CONTENTS.
|
[ILLUSTRATIONS.] |
| Page. | |
| [Letter of transmittal] | [7] |
| [Introduction] | [9] |
| Precipitation | [11] |
| Descent of flood | [14] |
| Highland tributaries and Central Basin | [14] |
| Flood at Macopin dam | [15] |
| Flood at Beattie's dam, Little Falls | [16] |
| Flood flow over Dundee dam | [17] |
| [Damages] | [23] |
| General statements | [23] |
| Highland tributaries | [23] |
| Ramapo River | [23] |
| Pequanac and Wanaque rivers | [24] |
| Central Basin | [25] |
| Lower Valley | [25] |
| Paterson | [26] |
| Passaic and vicinity | [27] |
| Preventive measures | [28] |
| General discussion | [28] |
| Lower valley improvements | [29] |
| Flood catchment | [31] |
| Pompton reservoir | [31] |
| Ramapo system | [33] |
| Wanaque system | [34] |
| Midvale reservoir | [34] |
| Ringwood reservoir | [35] |
| West Brook reservoir | [35] |
| Pequanac system | [35] |
| Newfoundland reservoir | [36] |
| Stickle Pond reservoir | [36] |
| Rockaway system | [37] |
| Powerville reservoir | [37] |
| Longwood Valley reservoir | [37] |
| Splitrock Pond | [38] |
| Upper Passaic Basin | [38] |
| Millington reservoir | [38] |
| Saddle River | [39] |
| Summary of flood-catchments projects | [40] |
| Preferable reservoir sites | [40] |
| [General conclusions] | [44] |
| [Index] | [47] |
| [Publications Of United States Geological Survey.] |
ILLUSTRATIONS.
| Page. | ||
| [PLATE I.] | A, Beattie's dam, Little Falls, N. J., in flood; B, Flood-water lines inresidence district, Paterson, N. J. | |
| [II.] | A, Pompton Lakes dam and water front of Ludlum Steel and IronCompany; B, Dry bed of Pompton Lake | |
| [III.] | Flood district of Paterson, N. J. | |
| [IV.] | A, Washout at Spruce street, Paterson, N. J.; B, River street, Paterson,N. J., after flood | |
| [V.] | A, Effects of flood in mill district, Paterson, N. J.; B, The wreck of ahotel in Paterson, N. J. | |
| [VI.] | A, Devastation in Hebrew quarter, Paterson, N. J.; B, A commonexample of flood damage | |
| [VII.] | A, Inundated lands at Passaic, N. J.; B, Undamaged bridge acrossPassaic River after partial subsidence of flood | |
| [Fig. 1.] | Comparative flood run-off at Dundee dam, March, 1902, and October,1903 | |
| [2.] | Diagram of flood flow at Dundee dam, flood of 1903 |
Department of the Interior,
United States Geological Survey,
Hydrographic Branch,
Washington, D. C., December 4, 1903.
Sir: I have the honor to transmit herewith a manuscript entitled, "Passaic Flood of 1903," prepared by Marshall Ora Leighton, and to request that it be published as one of the series of Water-Supply and Irrigation Papers.
This paper is a continuation of Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 88, by George B. Hollister and Mr. Leighton, and describes the flood of October, 1903, which was higher and far more disastrous than the flood of 1902. The occurrence of two great floods in the same basin during so short a period makes the subject worthy of attention, especially as the district is, from a manufacturing and commercial standpoint, one of the most important along the Atlantic coast.
Very respectfully,
F. H. Newell,
Chief Engineer.
Hon. Charles D. Walcott
Director United States Geological Survey.
THE PASSAIC FLOOD OF 1903.
By Marshall O. Leighton.
INTRODUCTION.
In the following pages is given a brief history of the disastrous flood which occurred in the Passaic River Basin in October, 1903. In the report by George Buell Hollister and the writer, entitled "The Passaic Flood of 1902," and published by the United States Geological Survey as Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 88, are discussed the principal physiographic features of the drainage basin and their general relations to the stream flow. This report will not repeat this information, and the discussion will be confined to the flood itself. References to local features will be made without explanation, the presumption being that this publication shall accompany the earlier one and be, as it is, a continuation of it. In the present report more attention is given to an estimate of damages than in the earlier work, and remedies by which devastation may be avoided are briefly considered.
Passaic River overflowed its banks on October 8, 1903, and remained in flood until October 19. Between these dates there occurred the greatest and most destructive flood ever known along this stream. Ordinarily the channel of the lower Passaic at full bank carries about 12,000 cubic feet of water per second, but at the height of this flood it carried about 35,700 cubic feet per second.
The flood period for the entire stream can not be exactly stated, as the overflow did not occur at the same time in different parts of the basin. For example, the gage-height records at Dundee dam show that the flood began to rise on October 8 at 6.30 a. m., and reached a maximum of 9-1/2 inches over the dam crest at 9 p. m. on October 10. Similarly, on Beattie's dam at Little Falls the flood began to rise at midnight on October 7, and reached its maximum at 2 p. m. on October 10, or about thirty-eight hours after the initial rise, the height of the water being 1.29 inches over the crest of the dam.
The flood rose on the highland tributaries as follows: On Ramapo River the flood crest passed Hillborn at about 10 a. m. on October 9 and reached Pompton, at the mouth of the river, shortly after noon of the same day.
