POSTSCRIPT.
Since these papers were sent to the press, the Commons of Ireland have, in their address to his Majesty, resolved, unanimously, “that it is not by temporary expedients, but by a free trade alone that this nation is now to be saved from impending ruin.” And the Lords have in their address unanimously entered into a resolution of the same import.
INDEX.
A.
Abercrombie, Lord, in Ireland and in Egypt, [lxxx-lxxxii]
Abraham Hutchinson, [lxxxv]
Absentees, remittances to, [76]
Acts of Parliament quoted:
"Edward III., 17th, 34th, and 50th of, [110]
"Edward IV., 3rd of, 4th of, [111]
"Henry VII., 10th of, [112]
"(English), Henry VIII., 13th and 28th of, &c., [116]
"Elizabeth, [87], [116]
"James I., [8]
"Charles II., [87]
"of Settlement and Explanation, [131]
"12th, [57]
"13th and 14th of, [115]
"17th and 18th of, [20]
"20th and 22nd of, [106]
"22nd and 23rd of, [119]
"William and Mary, first of, [57]
"William III., 7th and 8th of, [57]
"(English) Acts of 1697, [59]
"(Irish) Acts of 1695, 10th and 11th of, [20], [88], [91], [105]
"for encouraging Tillage, [38] note
"for Bounties on Land, Carriage and Coal Supply to Dublin, [lxx], and [39]
"3rd and 4th of Anne, [108]
"10th, 11th, and 22nd of Anne, [96]
"1st of George II, [122]
"4th and 6th of, [120]
"(English), 32nd of George II, [54], note
"(1750), taxing Irish Exports, [92]
"George III., 10th of, [93-96]
"18th of, [96]
"Imposing Duty on Woollen Goods, [67]
"Loan, 1759, [40]
Address of English Parliament to William III., [62-65]
Admiral Hawke, [xv]
Aldborough, Petition of, [85]
Aldred Mr., of Oxford, [xlv]
Advance, in Linen Trade, [51]
Alexander the Great, [xxxiv]
Alexandria, Lord Hutchinson of, [lxxxvi]
Alnager, Office and Fees of, x and [155], note
America, Robertson’s History of, [xiii]
"Wool and Linen Trades transferred to, by Irish Emigrants, [147]
Anderson, Dr., quoted, [72], note
Andrews, Provost, [xxxi]
Anthologia Hibernica, [lxxxvi]
Archbishop Craddock, [xxxiv], note
Archbishop Fowler, [lxvi]
Archbishop King quoted, [10]
Archbishop Laud quoted, [xxv]
Arms of Militia given to Volunteers, [xiv], note
Army Augmentation, [40], [44], [48]
Asia, Africa, and America, closed against Ireland, [90]
B.
Baird, Sir David, his Expedition from India to Egypt, [lxxxii]
Ballinamuck, Battle of, French defeated at, [lxxxi]
Banks in Dublin failed, [35-40]
Bankruptcy Law not known here in 1755, [35], note
Barlow, Mr., T.C.D., Exercising the Veto, [xxv], note
Barrè, Colonel Isaac, his description of Hutchinson, [lx], &c., and note
Batchelor, the, [xii]
Baratariana, meaning of name, [xiii]
"Written by, [xiii]
"Extracts from, [xv], [xvii], [xxi], note
"appeared originally in Freeman’s Journal, [xiii]
Beaconsfield, Lord, [x], note
Bedford, Duke of, Lord Lieutenant (Speech from the Throne), [37]
Beer, Exports and Imports of, [156]
Berkeley, Bishop, his Opinion on State of Irish People, [cxviii]
Berwick, Rev. Edward, deprived of Scholarship by Provost Hutchinson, and reinstated by Visitors, [xxxiv]
Bessborough Commission, [xxix], note
Biographie “Generale,” “Universale,” and “des contemporanes,” quoted, [lxxxi]
Bishops, Irish, ordaining on Scotch degrees, [liii]
Black-Dog prison, [cvi], note
Blackburne, Mr., quoted, [xcix]
Blacquiere, Sir John, [xxiii], [lxxvii]
Board and Provost of Trinity College, the, Publisher’s thanks to, [v]
Bolton, Duke of, Lord Lieutenant (Speech from the Throne), [24]
Boulter, Primate, his desire to have Englishmen appointed to Irish Bishoprics, [xxvi], note; [xlvi], note
Bounty on Land Carriage, and on Coals, to Dublin, [lxx], [cx], [43]
Bowes, Lord Chancellor, [60]
Boyle, Lord Shannon, Speaker, [xciv]
Bretagne, Duke of, Treaty with, [112]
Broderick, Speaker, Solicitor-General, Lord Chancellor, [17]
Brown, Prime-Sergeant, pumped on Mr. Mills, [xix], note
Bruce, Lieutenant, aided in effecting Lavalette’s escape, [lxxxiii]
Buckinghamshire, Lord Lieutenant. The Letters addressed to, [xcix]
"""Entertained by Trinity College, [lxvi]
"""A jobber in a mask, [lxviii], note
Burke, Sir Bernard, quoted, [xxiii], [lxxxi]
Burgh, Hussey, his Speech for opening the College to Catholics;
do. on the Irish bishops;
do. on a Money Bill, and Dismissal from Office, [liii], [lxxii], note
Burrowes, Peter, his speech, [xlix]
"Robert, [xlix]
Buyers, none at fairs, [2]
Byron, Lord, [x], note
C.
Campbell, Dr., his “Political Survey”, [72]
Carson, Rev. Dr., S.F.T.C.D., his extract from College Register, [xxxvii], note
Carte, his life of Ormond quoted, [cv], [12], [54]
Carteret, Lord Lieutenant, [28]
Castlebar, Battle of, English defeated at, strange mistake by French Encyclopædists, [lxxxvi]
"atrocities of English army in retreat from, [lxxxvi]
Castlereagh, Lord, Chief Secretary, [xcvi]
Catalogue of College Plate, by Mr. Hingston, [xxix], note
Cattle, Exportation Prohibition Act, [cv] and [55]
Catholic Scholars, T.C.D., [xlv], [li], and note
Catholics, admitted to the College by connivance;
how debarred from Scholarship and from voting, [xlvi], [li], note
Cattle Trade destroyed by England, loss of, drove the Irish into the wool trade, [cxi], [11]
Cattle, Present of, sent to London after the great fire, and ungraciously received, [cv]
Causes of Ireland’s debt, [48]
Chaffers, In Act of Edward IV., [111]
Chancellors of the Exchequer, Irish, [xciv]
Chancery-lane, [xiv-xxiii]
Chapelizod Church, Inscriptions in, to the third Earl of Donoughmore, [lxxxiv]
“Chapels” in T.C.D., [xx]
Charles I., Subsidies to, [9]
Charles II., Letter from, [12]
Charles II. See [Acts].
Charlemont, Lord, Life of, quoted, [lvi]
Charter Schools, cxi, [45]
Chesterfield, Lord Lieutenant, [32]
China, Trade of, [73], [cxii]
Cista Communis, [xxix]
Civil Establishment pensions, lxix, [45], [4]
Clarendon, Lord, his “History”, [10]
Clonmel, Factory at, [cv], [13]
College Plate in South Kensington Exhibition, [xxix], note
College rack-renting, as alleged by Mr. Duigenan—as explained by Mr. Galbraith, [xxix], note
College Park, [xx], note
Commercial Restraints and Colonial Trade, [1]
Commission of Trade, [67]
Committees, Parliamentary, on the Hutchinsons, [xl], [xli]
Colonies, Ireland excluded from commerce with, [68]
Commons, House of, could not cure the evil, [31]
"pass the Act against Irish trade, [cvii], and [66]
"advanced money for local purposes, [36]
"(Irish), Dispute with the Crown, [35]
"What they effected in 1782, [lxxi], note
"English, Address to William III., [62]
Commons, in Trinity College, [xlviii]
Condition of Irish people, [26]
Cooke’s Institutes, [110]
Constellation, The, Captain of, [cv], note
Corporation of Weavers, [49]
Council of Ireland present a Bill to Parliament, [67]
Corporation of Dublin petition the College for Lucas’ son, [lxiv]
Cowper, Lord Lieutenant, his speech at Belfast, [cxviii]
Cox, his history of Ireland, [9]
Croker, Crofton, Popular songs, quoted, [xxxi], note
Curates, Salary of, [liii]
D.
Davis, Sir John, quoted, [7] and note, [9], [110], [127], [149]
Decker, his “Decline of Foreign Trade”, [74-78]
Debt, National, smallness of in Ireland in 1715, [24]
"the alarm caused by the slight increase of, a proof of the destitution of the country, [24]
"how increased, [46]
Delany, Dr., F.T.C.D., his pupils and income, [xlvi], note
Devonshire, Duke of, Lord Lieutenant, [32]
Donoughmore estate, The, [lxxv], note
Donoughmore, Lord, “blood relations of,” [xxxi], note
Distress in Ireland, [23-29]
Dobbs, Mr., on the trade of Ireland, [14], [77], note
Dorset, Duke of, [29], [78]
"Distress in, 1759, [40]
"Sir Bernard de Gomme’s Map of, [xx], note
"Scandinavian Kingdom of, [xx], note
Dublin, Collection in, for the Waldenses—for New England—
"its freedom given to Hutchinson, [x]
"""to Captain Porter, [cv], note
"aid for the Londoners, [cv], note
Duigenan, Dr. Patrick, F.T.C.D., &c., his “Lachrymæ Academicæ,” [xxi]
""Sketch of his Life, [1], note
""educated in St. Bride’s Parish School, lived in Chancery-lane, [lxxxvii]
""his sham duel, [lvi], note
""his oratory, [lix]
""a fanatical anti-Catholic and anti-Nationalist, [lxxxviii]
""did not bring the Provost before the Visitors, [xxxvii], note
Dunkin, Rev. Mr., Master of Great Ship-street School, had an annuity from the College, [lxiv]
Dutch carried on the Trade of Ireland, [73]
Duty paid on Export of Linen, [21]
E.
Edward III. and IV.’s Acts, [110]
Egypt, trade at, [cxi]
Embargo on Irish provisions, 1776, [5]
Emigration of linen workers from Ulster, [101]
Embargoes in Ireland, [24];
from 1740 to 1779, [157]
England, prohibition of cattle exportation to, civ, note, [5]
"remittances to, more than double the entire trade of Ireland, [81]
"Great Seal of, to certify Irish Acts, [75]
"and Ireland compared as to taxation, [76]
"a sufferer by her restrictions on Ireland, [77]
"in 1779, had to pay for Irish army, [4]
"a gainer by Ireland, [cxvii], [149]
"the cause of Irish distress, [cxvii]
"repaid fifty-fold for advances to Ireland, [128]
English Parliament’s Address to William III., to destroy Irish wool trade, [cvii], and [61]
Equivalent of linen trade an imposture, [97]
Essex, Lord, Lord Lieutenant, [143]
Explanation, Act of, [131]
Exshaw’s Magazine, [xli], [xlvi], note
F.
Failures of Dublin Bankers, Ferral and French, [35]
Farmers of Customs, [57]
Farming in Ireland depressed, and why, [2]
Fashion, former, of Chancery-lane, Stephen-street, Ship-street, &c. &c., [xiv], note
Faulkner’s epistle to Howard, [lvi], note
Fawcett, Postmaster-General, his Speech at Shoreditch, [cxviii]
Fellows of Trinity College, Bishops, &c., [xxvi], note
Fellows of Trinity College, their income, [xxviii-xlvi]
Fellowship, worth of, [xxxiii]
Ferguson, Sir Samuel, the Publisher’s thanks to, [viii]
Fitzgerald, Lord Edward, on College Parliamentary Committee, [xliii]
""voted against Hutchinson, [l]
""served in Irish force in America, [lxi]
Fitzgibbon, John, Earl of Clare, educated in St. Michael le Pole’s School;
his college contests with Grattan, [xcii]
his early and rapid successes, [x], note
unseats the Provost’s son for the University, and replaces him, [xli]
At first a parliamentary supporter and great admirer of Grattan; his final quarrel with Grattan, [lxxxix]
crushed the Round Robin and humbled the Provost, [xxxix]
as Vice-Chancellor holds a College Visitation, [lxvi]
had an Honorary L.L.D. from the University, [lxxxix]
his speech on the progress of Ireland, during the 18 years of freedom, quoted, [cxix]
Fitzgerald, Rev. Mr., Fellow, treated harshly by Provost Hutchinson, [xxxiv]
Flanders producing good wool, [99]
Flax-seed imported into Ireland, bounty on, 1776, [95]
Flax an uncertain crop, [99]
Flemings; they beat the Italians out of the wool markets, and are beaten by the English, [99]
Flood, Henry, Candidate for the Provostship, [xxiv]
"His Will, [do.], note
"Life of, quoted, [do.], note
Folkestone, Petition of, [84]
Food of the Irish people in 1672, and in 1779, [cxii], and note
Forbes, John, supporter of Grattan, opposed pension list, educated in St. Michael le Pole’s School in Great Ship-street, lived in Stephen-street, [xciii]
Foreign Trade of Ireland annihilated, [74]
France used to supply England with linen, [92]
Free Trade, Meaning of, [lxxii], note
Freeman’s Journal published on St. Audoen’s Arch, and in Macœna’s Head, Bride-street (1776), [xiii]
""printer of, prosecuted, [xviii]
""quoted, [xiii], [xviii] note, [xix] note, [xxvi], [xli] note twice, [xlv] note, [liii] note, [cxvii].
French Pensioners, [38]
Friezes exempted from tax, [65]
Froude, Mr., quoted, [xii], [xviii], note, [xxix], note twice, [xxxvi], [xxxvii], [xli], note twice, [xlv] note, [lii], note, [cxviii].
G.
