SECTION II.
OF THE IMAGINATIVE FACULTY.
Chapter I.—Of the Three Forms of Imagination.
| [§ 1.] | A partial examination only of the imagination is to be attempted. | [142] |
| [§ 2.] | The works of the metaphysicians how nugatory with respect to this faculty. | [143] |
| [§ 3.] | The definition of D. Stewart, how inadequate. | [143] |
| [§ 4.] | This instance nugatory. | [144] |
| [§ 5.] | Various instances. | [145] |
| [§ 6.] | The three operations of the imagination. Penetrative, associative, contemplative. | [146] |
Chapter II.—Of Imagination Associative.
| [§ 1.] | Of simple conception. | [147] |
| [§ 2.] | How connected with verbal knowledge. | [148] |
| [§ 3.] | How used in composition. | [148] |
| [§ 4.] | Characteristics of composition. | [149] |
| [§ 5.] | What powers are implied by it. The first of the three functions of fancy. | [150] |
| [§ 6.] | Imagination not yet manifested. | [150] |
| [§ 7.] | Imagination is the correlative conception of imperfect component parts. | [151] |
| [§ 8.] | Material analogy with imagination. | [151] |
| [§ 9.] | The grasp and dignity of imagination. | [152] |
| [§ 10.] | Its limits. | [153] |
| [§ 11.] | How manifested in treatment of uncertain relations. Its deficiency illustrated. | [154] |
| [§ 12.] | Laws of art, the safeguard of the unimaginative. | [155] |
| [§ 13.] | Are by the imaginative painter despised. Tests of imagination. | [155] |
| [§ 14.] | The monotony of unimaginative treatment. | [156] |
| [§ 15.] | Imagination never repeats itself. | [157] |
| [§ 16.] | Relation of the imaginative faculty to the theoretic. | [157] |
| [§ 17.] | Modification of its manifestation. | [158] |
| [§ 18.] | Instances of absence of imagination.—Claude, Gaspar Poussin. | [158] |
| [§ 19.] | Its presence.—Salvator, Nicolo Poussin, Titian, Tintoret. | [159] |
| [§ 20.] | And Turner. | [160] |
| [§ 21.] | The due function of Associative imagination with respect to nature. | [161] |
| [§ 22.] | The sign of imaginative work is its appearance of absolute truth. | [161] |
Chapter III.—Of Imagination Penetrative.
| [§ 1.] | Imagination penetrative is concerned not with the combining but apprehending of things. | [163] |
| [§ 2.] | Milton's and Dante's description of flame. | [163] |
| [§ 3.] | The imagination seizes always by the innermost point. | [164] |
| [§ 4.] | It acts intuitively and without reasoning. | [165] |
| [§ 5.] | Signs of it in language. | [165] |
| [§ 6.] | Absence of imagination, how shown. | [166] |
| [§ 7.] | Distinction between imagination and fancy. | [166] |
| [§ 8.] | Fancy how involved with imagination. | [168] |
| [§ 9.] | Fancy is never serious. | [169] |
| [§ 10.] | Want of seriousness the bar to high art at the present time. | [169] |
| [§ 11.] | Imagination is quiet; fancy, restless. | [170] |
| [§ 12.] | The detailing operation of fancy. | [170] |
| [§ 13.] | And suggestive, of the imagination. | [171] |
| [§ 14.] | This suggestiveness how opposed to vacancy. | [172] |
| [§ 15.] | Imagination addresses itself to imagination. | [173] |
| Instances from the works of Tintoret. | [173] | |
| [§ 16.] | The entombment. | [174] |
| [§ 17.] | The Annunciation. | [174] |
| [§ 18.] | The Baptism of Christ. Its treatment by various painters. | [176] |
| [§ 19.] | By Tintoret. | [177] |
| [§ 20.] | The Crucifixion. | [178] |
| [§ 21.] | The Massacre of innocents. | [179] |
| [§ 22.] | Various works in the Scuola di San Rocco. | [181] |
| [§ 23.] | The Last Judgment. How treated by various painters. | [181] |
| [§ 24.] | By Tintoret. | [182] |
| [§ 25.] | The imaginative verity, how distinguished from realism. | [183] |
| [§ 26.] | The imagination how manifested in sculpture. | [184] |
| [§ 27.] | Bandinelli, Canova, Mino da Fiesole. | [184] |
| [§ 28.] | Michael Angelo. | [185] |
| [§ 29.] | Recapitulation. The perfect function of the imagination is the intuitive perception of ultimate truth. | [188] |
| [§ 30.] | Imagination how vulgarly understood. | [190] |
| [§ 31.] | How its cultivation is dependent on the moral feelings. | [190] |
| [§ 32.] | On independence of mind. | [191] |
| [§ 33.] | And on habitual reference to nature. | [191] |
Chapter IV.—Of Imagination Contemplative.