The highest reading recorded on the Geological Survey gage at the feeder of Morris Canal, in Pompton Plains, was 14.3 feet, at about 6 o'clock on the morning of October 10. As this gage is read only once daily it is probable that this reading does not represent the height of the flood crest. Evidence shows that it passed this point on the previous day. Records of the Newark water department show that the flood on Pequanac River began to rise at Macopin dam on October 8 at noon, and rose rapidly to the maximum of 6,000 cubic feet per second at 4 p. m. on October 10.
No records are available with reference to the rise of flood on Wanaque River.
Observations made on Pompton Plains on the morning of the 11th show that Pompton River was well within its banks at that time; therefore the Ramapo, Wanaque, and Pequanac must have discharged their flood waters some time previous to this hour. The fact is important when considered in connection with the height of water in the main stream at that period. This observation was made only eighteen hours after the maximum height over Beattie's dam at Little Falls, and twelve hours after the flood crest passed Dundee dam. The conditions here outlined illustrate the rapidity with which flood waters are discharged from the Pompton drainage area, and the deterring effect of Great Piece Meadows upon the flood.
The rise of the flood on Rockaway River at Old Boonton was almost coincident with that on Pequanac River at Macopin dam. The maximum flow occurred fourteen hours later than the maximum on the Ramapo at Pompton.
The flood crest did not reach Chatham on upper Passaic River until the morning of October 11, or about twenty-four hours later than the flood heights in Pompton and Rockaway rivers, and about twelve hours later than the maximum over Dundee dam.
Adequate reasons for these differences in flood periods between neighboring points are abundant. They are apparent after a review of the physiographic conditions described in Water-Supply Paper No. 88.
The flood of 1903 was the immediate result of an enormous rainfall, and not, as is often the case in north temperate latitudes, the combined effect of rainfall and the rapid melting of accumulated snows. The records of weather-observation stations in northern New Jersey and New York fail to show, throughout their entire observation periods, as great an amount of precipitation in so short a period. The storm which was the immediate cause of the flood occurred principally between October 8 and 11. During that interval rain fell to an average depth of 11.74 inches over the Passaic Basin.
The Passaic Basin is fairly well supplied with storage facilities, which, under ordinary circumstances, would temper the severity of floods by holding back a large amount of water. In this case no such effect was produced, as the reservoirs, lakes, and ponds on the drainage area were filled, or practically so, at the beginning of the storm, and there was consequently no available space in which to hold back even an appreciable part of the run-off water. Over some of the dams in the highland region a comparatively small amount of water was being discharged at the beginning of the storm. Therefore, while these storage basins may have had a certain deterring effect upon the rate of flood accumulation, they could not, in the end, assist materially in preventing damages in the lower part of the drainage area.
PRECIPITATION.
The precipitation records for June, July, August, and September are given below:
Precipitation, in inches, in Passaic Valley and vicinity, June to September, 1903.
| June. | July. | August. | September. | |||||
| Normal. | Observed. | Normal. | Observed. | Normal. | Observed. | Normal. | Observed. | |
| Highland region: | ||||||||
| Dover | 3.29 | 15.02 | 5.54 | 5.47 | 5.08 | 9.04 | 4.02 | 3.39 |
| Chester | 3.48 | 12.80 | 6.42 | 7.59 | 5.16 | 9.35 | 4.60 | ...... |
| Charlotteburg | 3.52 | 9.45 | 5.54 | 3.97 | 4.98 | 7.78 | 4.80 | 3.29 |
| Ringwood | ...... | 10.13 | ...... | 3.08 | ...... | 6.17 | ...... | 3.06 |
| Red Sandstone plain: | ||||||||
| Paterson | 4.31 | 11.17 | 5.32 | 5.40 | 4.31 | 10.89 | 4.86 | 2.88 |
| Hanover | 3.32 | ...... | 5.23 | 5.40 | 5.20 | 9.40 | 4.52 | ...... |
| River Vale | 3.17 | 10.62 | 4.87 | 3.41 | 4.17 | ...... | 3.61 | 2.90 |
| Essex Fells | 3.08 | ...... | 7.03 | ...... | 5.95 | ...... | 3.67 | 1.80 |
| Newark | 3.60 | 11.51 | 4.48 | 4.27 | 4.75 | 14.54 | 3.83 | 4.56 |
| South Orange | 3.57 | 9.28 | 5.43 | 4.22 | 5.05 | 13.75 | 4.04 | 3.80 |
| New York City | 3.13 | 7.42 | 4.26 | 3.23 | 4.70 | 5.96 | 3.72 | 2.60 |
| Plainfield | 3.62 | 10.14 | 5.86 | 4.70 | 4.37 | 6.87 | 4.42 | 7.10 |
| Elizabeth | 3.68 | 8.76 | 5.74 | 4.31 | 4.26 | 7.15 | 4.14 | 4.38 |
An examination of the above table shows that throughout the summer of 1903 the precipitation was considerably above normal. The records for June and August indicate extremely wet months, and the July figures are slightly above while the September figures are somewhat below normal. The important fact shown by this table is that disastrous floods may occur after long periods of abundant rains. It has been observed that heavy precipitation may be expected after protracted periods of drought. Such a belief is not altogether fanciful. In the northeastern part of this country the total amount of precipitation is approximately uniform from year to year. The variations, comparatively speaking, are not very wide, and we are therefore led to expect that there are in operation influences which serve to compensate for excesses or deficiencies in our annual rainfall. Therefore after the abundant precipitation of the summer of 1903, an observer might have had some measure of justification in predicting a normally or abnormally dry fall. In view of the actual events the fact must be emphasized that in adopting measures to prevent floods the margin of safety must be extremely wide. The extraordinary rainfall of those three October days can not with assurance be accepted as the maximum.