Galbraith, The Rev. J. A., S.F.T.C.D., Letter on College Rents, [xxix], note
Galway, Lord, Lord Lieutenant, his speech from the throne, [63]
Gardiner’s Relief Bill, [lxvii]
Gentleman’s Magazine, quoted, [xi], [lviii]
George II., Acts of, [54-120]
George III., Acts of, [121]
Gladstone, Mr., his speech in 1880, quoted, [xciv]
Gloucestershire, Petition from, [84]
Grafton, Duke of, Lord Lieutenant, 1723, his speech from the throne, [27]
Grattan’s Life of Grattan, [lix]
Grattan, partly educated at St. Michael le Pole’s, [lxxxix]
"his College Course and early contests with Fitzgibbon, [xc]
Graziers prosperous under cattle and wool trade, [xcii]
Great Britain, Sums remitted to, from Ireland, in pensions and salary, double the whole of Irish Trade, [81]
“Groves of Blarney,” Verse of, [xxxi]
H.
Habeas Corpus for Ireland, Heads of Bills for, cushioned in England, [159]
"carried in ’82, [lxxxi], note
Haliday Collection, R. I. Academy, [xxix], note, [liv], note
Halifax, Lord Lieutenant, his speech from the throne, 1762, [44]
Hardy, his Life of Lord Charlemont, [lvi]
Harris, his Life of William III. quoted, [13]
Haughton, Dr., Senior Lecturer, quoted, [xxxii], note
Hearth Money, [75-151]
Herrings from Waterford and Wexford prohibited by England, [85]
Hertford, Lord Lieutenant, his speech from the throne, [50]
Hessians, The, refused by Irish Parliament, [lxi], note
Hibernian Journal, [xviii]
Hindostan, Trade of, by foreigners, [cxii]
Historical Manuscripts Commission Report, [xvii], note
Hingston, Mr., his catalogue of the College Plate; in charge of the plate at South Kensington Exhibition, [xxix], note
Historian, no professed, of Ireland, since 1669, [23]
Homer, quoted, [cxiv], [127]
Hours of Examination in College formerly, [xx]
House of Commons Journal, quoted, [xli]
Husbandry, Grants for, prove the poverty of the country, [35]
Hutchinson, Rt. Hon. John Hely, Provost, &c., [ix]
his Matriculation, [x]
mention of, in College Calendar; his career and numerous appointments, [xi]
made Provost by Sir John Blacquiere, Chief Secretary, [xxxii]
and the price of the appointment, [x-xiv]
accused of a corrupt use of the office, [xxi]
trampled on Duigenan, [xxi]
challenged Dr. Doyle, Lucas, and Tisdall, [xxxii]
prosecuted in King’s Bench and defended himself, [xxxviii]
a warm supporter of Grattan, [lix]
inculpated before a Parliamentary Committee, and acquitted, [l]
evidence brought forward there concerning him, [lxv]
Miller’s Pamphlet on, and Young’s, [liv]
Lord North’s saying about him, [lx]
Hardy’s, Grattan’s, Taylor’s, Will’s, Barre’s, Pery’s, and Single Speech Hamilton’s favourable opinions of him, &c., [lvi]
published the “Commercial Restraints”, [lxiv]
entertained the Lord Lieutenant in the College, [lxv]
his liberal and national politics, [lxvii]
the constitutional changes which he witnessed and helped to produce, [lxviii]
read the King’s message to the Irish Parliament in 1782, [lxxxiv]
his death and will, [lxxxiv]
his family, [lxxvi]
a good husband and father, [xxxi]
his love for his children, [lxxxviii]
his likeness by Sir Joshua Reynolds, [Frontispiece]
"Richard Hely, Lord Donoughmore, his appointments, [lxxix]
""elected for the University and unseated by John Fitzgibbon,—member for Sligo, [lxxix]
"Francis Hely, member for the University, [lxxviii]
""petitioned against and sustained
""his duel, [lxxviii]
""Member for Naas, [lxxx]
"Abraham Hely, his volunteer military career in Ireland, Egypt, and Russia, [lxxviii]
""member for Taghmon, [lxxix]
""Commissioner and Clergyman, [lxxxi]
"John Hely (2nd), his services in the army in Ireland, Flanders, and Egypt; his defeat at Castlebar, and his conquest of the French in Egypt; voted for the Union, made Lord Hutchinson, and became Lord Donoughmore, [lxxx]
"John Hely (3rd), “Lavalette,” delivered Lavalette, and became Earl of Donoughmore, died at Chapelizod, tablet in Chapelizod Church, [lxxxiii]
"the fourth peer, served as an officer in India, [lxxxiv]
and in the House of Lords advocated the case of the East India Company’s officers, and supports Lord Dufferin’s Land Leasing Bill, [do.]
"The present peer, the 5th Earl, was one of the European Commission for organising Eastern Roumelia under the Berlin Treaty. He is also the creator of the Lords’ Committee of Inquiry on the Irish Land Act, [lxxxiv]
I.
Independence, Parliamentary, of Ireland, College identified with, [lxxiv]
Ireland deprived of the Cattle Trade, [cix]
"of the Wool Trade, Colonial Trade, and trade with all the world, [cxvii]
"sold in the linen trade, [47]
"constant wretchedness of, caused by England, [44]
"possesses abundant means of prosperity, [cxix], [2]
"oppressed by the Navigation Law, [122]
"loyal to English Crown, [125]
"a great commercial gain to England, [149]
"a mine of wealth to England, cxvii, [149]
"Bishop Berkeley’s opinion on, [cxix]
"ought to depend on her own resources, [cxvii]
"its people fond of equal justice: their food, [145], and note
"good wool-spinners, [71]
"had no professed historian since 1699, [23]
"overtaxed in consequence of paying its share of the National Debt, [33]
"supposed wealth caused real poverty, [48]
"her debt for the war of 1761 was accountable, but its increase during 16 years of peace unaccountable, [46]
Ireland, distress of, arose, not from natural causes but from bad laws, [53]
Irish, the indolence of, from loss of liberty, [127]
Irish shipping useful to Edward I. in his French wars, [111]
Irish, population of, more than doubled in 80 years, [148]
"population of, in 1779, [148]
"able to pay taxes, [151]
"residing in houses of one hearth, [151], note
"Non-distribution of property caused by bad English laws, [150]
"home trade most important for, [145]
"trade of, various restrictions on, [154], [157]
"troops, 100,000, served in English army and navy in French and Spanish war, [161]
J.
James II. ruined the trade and revenue of Ireland, [13]
Jocelyn, Lord, his return of Pension List, [lxix], note
Johnston, Dr., his Hon. degree from T.C.D., and letter to Leland, [lxxxvi]
"his opinion of Leland’s “History”, [do.]
"his opinion of England’s treatment of Ireland, [do.]
Judges appointed for life in Ireland in 1782, [lxxi]
Junto, The, [xxiii], [lxviii]
K.
Keating, Lord Chief Justice, [11], note
King, Archbishop, his “State of the Protestants in Ireland”, [135]
Knocklofty, Mr. Richard Hutchinson of, [x-lxxv]
"Lord Hutchinson of, [lxxx]
L.
“Lacrymæ Academicæ,” by Duigenan, [xxi], &c.
"its severe attack on the Provost, [do.]
"its interesting record of College events and College life, [do.]
"censured by the Board, [xxxiv]
"and the censure replied to by Duigenan in Freeman’s Journal, [xxxvii]
"in King’s Bench, [do.]
Langrishe, Sir Hercules, wrote in Baratariana, [xiii]
"obtained a grant for clothing for the Volunteers, [xiii], note
"one of his bon mots, [do.]
Land Carriage Act, 1757, [43]
"improved the agriculture of Ireland, [145]
Land Bill, 1759, [40]
Latin Schools of Dublin, [xcii], note
Laud, Archbishop, his statutes for the University, [xxv]
“Lavalette” Hutchinson, [lxxxiii]
Lavalette, his escape from France, [lxxxiii]
Leaves of absence allowed to Fellows and to Scholars, [xlviii]
Leland, Dr. S.F., T.C.D, quoted, [9]
"Duigenan’s attacks on, [xxi]
"Dr. Johnston’s letter to, [lxxxvi]
"mentioned in the Historical Manuscripts, [do.]
"Commission Report, [do.]
"Estimate of his history, [lxxxv]
Leeds, Petition from, [84]
“Liber munerum,” quoted, [xxxii], [xxxv], note, [lxx]
Linen trade no equivalent for suppressed wool trade, [20]
"a hypocrisy and imposture, [ciii], note
"sums paid on exportation of, [21], note
"caused the decay of agriculture, [51]
"declined, 1771, [4]
"Ireland not specially adapted for, [91]
"world shut against, [91]
London, The Dublin contribution to, [cv]
Lord Lieutenants, List of, [xcv]
Lucas, Dr., his son had free education from the Board of T.C.D., [lxiv]
Lyttleton, Lord George, his history of Henry II., helped by Leland, [lxxxvi]
"applied to by Swift for Macaulay, [xliv]
M.
Macaulay, Alexander, supported by Swift, [xliv]
"returned for College and unseated, [do.]
"lived in Great Ship-street, [xciii]
Macaulay, Boyd, his son, educated in Great Ship-street School, [do.]
Macaulay, Catherine, her history quoted, [135]
Magee, Archbishop, his evidence, [xlvii]
"he wanted to go to the Bar, [do.]
"his sermon on Lord Clare, [xcii]
Magill, John, got an Honorary LL.D., was a carpenter and a Commissioner of Barracks, [xxv], note
Malone, Anthony, dismissed from Prime Serjeancy, and from the Irish Exchequer, [lxviii]
"lived in Chancery-lane, [xiv], note
Malady, The, of Emigration, [147]
Mathers, Rev. Nathaniel, made collection in Dublin, [cvi], note
"Rev. Samuel,do.do.[do.]
Matthew Paris, quoted, [16]
Militia Bill defeated by Hutchinson, 1766, [xiv], and note
"dropped in 1778, [4]
Militia, Arms for, given to the Volunteers in 1779, [xiv], note
£20,000 for clothing, [do.]
enrolled in 1785, [do.]
Miller, Rev. G., F.T.C.D., &c., [lxiv] and note
"his evidence, Case, and works, [xliv]
"his Pamphlet and case for legal opinion, [liv]
Mills, Michael, the printer, under the College pump, [xix], note
Moira, Lord, [lxi], note
Mutiny Act, perpetual and repealed, [lxx] and [lxxi]
N.
Natives, Places in Trinity College, [xxvii]
Navigation Act, 7th and 8th, William III., compelled Irish ships coming from America to pass by Ireland and unlade at England, and ship again for Ireland, [120]
Navigation Acts, Petty’s opinion on, [123]
Netherlands, Treaty with, by Henry VII., includes Ireland as to both Exports and Imports, [112]
New England, Dublin Subscription for, by Rev. Mr. Mather, [cv]
Non-Coing, [xxvii]
"value of, to Scholars, [xlvii]
""and to Fellows, [do.]
North, Lord, his saying about Provost Hutchinson, [lx]
O.
O’Connor, Charles, of Ballenagare, [lxxxvi]
"his opinion of Leland, and of the T.C.D. MSS., [do.]
Offices formerly on the Irish Establishment, List of, [lxx]
O’Hagan, Lord, his Address to the Social Science Congress, Introd., [ci], note
O’Hagan, Mr. Justice, his judgment on the Stackpoole Lease, Introd., [ci], note
Ormonde, Duke of, Lord Lieutenant, [12], [16], [18]
""his fidelity to Ireland, set up the wool trade at Clonmel, opposed the Cattle Act, [lv], [12]
""made collection here for Londoners after the great fire, [cv]
""Personal prejudice against, [55]
""Carte’s Life of, [cv]
Ossory, Lord, challenged Duke of Buckingham, [do.]
P.
Parliaments seldom convened in Ireland under James and Charles I., [11]
"suspended over for 26 years after the Restoration, [11]
"Composition of, [lxix]
"Independence of, 1782, [lxxiv]
"Acts of, in 1782, [lxxi]
"Addresses of, to Lord Lieutenant, [15], [24], [25], [27], &c.
Parliamentary Committee on Election of Francis Hutchinson for the University, Duke of Wellington and Lord Castlereagh on it, [xlii]
"Counsel employed, evidence brought forward, Committee decided in favour of Hutchinson by double vote of Chairman, [l]
"Catholic Scholars, Toomey and Casey, [xlv], [li]
"Burrowes’ Speech, [xlix]
Park, The College, levelled and walled in, [xx], and note
"infested by the Hutchinsons, [xxxi]
"formerly a place for pistol practice, [xxxii]
Pensions, Amount of, [38], [40], [44]
"French, Amount of, [38], [40]
Pepys, his Diary, quoted, [civ], note
Peroration, Eloquent, of the “Restraints”, [158]
Pery, Edward Sexten, Speaker, [43]
""Notice of, [xvii], note
""the fountain of all the good that befel Ireland, [lxxi]
Petty, Sir William, quoted, [54], [72], [106], [123], [130], [131], [132]
""his estimate of the Irish destroyed in the Civil War of 1641, [130]
""his opinion of the prohibition of the cattle trade, [55]
""on the navigation laws, [123] and [132]
""his description of the people’s food, [cxii], note
Places, List of, [lxx], note
Placemen in Parliament, List of, [lxix], note
Plantation goods for Ireland, [120]
"to be first unloaded in England, [do.]
Plate, College, Some of, melted down by Hutchinson, [xxix] and note
"note on, [do.]
Plowden, quoted, [xxxix], note, [lxii], note
Plunket, (Lord Chancellor), his speech before the Parliamentary Committee, [xlviii]
"son of a Unitarian minister, [lii]
Poll-tax paid by 360,000 people in 1661, [131]
Pope applied to by Swift, [xliv]
"his translation of the passage from Homer, [cxiv]
Potatoes, Failure of, 1765, [49]
Potter, Captain of the Constellation brought over American supply in last famine, [cv], note
and receives the Freedom of Dublin, [do.]
