Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee
BY
JOHN RANDOLPH NEAL, M.A., LL.B.
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
in the
Faculty of Political Science
Columbia University
NEW YORK
The Knickerbocker Press
1899
| CONTENTS. | ||
|---|---|---|
| CHAPTER | PAGE | |
| I. | Separation | [1] |
| II. | Responsibility for Separation | [12] |
| III. | Loyalty of East Tennessee | [16] |
| IV. | Restoration of Civil Government | [24] |
| V. | Recognition by Congress | [32] |
| VI. | Tennessee and the New Amendments | [39] |
| VII. | Financial Administration of the RadicalGovernment | [44] |
| VIII. | Radical Municipal Administration | [52] |
| IX. | Ku-Klux Outrages | [57] |
| X. | Close of the Radical Domination | [66] |
| XI. | Constitutional Convention of 1870 | [74] |