Precipitation, in inches, in Passaic Valley and vicinity, October 7 to 11, 1903.
| From | To | ||||
| Station. | Day. | Hour. | Day. | Hour. | Amount. |
| Highland region: | |||||
| Dover | 7 | ..... | 11 | 9 p.m. | 10.13 |
| Little Falls | 7 | 4 a.m. | 11 | 7 a.m. | 14.13 |
| Charlotteburg | 7 | ..... | 10 | ..... | 12.67 |
| Ringwood | 8 | 11 a.m. | 9 | 8 p.m. | 10.63 |
| Red Sandstone plain: | |||||
| Paterson | 7 | 5 a.m. | 9 | 3.45 p.m. | 15.04 |
| River Vale | 8 | 8 a.m. | 11 | 6 p.m. | 12.55 |
| Essex Fells | 8 | ..... | 9 | 4 p.m. | 10.66 |
| Newark | 8 | 8.30 a.m. | 11 | 5 a.m. | 12.09 |
| South Orange | 8 | 6 a.m. | 10 | Night | 10.48 |
The extremely rapid rate of precipitation during the crucial part of the storm is shown by the recording gages placed at observation stations in Newark and New York City.
Hourly records of precipitation at New York observation station, October 8 and 9, 1903.
| Inches. | Inches. | ||||
| Oct. 8, | 9 to 10 a. m. | 0.08 | Oct. 9, | 1 to 2 a. m. | 0.25 |
| 10 to 11 a. m. | .02 | 2 to 3 a. m. | .75 | ||
| 11 to 12 m. | .32 | 3 to 4 a. m. | .34 | ||
| 12 m. to 1 p. m. | .10 | 4 to 5 a. m. | .46 | ||
| 1 to 2 p. m. | .05 | 5 to 6 a. m. | .41 | ||
| 2 to 3 p. m. | .06 | 6 to 7 a. m. | .29 | ||
| 3 to 4 p. m. | .34 | 7 to 8 a. m. | .51 | ||
| 4 to 5 p. m. | .01 | 8 to 9 a. m. | 1.38 | ||
| 5 to 6 p. m. | .10 | 9 to 10 a. m. | 1.04 | ||
| 6 to 7 p. m. | .02 | 10 to 11 a. m. | .08 | ||
| 7 to 8 p. m. | .93 | 11 to 12 m. | .23 | ||
| 8 to 9 p. m. | .32 | 12 m. to 1 p. m. | .24 | ||
| 9 to 10 p. m. | .24 | 1 to 2 p. m. | .31 | ||
| 10 to 11 p. m. | .27 | 2 to 3 p. m. | .32 | ||
| 11 to 12 p. m. | .26 | 3 to 4 p. m. | .01 | ||
| 9, 12 to 1 a. m. | .30 | Total | 6.92 |
Hourly record of precipitation at Newark observation station, October 8-11, 1903.
| Inches. | Inches. | ||||
| Oct. 8, | 8.25 to 9 a. m. | 0.05 | Oct. 9, | 7 to 8 a. m. | 0.29 |
| 9 to 10 a. m. | .04 | 8 to 9 a. m. | .69 | ||
| 10 to 11 a. m. | .00 | 9 to 10 a. m. | .69 | ||
| 11 to 12 m. | .00 | 10 to 11 a. m. | .39 | ||
| 12 m. to 1 p. m. | .14 | 11 to 12m. | .20 | ||
| 1 to 2 p. m. | .72 | 12m. to 1 p. m. | .39 | ||
| 2 to 3 p. m. | .49 | 1 to 2 p. m. | .28 | ||
| 3 to 4 p. m. | .11 | 2 to 3 p. m. | .34 | ||
| 4 to 5 p. m. | 1.05 | 3 to 3.25 p. m. | .13 | ||
| 5 to 6 p. m. | .45 | 11.50 to 11.55 p. m. | .01 | ||
| 6 to 7 p. m. | 1.20 | 10, 3 to 4 a. m. | .02 | ||
| 7 to 8 p. m. | .60 | 7 to 8 p. m. | .07 | ||
| 8 to 9 p. m. | .24 | 8 to 9 p. m. | .09 | ||
| 9 to 10 p. m. | .24 | 9 to 10 p. m. | .02 | ||
| 10 to 11 p. m. | .13 | 10 to 11 p. m. | .04 | ||
| 11 to 12 p. m. | .17 | 11 to 12 p. m. | .04 | ||
| 9, 12 to 1 a. m. | .29 | 11, 12 to 1 a. m. | .06 | ||
| 1 to 2 a. m. | .33 | 1 to 2 a. m. | .09 | ||
| 2 to 3 a. m. | .62 | 2 to 3 a. m. | .03 | ||
| 3 to 4 a. m. | .29 | 3 to 4 a. m. | .05 | ||
| 4 to 5 a. m. | .35 | 4 to 5 a. m. | .01 | ||
| 5 to 6 a. m. | .26 | Total | 11.83 | ||
| 6 to 7 a. m. | .13 |
From the above tables it may be seen that the maximum rate of precipitation per hour was 1.38 inches at New York and 1.2 inches at Newark. Comparison of the tables on pages 11 and 12 gives an excellent idea of the intensity of the storm. The amount of water falling in a single storm is nearly equal to the total for June, a month of unusual precipitation.