“Prancer,” nickname of the Provost, [xvii]
“Pranceriana, Pranceriana Poetica” extracts from, note on, [xviii], note
""originally in Freeman’s Journal, [xviii]
Private works here, carried on by public money, to lessen the balance in the Treasury available for Pensions, &c., [35]
"they prove the poverty of the country, [35]
Proclamation of 1776, on all provision ships laden in Ireland, [5], note
""partly withdrawn, 1779, [5], note
Provost Andrews, [xiii]
"Hely Hutchinson, [xxv]
"The present, the Publisher’s thanks to, [v]
Provost’s house built at a cost of £11,000, [xii]
Pryn, quoted, [109], note
Pupils of Fellows, [xlvi], and note
Q.
Quickening Speech to Irish Parliament, [cvii]
R.
Rack-renting, by Provost Hutchinson, [xxviii], and note
“Rapin’s History” quoted, [63]
Record Office, Public, [xxi], note
"Gatherings from, [xxiii], note
"fac-simile of Provost Hutchinson’s autograph given by Sir S. Ferguson, [Frontispiece]
Redundancy in the Treasury caused the dispute between the Crown and the Commons in 1753, [35] and [lxx], note
Regulators’ places, [xlv]
Relief not attempted by Irish of Commons, and why, [31]
Remedy proposed by Government, to circulate paper without money, [26]
Renewal Fines, Dr. Duigenan and Mr. Stack, S.F.T.C.D., on, [xxix], and note
Resnal, Abbé, quoted, [83], note
Reynolds, Sir Joshua, his likeness of Provost Hutchinson, [Frontispiece]
Robinson, Primate, held visitation in College in 1776, and ruled against Provost Hutchinson, [xxxiv]
Rolls in Examination Hall, [xx]
Round Tower in Great Ship-street, [xcii]
Russia, a powerful rival to Ireland in linen trade, [12]
S.
Sancho Panza, [xiii]
“Scandinavian Kingdom of Dublin,” quoted, [xx], note
Scholars of Trinity College, [l], note
Scholarship, worth of, [xxviii]
Scotland, Protestant families had to remove into, [10], [92]
Secretaries, Principal, of State, [xciv]
"Chief, to Lords, List, Lieutenants, List of, [xcv]
Shaw, Mr., M.P., his speech, 1880, quoted, [lxi], note
Shelburne, Lord, Life of, [lx], [lxi], [lxiii], note
Shewbridge, Mr., F.T.C.D., his death and funeral, [94]
Smith’s “Wealth of Nations”, [72], [73], [145]
Smith’s “Memoirs of Wool”, [59], [77], [107], [145]
South Sea Bubble, [25-26]
Speakers of Irish House of Commons from the Restoration, List of, [xciv]
Speaker Perry, [xviii], and note
Stack, Rev. T., S.F.T.C.D., letter in Bessborough Commission Report, [xxix]
Strafford, Lord, his destruction of the wool trade and substitution of the linen trade, his oppression of the country, [10], [13], [56], [73], [87]
Stubbs, Rev. Dr., F.T.C.D., quoted, [xx], note
St. Michael le Pole’s School, in Great Ship-street, illustrious men educated in, [xciii]
Subsidies granted to Charles I. by Commons and by Clergy, [9]
Swift, Dean, exerted himself for Grattan the Fellow, [xlviii]
"wrote for Alexander Macaulay, [xliv], note
"applied to the Board of College for Dunkin, [lxiv]
"his estimate of Dr. Delany’s income, [xlvi]
Sydney, Lord Justice, his “Quickening Speech” to the Irish Parliament to suppress the trade of the country, [11], [13]
T.
“Tardies”, [xx]
Taxes comparatively heavier in Ireland than in England, [cxiii]
Taylor, his estimate of Provost Hutchinson, [lix]
Temple, Sir William, [11], [107], [130], [148]
Tisdall, Philip, his description of Hutchinson, [xv]
"description of himself, [xxi], note
"verses on, [do.]
"sketch of, [do.]
"lived in Chancery-lane, [xxiii], note
Tontines introduced, 1773, [81]
Townshend, Lord Lieutenant, briber, [lxviii], note
Traynor, Mr., of Essex-quay, [xix], note
Trinity College, the one home of friendless merit, [xxvi]
"its plate, [xxix], note
"estates, [xxix], note
"Park, [xx]
"Calendar, Registry, Judgment, and Matriculation Books quoted, [l], [xxii], [xxvi], [xc]
U.
Ulster lost 30,000 people by emigration in two years (1779), [94]
“Una Cum,” Clause of, in letters patent of Charles I., quoted, discussed by Mr. Miller, [liii]
"not decided by Lord Clare, [lxvi]
"expunged in alterations made by queen’s Letter in 1857, [liii], and note
V.
Visitations in Trinity College in Hutchinson’s time, in 1776 and 1791, [xxxiv], and [lxvi]
W.
Walker’s Hibernian Magazine, quoted, [xxxviii], [xli], [lxvi], [lxvii]
Walpole, Sir Robert, [60]
Walpole, Horace, [lix]
Walpole, Sir Edward, [xcv]
Warbeck, Perkin, [137]
War with Spain, English, Ireland first time taxed for, [44]
Weavers of Dublin, their distress and petition, [27]
Webb, Alfred, his “Irish Biography,” quoted, [xxi]
Webb, Professor, Q.C., his “Faust,” quoted, [x], note
“Wellington Correspondence”, [lxvii]
Wellesley, Sir Arthur, [lxviii], and [lxxxviii]
Werburgh’s, St., Church, Conformity in, [xlvi]
Wesley, Hon. Arthur (Duke of Wellington), on College Parliamentary Committee, voted against Hutchinson, [xliii-l]
"Chief Secretary for Ireland, [lxxxviii]
White Boys, 1762, caused by want of means of industry, [44]
"produced by the English laws, [do.]
Will of Provost Hutchinson, [lxxiv]
"of Mr. Richard Hutchinson, [lxxvi]
"of Philip Tisdall, [xxiii]
"of Dr. Duigenan, [lxxxix]
Wills, Dr., his sketch of Provost Hutchinson, [lx]
""of Dr. Duigenan, [lxxxviii]
William III., his Acts, [cvii]
"his pledge to ruin the Irish wool trade, [cvii]
"willing to act fairly by Ireland, [civ]
Wilson, Sir Robert, [lxxxiii]
“Winstanley’s Poems,” [xx], note
Wool trade, Ireland’s great staple trade, and protected from the time of Edward III., [55]
"ruined by William III., [cvii], [59]
Wool-running detrimental to England, and beneficial to her Continental rivals, [77]
"could not be prevented in this country, [79]
Y.
Yelverton, Barry, his matriculation, a sizar, an usher in Buck’s school, Lord Chief Baron, Lord Avonmore, [lxxxvii], note
"Attorney-General, Recorder of Carrickfergus, M.P., presents the address to Hussey Burgh, his Act for T.C.D. Graduate Law Students, [xii]
Young, Dr., Bishop of Clonfert, Ex-F.T.C.D., [liv]
Printed by M. H. Gill & Son 50 Upper Sackville-street, Dublin.
Footnotes:
[1] His Matriculation is—“1740, April 29th. Johannes Hely, Filius Francisci Gen. Annum agens 17. Natus Corcagii. Educatus sub Dr. Baly. (Tutor) Mr. Lawson.”
[3] Hutchinson had thus achieved very considerable success and distinction when he was thirty-seven years of age—“the fatal year” in the development of genius, according to Lord Beaconsfield. Grattan accomplished his great work at the age of thirty-six, the age at which Lord Byron had finished his poetry. Fitzgibbon, too, ran high in this respect. At twenty-nine he was a leading lawyer, and M.P. for the University, having displaced and replaced the Provost’s son; at thirty-four he was Attorney-General, governing the country. He was Lord Chancellor and a peer before he had attained what Dr. Webb, in his “Faust,” calls “the mature age of forty-one.” He died at 53.
[4] [Pue’s Occur.]
[5] Alnager, or Aulnager, from the Latin Ulna, an ell, was an officer for measuring and stamping cloth in the wool trade. Pranceriana Poetica has the line:—
“Send Prancer back to stamping friezes.”
[6] See his will.
[8] Lord Lieutenant Townshend’s organ was “The Batchelor; or, Speculations of Jeoffrey Wagstaffe, Esq.,” published at the Mercury in Parliament-street, by one Hoey, a popish printer. To be “mimicked by Jephson and libelled by Hoey,” were amongst the social terrors of the period.—[Baratariana.]
[9] Pranceriana has the line, “To storm her fane in Owen’s Arch.”
[10] It was Sir Hercules Langrishe who accounted to Lord Lieutenant Townshend for the marshy and undrained condition of Phœnix Park, by observing that the English Government “had been too much engaged in draining the rest of the kingdom.”
[11] In 1779 the arms which had been intended for the Militia were given by Government to the Volunteers, the Militia Enrolment Act of the previous years not having been carried out, from want of money.
In 1783 the Volunteers were—prematurely—disbanded, and in 1785 the Militia were enrolled, and Langrishe’s Bill obtained from parliament £20,000 for clothing them. Subsequently the Commissioners of Array were appointed.
[12] Anthony Malone, along with so many other grandees of the period, lived in Chancery-lane. It requires an effort of historic faith to realise that the Chancery-lane of to-day was a couple of generations ago the abode of such fashion and rank. The fact, however, is quite certain. St. Bride’s Vestry Book contains a copy of Anthony Malone’s and Alexander MacAulay’s Opinions in re Powell’s Legacy to the Dublin parishes.
[14] Froude details the bargain. In 1771 it was important to secure for the Army Augmentation Bill the support of Hutchinson, who had been patriotising on the Surplus, Pension, and Septennial Bills. His terms to Lord Lieutenant Townshend were, “a provision for the lives of his two sons, one aged 11 and the other 10, by a grant to them or the survivor of them of some office of at least £500 a year. If no vacancy occurred, then either a pension, or a salary to that amount to be attached to some office for them—and his wife to be created a Viscountess.”—“English in Ireland,” vol. i., p. 632, and elsewhere.
[15] Palmerston, the Provost’s private country residence, was a noble and beautifully situated mansion on the banks of the Liffey, between Chapelizod and Lucan. It is now occupied by Stewart’s Idiot Asylum.
[16] Tisdall did not outlive him, and Hutchinson got the Principal Secretaryship.
[17] One of the severest letters in the collection is No. 22, on Edmund Sexten Pery, who, for fourteen years, was Speaker of the House of Commons. Patriotic and eminent as Pery was, and upright and loyal as he always was in the Chair, it cannot be denied that he got the Speakership by an unworthy manœuvre. The passage is fully and bitterly rehearsed in the last volume of the Historical Manuscript Reports. Pery was bought by the corrupter Townshend at the same time with Hutchinson, Tisdall, Flood, &c.
[18] The Court of King’s Bench granted an information in the name of the king, at the prosecution of the Right Hon. Hely Hutchinson, against Samuel Leathley, the printer of the Freeman’s Journal, for publishing in that paper the article signed “Crito,” in November, 1776. The article is not in the “Pranceriana.”—[Freeman’s Journal, June 9th, 1777.]
[19] The Pranceriana Poetica, or Prancer’s Garland, published in 1779, opens,
“A harlequin provost, cognomine prancer;
A duellist, scribbler, a fop, and a dancer;
A lawyer, prime sergeant, and judge of assizes;
A parliament man, and a stamper of friezes;
A councillor privy; a cavalry major;
A searcher and packer, comptroller and gauger;
A speecher, a critic, prescriber of rules;
A founder of fencing and ’questrian schools.
If various employments can give a man knowledge,
Then who knows so much as the head of the College?
******
The Seniors and Juniors in this are agreed,
As a Consul of Rome was Caligula’s steed;
They very much fear that if Prancer was dead
Sir John would appoint a Jackass in his stead.”
(Halliday Collection)
This book also is a collection of fugitive pieces, and it is dedicated to “Sir John Blacquiere, Knight of the Bath, Alnager of all Ireland, and Bailiff of the Phœnix Park.” There is not a copy in the College Library. The Royal Irish Academy copies have the excellent woodcuts. In an autograph note to his own copy of the book, Dr. Stock, F.T.C.D., afterwards Bishop of Killala, says that the engravings were made by his brother, Mr. Frederick Stock, who kept a woollen draper’s shop in Dame-street. He states that the printer, Michael Mills, was forced from his house by a party of college lads, who conveyed him to the College, and there pumped on him; and that the late Prime Serjeant Browne, then a student, had a share in the outrage. Dr. Stock gives the key to the “Poetica,” viz.—Moderator, Prancer, and Hipparchus = the Provost; Dr. Pomposo and Mendex = Dr. Leland; Matthew Ben Sadi and Dr. Dilemma = Dr. Forsayeth; Billy Bib = Dr. Hales; and Bezabel Black-letter = Michael Mills. A copy of the extract is in the possession of Mr. Traynor, Bookseller, Essex-quay.
[20] “Pranceriana Pœtica” says that the Provost multiplied the composition premiums as means of bribery. It gives one of the Provost’s advertisements (1777): “Any student may be a candidate for all, or for any more of the said premiums!”
[21] In Sir Bernard de Gomme’s map of the city and harbour of Dublin, in 1673, given in Mr. Prendergast’s edition of “The Scandinavian Kingdom of Dublin,” p. 229, the college park is marked as set out in paddocks. Dr. Stubbs says that the park was thrown into its present champaign form, laid out, and planted in the year 1722, as appears from “Winstanley’s Poems,” vol. i., p. 269. Dublin: 1742.
