1905–6, p. 50–1.)
Baker, H. P. The farm woodlot in Pennsylvania. (Forest Leaves, Philadelphia, Pa., Oct. 1908, v. 11: 163–7.)
Baker, J. Fred. The Michigan woodlot. 14 p., illustrated. East Lansing, Mich., 1912. (Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station. Circular 17.)
Balderson, R. W. The farm woodlot. (Forest Leaves, Philadelphia, Pa., April 1905, v. 10: 25.)
Besley, F. W. Woodlot forestry for Maryland farmers. 7 p. Baltimore, Md. (Maryland State Board of Forestry leaflet No. 5.)
Bogue, E. E. The farm woodlot. (Garfield, C. W. The Michigan forestry commission and its work, 1905, p. 10–14.)
Bogue, E. E. Woodlot thinning, illustrated. (Forestry and Irrigation, Aug. 1906, v. 12: 385–8.)
Bradfield, W. Standing timber in woodlots. (National Conservation Commission. Report, 1909, p. 181–7.)
Bryner, H. E. The improvement of farm woodlots. (Forest Leaves, Philadelphia, Pa., June 1910, v. 12, No. 9: 133–5.)
Campbell, M. E. The farm woodlot. (Michigan Forestry Commission. Report, 1905–6, p. 87–90.)
The care of the woodlot. (School World, Farmington, Me., Sept. 1908, p. 21–4.)
The care of the farmers’ woodlot. (Michigan State Board of Agriculture. Farmers’ Institutes, 1903–4, p. 80–6.)
Clark, Judson F. Defects in the woodlot and how they may be remedied. (Ontario Agricultural Experiment Union. Twenty-sixth annual report, 1904, p. 63–8.)
Clark, J. F. The farmers’ woodlot, illustrated. (Ontario Forestry Bureau. Annual report, 1904, p. 51–8.)
Clark, J. F. The propagation of trees by farmers. (Ontario Bureau of Forestry. Annual report, 1904, p. 334–50.)
Clark, J. F. Woodlot forestry. (Michigan Forestry Commission. Report, 1903–4, p. 47–56.)
Coulter, Stanley. Suggestions for the improvement of Indiana woodlots, illustrated. (Indiana State Board of Forestry. Twelfth annual report, 1912, p. 85–106.)
Coulter, Stanley. Woodlot conditions and possibilities. (Indiana State Board of Forestry. Ninth and tenth annual report, 1909: 37–46; 1910: 126–35.)
Davis, C. A. Woodlot studies. 16 p. Ann Arbor, Mich., 1906.
Defebaugh, J. E. Relation of the lumber tariff to the value of farmers’ woodlots. (American Lumberman, Chicago, Feb. 27, 1909, No. 1762: 39–40.)
Every farmer his own forester. (Craftsman, June 1912, v. 22: 348–50.)
Farm forestry. (Forest Fish and Game, N. Y., June 1909, v. 3, No. 1: 1–22.)
Farmer and the forest. (Independent, N. Y., July 16, 1908, v. 65: 165–7.)
Faville, E. E., and Reeves, E. The farmer and the woodlot. (Iowa Park and Forestry Association. Proceedings, 1904, p. 25–30.)
Ferguson, J. A. The importance of the farm woodlot. (Pennsylvania State College, May 1911, v. 4, No. 1: 18–21.)
Ferguson, Meade. The forest and the farmer. (Southern Planter, Richmond, March 1913, v. 74: 315–21.)
Fernow, B. E. Farm woodlot, illustrated. (Bailey, L. H. Cyclopedia of American Agriculture, 1907, v. 2: 313–23.)
Fisher, R. T. Forestry for Southern New England woodlots. (Forestry and Irrigation, Washington, D. C., March 1903, v. 9, No. 3: 120–1.)
Foster, J. H. Improving the farm woodlot. 1 p. Durham, N. H., 1912. (New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station. Press bulletin 11.)