The average of the total amounts of precipitation recorded at the various stations in the Passaic area is 11.74 inches. These totals are fairly uniform, none of them varying widely from the average. Therefore the figure 11.74 represents a conservative mean for a calculation of total amount of water over the drainage area. Assuming this as the correct depth, the amount of water which fell on each square mile of the Passaic drainage area during the storm was 27,273,000 cubic feet, or for the whole Passaic drainage area over 27,000,000,000 cubic feet, weighing about 852,000,000 tons. This amount of water would, if properly stored, fill a lake with twenty times the capacity of Greenwood Lake, would cover Central Park in New York City, which has an area of about 1.5 square miles, to a height of 645 feet, and, at the present rate of water consumption in the city of Newark, N. J., would supply the city with water for twenty years.
DESCENT OF FLOOD.
HIGHLAND TRIBUTARIES AND CENTRAL BASIN.
A description of the descent of flood waters from the highland tributaries into the Central Basin has been given in Water-Supply Paper No. 88. It has been shown that the lands of the Central Basin are covered even in ordinary freshets, and that in the event of a great flood the waters merely rise higher, being, for the greater extent, almost quiescent, and beyond the flooding of houses and barns and the destruction of crops, little damage is done. In other words, the flood along this portion is not torrential in character.
During the flood of 1903 the water fell so quickly all over this basin, and was collected so rapidly by the small tributaries, that a lake was formed at once which served as a cushion against which the raging torrent of the highland tributaries spent itself without doing extraordinary damage in that immediate region. Bridges which might have been lost in a smaller flood like that of 1902 were actually standing in slack water by the time the mountain torrents appeared in force. These streams caused much destruction higher up in the mountains, but in the Central Basin their energy became potential—a gathering of forces to be loosed upon the lower valley. A discussion of the effects of this will be taken up under the heading "Damages."
In Water-Supply Paper No. 88 is given the proportion of flood waters contributed to the Central Basin by each of the tributaries. These figures were computed from the results of gagings maintained for a period sufficient to afford this information within a reasonable approximation. In the case of the storm which resulted in the flood of 1903 it is probable that data referred to can not be safely applied.
The flood of 1902 was the result of abundant rains following upon and melting a heavy snow. Weather Bureau records show that neither the depth of the snow nor the amount of subsequent rainfall was uniform, or even approximately so, over the Passaic drainage area. Indeed, so marked was the variation that it was believed that the mean rainfall for all the observation stations on the basin did not bear sufficient relation to observed run-off to allow of any reliable deductions. In the case of the October storm, however, the distribution of rainfall was more nearly uniform, and the run-off from the highland tributaries into the Central Basin must have been proportionately different in amount from that indicated in the upland tributary tables in the report of the previous flood. The data given for the 1902 flood can not, therefore, in the case of the highland tributaries, be applied to the conditions which obtained in the flood of 1903.
FLOOD AT MACOPIN DAM.
Mr. Morris R. Sherrerd, engineer of the Newark city water board, has furnished flow computations over Macopin intake dam, which is the head of the Newark pipe line. As about 73 per cent of the Pequanac drainage area lies above this intake, the table on page 16 shows roughly an equivalent percentage of the flow contributed by Pequanac River to the Central Basin of the Passaic. In consulting this table it should be borne in mind that the entire run-off of the drainage area above Macopin is about 25,000,000 gallons per day more than the amounts presented in this table. All reservoirs and ponds connected with the conservancy system of the Newark water supply were filled except that at Oakridge, which was about 1.5 feet below the crest of the spillway.
Flow of Pequanac River over Macopin dam, October 7-24, 1903.
[From Newark water department.]
| Cubic feet. | ||
| Oct. 8, | 6 a. m. to 12 m. | 240,600 |
| 12m. to 4 p. m. | 347,600 | |
| 4 to 6 p. m. | 842,200 | |
| 8-9, | 6 p. m. to 6 a. m. | 40,110,000 |
| 9, | 6 a. m. to 12 m. | 51,870,000 |
| 12m. to 1 p. m. | 15,100,000 | |
| 1 to 5 p. m. | 62,430,000 | |
| 5 to 10 p. m. | 89,040,000 | |
| 10 to 11 p. m. | 19,520,000 | |
| 9-10, | 10 p. m. to 8 a. m. | 201,350,000 |
| 10, | 8 a. m. to 12 m. | 75,670,000 |
| 12 m. to 6 p. m. | 103,650,000 | |
| 6 to 12 p. m. | 73,530,000 | |
| 11, | 12 to 6 a. m. | 56,820,000 |
| 6 a. m. to 12m. | 41,440,000 | |
| 12 m. to 6 p. m. | 32,755,000 | |
| 6 to 12 p. m. | 25,665,000 | |
| 12, | 12 to 6 a. m. | 23,800,000 |
| 6 a. m. to 12m. | 20,725,000 | |
| 12 m. to 6 p. m. | 18,450,000 | |
| 6 to 12 p. m. | 15,105,000 | |
| 13, | 12 to 6 a. m. | 13,370,000 |
| 6 a. m. to 12 m. | 11,890,000 | |
| 12 m. to 6 p. m. | 11,230,000 | |
| 6 to 12 p. m. | 11,230,000 | |
| 14, | 12 to 6 a. m. | 9,626,000 |
| 6 a. m. to 12 m. | 8,690,000 | |
| 12 m. to 6 p. m. | 8,022,000 | |
| 6 to 12 p. m. | 7,353,000 | |
| 15, | 12 to 6 a. m. | 6,952,000 |
| 6 a. m. to 6 p. m. | 12,700,000 | |
| 15-16, | 6 p. m. to 6 a. m. | 10,965,000 |
| 16, | 6 a. m. to 6 p. m. | 10,025,000 |
| 16-17, | 6 p. m. to 6 a. m. | 9,091,000 |
| 17, | 6 a. m. to 6 p. m. | 8,690,000 |
| 17-18, | 6 p. m. to 6 a. m. | 9,893,000 |
| 18, | 6 a. m. to 6 p. m. | 10,565,000 |
| 18-19, | 6 p. m. to 6 a. m. | 8,690,000 |
| 19, | 6 a. m. to 6 p. m. | 6,952,000 |
| 19-20, | 6 p. m. to 6 a. m. | 6,150,000 |
| 20, | 6 a. m. to 6 p. m. | 5,882,000 |
| 20-21, | 6 p. m. to 6 a. m. | 5,749,000 |
| 21, | 6 a. m. to 6 p. m. | 5,481,000 |
| 21-22, | 6 p. m. to 6 a. m. | 5,214,000 |
| 22, | 6 a. m. to 6 p. m. | 4,144,000 |
| 22-23, | 6 p. m. to 6 a. m. | 3,677,000 |
| 23, | 6 a. m. to 6 p. m. | 3,877,000 |
| 23-24, | 6 p. m. to 6 a. m. | 5,749,000 |
| 24, | 6 a. m. to 6 p. m. | 5,615,000 |
FLOOD AT BEATTIE'S DAM, LITTLE FALLS.