[22] Other persons also were satirised occasionally in “Pranceriana,” as, for instance, Philip Tisdall in the following description:—“He was a man formed by nature, and fashioned by long practice, for all manner of court intrigue. His stature was low, so as to excite neither envy nor observation; his countenance dismal, his public manners grave, and his address humble. But as in public he covered his prostitution by a solemnity of carriage, so in private he endeavoured to captivate by convivial humour, and to discountenance all public virtue by the exercise of a perpetual, and sometimes not unsuccessful, irony. To these qualifications he added an extraordinary magnificence of living.(1) His table was furnished with everything that splendour could suggest, or luxury could conceive, and his position and policy united to solicit a multitude of guests. To his house, then, resorted all those who wished through him to obtain, or learn from him to enjoy, without remorse, those public endowments which are the purchase of public infidelity.” Tisdall was depicted in “Baratariana” also. In the pungent rhyme on “The rejection of the Altered Money Bill,” in 1772, we have—
“The next that stepped forward was innocent Phil,
Who said ‘that in things of the kind he’d no skill,
But yet that he thought it a mighty good bill,’
Which nobody can deny.”
And again, in “A list of the Pack,” we have—
“Lo, Tisdall, whose looks would make honest men start,
Who hangs out in his face the black sign of his heart;
If you thought him no devil his aim he would miss,
For he would, if he could, appear worse than he is.
Then kick out these rascally knaves, boys;
Freemen we will be to our graves, boys;
Better be dead than be slaves, boys;
A coffin or freedom for me.”
Philip Tisdall enjoyed a long tenure of very distinguished success. He was educated at Sheridan’s celebrated school in Capel-street, and thence entered Trinity College as a fellow-commoner in 1718. His Matriculation is:—“1718, Nov. 11th. Philip Tisdel. Soc. Com. Educatus Dub. Mag. Sheridan. (Tutor) Mr. Delany.” He took his B.A. in the spring commencements of 1722, the shortened three-and-a-half years’ academic course, as exemplified in the case of Grattan and Fitzgibbon [see [note D]], being a fellow-commoner’s privilege. In 1739, Tisdall was elected simultaneously M.P. for Armagh and for the University. He chose the latter, and succeeded in a parliamentary petition against Alexander Macaulay. He afterwards contested the seat successfully in 1761 against Mr. French, Lord Clonmel’s nominee; and in 1776 unsuccessfully against Provost Hutchinson’s second son. In 1741, Tisdall was promoted Third-Serjeant, in 1751 he was Solicitor-General, and from 1761 till his death he was Attorney-General. In 1761 he was presented by the City of Cork with its freedom in a silver box. The Solicitor-General Gore was, in consequence of some of Tisdall’s trimming, appointed over his head Chief Justice of the King’s Bench, and soon after was created Lord Annaly. Tisdall was a very eminent lawyer, and although not at all an orator, he had great weight and influence in the House of Commons. He commenced political life as a patriot, and became the organ of the Junto. He was then, along with Pery and Hutchinson, bought by the corrupter, Lord Lieutenant Townshend. Tisdall’s house was in Chancery-lane, and his country villa was in Stillorgan. He died in 1777. He was son of Richard Tisdall, Registrar in Chancery, and succeeded his father in the office, 1744. Philip’s wife, Mary, had a pension of one hundred a year, and his brother Thomas was Registrar of the Court of Admiralty. In his will, made 1772, which is in the Public Record Office, he leaves a remembrance to his daughter, Elizabeth Morgan, “heretofore amply provided for.” The whole of his real and personal estate he leaves to his wife Mary. His daughter Elizabeth, by his wife Mary (Singleton), niece and co-heiress of Lord Chief Justice Singleton, was baptised in St. Bride’s Church. She was married to Colonel Morgan, of Cork Abbey, county Wicklow, and was grandmother to the late H. U. Tighe, Dean of Ardagh, and of the Chapel Royal, Dublin, and afterwards of Londonderry.—[Burke’s Landed Gentry, Art., “Tighe of Mitchelstown;” Life of Charlemont. Life of Shelbourne, Record Office, and S. Bride’s Register.]
(1) In the pre-Union times, when a home parliament secured the residence of our aristocracy and gentry, Dublin was famous for its fashion and hospitalities. Primate Stone maintained a lordly style at Leixlip Castle; while, as we read in “Mrs. Delany’s Letters,” Bishop Clayton at St. Woolstons, close by, and in St. Stephen’s-green, kept up an equal grandeur. His house in the Green had a front like Devonshire House, and was magnifique. Mrs. Clayton’s coach, with six flouncing Flanders mares, was not “out-looked by any equipage except the Duke of Dorset’s, for she would not be outshone by her neighbours, a thing not easily done here.” The Delanys entertained Viceroyalty at Delville, fed their own deer, and went about in a coach-and-six. Luke Gardiner’s (Lord Mountjoy) house in the Phœnix Park was the head-quarters of fashionable life(a); and Hussey Burgh drove his coach-and-six, with outriders. The wealthy wool, linen, silk, &c., mercers, of Bride-street and Golden-lane, kept good style and equipages also, as appears by their wills in the Public Record Office.
(a) Gardiner was Master of the Revels, and Surveyor-General of Customs.
[24] Flood, who did not get the provostship, bequeathed, by his will, in 1791, to the college, his estate in Kilkenny, worth £5,000 a year, to found and endow a professorship of the Erse or Irish language, and to establish a library of manuscripts and books in that language, and in the modern polished languages. Provost Hutchinson did not leave a shilling to the college. Flood’s bequest fell through owing to his illegitimacy. He entered Trinity College as a fellow-commoner, completed his junior sophister terms, and then migrated ad eundem to Oxford.—[Flood’s “Life of Flood,” and Webb’s “Com. Biog.”]
[25] He was a Commissioner of Barracks; as was also Sir Herc. Langrishe. Langrishe was, besides, Commissioner of Revenue and Commissioner of Excise.
[26] There does not seem to have been any Mr. Barlow in these servile days to exercise the ancient tribunitial power of the Senior Master Non Regent—the power to veto, in the name of the community, dishonouring presentations to honorary degrees.
[28] In 1726, Primate Boulter wrote that unless a new Englishman was appointed to a then vacant bishopric there would be thirteen Irish bishops to nine English, to the Primate’s great dismay. The Editor of “Boulter’s Letters,” in 1770, adds, in a note, that there was at one time in the Irish House of Lords a majority of native bishops, of whom five had been fellows of the University, viz., Drs. Howard, Synge, Clayton, Whitcombe (Archbishop of Cashel), and Berkeley. These are, probably, the five alluded to by Duigenan. In a pamphlet entitled “Thoughts on the Present State of the College of Dublin,” published in 1782, the well-informed author says that in King William’s reign, at or nearly at the same time, “the people saw ten prelates on the bench, who had been Fellows.” The writer says that there was a great increase in the number of students—that the undergraduates were 565, the average of entrances 144 yearly, and the average of B.A. degrees, 78.—[Halliday Collection.]
We can ourselves remember, dating from the year 1830, eight bishops and one archbishop, all Ex-Fellows. Altogether “there have been seven archbishops and forty-two bishops of the Irish Church chosen from amongst the Fellows of Trinity College. Eight have become Members of Parliament, and six have been raised to the Judicial Bench.”—[Coll. Cal.]
[29] This seems not to have been the case in Dr. Delany’s time. See Primate Boulter’s Letters, and Mrs. Delany’s, and Swift’s.
[31] The rack-renting cannot have been very exorbitant, inasmuch as the average rent per acre now paid to the College by its perpetuity tenants is four shillings and twopence. The great bulk of the College property is situated in the counties of Armagh, Kerry, and Donegal. The following statement gives in round numbers the acreage and rental:—
| Acres. | Rent. | Rent per acre. | |||||
| Armagh, | 23,000 | £9,600 | 8s. | 4d. | |||
| Kerry, | 60,000 | 11,500 | 3s. | 10d. | |||
| Donegal, | 62,700 | 9,000 | 2s. | 10d. | |||
| Total, | 145,700 | £30,100 | 4s. | 2d. | |||
The number of perpetuity holdings let by the College are in all fifty-four; four only are let to persons of the class of tenant-farmers; of the remaining fifty, sixteen, containing over 60,000 acres, are enjoyed by three lessees, who pay the College an average rent of 3s. 5d. per acre.—[See Letter by Rev. J. A. Galbraith, S.F.T.C.D., Bursar, Freeman’s Journal, March 6, 1882, and also “Statement to the Chief Secretary.”—Freeman, March, 15, 1882.]
[32] The renewal fines in 1850 averaged £6,700 a year. The arbitration at that time between the College and the tenants cost the College £3,000.—[See Letter by Rev. T. Stack, S.F.T.C.D., Registrar, printed in the Report of the Bessborough Commission, and also “Statement” as above.]
[33] This charge, as it stands, rests on a slender foundation, and is very misleading. The catalogue of the College plate, which, to guard against such imputations in future, Mr. Hingston, the Chief Steward, has drawn up with so much care and skill, shows that the old inscribed plate is still in use; and it enumerates pieces dated as early as 1632 and 1638. A selection of the service was sent over, in Mr. Hingston’s charge, to the late South Kensington Exhibition, and was greatly admired by all who were conversant with antique silver art—some of the choicest pieces being facsimiled for the London Institution. The collection of plate is abundant, and the store was accumulated in this way. It used to be the custom that all students at entrance should deposit “caution money,” which was returned to them on graduation. The rich men and Fellow Commoners, instead of taking back the money, used to present it to the College in the form of inscribed goblets or tankards, and in the course of years there was a large assortment of these offerings. Provost Hutchinson had a number of these tankards melted down and refashioned into the present silver plates, and this he did with the consent of the Board. Before Hutchinson’s time a large quantity of the plate was sold by the Board, and the produce was invested in the purchase of land. In 1689, when James II. seized on the College, the Vice-Provost and Fellows sold £30 worth of the plate for subsistence of themselves and the Scholars. At the same time all the rest of the plate was seized on and taken away to the Custom House by Col. Luttrel, King James’s Governor of the city, but it was preserved and afterwards restored to the College.—[See Mr. Hingston’s Catalogue and Coll. Cal. List of Fellows, 1689.]
[34] In 1775, seven marriage dispensations by King’s Letters were obtained.—[Lib. Mun.]
[35] In 1796, the term of grace was extended to a twelvemonth by a King’s Letter.—[Lib. Mun.]
[36] The following—the 5th verse in Milliken’s ever popular song, “The Groves of Blarney”—was an impromptu addition at an electioneering dinner in the south of Ireland in 1798. It is said to have been intended as an insult to Lord Donoughmore, who was present, but his Lordship’s readiness completely turned the tables. He applauded the verse, and in a humorous speech acknowledged the relationship, thanked the author, and toasted the Murphy’s, Clearys, Helys, and others who in the recent political contest had ventured life and limb in support of the Hutchinson cause, and had thus made their blood-relationship with him unquestionable.
“’Tis there’s the kitchen hangs many a flitch in,
With the maids a stitching upon the stair;
The bread and biske’, the beer and whiskey,
Would make you frisky if you were there.
’Tis there you’d see Peg Murphy’s daughter
A washing praties forenint the door,
With Roger Cleary, and Father Healy,
All blood relations to my Lord Donoughmore.
Oh, Ullagoane.”
Lord Hutchinson always heartily enjoyed this verse, which has become completely identified with Milliken’s song.—(See Crofton Croker’s “Popular Songs of Ireland,” pp. 144-8.)
Father Prout has not translated this verse. Why does not Professor Tyrrell render it, Græce et Latine?
[37] He challenged Mr. Doyle to single combat for daring to issue an address to the University constituency against his (the Provost’s) son’s candidature. Mr. Doyle was a helpless invalid at the time, and had to stand on a spread-out coat, for fear of cold; the combatants met on Summer-hill, “fired a pistol each, and made up the matter without blood.” Hutchinson had previously challenged Dr. Lucas, the patriot, who was crippled with rheumatism.
[38] The number now is 1,338, of whom 789 are “Residents”—i.e., living within reach of College opportunities. [See Dr. Haughton’s return analysis, quoted in the Freeman’s Journal of January 7, 1882.] The number of students on the books under the degree of M.A. is 1,253 [see College Calendar for 1882, page 434]. The number of interns now is 250.
[40] On this Visitation “Pranc. Poet.” has—
“Disgrac’d by libels, worried by his foes
Poor Prancer labours under endless woes;
He therefore only supplicates your Grace
That right or wrong you’ll keep him in his place.”
The Visitation lasted five days, and was held before Primate Robinson as Vice-Chancellor for the Duke of Gloucester, and Archbishop Cradock of Dublin. Hutchinson published a pamphlet reviling the Visitors, and pronouncing their decision invalid.
[41] A King’s Letter was obtained for raising the salary for this special occasion.—Lib. Mun.
[42] Duigenan did not execute this intention, as appears by the following record, kindly supplied by Dr. Carson, S.F.T.C.D.:—“I have to inform you that I have gone carefully through the College Register for the years 1777 and 1778, and I cannot find therein the least trace of any Visitation having been held in either of these years. The censure on Dr. Duigenan is duly recorded under its proper date, in the year 1777; but no further Collegiate notice appears to have been taken of it.”
[43] Walker’s Hiber. Mag. 177-8.
[44] Grattan’s Life, and Hib. Mag.
[45] The Round Robiners probably bethought of the case of 1753 when the patriots who resisted the Court in the matter of the disposal of surplus revenue were dismissed from office by Primate Stone. They, no doubt, were afterwards reinstated with honour, but the conspirators of 1789 had to deal with John Fitzgibbon.—[See “Plowden,” p. 311, &c.]
[46] Froude, vol. ii., p. 509.
