SECTION VI.
OF TRUTH OF VEGETATION.—CONCLUSION.
Chapter I.—Of Truth of Vegetation.
| [§ 1.] | Frequent occurrence of foliage in the works of the old masters. | [384] |
| [§ 2.] | Laws common to all forest trees. Their branches do not taper, but only divide. | [385] |
| [§ 3.] | Appearance of tapering caused by frequent buds. | [385] |
| [§ 4.] | And care of nature to conceal the parallelism. | [386] |
| [§ 5.] | The degree of tapering which may be represented as continuous. | [386] |
| [§ 6.] | The trees of Gaspar Poussin. | [386] |
| [§ 7.] | And of the Italian school generally, defy this law. | [387] |
| [§ 8.] | The truth, as it is given by J. D. Harding. | [387] |
| [§ 9.] | Boughs, in consequence of this law, must diminish where they divide. Those of the old masters often do not. | [388] |
| [§ 10.] | Boughs must multiply as they diminish. Those of the old masters do not. | [389] |
| [§ 11.] | Bough-drawing of Salvator. | [390] |
| [§ 12.] | All these errors especially shown in Claude's sketches, and concentrated in a work of G. Poussin's. | [391] |
| [§ 13.] | Impossibility of the angles of boughs being taken out of them by wind. | [392] |
| [§ 14.] | Bough-drawing of Titian. | [392] |
| [§ 15.] | Bough-drawing of Turner. | [394] |
| [§ 16.] | Leafage. Its variety and symmetry. | [394] |
| [§ 17.] | Perfect regularity of Poussin. | [395] |
| [§ 18.] | Exceeding intricacy of nature's foliage. | [396] |
| [§ 19.] | How contradicted by the tree-patterns of G. Poussin. | [396] |
| [§ 20.] | How followed by Creswick. | [397] |
| [§ 21.] | Perfect unity in nature's foliage. | [398] |
| [§ 22.] | Total want of it in Both and Hobbima. | [398] |
| [§ 23.] | How rendered by Turner. | [399] |
| [§ 24.] | The near leafage of Claude. His middle distances are good. | [399] |
| [§ 25.] | Universal termination of trees in symmetrical curves. | [400] |
| [§ 26.] | Altogether unobserved by the old masters. Always given by Turner. | [401] |
| [§ 27.] | Foliage painting on the Continent. | [401] |
| [§ 28.] | Foliage of J. D. Harding. Its deficiencies. | [402] |
| [§ 29.] | His brilliancy of execution too manifest. | [403] |
| [§ 30.] | His bough-drawing, and choice of form. | [404] |
| [§ 31.] | Local color, how far expressible in black and white, and with what advantage. | [404] |
| [§ 32.] | Opposition between great manner and great knowledge. | [406] |
| [§ 33.] | Foliage of Cox, Fielding, and Cattermole. | [406] |
| [§ 34.] | Hunt and Creswick. Green, how to be rendered expressive of light, and offensive if otherwise. | [407] |
| [§ 35.] | Conclusion. Works of J. Linnel and S. Palmer. | [407] |
Chapter II.—General remarks respecting the Truth of Turner.
| [§ 1.] | No necessity of entering into discussion of architectural truth. | [409] |
| [§ 2.] | Extreme difficulty of illustrating or explaining the highest truth. | [410] |
| [§ 3.] | The positive rank of Turner is in no degree shown in the foregoing pages, but only his relative rank. | [410] |
| [§ 4.] | The exceeding refinement of his truth. | [411] |
| [§ 5.] | There is nothing in his works which can be enjoyed without knowledge. | [411] |
| [§ 6.] | And nothing which knowledge will not enable us to enjoy. | [412] |
| [§ 7.] | His former rank and progress. | [412] |
| [§ 8.] | Standing of his present works. Their mystery is the consequence of their fulness. | [413] |
Chapter III.—Conclusion.—Modern Art and Modern Criticism.
| [§ 1.] | The entire prominence hitherto given to the works of one artist caused only by our not being able to take cognizance of character. | [414] |
| [§ 2.] | The feelings of different artists are incapable of full comparison. | [415] |
| [§ 3.] | But the fidelity and truth of each are capable of real comparison. | [415] |
| [§ 4.] | Especially because they are equally manifested in the treatment of all subjects. | [415] |
| [§ 5.] | No man draws one thing well, if he can draw nothing else. | [416] |
| [§ 6.] | General conclusions to be derived from our past investigation. | [417] |
| [§ 7.] | Truth, a standard of all excellence. | [417] |
| [§ 8.] | Modern criticism. Changefulness of public taste. | [418] |
| [§ 9.] | Yet associated with a certain degree of judgment. | [418] |
| [§ 10.] | Duty of the press. | [418] |
| [§ 11.] | Qualifications necessary for discharging it. | [418] |
| [§ 12.] | General incapability of modern critics. | [419] |
| [§ 13.] | And inconsistency with themselves. | [419] |
| [§ 14.] | How the press may really advance the cause of art. | [420] |
| [§ 15.] | Morbid fondness at the present day for unfinished works. | [420] |
| [§ 16.] | By which the public defraud themselves. | [421] |
| [§ 17.] | And in pandering to which, artists ruin themselves. | [421] |
| [§ 18.] | Necessity of finishing works of art perfectly. | [421] |
| [§ 19.] | Sketches not sufficiently encouraged. | [422] |
| [§ 20.] | Brilliancy of execution or efforts at invention not to be tolerated in young artists. | [422] |
| [§ 21.] | The duty and after privileges of all students. | [423] |
| [§ 22.] | Necessity among our greater artists of more singleness of aim. | [423] |
| [§ 23.] | What should be their general aim. | [425] |
| [§ 24.] | Duty of the press with respect to the works of Turner. | [427] |