The flow over Beattie's dam at Little Falls, has been calculated according to coefficients used for the same dam in Water-Supply Paper No. 88. Recorded gage heights show that over the main dam there was a maximum depth of 11.12 feet, which continued from 2 to 8 p. m., on October 10, representing a maximum flow of 31,675 cubic feet per second. (See Pl. I, A.) In the following table is set forth the flow of the river over Beattie's dam during the flood, and for purposes of comparison, the figures for the flood period of March, 1902. It should be borne in mind in consulting this table, that in the case of the flood of 1903 exact dates and hours are given, while the figures for the 1902 flood represent flow determinations at six-hour intervals, beginning with the initial rise of that flood.
| U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY | WATER-SUPPLY PAPER NO. 92 PL. I |
A. BEATTIE'S DAM, LITTLE FALLS, N. J., IN FLOOD.
B. FLOOD-WATER LINES IN RESIDENCE DISTRICT, PATERSON, N. J.
Flood flow over Beattie's dam during floods of 1902 and 1903.
| Date and hour. | 1903. | 1902.[A] | |
| Sec.-feet. | Sec.-feet. | ||
| Oct. 8, | 12 p.m | 1,645 | 490 |
| 9, | 6 a.m. | 4,235 | 700 |
| 12 m. | 8,560 | 1,350 | |
| 6 p.m. | 15,755 | 2,120 | |
| 12 p.m. | 23,927 | 3,540 | |
| 10, | 6 a.m. | 28,370 | 4,250 |
| 12 m. | 31,305 | 4,600 | |
| 6 p.m. | 31,675 | 5,000 | |
| 12 p.m. | 30,770 | 6,500 | |
| 11, | 6 a.m. | 29,840 | 7,600 |
| 12 m. | 28,950 | 8,250 | |
| 6 p.m. | 26,960 | 9,000 | |
| 12 p.m. | 25,530 | 10,200 | |
| 12, | 6 a.m. | 24,435 | 11,450 |
| 12 m. | 22,625 | 14,700 | |
| 6 p.m. | 20,810 | 18,150 | |
| 12 p.m. | 18,655 | 20,650 | |
| 13, | 6 a.m. | 17,930 | 22,200 |
| 12 m. | 16,190 | 22,700 | |
| 6 p.m. | 14,900 | 23,400 | |
| 12 p.m. | 13,615 | 23,300 | |
| 14, | 6 a.m. | 12,340 | 22,950 |
| 12 m. | 11,740 | 22,650 | |
| 6 p.m. | 10,975 | 22,350 | |
| 12 p.m. | 9,820 | 22,100 | |
| 15, | 6 a.m. | 9,180 | 21,150 |
| 12 m. | 8,330 | 19,900 | |
| 6 p.m. | 7,700 | 18,900 | |
| 12 p.m. | 7,005 | 17,350 | |
| 16, | 6 a.m. | 6,695 | 15,750 |
| 12 m. | 5,920 | 13,900 | |
| 6 p.m. | 5,620 | 13,300 | |
| 12 p.m. | 5,360 | 11,800 | |
| 17, | 6 a.m. | 4,855 | 10,650 |
| Below full bank | 8,900 | ||
| Do...... | 8,500 | ||
| Do...... | 8,100 | ||
| Do...... | 8,200 | ||
| Do...... | 7,000 | ||
| Do...... | 6,250 | ||
| Do...... | 5,900 | ||
| Do...... | 5,300 | ||
| Do...... | 5,200 | ||
| Do...... | 4,900 | ||
FLOOD FLOW OVER DUNDEE DAM.
The flood, as indicated by gage heights at Dundee dam, lasted from about 6.30 p. m. October 8 to about midnight October 18. Although the maximum recorded gage height was 19 inches higher than during the flood of 1902, the actual time during which the river was out of its banks was forty-five hours less than at the earlier flood. Examination of fig. 1 shows that the flood of 1903 was decidedly more intense than that of 1902, the maximum height being reached in 1903 in about sixty hours, while in 1902 the maximum was not reached until the expiration of about one hundred and twenty hours.