[47] Barry Yelverton was an unsuccessful candidate in this College Election of 1776. In the next year he was elected for Donegal, Belfast, and Carrickfergus, and chose the last.—[Ho. Co. Jour.]
It was as Recorder of Carrickfergus that Barry Yelverton presented Hussey Burgh with an address and the freedom of that Corporation in a gold box for resisting the Government on the question of Supplies while Prime Serjeant, and losing his place thereby. [Freeman’s Journal, Jan. 4, 1780.]
[48] Walker’s Hibernian Magazine, Freeman’s Journal, and Exshaw’s Magazine.
[49] “The case of the Borough of Trinity College, near Dublin, as heard before a Select Committee of the House of Commons, A.D. 1791.”
[50] Swift made an eager canvass for MacAulay, and wrote to Pope, asking him to write to Lord George (then Mr.) Lyttleton, who was private secretary to Frederick, Prince of Wales, the Chancellor of the University. The prince complied with the request, and Tisdall’s supporters sent over a remonstrance.—[“Swift’s Letters.”]
[51] This Francis Stoughton Sullivan got Scholarship, in 1744, at fifteen, and was probably one of the youngest Scholars and the youngest Fellow in the college records.
[52] He published, through the University Press, in 1797, a scholarly Edition of “Longinus,” and was the author of several other works. (See an interesting sketch of his life prefixed to Bohn’s edition of his “Philosophy of History.”)
[53] “About a month ago considerable sensation was created in Oxford by the rumour that one of the University examiners, who is also a “coach,” had prepared his private pupils in the precise questions set for examination. This, we may observe, was one of the heavy charges brought against Provost Hely Hutchinson, of Trinity College, about a century ago, the Provost having had recourse to the unprincipled manœuvre as an electioneering dodge. The ever-memorable Counsellor Peter Burrowes, when arraigning the Provost before a committee of the Irish House of Commons, said that his trick “would have made a docile parrot appear superior to Sir Isaac Newton;” but the committee condoned the Provost, against the judgment and votes of Arthur Wesley (Duke of Wellington) and Lord Edward Fitzgerald. The Oxford authorities seem not to be disposed to view so leniently the action of Mr. Philip Aldred, D.C.L. When the matter was reported to the Vice-Chancellor a substitute for the transgressing examiner was at once appointed. We believe that a University committee has been appointed to consider the expediency of taking away Mr. Aldred’s degrees—as was done in the Tractarian controversy days with Mr. Ward, the author of the “Ideal;” and, meanwhile, Mr. Aldred is now about to bring his case before the public, with the protest that he has been condemned unheard, after challenging investigation, and that he is able and willing to meet every charge brought against him.”—[Freeman’s Journal, Jan. 13th, 1882.]
[54] He was prevented from voting, not by any University or College statute, but by the Penal Law of 1727, which took away the franchise from Catholics. All the long past exclusiveness of the college, detrimental as it was to the college and to the country, was enjoined by the foreign power which cared little for the advancement of either. Down to this period the English legislature did not recognise at all the existence of Catholics in the college, believing them to be effectually excluded by the statute enforcing attendance at Anglican worship and Sacrament, and by the Supremacy and anti-Transubstantiation Declarations for Degrees, which were swept away by the Act of 1792.
[55] In 1725, Primate Boulter estimated that Dr. Delany, a Senior Fellow, and “the greatest pupil-monger,” had from Fellowship and pupils six or seven hundred pounds per annum.—[Letters.]
Swift, in 1730, computed that Delany, “by the benefit of the pupils, and his Senior Fellowship, with all its perquisites, received every year between nine hundred and a thousand pounds.”—[Works, vol. xiii., p. 82.]
Duigenan, in 1777, reckoned Dr. Leland’s Senior Fellowship at “£800, one year with another.”—[Lachrymæ.]
In 1777, it was considered surprising that Dr. Leland refused the living of Benburb, worth £1,000 a year, while his college income fell short of £700 a year.—[Exshaw’s Magazine, 1777.]
[56] In 1713, Swift wrote to Stella:—“I have been employed in endeavouring to save one of your Junior Fellows (Mr. Charles Grattan) who came over here for a dispensation from taking orders, and in soliciting it has run out his time, and now his Fellowship is void if the College pleases, unless the queen suspends the execution and gives him time to take Orders. I spoke to all the ministers about it yesterday; but they say, ‘the queen is angry and thought it but a trick to deceive her;’ and she is positive, and so the man must be ruined, for I cannot help him. I never saw him in my life, but the case was so hard, I could not forbear interposing. Your Government recommended him to the Duke of Ormond, and he thought they would grant it; and by the time it was refused, the Fellowship by rigour is forfeited.” The College Calendar has, “Charles Grattan, Fellow, 1710—removed for not taking Holy Orders, May 25th, 1713—Master of Enniskillen School, 1714.”—[Journal, Letter lxii., March 29th.]
[57] He got Scholarship along with his brother Robert, in 1775. The brothers Roberts, the present Senior Fellows, did the same in 1836.
[58] Denis George’s name does not appear in the list of scholars. He took his B.A. in 1773. Neither does Tankerville Chamberlain’s. He graduated in 1774.
[59] From the ranks of the Scholars have proceeded 13 Provosts, 199 Fellows; 1 Archbishop; 16 Bishops, of whom two held English sees; 4 Lord Chancellors; 2 Lords Justices; 29 Judges; 27 M.P.’s; 4 Vice-Chancellors; 18 Deans; 14 Governors, &c., of British dependencies; renowned Professors in all the Faculties, and nearly all the distinguished schoolmasters of the country; 1 Poet Laureate, and several celebrated authors and editors, besides numerous eminent clergymen and lawyers. This is exclusive of the enumeration [page xxvi] of the dignities obtained by Scholar-Fellows.
[60] It is even more remarkable that this matter was not mentioned by Duigenan.
[61] In the petition of 1778 one of the points set forth was that Scholars and Fellows should be legal Protestants to entitle them to vote, whereas the Provost had received for his son and Yelverton the votes of some who were not Protestants at the time of their election.
[62] Catholics and Nonconformists were not excluded from Scholarship by the statutes or by any oath. They were, however, designedly, and in the main effectually, excluded by the statute that all scholars, students, and sizars should attend chapel and partake of Holy Communion as often as it was administered (see “History of University,” Coll. Cal., 1876, vol. ii. p. 9), and the “Heron Visitation” (Chartæ and Statuta, vol. ii., p. 3, 1862). Attendance on the Anglican Chapel service and Communicating were of course intended as tests and pledges of Conformity.
[63] Parliamentary Debates.
[64] William Conyngham, Lord, and Lord Chancellor Plunket was the son of the Rev. Thomas Plunket, minister of the Strand-street Unitarian Congregation, who died on the 18th Sept., 1776. There is a very eulogistic notice of him in the Freeman’s Journal of the date.
[65] Down to the alterations made in the Statutes by the Queen’s Letter of 1855, the words of the Lit. Pat. of Charles I. were:—“in quem vel quos major pars Sociorum Seniorum unâ cum Præposito, vel eo absente, Vice Præposito consensisse deprehendetur, is, vel illi pro electo vel electis habeantur, et mox pronunciabuntur a Præposito. Quod si primo, vel Secundo Scrutinio electorum major pars, cum Præposito, vel eo absente, Vice Præposito non consenserint, eo casu in tertio Scrutinio, is, vel illi pro electo, vel electis sunto, quem, vel quos, Præpositus, vel eo absente Vice Præpositus, nominabit.” [Caput xxv. De Elect. form. et temp.]
[66] See also “An Enquiry how far the Provost of Trinity College is invested with a negative on the Proceedings of the Senior Fellows” (1790), by Dr. Young, Ex-Fellow and afterwards Bishop of Clonfert. It takes the same view of the case as that put forward in Miller’s pamphlet.—[Halliday Collection.]
[67] Note A.
[68] Hutchinson had to say to three of these affairs of honour, and according to Duigenan he came badly out of all of them. Duigenan himself, it should be observed, once had a sham duel, in which he did not figure at all brilliantly, according to the orthodox interpretation of the code. He had insulted Sir Richard Borough so grossly that a meeting could not be evaded, and when the paces were measured Duigenan refused to take up the pistols, which in due form were laid at his feet. He then shouted to the “old rascal to fire away,” and when Borough thereon left the field Duigenan declined to fight with his second, because he “had too great a regard for him to kill him.”
[69] In George Faulkner’s “Epistle to Howard” (1771), contained in the Halliday Collection in the Royal Irish Academy, we have—
“Thou Hutchinson whom every muse
With winning grace and art endues,
Whose power ’gainst prejudice contends
And proves that law and wit are friends—
In that promiscuous page alone
By letters J. H. H. art known.”
[70] [“Life of Lord Charlemont.”]
[72] “History of the University of Dublin,” p. 253, &c.
[73] “Froude,” vol. ii. p. 104.
[74] “Distinguished Irishmen,” vol. v. p. 233, &c.
[75] “English in Ireland,” passim.
[76] Barrè was over here at that time as Vice-Treasurer, &c. He received the Freedom of Dublin in 1776.
[77] The Bill was to raise the army in Ireland to 15,500 men. Pery and the Nationalists saw that the object of the Crown was to have troops to send to America to crush the Colonists, and this they would not have on any terms. The Government, in reply, passed an Act through the English Parliament, giving satisfactory security that the full force of 12,000 should be kept in Ireland. Nationalists now have not to complain of any want of troops in this country, and we do not hear of their demanding any “satisfactory assurance” of the permanence of the forces.
Nothing could exceed the eagerness of the English Ministry to have the Army Augmentation Bill passed through the Irish Parliament. Lord Shelbourne, the English Home Secretary, wrote to Lord Lieutenant Townshend (March 1768) (a) that he would not hear of Malone’s and Hutchinson’s suggestions of delay in bringing in the Bill. He further announced that the English Parliament had passed an Act taking off the limitation of the troops in Ireland, imposed by the 10th of William III., and pledging that a full force of 12,000 men should be kept in Ireland. Sexten Pery led the opposition, which defeated the Bill by a majority of four. The Irish parliament was prorogued and dissolved, and did not meet for sixteen months, when they again threw out the Army Bill. Eventually, in November, 1769, Townshend succeeded in having the clause carried in another Act, whereby 3,235 men, in addition to the 12,000 to be kept here, were voted.
In 1775, Lord Lieutenant Harcourt asked for 4,000 men for the king out of the Irish establishment to be despatched to America, and he offered to supply their place by German Protestant troops. Anthony Malone was chairman of the Parliamentary Committee which, after a warm debate, granted the contingent as “armed negotiators,” but rejected the Hessians. Grattan afterwards fiercely, and not unfairly, assailed Flood for carrying this discreditable measure. The troops were in time for the surrenders at Saratoga and Yorktown. Lord Edward Fitzgerald, one regrets to read, served on this expedition as aide-de-camp to Lord Moira. Lord Effingham, on the other hand, resigned his regiment rather than serve against those who were struggling for freedom, and he was twice publicly thanked by the people of Dublin.—[Plowden and Mitchell.]
In 1782, the king was allowed to draw 5,000 men out of the kingdom. In 1793, the Irish force was raised to 20,232. Most of these acts were for one year.
(a) “Life of Shelbourne,” vol. ii., p. 12.
[78] In the debate (1772) on the Altered Money Bill, Hutchinson seems to have recovered his prudence.
[79] Another page shows how he was compensated for this “trifling profit” of the Prime Serjeancy.
[80] Baratariana says:—
“The Prime Serjeant, then, with a shuffling preamble
Like a nag that before he can canter must amble,
Betwixt right and wrong made a whimsical shamble,
Which nobody can deny.
’Twas important, he said, and availed not a groat;
But whether ’twas right or whether ’twas naught,
Or whether he’d vote for it, or whether he’d not
He’d neither assert nor deny.”
[81] One of the rewards that Hutchinson demanded from the Government as the price of his support was, that his wife should be made a baroness. [Lord Lieutenant Townshend’s letter, quoted by Froude, vol. ii., p. 67, and by Lord Fitzmaurice, vol. ii., p. 102.]
[83] Froude, vol. ii., p. 50.
[84] [Plowden.] In 1736 the Board granted an allowance of £100 a year to Mr. Dunkin (who was Ball’s predecessor in the Great Ship-street School), on Swift’s appeal.—[See Swift’s Letters.]
[85] Walk. Hib. Mag. 1777.
[86] Walk. Hib. Mag. 1791.
[87] In 1771, John Ponsonby resigned the Speakership rather than present to Lord Townshend the adulatory Address of the House of Commons, and Pery was, by Government influence, elected in his room.
[88] See Wellington’s Correspondence.
[89] Grattan said Townsend was a corrupter, and Buckingham a jobber in a mask.
[90] On this prorogation, “Baratariana” has—
“Our worthy Lieutenant comes down to the House,
Protests their proceedings are not worth a louse,
And leaving undone the affairs of the nation,
The session concludes with a d——d prorogation,
Derry down.
“Here mark, my dear friends, that our ruin’s completed
Since a parliament’s useless which thus can be treated;
While they served his foul purpose he’ll fawn and collogue them,
But if once they do right he’ll that instant prorogue them.
Derry down.”
[91] In 1739 the English parliament passed an Act removing the duties on some of the Irish Woollen Exports, and this was done for the benefit of the English wool manufacturers.
[92] Out of 300 members 104 held places, and 120 were nominated by patrons under the influence of Government. The civil establishment, with its contingent expenses, amounted to over half a million sterling a year, while the entire revenue of the kingdom was under a million and a quarter.—[Pery.] In 1789, Lord Jocelyn presented to the House, by order, the list of pensions. The civil pensions amounted to £97,850, and the military pensions to £5,827.
