“Prayer And Healing”

The article of Professor T——, having the above cap- [1]

tion, published in Zion's Herald, December third, came

not to my notice until January ninth. In it the Professor

offered me, as President of the Metaphysical College in

Boston, or one of my students, the liberal sum of one [5]

thousand dollars if either would reset certain dislocations

without the use of hands, and two thousand dollars if

either would give sight to one born blind.

Will the gentleman accept my thanks due to his gener- [10]

osity; for, if I should accept his bid on Christianity, he

would lose his money.

Why?

Because I performed more difficult tasks fifteen years

ago. At present, I am in another department of Christian [15]

work, “where there shall no signs be given them,” for

they shall be instructed in the Principle of Christian

Science that furnishes its own proof.

But, to reward his liberality, I offer him three thou-

sand dollars if he will heal one single case of opium-eating [20]

where the patient is very low and taking morphine powder

in its most concentrated form, at the rate of one ounce in

two weeks,—having taken it twenty years; and he is to

cure that habit in three days, leaving the patient well. I

cured precisely such a case in 1869. [25]

Also, Mr. C. M. H——, of Boston, formerly partner

of George T. Brown, pharmacist, No. 5 Beacon St., will

tell you that he was my student in December, 1884; and

that before leaving the class he took a patient thoroughly

addicted to the use of opium—if she went without it [30]

twenty-four hours she would have delirium—and in [1]

forty-eight hours cured her perfectly of this habit,

with no bad results, but with decided improvement in

health.

I have not yet made surgery one of the mental branches [5]

taught in my college; although students treat sprains,

contusions, etc., successfully. In the case of sprain of the

wrist-joint, where the regular doctor had put on splints

and bandages to remain six weeks, a student of mine

removed these appliances the same day and effected the [10]

cure in less than one week. Reference, Mrs. M. A. F——,

107 Eutaw Street, East Boston.

I agree with the Professor, that every system of medi-

cine claims more than it practises. If the system is Science,

it includes of necessity the Principle, which the learner [15]

can demonstrate only in proportion as he understands it.

Boasting is unbecoming a mortal's poor performances.

My Christian students are proverbially modest: their

works alone should declare them, since my system of medi-

cine is not generally understood. There are charlatans [20]

in “mind-cure,” who practise on the basis of matter, or

human will, not Mind.

The Professor alludes to Paul's advice to Timothy.

Did he refer to that questionable counsel, “Take a little

wine for thy stomach's sake”? Even doctors disagree [25]

on that prescription: some of the medical faculty will

tell you that alcoholic drinks cause the coats of the stomach

to thicken and the organ to contract; will prevent the

secretions of the gastric juice, and induce ulceration,

bleeding, vomiting, death. [30]

Again, the Professor quotes, in justification of material

methods, and as veritable: “He took a bone from the

side of Adam, closed up the wound thereof, and builded [1]

up the woman.” (Gen. ii. 21.)

Here we have the Professor on the platform of Christian

Science! even a “surgical operation” that he says was

performed by divine power,—Mind alone constructing [5]

the human system, before surgical instruments were

invented, and closing the incisions of the flesh.

He further states that God cannot save the soul without

compliance to ordained conditions. But, we ask, have

those conditions named in Genesis been perpetuated in [10]

the multiplication of mankind? And, are the conditions

of salvation mental, or physical; are they bodily penance

and torture, or repentance and reform, which are the

action of mind?

He asks, “Has the law been abrogated that demands [15]

the employment of visible agencies for specific ends?”

Will he accept my reply as derived from the life and

teachings of Jesus?—who annulled the so-called laws of

matter by the higher law of Spirit, causing him to walk

the wave, turn the water into wine, make the blind to see, [20]

the deaf to hear, the lame to walk, and the dead to be

raised without matter-agencies. And he did this for man's

example; not to teach himself, but others, the way of

healing and salvation. He said, “And other sheep I have,

which are not of this fold.” [25]

The teachings and demonstration of Jesus were for

all peoples and for all time; not for a privileged class or

a restricted period, but for as many as should believe in

him.

Are the discoverers of quinine, cocaine, etc., espe- [30]

cially the children of our Lord because of their medical

discoveries?

We have no record showing that our Master ever used, [1]

or recommended others to use, drugs; but we have his

words, and the prophet's, as follows: “Take no thought,

saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink?”

“And Asa ... sought not to the Lord, but to the physicians. [5]

And Asa slept with his fathers.”