At Dundee dam the familiar break in the progress of the flood took place about thirty-five hours after the initial rise. It occurred before the time of the maximum gage height at the mouth of Pompton River, and there is nothing to indicate that it was caused, as has been claimed, by slack water from the Pompton flood being forced back into Great Piece Meadows. There is no doubt that a part of the Pompton flood was so diverted, but there was maintained throughout at Little Falls a steady pressure, which constantly increased to maximum. This flood check, at Dundee dam was observed in 1902, but it could not be shown to arise from the frequently mentioned phenomena at the mouth of Pompton River. It is important to prove or disprove this hypothesis. If it were found to be true, it could be advantageously taken into consideration in connection with measures for the prevention of flood damages. As the Pompton had no such effect upon the flood flow at Dundee dam in two consecutive historic floods, the writer is inclined to believe that the idea is entirely erroneous.
Fig. 1.—Comparative flood run-off at Dundee dam, March, 1902, and October, 1903.
Since the flow curves in fig. 1 were drawn it has been found by careful observation that the depressions which occur in the rise of every flood over Dundee dam are probably due to the carrying away of the flashboards which are placed upon the dam crest in times of low water. A review of the gage heights recorded by floods for several years past shows that the break occurs when the height of water over the dam crest reaches from 40 to 60 inches. The flashboards used upon this dam are usually 18 inches wide, and as they are supported by iron rods, which are of approximately the same strength and are placed upon the dam by one crew of workmen, it may be safely assumed that they are of approximately equal stability and might be expected to fail almost simultaneously along the length of the dam crest. So sudden a decrease in the effectual height of the dam must lower the water on the dam crest markedly, and as every other probable cause has been eliminated in the case of the recent flood, the explanation of the check in the progress of floods over this dam may be safety accepted as due to carrying away of flashboards. This effect should be apparent in the gage-height records only.
In the flow diagrams (figs. 1 and 2) the effect would not be the same, but the curve would rise more sharply. Similarly, the measurements at the beginning are not correct, as they are calculated according to gage heights measured from the stone crest of the dam. Therefore, a true flood curve at this point would be much flatter at the beginning and rise sharply at a period coincident with the carrying away of the flashboards.
An important difference between the two floods is that the earlier continued longer, but the later one was much higher. The flood of 1902 was caused by the turning of an equivalent of approximately 6 inches of precipitation into the main channel during a period of six days. In the deluge of 1903 there fell 11.74 inches of rain, the greater part of which was precipitated in 36 hours. Thus it is seen that there was in the flood of 1903 a larger rainfall during a much shorter period than in the flood of 1902. Computation shows that the total run-off from the drainage area above Dundee dam during the earlier flood was 13,379,000,000 cubic feet, and that on account of the frozen condition of the ground at that time this amount of water represented practically all of the precipitation. During the flood of 1903 there was a total run-off for the same area of 14,772,000,000 cubic feet, which represents about 66 per cent of the observed precipitation. According to these figures the total amount of run-off in the 1903 flood was only 10 per cent greater than that in 1902, while the actual flood height during the 1903 flood was 27 per cent higher than during the flood of 1902. The above comparison shows, in a striking manner, the effect of the condition of the surface. In the case of the later flood we had, as has been stated in previous pages, an area which had been well watered during the previous summer, and the observed ground-water levels were fairly high. There was, however, sufficient storage capacity in the basin to retain about 34 per cent of the precipitation occurring between October 7 and 11. This water must have been largely absorbed by the earth. The general relations of the floods of 1903 and 1902 can therefore be briefly stated as follows:
General relations of floods of 1903 and 1902.
| Average precipitation. | Duration of precipitation. | Maximum flood flow. | Total run-off. | Run-off. | Duration of flood at dundee dam. | |
| Inches. | Days. | Sec.-feet. | Cubic feet. | Per cent. | Hours. | |
| 1902..... | 6 | 6 | 24,800 | 13,379,000,000 | 100[B] | 270 |
| 1903..... | 11.74 | 3 | 35,700 | 14,772,000,000 | 66 | 225 |
In the following table and fig. 2 are recorded gage heights taken at hourly intervals during the crucial part of the flood and the amount of water expressed in cubic feet per second flowing over the crest of the dam at each gage height.
Fig. 2.—Diagram of flood flow at Dundee dam, flood of 1903.
Flow of Passaic River at Dundee dam, 1903.
DAMAGES.
GENERAL STATEMENTS.
Estimates of flood damages are always approximations only. It is possible to determine with a fair degree of assurance the cost of replacing structures which have been carried away, to estimate the value of goods destroyed—especially if they be commodities stored in shops or warehouses—to calculate the amount of operatives' wages lost, and in the case of general mercantile business to estimate the damages incurred through consequent reduction of trade. Destruction by flood, however vast, is incomplete. It differs materially from destruction by fire, for often destructible property is of value after floods have passed. Buildings which are inundated still retain value, and many kinds of merchandise are not totally destroyed. Therefore when the amount of damages is calculated there is always to be taken into consideration the fact that a part of the material which has been flooded can be reclaimed, and retains some proportion, at least, of the value which it had previously possessed. Furthermore, damages by flood enter into practically every detail of social and business affairs. There are losses which are severe to one or more persons, and which can not be appreciated except by those whom the floods have actually overtaken. Therefore estimations of flood damages can be only approximate, and while a measure of accuracy may be reached with respect to a part of the losses, there remains a necessity for approximation which can not be classed with carefully computed damages along other lines.
HIGHLAND TRIBUTARIES.