In Grattan’s Life, vol. iv., p. 14, the placemen in parliament are enumerated, and the list shows:—
| In the military department | 36 | |
| In the law do | 38 | |
| In the revenue do | 38 | |
| In state and miscellaneous do | 9 | |
| Pensions | 7 | |
| Total | 109 |
Lib. Mun. vol. i. part 1, enumerates 389 patent offices in the establishment of Ireland—amongst them are: Keeper of the Signet, Under Secretary of State for the Civil Department, do. for Military Do., Pursuivant, Master of the Game, Interpreter of Irish tongue, Star Chamber, with Commissioners, Marshals, clerks, &c., Courts of Wards and Liveries with Masters; fœdaries, &c., the Court of Palatines, the Lord Almoner, the Vice-Treasurer, Transcriptor and Foreign Apposer, Summonister and Clerk of Estreats, the Trustees of the Linen Manufacture, Commissioners of Wide Streets, Commissioners of Array, Constables of Castles, Muster Master General, Commissioners for Victualling, Provincial Provost Martials, Alnager, Clerk of the Pells, Vice-treasurer, Clerk of the Lords, Clerk of the Commons, six Clerks of Chancery, Principal Secretaries of State, Prime Serjeant, Lord High Treasurer, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Auditor-General, Commissioners of Treasury, Commissioners of Accounts, First Clerk, Second and Third Clerk to do.; Commissioner of Appeals, Commissioners of Stamps, Hearth Money Collectors, Poll Tax Collectors, Cursitors in Chancery, Register of Appeals Spiritual, Clerk of the Pipe, Prothonotary, Philizer, or Filacer Clerk of Privy Council, Wine-taster, Escheator, Searcher, Packers, Craners, Seneschals, Presidents of the Four Provinces, Governors of Forts, Clerks of the First Fruits, Deputy Master of the Rolls, Examinators, Master of the Revels, Clerk of the Nickells, Exigenter, Clerk of the Outlawries, Clerk of the Essions, Chirographers, Sirographers, &c., &c.
[93] The first real and important debate in the Irish Parliament was in 1753, on the Money Bill, on the Commons’ power to dispose of surplus revenue.
The beginning of useful practical legislation for the country was made in 1757 by Edmund Sexten Pery’s Land Carriage Act, giving bounties on the land carriage of corn to Dublin. In the same year he carried another Act giving bounties on ship carriage of coal to Dublin.
[94] In the single year of 1782 (short parliaments and free trade having been already secured)—
The Bank of Ireland was established.
Habeas Corpus was made law.
The Sacramental test for Protestant nonconformists was abolished.
Poyning’s Act and 6th of George I. were repealed.
The perpetual Mutiny Act was repealed.
Judges appointed quam diu.
A great Catholic Relief Act, including education, was carried.
Parliamentary independence was achieved.
Grattan’s parliament did not keep up to this high level of public spirit. It sank and perished by its own unreformed corruption.
[95] “Free Trade for Ireland,” in 1779, meant something quite distinct from the political economy free trade of the present day. The latter means an exemption from all duties to the State on exports and imports; whereas the former meant a release from the restrictions on Irish trade imposed by England for the benefit of England. The reform of 1779 continued the duties, but enjoined that they should be imposed by the native parliament for the benefit of the Irish kingdom. The Irish Free Trade Parliament was Protectionist. In the November of 1779 Grattan’s amendment on the Address, supported by Hussey Burgh and the volunteers, demanding Free Trade, was carried. In February 1780 the concession was made by England, and the Provost’s book had a large share in the triumph.—[See Mitchel.]
It was on the debate on the Short Supply in connection with this measure that Hussey Burgh said, and lost the Prime Serjeancy for saying, “The English have sowed their laws like serpents’ teeth and they have sprung up in armed men.”
[96] One other provost, Archbishop Loftus; one chancellor, Lord Cairns; two vice-chancellors, Bishop Jones and John Fitzgibbon; one fellow, Bishop Howard; and three scholars, Yelverton, Wolfe, and Plunket, also founded noble houses.
[97] See the summary of his speech in Plowden.
[99] It is not said what either the real or the personal estate amounted to. In De Burgh’s “Landowners of Ireland,” the Donoughmore property is set down at 11,950 acres, with the Government valuation of £10,466. The Tipperary portion is 4,711 acres, and £4,764. The other portions are situate in Galway, Cork, Dublin, Kilkenny, Louth, Monahan, Waterford, and Wexford.
[100] He does not say what price he paid for it, or from whom he purchased it. Probably it was part of his place-traffic with Blaquiere.
[101] Doubtless this is the “A. Hely Hutchinson” whose autograph appears in the Preacher’s Book of S. Bride’s, Dublin, in the year 1796. Under the autograph there is written, in a different hand and in different ink, “Now an officer in H.M.’s Service.”
[102] This is the only mention of the College; in the Will. The Provost left it no bequest, and did not even designate himself as Provost.
[103] This direction has never been carried out. The MS. is known to be in existence; and would it not be seemly and desirable to have it deposited in the College Manuscript Room?
[104] Duigenan’s matriculation is—
1753—June. Patricius Duigenan, Siz., Filius Annum agens 16. Educatus sub ferula Mr. Sheill. Natus in Comtu Derri.
Dr. Lawson.
It would be a pity not to give the matriculation above his—
“Barry Yelverton, Siz. Filius Franc. Gen. Annum agens 17. Educatus sub. fer. Mr. Egan. Natus in Comtu Cork.
Mr. Radcliffe.”
These two poor Sizar boys, one from the North and the other from the South—meeting probably for the first time in the College hall and sitting side by side—what careers the College opened to them! Probably, there is not in all the matriculation books a more interesting page than the page which contains these two consecutive entries.
[105] “Wellington Correspondence.”
[106] For a full account of this school see “The Old Latin Schools of Dublin,” by the Editor.
[107] Fitzgibbon’s father had been a Catholic, and was intended for the priesthood. He and his wife Eleanor are buried in St. Bride’s churchyard, without any sort of monument or tombstone.
[108] Mr. Blackburne’s “Causes of the Decadence of the Industries of Ireland,” p. 19.
There are two copies of the work in the College Library, both of which have been recently obtained, and from one of them, by the obliging indulgence of the Provost and Board, the present re-issue is taken.
[109] Froude—“English in Ireland,” vol. ii., p. 228.
[110] See the State Papers of Henry VIII., and the official certificates almost ever since. See also Lord O’Hagan’s Address to the Social Science Congress in Dublin, 1881. If any of these pronouncements were right, it would be difficult to discover any room for future improvement. All of these glowing congratulations were, however, invariably exposed and exploded by sober contemporary historians and observers, and the O’Hagan passage illustrates the process. His lordship said: “I have indicated to you the results of honest effort by Irishmen of this generation in obtaining for their country amended laws, cheap and facile justice—education liberal, unconditioned, and available to all—... increased provision for the national health and comfort—and security in his possessions and encouragement to his industry for the tiller of the soil. In the midst of many troubles and much discouragement, these have been steps of real cheering progress—improvements, permanently conquered from the past, and auspicious, as they will be fruitful, of a happier future.” Compare with this charming view the following versions.
In his speech in the adjourned debate on the Address in the House of Commons, January, 1881, Mr. Shaw, M.P. for Cork County, showed the value of this “real cheering progress,” and of the “permanent improvements and increased provisions for the national health and comfort.” “Within three or four months,” said Mr. Shaw, “I have gone through various parts of the country, and I must say this—I did not think it possible for human beings to exist as I found tenant-farmers existing in the West of Ireland.... It is a disgrace to the landlords, it is a disgrace to the Government, it is a disgrace to every institution in the country to think of it that now for years, for generations, this cry year after year has been coming up from the people.”
In the debate on the 28th of January Mr. Gladstone said that “there are still hundreds of thousands in Ireland who live more or less on the brink of starvation, and that forty years ago that was the case not with hundreds of thousands but with millions.”
A writer in the current number of the Quarterly Review, after picturing the maddened and disturbed state of the country, adds:—
“And all this with between four and five hundred suspects in gaols with an army of 50,000 men in the country, with Land Bills, Coercion Bills, Proclamations, new magisterial boards, the island parcelled out into military districts, spies, informers, and all the endless appliances of a Liberal Government in full operation.”
See, too, what Mr. Justice O’Hagan said in his judgment on the Stacpoole leases. It is not very easy to reconcile these four unassailable statements of facts with the smooth optimism of the ex-Lord Chancellor, although without question the “Conquests” enumerated by him have been, as he says, won. The truth is that these specialist statistics are no more a real index of the condition of the country than a brick is an index of the quality of a house. There is no use in attempting to deny that England—both when meaning well and meaning ill—has kept Ireland in a deplorable condition.
[111] Concerning this debate “Pepys’ Diary,” vol. iv., p. 109, records—1666—October 8th:—“The House did this day order to be engrossed the Bill against importing Irish Cattle—a thing, it seems, carried on by the Western Parliament men wholly against the sense of most of the rest of the House; who think if you do this you give the Irish again cause to rebel. Thus plenty on both sides makes us mad.”
P. 135—1666. October 27th:—“Thence to talk about publique business; he [Lord Belassis] tells me how the two Houses begun to lie troublesome, the Lords to have quarrels one with another. My Lord Duke of Buckingham having said to the Lord Chancellor (who is against the passing of the Bill for prohibiting the bringing over of Irish cattle) that whoever was against the Bill was there led to it by an Irish interest or an Irish understanding, which is as much as to say he is a foole. This bred heat from my Lord Chancellor, and something he [Buckingham] said did offend my Lord of Ossory (my Lord Duke of Ormonde’s son), and they two had hard words, upon which the latter sends a challenge to the former; of which the former complains to the House, and so the business is to be heard on Monday.” Clarendon and Carte attribute cowardice to Buckingham in the matter. Both he and Ossory were sent to the Tower. The Bill, as noticed above, was subsequently passed.
[112] “Life of Ormond,” vol. iv., p. 234, &c.
[113] Ten years later Dublin sent out a cargo of provisions valued at £937 13s. to New England, and the benevolence was gratefully and gracefully commemorated in 1880 by Captain Potter, of the Constellation, when he brought over America’s consignment to our famishing agriculturists, and received the honorary freedom of our city. It may be noted, too, that ten years before the contribution to London, Dublin sent a relief amounting to £1,000 to the Waldenses, when suffering from the persecution of the Duke of Savoy. The last-named collection was made by a Cromwellian Fellow of Trinity College, the Rev. Samuel Mather, an excellent man, who on the Restoration was thrown into a Dublin prison, probably the “Black Dog,” for declining to sign the Act of Uniformity. The New England collection was made by his brother, the Rev. Nathaniel Mather, Minister of the New-row Meeting-house. The collection for London was made by the Duke of Ormond.
[114] This encouragement of the linen trade here proved a hypocrisy and imposture. The linen trade was never an equivalent for the wool trade.
[115] Excepting, perhaps, Poyning’s Act, and the Act of Union, this was the most disgraceful Act ever passed by an Irish Parliament.
[116] See page [lxx], note, and [35].
[117] See page [lxx], note, and [43].
[118] It was on the Army Augmentation Bill that Hutchinson made one of his early “strides in apostasy.” It was on this occasion also that Ireland was for the first time called upon to contribute to England’s war expenses. She passed a vote of credit for £200,000. See pages [44], [46].
[119] The condition of the people would thus seem to have declined from what it was a century before. In 1672, Petty stated in his “Political Anatomy,” that the drink of the Irish people was milk, and in winter small beer or water; and that their food was bread made into cakes, with eggs and rancid butter, and with muscles, cockles, and oysters, on the sea-shore parts.
[120] There are also several inaccuracies in the printed edition, which are reproduced as they stand. E.g., in page 81 “between £12,000 and £13,000” is set down as an increase on £1,100,000; and Petty’s “Survey” is throughout put for his Political Anatomy. In the note to page 127 the literal misprints in the Greek quotation are corrected. The line is given “as Homer quoted by Longinus,” and as if it were a Homeric line, but it is not a hexameter at all. The quotation joins the beginning of one line to a portion of another, and it is needless to say that the break was duly notified by Longinus, though apparently it was not perceived by the Provost.
The passage occurs in the 17th book of the Odyssey, V.V. 323-3:—
“Ἡμισυ γαρ τ᾽ ᾽αρετῆς ἀποαίνυται ἐυρυόπα Ζευς
᾽Ανε᾽ρος, ἐῦτ᾽ αν μιν κατα δουλιον ἧμαρ ἔλησιν.”
Rendered by Pope,
“Jove fix’d it certain, that whatever day
Makes man a slave, takes half his worth away.”
[121] See Freeman’s Journal, Nov. 3 and Nov. 24, 1881.
[122] Querist, 134.
[123] On account of the inability of Ireland, Great Britain, since Christmas, 1778, relieved her from the burden of paying forces abroad.
[124] A sum of £50,000 has been lately sent from England for that purpose.
[125] By a Proclamation, dated the 3rd of February, 1776, on all ships and vessels laden in any of the ports in this kingdom with provisions of any kind, but not to extend to ships carrying salted beef, pork, butter and bacon into Great Britain or provisions to any part of the British empire except the Colonies mentioned in the said Proclamation. 4th of January, 1779, taken off as far as it relates to ships carrying provisions to any of the ports of Europe.
[126] Its tranquillity was so well established in 1611, that King James reduced his army in Ireland to 176 horse and 1,450 foot; additional judges were appointed, circuits established throughout the kingdom (2nd Cox, 17); and Sir John Davis observes that no nation under the sun loves equal and indifferent justice better than the Irish (Davis, pp. 184-196).
[127] 13 Jac., ch. 1.
[128] Vol. i. Com. Journ., p. 92.
[129] Vol. i. Com. Journ., p. 61.
[130] Ib., p. 88.
[131] 1 Davis, pp. 1, 193, 194.
[132] Cox’s Hist. of Ireland, vol. ii., p. 91.
[133] Ib. Some of these subsidies, from the subsequent times of confusion, were not raised.