Foster, J. H. Suggestions for cutting waste pine lots. 1 p. Durham, N. H. (New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station. Press bulletin 22.)
Fyles, Thos. W. The farmer’s woodlot. (Ontario Entomological Society. Thirty-ninth annual report, 1908, p. 138–45.)
Gaskill, Alfred. Let’s not overlook the woodlots. (Forestry Quarterly, Washington, D. C., March 1913, v. 11: 58–61.)
Gifford, John. The forest in relation to the farm, illustrated. (New Jersey State Board of Agriculture, twenty-third annual report, 1895, p. 170–178.)
Gifford, John. Forestry for the farm. (Connecticut Board of Agriculture. Thirty-sixth annual report, 1902, p. 85–95.)
Goetz, C. H. Need of farm woodlots in the Central States. (Forest Leaves, April 1911, v. 13, No. 2: 21–3.)
Goetz, C. H. Practical work on the woodlot. (Forest Leaves, Philadelphia, Pa., Feb. 1912, v. 13: 107–8.)
Graves, Henry Solon and Fisher, R. T. The woodlot. 89 p. pl. Washington, D. C., 1903. (United States Agricultural Department of Forest Service. Bulletin 42.)
Haines, A. S. A study of the chestnut woodlot. (9 Forest Leaves, Philadelphia, Pa., Aug. 1901, v. 8, No. 10: 150–1.)
Hawes, A. F. The farmers’ woodlot. (Vermont State Forester. Annual report, first, 1908–9, p. 166–72.)
Hazard, James O. An example of woodlot forestry. 23 p. pl. Trenton, N. J., 1912.
House, H. D. Improvement of the woodlot. 14 p., illustrated. Columbia, S. C., 1907. (South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin 129.)
Hutt, W. N. Management of the farmers’ woodlot, illustrated. (Cornell Countryman, 1907, v. 4, No. 5: 128–34.)
The importance of the farm woodlot. (Pennsylvania State Farmer, Pennsylvania State College, May 1910, v. 333, No. 4: 82–85.)
Jackson, E. R. Forestry and the farmer. (University of Virginia. Alumni Bulletin. Aug. 1911, ser. 3, v. 4, No. 4: 417–25.)
Kellogg, R. S. Farm forestry in Michigan, illustrated. (Michigan State Board of Agriculture of Michigan Farmers’ Institutes, 1907–8, p. 61–70.)
Knechtel, A. Making a woodlot from seed. 7 p. Albany, N. Y., 1907.
Meller, C. L. The prairie farmer’s tree problem, illustrated. (Country Gentleman, Dec. 14, 1912, v. 77, No. 50: 3–32.)
Miller, F. G. The farm woodlot in Michigan. (Forestry and Irrigation, Washington, D. C., April 1903, v. 9, No. 4: 187–9.)
Mulford, Walter. The improvement of the woodlot. 24 p., illustrated. Ithaca, N. Y., 1912. (Cornell Reading Courses, v. 1, No. 12; Farm Forestry Series, No. 1.)
Payne, W. F. Value to a farm of a woodlot, illustrated. (Canadian Forestry Journal, Ottawa, March, April 1912, v. 8: 51–53.)
Price, O. W. First principles of woodlot management, illustrated. (Farming, Toronto, Oct. 1906, v. 2: 93–4.)
Records, P. C. The value of a woodlot. (Northwoods, St. Paul, April 1913, v. 2: 7–14.)
Record, Samuel James. What is the woodlot worth? illustrated. (Country Gentleman, Philadelphia, Pa., Sept. 7, 1912, p. 5–8.)
Reynolds, L. C. Protect the farm woodlot. (New York Tribune Farmer, July 16, 1908, p. 9.)
Schwartz, G. F. Productive possibilities, common deficiencies and how to improve the woodlot, illustrated. (In United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Bulletin 44, p. 21–7.)
Transcriber’s Notes:
Punctuation and spelling inaccuracies were silently corrected.
Archaic and variable spelling has been preserved.
Variations in hyphenation and compound words have been preserved.