Along the three northern tributaries, the Ramapo, Wanaque, and Pequanac, and at their confluence with the Pompton, the destruction by flood waters was far greater than along the Rockaway, Whippany, and upper Passaic, or in that area described as the Central Basin. In the drainage areas of the three tributaries last mentioned the waters were higher than in the flood of 1902, but the general effects were of the same nature, and consisted principally of flooded lands, houses, and washouts. There were few radical cases of complete destruction like those which marked the course of the flood in the northern tributaries. The principal interest is therefore confined to the Pompton and the three highland tributaries which discharge into it.
Ramapo River.—The greatest destruction was along the Ramapo. It is the largest of the upland branches, and was therefore the heaviest contributor to the main stream. Throughout the flood period the stream was especially violent, causing great apprehension in the lower valley.
The destruction along several stretches of the valley was almost complete. Nearly all the dams failed, and every bridge across the river, with one exception, was carried away. Some small villages were swept bare, and the damages to realty value and personal property were excessive.
It was only by strenuous measures that the dam impounding the waters of Tuxedo Lake was saved. If this had failed the destruction along the entire course of the river, even to the cities in the lower valley, would have been enormously increased.
The dam at Cranberry Pond, in Arden, failed in the early part of the storm, the flood waters disabling the Tuxedo electric-light plant and inundating the Italian settlements along the river below. The failure of the dam conserving the waters of Nigger Pond, which lies at the head of a small tributary emptying into the Ramapo below Tuxedo, resulted in the inundation of Ramapo village. The village of Sloatsburg was practically obliterated.
The damage at Pompton Lakes was especially severe. During the early part of the flood the timber dam of the Ludlum Steel and Iron Company, which raised the water to a height of 27 feet, and afforded 7.04 horsepower per foot fall, was carried away with a part of the headrace. (See Pl. II, A.) This sudden emptying of Pompton Lake, an expanse of 196 acres (see Pl. II, B), was extremely destructive to Pompton Plains, and the destruction of the dams above on Ramapo River, which followed some time after the bursting of the lower dam, refilled Pompton Lake above its former level, and caused greater damage than that which resulted from the failure of Pompton dam itself. The large iron bridge just below the dam was carried away, with the stores of the Ludlum Steel and Iron Company. The river front along this company's property was destroyed, along with coal docks at the head of Morris Canal feeder. The channel of the river below the dam is filled with débris, which will raise the height of the water in the tailrace, and unless it is cleared will diminish the available power at the iron works. It has been authoritatively announced, however, that the power facilities will not be restored, as the Ludlum Steel and Iron Company is preparing to use steam power exclusively.
Pequanac and Wanaque rivers.—Along Pequanac River the principal damage consisted of washed-out roads and destroyed bridges. The large ponded area in this basin was practically full at the time of the flood, and, as measurements at Macopin dam show, the run-off per square mile was extremely large. In the Wanaque drainage area the storage facilities afforded at Greenwood Lake were probably useful in holding back a part of the water for a brief period, but the damages along the stream are comparable to those of the Pequanac.
The effect of the flow from these two streams, added to that of the Ramapo, was particularly disastrous over the Pompton Plains. Three
| U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY | WATER-SUPPLY PAPER NO. 92 PL. II |
A. POMPTON LAKES DAM AND WATER FRONT OF LUDLUM STEEL AND IRON COMPANY.
B. DRY BED OF POMPTON LAKE.
| U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY | WATER-SUPPLY PAPER NO. 92 PL. III |
FLOOD DISTRICT OF PATERSON, N. J.
bridges at Pompton station, over Wanaque and Pequanac rivers, were carried away, and in the end one bridge only remained over Pompton River, that at Pequanac station. In all about 100 houses were inundated on Pompton Plains, and the damage to roads and culverts was particularly severe.
The total loss in the drainage area of Pompton River was $350,000.
CENTRAL BASIN.
Over the Central Basin there was the usual impounding of flood waters, but the effects were not materially different from those described in the report on the flood of 1902. The damage along this basin from floods of this character is accumulative by reason of the fact that the presence of water over the land for so long a period kills the desirable feed grasses and fosters in their place the coarse meadow grass. This effect has been observed for some years, particularly since the flood of 1896. It is estimated that over the Central Basin the damage to crops and arable land alone arising from the floods of 1902 and 1903 amounts to $300,000. A statement of the damage arising from the later flood can not separately be made, as its effect upon the fertility of the meadow lands can not be determined without the experience of a planting season.
LOWER VALLEY.
The flow of the stream through the constricted channel at Little Falls and on to Great Falls at Paterson is given in the weir measurements on page 17. It was attended by comparatively large damages, the features of which were not materially different from those described in the previous report. The pumping station of the East Jersey Water Company, situated just below Little Falls dam, did not suffer as severely as during the previous flood, by reason of the fact that extensive and effective barricades were placed so as to keep a large part of the water away from the pumps. This was not accomplished in the flood of 1902. The total damage in this district amounted to nearly $200,000.