[134] Cox, vol. ii., p. 33.
[135] Leland’s Hist. of Ireland, vol. iii., p. 31.
[136] Lord Strafford’s Letters, vol. ii., p. 297.
[137] Ir. Com. Journ., vol. i., pp. 228-229.
[138] Lord Clarendon, Cox, ib., Ir. Com. Journ., vol. ii., pp. 280, 311.
[139] Archbishop King in his State of the Protestants of Ireland, pp. 52, 53, 445, 446; Lord Chief Justice Keating’s Address to James the Second, and his Letters to Sir John Temple. Ib.
The prohibition of the exportation of our cattle to England, though a great, was but a temporary distress; and in its consequences greatly promoted the general welfare of this country.
[140] Lord Sydney’s words, in his speech from the throne in 1692, from his own former knowledge of this country. Ir. Com. Journ., vol. ii., p. 577.
[141] Carte, vol. ii., pp. 342, 344.
[142] Lord Strafford laid the foundation of the linen manufacture in Ireland, but the troubles which soon after broke out had entirely stopped the progress of it.
[143] Harris’s Life of K. W., 116.
[144] The words of Lord Sydney, in his speech from the throne in 1692. Com. Journ., vol. ii., p. 576.
[145] Ir. Com. Journ., vol. iii., pp. 45 and 65, that great supplies were given during this period.
[146] Dobbs, pp. 5, 6, 7, 19.
[147] Com. Journ., vol. iii., p. 45.
[148] Ir. Com. Journ., vol. iii., pp. 65, 66.
[149] Com. Journ., vol. iii., p. 149.
[150] Ib. p. 195.
[151] Ir. Com. Journ., vol. iii., pp. 207, 208.
[152] Com. Journ., vol. iii., p. 210.
[153] Ib., pp. 79, 94.
[154] Com. Journ., vol. iii., p. 298.
[155] Ib., pp. 225, 266.
[156] Ib., pp. 253, 258.
[157] Ib., pp. 364, 368, 369.
[158] Ib., p. 573.
[159] Com. Journ., vol. iii., p. 827.
[160] Ib., p. 929.
[161] Ib., p. 876.
[162] In the same session an act was made for the advancement of the linen manufacture, which shows that both kingdoms then thought (for these laws came to us through England) that each of these manufactures was to be encouraged in Ireland.
[163] Ir. Com. Journ., vol. ii., p. 725.
[164] Ib., p. 733.
[165] The sums paid on the exportation of Irish linens from Great Britain, at a medium of twenty-nine years, from 1743 to 1773, amount to something under £10,000 yearly.—Ir. Com. Journ., vol. xvi., p. 374, the account returned from the Inspector-General’s Office in Great Britain.
[166] Com. Journ., vol. iv., p. 249.
[167] Ib., p. 296.
[168] Ib., p. 335.
[169] Com. Journ., vol. iv., pp. 694, 700, 701.
[170] Ir. Com. Journ., vol. iv., p. 694.
[171] Ib., p. 720.
[172] Ib., p. 832.
[173] It is not here intended to enter into the question, whether in different circumstances a national bank might not be useful to Ireland.
[174] Com. Journ., vol. v., p. 12.
[175] Ib., p. 102.
[176] It was then £77,261 6s. 7d. Vol. iv., p. 778.
[177] Com. Journ., vol. iv., p. 108.
[178] Ib., p. 16.
[179] Com. Journ., vol. iv., p. 136.
[180] At midsummer, 1725, it amounted to £119,215 5s. 3⅝d. Vol. v., Com. Journ., pp. 282, 295, 434, 435, 642.
[181] Com. Journ., vol. v., pp. 732, 755.
[182] Duke of Dorset’s speech from the throne. Com. Journ., vol. vi., p. 12.
[183] Com. Journ., vol. vi., p. 143.
[184] Ib., vol. vi., p. 189.
[185] Com. Journ., vol. v., pp. 214, 220, 222.
[186] The act entitled an act for better regulation of partnerships and to encourage the trade and manufactures of this kingdom has not a word relative to the latter part of the title.
[187] Com. Journ., vol. vi., p. 694; ib., vol. vii., p. 742.
[188] The sum remaining due on the loans at Lady-day, 1753, was £85,585 0s. 9½d. The whole credit of the nation to that day was £332,747 19s. 1⅛d., and deducting the sums due on the loans amounted to £247,162 18s. 3⅛d. Com. Journ., vol. ix. pp. 3, 349, 352.
[189] Com. Journ., vol. iv., p. 195.
[190] Com. Journ., vol. vi., p. 289.
[191] Ib., vol. ix., p. 352.
[192] Ib., p. 332.
[193] Com. Journ., vol. x., p. 751.
[194] Ib., vol. ix., p. 818.
[195] Ib., pp. 819, 829, 846, 865.
[196] March 6, 1754, Thomas Dillon and Richard Ferral, failed. 3rd March, 1755, William Lennox and George French. Same day, John Wilcocks and John Dawson.
[197] There was then no bankruptcy law in Ireland.
[198] Com. Journ., vol. x., p. 751.
[199] Ib., p. 16, speech from the throne, and ib., p. 25, address from the House of Commons to the king.
[200] Ib., p. 25. Address from the House of Commons to the king.
[201] Com. Journ., vol. x., p. 25.
[202] They brought in a law for the encouragement of tillage, which was ineffectual (see post 42); but the preamble of that Act is a legislative proof of the unhappy condition of the poor of this country before that time. The preamble recites, “the extreme necessity to which the poor of this kingdom had been too frequently reduced for want of provisions.”
[203] Com. Journ., vol. x., p. 285.
[204] Com. Journ. vol. xi., p. 472. Speaker’s speech.
[205] Ib., p. 16.
[206] The Acts passed in ’58, giving bounties on the land carriage of corn, and on coals brought to Dublin.
[207] Com. Journ., vol. xi., p. 212.
[208] Ib., from 826 to 837.
[209] Ib., vol. xi., p. 141.
[210] Ib., p. 408.
[211] Ib., p. 473.
[212] Ib., p. 862.
[213] Ib.
[214] Ib., p. 982, from 25th March, ’59, to 21st of April, ’60, exclusive.
[215] Clement’s, Dawson’s, and Mitchell’s.
[216] Com. Journ., vol. xi., p. 966, April 15, 1760.
[217] Com. Journ., vol. xi., pp. 993, 994.
[218] Ib., p. 1049.
[219] Brought in by Mr. Pery the present Speaker.
[220] In the year ending Lady-Day, 1778, it amounted to £71,533 1s., and in that ending Lady-Day, 1779, to £67,864 8s. 10d.
[221] Com. Journ., vol. xii, p. 700.
[222] Ib. p. 728.
[223] Ib., p. 443.
[224] Ib. p. 929. Speech of Lord Hallifax from the throne, 30th April, 1762.
[225] Ir. Com. Journ., vol. xiii., p. 21.
[226] Com. Journ., vol. xiii., p. 23.
[227] For a year ending 25th March, 1763, they were £66,477 5s.; they afterwards rose to £89,095 17s. 6d. in September, 1777, at the highest; and in this year, ending the 25th March last, amounted to £85,971 2s. 6d.
[228] Com. Journ. vol. xiii., p. 576.
[229] Ib. pp. 574, 621.
[230] Com. Journ., vol. xiv., p. 715.
[231] Com. Journ., vol. xv., p. 710.
[232] Ib., p. 153.
[233] Ib., vol. xvi., p. 372.
[234] Ib., pp. 190, 191, 193.
[235] Ib., p. 256.
[236] Com. Journ., vol. xii., p. 928.
[237] Ib., vol. xiii., p. 987.
[238] Ib., vol. xiv., pp. 69, 114, 151.
[239] Com. Journ., vol. xiv., p. 665.
[240] Com. Journ., vol. xiv., p. 467, report from committee, and ib., p. 501, agreed to by the House, nem. con.
[241] Carte, vol. ii., pp. 318, 319.
[242] Sir W. Petty’s “Political Survey,” pp. 69, 70. Sir W. Temple, vol. iii., pp. 22, 23.
[243] By several British acts (32 G. 2, ch. 11; 5 G. 3, ch. 10; 12 G. 3, ch. 56), allowing from time to time the free importation of all sorts of cattle from Ireland.
[244] Personal prejudice against the Duke of Ormond (Carte, vol. ii., pp. 332, 337.)
[245] 15 Ch. 2, ch. 7. 18 Ch. 2, ch. 2.
[246] Carte, vol. ii., p. 332.
[247] Com. Journ., vol. i., p. 208, by a clause to be inserted in an Irish act.
[248] See post, those acts stated.
[249] Com. Journ., vol. ii., p. 576.
[250] English acts, 12 Ch. 2, ch. 32, 13 and 14. Ch. 2, ch. 18.
[251] 1 W., and M. ch. 32.
[252] 7 and 8 W., ch. 28.
[253] 14th Jan., 1697.
[254] 7th July, 1698, dissolved.
[255] In a pamphlet cited by Dr. Smith (vol. ii., p. 244, in his memoirs of wool) it is said that the total value of those manufactures exported in 1697, was £23,614 9s. 6d., namely, in friezes and stockings, £14,625 12s.; in old and new draperies, £8,988 17s. 6d.; and that though the Irish had been every year increasing, yet they had not recovered above one-third of the woollen trade which they had before the war (ib. 243). The value in 1687, according to the same authority, was £70,521 14s.; of which the friezes were £56,485 16s.; stockings, £2,520 18s.; and old and new drapery (which it is there said could alone interfere with the English trade), £11,514 10s.
[256] Preamble of English act of 1699.
[257] 9th June, 1698, vol. of Lords’ Journals, p. 314.
[258] Lords’ Journ., p. 315.
[259] 30th June, 1698.
[260] 16th July, 1698.
[261] Rapin’s Hist., vol. xvii., p. 417.
[262] 27th September, 1698, vol. ii., p. 994.
[263] Com. Journ., vol. ii., p. 997.
[264] Ib., vol. ii., p. 1022.
[265] October 24, 1698.
[266] Com. Journ., vol. ii., pp. 1007, 1035.
[267] Com. Journ., p. 1032.
[268] Ib., vol. ii., p. 1082.
[269] Com. Journ., vol. ii., p. 1007.
[270] Ib., 1104, by 105 against 41.
[271] 10 W. 3, ch. 5.
[272] And. on Com. Journ., vol. i., 204.
[273] The Commissioners of Trade in England, by their representation of the 11th October, 1698, say (Eng. Com. Journ., vol. xii., p. 437), “they conceive it not necessary to make any alteration whatsoever in this Act,” but take notice that the duties on broadcloth, of which very little is made in Ireland, is 20 per cent.; but the duty on new drapery, of which much is made, is but 10 per cent.
[274] Eng. Stat., 10 and 11 William III., ch. 10, passed in 1699.
[275] 12 Ch. II. ch. 4, Eng., and afterwards continued by 11 Geo. I., ch. 7. Brit.
[276] By an Eng. Act, made in 1663, the same which laid the first restraint on the exportation of cattle.
[277] See the Address of the English House of Lords.
[278] Potatoes and milk, or more frequently water.
[279] Dr. Smith’s “Wealth of Nations,” vol. i., p. 94.
[280] Ib., pp. 85, 86.
[281] Dr. Smith’s “Wealth of Nations,” vol. i., p. 445; Dr. Campbell’s “Polit. Survey of Great Britain,” vol. ii., p. 159; Anderson on “Industry.”
[282] Smith, ib.
[283] Sir W. Petty’s “Political Survey of Ireland,” p. 90.
[284] Smith’s “Wealth of Nations,” vol. i., p. 446.
[285] Ib.
[286] Lord Strafford’s Letters, vol. i., p. 33.
[287] Smith’s “Wealth of Nations,” vol. i., p. 445.
[288] Sir M. Decker’s “Decline of Foreign Trade,” p. 155, and Anderson on “Commerce,” vol. ii., p. 149.
[289] Compare the circumstances of the two countries in one of those articles which affects all the rest. The sums raised in Great Britain in time of peace are said to amount to ten millions, in Ireland to more than one million yearly. The circulating cash of the former is estimated at twenty-three millions, of the latter at two.
[290] See post 81.
[291] Essay on the “Trade of Ireland,” pp. 6, 7.
[292] “Decline of Foreign Trades,” pp. 55, 56, 155.
[293] Dobb’s, p. 76.
[294] In 1774.
[295] Nor was this deficiency made up by the exportation of yarn. The quantities of these several articles exported from 1764 to 1778 are mentioned in the Appendix, number.
[296] Smith’s “Memoirs of Wool,” vol. ii., p. 554. The only way to prevent it, is to enable us to work it up at home. Ib., p. 293.
[297] This was done for the benefit of the woollen manufacture in England. Eng. Com. Journ., vol. xxii., p. 442.
[298] This is stated considerably under the computation made in the list of absentees published in Dublin in 1769, which makes the amount at that time £1,208,982 14s. 6d.
[299] Smith’s “Wealth of Nations,” vol. i., p. 316.
[300] Anderson on Com., vol. i., p. 131.
[301] The wish of traders for a monopoly is not confined to England; in the same kingdom some parts are restrained in favour of others, as in Sweden to this hour. Abbé Resnal, vol. ii., p. 28.
[302] Eng. Com. Journ., vol. xii., pp. 64, 68.
[303] Ib., p. 64.
[304] Ib., p. 7.
[305] Eng. Com. Journ., vol. xii., p. 527.
[306] Ib., p. 530.
[307] Ib., p. 434.
[308] Ib., p. 387.
[309] Ib., vol. xxii.
[310] Eng. Com. Journ., vol. xxii., p. 178.