| [§ 1.] | Imagination contemplative is not part of the essence, but only a habit or mode of the faculty. | [192] |
| [§ 2.] | The ambiguity of conception. | [192] |
| [§ 3.] | Is not in itself capable of adding to the charm of fair things. | [193] |
| [§ 4.] | But gives to the imagination its regardant power over them. | [194] |
| [§ 5.] | The third office of fancy distinguished from imagination contemplative. | [195] |
| [§ 6.] | Various instances. | [197] |
| [§ 7.] | Morbid or nervous fancy. | [200] |
| [§ 8.] | The action of contemplative imagination is not to be expressed by art. | [201] |
| [§ 9.] | Except under narrow limits.—1st. Abstract rendering of form without color. | [201] |
| [§ 10.] | Of color without form. | [202] |
| [§ 11.] | Or of both without texture. | [202] |
| [§ 12.] | Abstraction or typical representation of animal form. | [203] |
| [§ 13.] | Either when it is symbolically used. | [204] |
| [§ 14.] | Or in architectural decoration. | [205] |
| [§ 15.] | Exception in delicate and superimposed ornament. | [206] |
| [§ 16.] | Abstraction necessary from imperfection of materials. | [206] |
| [§ 17.] | Abstractions of things capable of varied accident are not imaginative. | [207] |
| [§ 18.] | Yet sometimes valuable. | [207] |
| [§ 19.] | Exaggeration. Its laws and limits. First, in scale of representation. | [208] |
| [§ 20.] | Secondly, of things capable of variety of scale. | [209] |
| [§ 21.] | Thirdly, necessary in expression of characteristic features on diminished scale. | [210] |
| [§ 22.] | Recapitulation. | [211] |
Chapter V.—Of the Superhuman Ideal.
| [§ 1.] | The subject is not to be here treated in detail. | [212] |
| [§ 2.] | The conceivable modes of manifestation of Spiritual Beings are four. | [212] |
| [§ 3.] | And these are in or through creature forms familiar to us. | [213] |
| [§ 4.] | Supernatural character may be impressed on these either by phenomena inconsistent with their common nature (compare [Chap. iv. § 16]). | [213] |
| [§ 5.] | Or by inherent Dignity. | [213] |
| [§ 6.] | 1st. Of the expression of inspiration. | [214] |
| [§ 7.] | No representation of that which is more than creature is possible. | [215] |
| [§ 8.] | Supernatural character expressed by modification of accessories. | [216] |
| [§ 9.] | Landscape of the religious painters. Its character is eminently symmetrical. | [217] |
| [§ 10.] | Landscape of Benozzo Gozzoli. | [217] |
| [§ 11.] | Landscape of Perugino and Raffaelle. | [218] |
| [§ 12.] | Such Landscape is not to be imitated. | [218] |
| [§ 13.] | Color, and Decoration. Their use in representations of the Supernatural. | [219] |
| [§ 14.] | Decoration so used must be generic. | [220] |
| [§ 15.] | And color pure. | [220] |
| [§ 16.] | Ideal form of the body itself, of what variety susceptible. | [221] |
| [§ 17.] | Anatomical development how far admissible. | [221] |
| [§ 18.] | Symmetry. How valuable. | [221] |
| [§ 19.] | The influence of Greek art, how dangerous. | [222] |
| [§ 20.] | Its scope, how limited. | [223] |
| [§ 21.] | Conclusion. | [224] |
| ADDENDA. | [225] |