The channel contours were changed somewhat in this portion of the stream. In the river at the pumping station of the East Jersey Water Company there was completed a somewhat interesting cycle of changes, described in the following extract of a letter from Mr. G. Waldo Smith, chief engineer for the New York aqueduct commissioners, and formerly engineer and superintendent of the East Jersey Water Company:
"No better illustration of the old adage, 'The river claims its own,' could be given than that offered by the action of Passaic River at Little Falls, New Jersey, at the point where the works of the East Jersey Water Company have been constructed. These works were built between 1897 and 1900. In the course of the work the river channel for a distance of several thousand feet down stream from the power house was drained and improved, so that the head on the wheels at the ordinary stage of the river was increased about 6 feet. From the time this improvement was completed to March, 1902, through the action of the ordinary flow of water and moderate floods, this head had been reduced about one-third. The great freshet of March, 1902, cut off about another third, and the recent flood has completed the cycle and entirely wiped out the benefit due to the river improvement, and the water at the pumping station stands now at almost precisely the same level that it stood before any improvements were undertaken. New bars were formed in approximately the same location as they existed before, and, so far as possible, except for the changed conditions brought about by the building of the power station, the condition of the river is not dissimilar to that existing when the work was commenced.
"In this connection it might be well to state that a New Jersey drainage commission, in blasting out a channel below the Little Falls dam some years ago, dumped a considerable portion of the excavation in the deep water under the Morris Canal viaduct.
"The action of the two great floods, March, 1902, and October, 1903, has washed a large part of this material out of this deep hole and piled it up in the river about 300 feet below where the river widens, and reduces the force of the current.
"I have made no estimate of the amount of material deposited in the river, but offhand should say that it would be at least 100,000 yards."
Paterson.—The flood district in the city of Paterson (see Pl. III) comprised 196 acres and involved the temporary obstruction of 10.3 miles of streets. Along the streets close to the river banks the height of water was 12 feet, sufficient to inundate the first floors of all the buildings (see Pl. I, B), and in some cases to reach to the second floor. During this flood period householders who remained at their homes were compelled to use boats, while in the more exposed places the danger was too great to admit of remaining, and at one time 1,200 persons were housed and fed in the National Guard armory at Paterson.
The bridges crossing Passaic River in Passaic, Essex, and Bergen counties were almost completely destroyed, and the damage amounted to $654,811. Within the limits of Paterson, below Great Falls, all of the highway bridges except two were either severely damaged or completely carried away. West street bridge, the first below the falls, was a Melan concrete, steel-arch structure, built in 1897, and costing $65,000. It was composed of three spans, each about 90 feet long. The flood practically split two spans longitudinally, the upstream side of each, equal to about one-third of the width of the bridge, being carried away.
| U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY | WATER-SUPPLY PAPER NO. 92 PL. IV |
A. WASHOUT AT SPRUCE STREET, PATERSON, N. J.
B. RIVER STREET, PATERSON, N. J., AFTER FLOOD.
| U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY | WATER-SUPPLY PAPER NO. 92 PL. V |
A. EFFECTS OF FLOOD IN MILL DISTRICT, PATERSON, N. J.
B. THE WRECK OF A HOTEL IN PATERSON, N. J.
This structure was built to conform to the established grades of streets on both sides of the river and was completely inundated, forming a barrier for floating débris and practically making a dam in the river. Main street bridge is a 3-span, steel-arch structure, which was completely covered during the flood, but was only slightly injured. Arch street bridge, built in 1902 to take the place of a structure carried away by the March flood, was a concrete-arch bridge of three spans. It was undermined at the north pier and collapsed, being practically destroyed. The original cost of this bridge was $34,000. Its piers presented a serious obstruction to the flow of the stream, especially as the channel is very narrow at this point. In addition to this, the bridge was of low grade and admirably adapted for deterring flood flow. Below Arch street bridge all the other structures crossing the Passaic were of iron and were carried away, with the exception of Sixth avenue and Wesel bridges. Those destroyed were designated as follows: Straight street, Hillman street, Moffat, Wagaraw, Fifth avenue, East Thirty-third street, and Broadway bridges. All these structures were built too low, and were inundated during the early stages of the flood.
The damage to real property, stock, and household goods in the city of Paterson amounted, according to certified returns, to about $2,700,000. It is impossible to secure correct figures, because merchants and manufacturers refuse to give details of losses, fearing that the publication thereof would affect their credit. General ideas concerning the destruction by the flood can be gathered from Pls. I, B, III, IV, V, and VI.
Passaic and vicinity.—Below the city of Paterson destruction was as complete as in Paterson, although the damage was not as great because the improvements were not as valuable. Damage to property, exclusive of public works, in this region, amounted to about $1,250,000. This estimate does not take into consideration losses by manufacturers arising from destruction of raw materials or finished products. The flood was about 4-1/2 feet higher than that of 1902. (See Pl. VII, A.)
On the right bank of Passaic River, in the city of Passaic, the damage was severe, especially to manufacturing plants. In addition to the flood in the Passaic itself, the bursting of Morris Canal, a few miles east of Passaic, flooded Wesel Brook, which in Passaic is used as the tail-race of the Dundee Power Company. The capacity of Wesel Brook channel is limited, and the extraordinary amount of water which was turned into it carried away all culverts and bridges from Richfield to Passaic.
Below Passaic, along the river front of Essex County, the damages to bridges amounted to $50,000. (See Pl. VII, B.) The loss due to washouts in roads throughout the county amounted to $15,000. The effects of the flood were apparent along the entire length of the river and into Newark Bay. The damage from inundation in Newark and vicinity amounted to $753,199.
The figures above given with reference to damage along Passaic River are uncommonly accurate, being for the most part the result of a house-to-house canvass by the northern New Jersey flood commission. As has been stated above, tradesmen are reluctant to give full details with reference to their losses through fear of injured credit. Roughly estimating the damage as a whole, and taking into consideration factors which were given to the writer confidentially, the damage throughout the drainage area from this flood will amount to not less than $7,000,000.