[311] The Lords Commissioners of Trade in England, by their report of the 31st August, 1697 (Eng. Com. Journ., vol., xii., p. 428), relating to the trade between England and Ireland, though they recommend the restraining of the exportation of all sorts of woollen manufactures out of Ireland, make the following exception, “except only that of their frieze, as is wont, to England.”
[312] See before speech of Lords Justices.
[313] Mr. Dobbs, and after him Dr. Smith.
[314] 11 Elizabeth, session 3, ch. 10.
[315] 13 Elizabeth, session 5, ch. 4.
[316] 17 and 18, ch. 2; ch. 9 for the advancement of the linen manufacture. Carte.
[317] See before.
[318] 7 and 8 W. 3, ch. 39, from the 1st of August, 1696.
[319] 7 and 8 W., ch. 28.
[320] Not till the year 1705.
[321] Com. Journ., vol. ii., p. 725, 733; vol. xvi., p. 360.
[322] See before.
[323] Dobbs, 6, 7.
[324] Com. Journ., vol. xvi., p. 362.
[325] Ib., p. 363.
[326] By 3rd and 4th Anne, ch. 9.
[327] And. on Comm., vol. ii., p. 225.
[328] This appears by the preamble to the English Act of the 7th and 8th W. 3, ch. 39.
[329] Anderson on Commerce, vol. ii., p. 177.
[330] Com. Journ., vol. xvi., p. 365.
[331] In 1750.
[332] By the law of 1750, and the bounties given on the exportation of sail-cloth from Great Britain to foreign countries, Ireland has almost lost this trade; she cannot now supply herself. Great Britain has not been the gainer; the quantities of sail-cloth imported there, in 1774, exceeding, according to the return from the Custom House in London, the quantities imported in the year 1750, when the restrictive law was made. It has been taken from Ireland and given to the Russians, Germans, and Dutch (Ir. Com. Journ., vol. xvi., p. 363).
[333] 10 G. 3, ch.—continued by act of last session to the year 1786.
[334] In the year 1743.
[335] Com. Journ., vol. xvi., 369, pp. 389.
[336] To please the English Scotland has for half a century past exerted herself as much as possible to improve the linen manufacture.—Anderson on Industry, vol. ii., p. 233.
[337] Com. Journ., vol. xvi., p. 370.
[338] The province of Ulster, in two years, is said to have lost 30,000 of its inhabitants. Com. Journ., vol. xvi., p. 381.
[339] From 24th June, 1705, 3 and 4 Anne, ch. 8, for 11 years, but afterwards continued.
[340] Brit. Acts, 10 Anne, ch. 19; 11 and 12 Anne, ch. 9; 6 G. 1, ch. 4.
[341] Brit. Act. 18 G. 3, ch. 53.
[342] Ir. Com. Journ., vol xvi., pp. 363, 364.
[343] Ib., p. 365
[344] Anderson on Industry, vol. i., pp. 34 to 40
[345] Com. Journ., vol. xvi., p. 370.
[346] See Com. Journ., vol. xvii., pp. 263 to 287, for the sums paid from 1700 to 1775. They amount to £803,486 0s. 2¾d.
[347] This malady of emigration among our linen manufacturers has appeared at many different periods during this century.
[348] 12 Ch. II., ch. 7.
[349] As other nations did the same, Ireland was shut out from the New World and a considerable part of the Old in Asia and Africa.
[350] 15 Ch. II., ch. 15.
[351] Ch. 39.
[352] 10th and 11th Wm. III., ch. 10.
[353] 15 Ch. II., ch. 7. 18 Ch. II., ch. 2. 20 Ch. II., ch. 7. 22nd & 23rd Ch. II., ch. 2.
[354] Petty’s “Political Survey of Ireland,” p. 70, and ib. “Report from the Council of Trade,” pages 117, 118. Sir W. Temple, vol. iii, pp. 22, 23, that England was evidently a loser by the prohibition of cattle.
Dr. Smith’s “Memoirs of Wool,” vol. ii, p. 337, that the English have since sufficiently felt the mischiefs of this proceeding.
[355] 3 and 4 Anne, ch. 8.
[356] 4 Inst., 349. Matth. Paris, anno. 1172, pp. 121, 220. Vit. H. 2. Pryn, against the 4 Inst., c. 76, pp. 250, 252. Sir John Davis’s Hist., p. 71. Lord Lyttleton’s Hist. of, H. 2. vol. iii., pp. 89, 90. 7 Co., 22, 23. 4th Black, 429.
[357] Cooke’s 4th Inst., 351.
[358] Anderson on Commerce, vol. i., p. 174.
[359] 3rd Edward IV., ch. 4.
[360] The part of this law which mentions that it shall be determinable, at the King’s pleasure, has the prohibition for its object, and does not lessen the force of the argument in favour of Ireland.
[361] 4th Edward IV., ch. 1.
[362] Anderson on Commerce, vol. i., p. 285.
[363] Ib., p. 319.
[364] 3rd James, ch. 6.
[365] 12th Ch. II., ch.
[366] 12th Ch. II., ch. 18.
[367] 13th and 14th Ch. II., ch. 11.
[368] Ib., ch. 18.
[369] 12th Ch. II., ch. 27.
[370] Ir. Act, 13th H. VIII, ch. 2.
[371] 28th H. VIII., ch. 17.
[372] Ch. 10.
[373] The necessity of encouraging the people of Ireland to manufacture their own wool appears by divers statutes to have been the sense of the legislature of both kingdoms for some centuries.
[374] Ir. Act of 17 and 18 Ch. II., ch. 15.
[375] Carte, vol. ii., p. 344.
[376] 15th Ch. II., ch. 7.
[377] 22nd and 23rd Ch. II., ch. 26.
[378] Sugar, tobacco, cotton, wool, indigo, steel or Jamaica wood, fustick or other dying wood, the growth of the said plantations.
[379] 4th Geo. II., ch. 15; 6th Geo. II., ch. 15; 4th Geo. II., ch. 15.
[380] The articles in the last note, and also rice, molasses, beaver skins, and other furs, copper ore, pitch, tar, turpentine, masts, yards, and bowsprits, pimento, cocoa-nuts, whale fins, raw silk, hides and skins, pot and pearl ashes, iron and lumber.
[381] From the 24th of June, 1778, it shall be lawful to export from Ireland directly into any of the British plantations in America or the West Indies, or into any of the settlements belonging to Great Britain on the coast of Africa, any goods being the produce or manufacture of Ireland (wool and woollen manufactures in all its branches, mixed or unmixed, cotton manufactures of all sorts, mixed or unmixed, hats, glass, hops; gunpowder, and coals only excepted); and all goods, &c., of the growth, produce, or manufacture of Great Britain which may be legally imported from thence into Ireland (woollen manufacture in all its branches and glass excepted), and all foreign certificate goods that may be legally imported from Great Britain into Ireland. Two of the principal manufactures are excepted, and one of them closely connected with, if not a part of, the linen manufacture.—18th Geo. III., ch. 55.
[382] This appears by the English Acts (3 and 4 Anne, ch. 10, 8 Anne, ch. 1, 2 Geo. II., ch. 35), giving bounties on the importation of those articles into Great Britain.
[383] Sir William Petty mentions that “the English who have lands in Ireland were forced to trade only with strangers, and became unacquainted with their own country, and that England gained more than it lost by a free commerce (with Ireland), as exporting hither three times as much as it received from hence,” and mentions his surprise at their being debarred from bringing commodities from America directly home, and being obliged to bring them round from England, with extreme hazard and loss.—“Political Survey of Ireland,” p. 123.
[384] 22nd and 23rd Ch. II., ch. 26, sec. 11.
[385] Sir John Davis and Sir Edward Cooke.
[386] ‘Ημισυ γαρ τ’ ἀρετῆς ἀποαίνυται δόυλιον ἧμαρ.
[387] Sic utere tuo, alienum non lædas.
[388] Sir William Petty’s “Political Survey of Ireland,” p. 19.
[389] Sir William Temple, vol. iii., p. 7.
[390] The Act of Explanation.
[391] 15 Ch. II.
[392] Sir W. Petty, p. 9.
[393] Ib. pp. 9 and 110.
[394] Sir W. Petty, p. 89.
[395] Ib., pp. 9 and 10.
[396] Ib, pp. 34, 71, 125.
[397] 15 Ch. II., ch. 7.
[398] Carte, vol. ii., pp. 425 to 428, 465.
[399] Archb. Bishop King’s State, 209. James II., in his speech from the throne in Ireland, recommended the repeal of the Act of Settlement.
[400] Their demands in 1642 were the restitution of all the plantation lands to the old inhabitants, repeal of Poyning’s Act, &c.—Macaulay’s Hist., vol. iii, p. 222. In the meeting called a parliament, held by James in Ireland, they repealed the Acts of Settlement and Explanation, passed a law that the Parliament of England cannot bind Ireland, and against writs of error and appeal to England.
[401] 3rd and 4th Anne, ch. 8.
[402] Sir W. Petty’s “Survey.”
[403] Ib., p. 117.
[404] Order 14th March, 1698, Lords’ Journ., vol. xvi. Eng. Com. Journs., 18th Jan., 1698, vol. xii., p. 440.
[405] The Commissioners of Trade, in their representation dated 11th November, 1697, relating to the trade between England and Ireland, advise a duty to be laid upon the importation of oil, upon teasles, whether imported or growing there, and upon all the utensils employed in the making any woollen manufactures, on the utensils of worsted combers, and particularly a duty by the yard upon all cloth and woollen stuffs, except friezes, before they are taken off the loom. Eng. Com. Journ., vol. x., p. 428.
[406] See in the [Appendix] an account of those articles imported from England into Ireland for ten years, commencing in 1769, and ending in 1778.
[407] Com. Journ., vol. iii., pp. 348, 548.
[408] Sir W. Petty’s “Political Survey,” p. 123.
[409] Sir W. Temple, vol. iii., p. 11.
[410] Lord’s Journ., 16th Feb., 1697.
[411] Lord’s Journ., 19th Feb., 1697.
[412] See Dr. Smith’s “Wealth of Nations.”
[413] The consumption of our own people is the best and greatest market for the product and manufactures of our own country. Foreign trade is but a part of the benefit arising from the woollen manufacture, and the least part; it is a small article in respect to the benefit arising to the community, and Dr. Smith affirms that all the foreign markets of England cannot be equal to one-twentieth part of her own.—Dr. Smith’s “Memoirs of Wool,” vol. ii., pp. 113, 529, 530, and 556, from the British Merchant and Dr. Davenant.
[414] Address of Eng. Commons, ante.
[415] King’s Stat., pp. 160, 161.
[416] Eng. Com. Journ., vol. xii., pp. 514, 523, 528.
[417] Vol. iii., p. 8.
[418] See Sir John Davis’s “Discourses,” pp. 5, 6, 194.
[419] Summary of Imports and Exports to and from Ireland, laid before the British House of Commons in 1779.
[420] Those states are least able to pay great charges for public disbursements whose wealth resteth chiefly in the hands of the nobility and gentry.—Bac., vol. i., p. 10; Smith’s “Wealth of Nations,” vol. ii., p. 22.
[421] A very judicious friend of mine has, with great pains and attention, made a calculation of the numbers of people in Ireland in the year 1774, and he makes the numbers of people to amount to 2,325,041; but supposes his calculation to be under the real number. I have, therefore, followed the calculation commonly received, which makes their number amount to 2,500,000. He computes, as has been before mentioned, the persons who reside in houses of one hearth, to be 1,877,220. Those find it very difficult to pay hearth money, and are thought to be unable to pay any other taxes. If this is so, according to this calculation, there are but 447,821 people in Ireland able to pay taxes.
[422] Ireland was much more numerous in 1685 than at any time, after the Revolution, during that century, there having been a great waste of people in the rebellion at that era.
[423] 12 Ch. II., ch. 4. Eng.
[424] Yet, in favour of Great Britain, old and new drapery imported into Ireland from other countries are subject to duties equal to a prohibition. Ir. Act 14th and 15th, Ch. II., ch. 8.
[425] On every piece of old drapery exported, containing thirty-six yards, and so for a greater or lesser quantity, 3s. 4d., and of new drapery 9d., for the subsidy of alnage and alnager’s fee. See 17th and 18th Ch. II., ch. 15. Ir. But the English have taken off these and all other duties from their manufactures made or mixed with wool. Eng. Act 11 and 12 W. III., ch. 20.
[426] 30 per cent. by the British acts of 9 and 10 Anne, ch. 39., and 12 Anne, ch. 9.
[427] This tax is ad valorem, and the linen not valued.
[428] Brit. Act, 9 Anne, ch. 12.
[429] Hence it is that the price of wool in England is said to be 50 per cent. below the market price of Europe.—Smith’s “Memoir’s of Wool.”
[430] 12 Ch. II., ch. 5. 3 and 4 Anne, ch. 4. 4 and 5 W. and M., ch. 5.
[431] 7 G. I., ch. 7.
[432] When the commercial restraints of Ireland are the subject, a source of occasional and ruinous restrictions ought not to be passed over. Since the year 1740, there have been twenty-four embargoes in Ireland, one of which lasted three years.
[433] The common law of England.
[434] Heads of bills for passing into a law the Habeas Corpus Act, and that for making the tenure of judges during good behaviour, have repeatedly passed the Irish House of Commons, but were not returned.
[435] The Eng. Act of Ch. II, ch. —, calls the importation of cattle from Ireland a common nuisance.
[436] This number of Irishmen was computed to have served in the fleets and armies of Great Britain during the last war.
[437] The furs of Canada, the indigo of Florida, the sugars of Dominica, St. Vincent, and the Grenadas, with every other valuable production of those acquisitions Ireland was prohibited to receive but through another channel. Her poverty scarcely gathered a crumb from the sumptuous table of her sister.
Transcriber’s Note: Foonote 86 appears on page [lxvii] of the text, but there is no corresponding marker on the page.