FOOTNOTES:
[123:1] Wood's Mechanics, p. 31.
[124:1] Authent. N. T. Tr. p. 237.
[124:2] According to Less.
[124:3] Tracts for the Times, No. 85, p. 78 [Discuss. iii. 6, p. 207].
[125:1] [Ibid. p. 209. These results are taken from Less, and are practically accurate.]
[126:1] No. 85 [Discuss. p. 236].
[132:1] Ep. 93. I have thought it best to give an over-literal translation.
[132:2] Vid. Concil. Bracar. ap. Aguirr. Conc. Hisp. t. ii. p. 676. "That the cup was not administered at the same time is not so clear; but from the tenor of this first Canon in the Acts of the Third Council of Braga, which condemns the notion that the Host should be steeped in the chalice, we have no doubt that the wine was withheld from the laity. Whether certain points of doctrine are or are not found in the Scriptures is no concern of the historian; all that he has to do is religiously to follow his guides, to suppress or distrust nothing through partiality."—Dunham, Hist. of Spain and Port. vol. i. p. 204. If pro complemento communionis in the Canon merely means "for the Cup," at least the Cup is spoken of as a complement; the same view is contained in the "confirmation of the Eucharist," as spoken of in St. German's life. Vid. Lives of Saints, No. 9, p. 28.
[132:3] Niceph. Hist. xviii. 45. Renaudot, however, tells us of two Bishops at the time when the schism was at length healed. Patr. Al. Jac. p. 248. However, these had been consecrated by priests, p. 145.
[133:1] Vid. Bing. Ant. xv. 4, § 7; and Fleury, Hist. xxvi. 50, note g.
[135:1] Kaye's Justin, p. 59, &c.
[135:2] Kaye's Clement, p. 335.
[135:3] p. 341.
[135:4] Ib. 342.
[136:1] Reliqu. Sacr. t. ii. p. 469, 470.
[137:1] [This subject is more exactly and carefully treated in Tracts Theol. and Eccles. pp. 192-226.]
[138:1] [They also had a cultus in themselves, and specially when a greater Presence did not overshadow them. Vid. Via Media, vol. ii. art. iv. 8, note 1.]
[139:1] Exod. xxxiii. 10.
[139:2] Dan. x. 5-17.
[141:1] Athan. Orat. i. 42, Oxf. tr.
[141:2] [Vid. supr. p. 138, note 8.]
[142:1] Athan. ibid.
[142:2] And so Eusebius, in his Life of Constantine: "The all-holy choir of God's perpetual virgins, he was used almost to worship (σέβων), believing that that God, to whom they had consecrated themselves, was an inhabitant in the souls of such." Vit. Const. iv. 28.
[146:1] Hær. 78, 18.
[148:1] Aug. de Nat. et Grat. 42. Ambros. Ep. 1, 49, § 2. In Psalm 118, v. 3, de Instit. Virg. 50. Hier. in Is. xi. 1, contr. Pelag. ii. 4. Nil. Ep. i. p. 267. Antioch. ap. Cyr. de Rect. Fid. p. 49. Ephr. Opp. Syr. t. 3, p. 607. Max. Hom. 45. Procl. Orat. vi. pp. 225-228, p. 60, p. 179, 180, ed. 1630. Theodot. ap. Amphiloch. pp. 39, &c. Fulgent. Serm. 3, p. 125. Chrysol. Serm. 142. A striking passage from another Sermon of the last-mentioned author, on the words "She cast in her mind what manner of salutation," &c., may be added: "Quantus sit Deus satis ignorat ille, qui hujus Virginis mentem non stupet, animum non miratur. Pavet cœlum, tremunt Angeli, creatura non sustinet, natura non sufficit; et una puella sic Deum in sui pectoris capit, recipit, oblectat hospitio, ut pacem terris, cœlis gloriam, salutem perditis, vitam mortuis, terrenis cum cœlestibus parentelam, ipsius Dei cum carne commercium, pro ipsâ domûs exigat pensione, pro ipsius uteri mercede conquirat," &c. Serm. 140. [St. Basil, St. Chrysostom, and St. Cyril of Alexandria sometimes speak, it is true, in a different tone; on this subject vid. "Letter to Dr. Pusey," Note iii., Diff. of Angl. vol. 2.]
[153:1] Pope's Suprem. ed. 1836, pp. 26, 27, 157, 171, 222.
[157:1] ἥτις καὶ προκάθηται ἐν τόπῳ χωρίου Ῥωμαίων.
[158:1] Athan. Hist. Tracts. Oxf. tr. p. 56.
[159:1] Hist. ii. 17.
[159:2] Hist. iii. 10.
[159:3] Theod. Hist. v. 10.
[160:1] Coustant, Epp. Pont. p. 546.
[160:2] In 1 Tim. iii. 14, 15.
[160:3] Coustant, p. 624.
[161:1] ii. 3.
[161:2] Coustant, pp. 896, 1064.
[161:3] Ep. 186, 2.
[161:4] De Ingrat. 2. Common. 41.
[162:1] Serm. De Natal. iii. 3.
[162:2] Ibid. v. 4.
[162:3] Ep. ad Eutych. fin.
[162:4] Concil. Hard. t. ii. p. 656.
[164:1] Barrow on the Supremacy, ed. 1836, pp. 263, 331, 384.