FOOTNOTES:
[5] Cal. Close Rolls, 27 Jan. 1337. Rymer, Foedera, iv. 703.
[6] Exchequer Accts. 19/31.
[7] This rate was being paid in 1303.
[8] Oppenheim, The Administration of the Royal Navy, 1509-1660, p. 14.
[9] Thos. Allen, writing to the Earl of Shrewsbury in 1516, refers to 'one Brygandin son unto him that made the King's great ship.' Lodge, Illustrations of British History, vol. i. p. 14.
[10] Cal. S.P. Dom., May 12, 1519.
[11] 'An Act for Servants' Wages,' 11 Henry VII, c. 22.
[12] An Act concerning Artificers and Labourers, 6 Henry VIII c. 3.
[13] Op. cit., pp. 22, 153, 179, 232-3.
[14] Henry V had merely given a pension for past service to a shipwright incapable of further labours.
[15] Patent Roll 680.
[16] 'Ac in consideratione veri et fidelis servicii quod dilectus serviens noster Jacobus Baker durante vita sua impendere intendit.'
[17] Pat. Roll 704.
[18] Acts of the P.C., New Series, i. 233.
[19] Ibid., ii. p. 186.
[20] Pat. Roll 833. I cannot trace in the rolls any similar grant to Holborn or Smyth.
[21] Pat. Roll, 921.
[22] He may be the Richard Bull who was called before the Council in 1555. Acts of the P.C., v. 189.
[23] Stephins was engaged on the repair of the Lion barge in 1553, and was paid 20l. as 'the Queen's Majesty's Shipwright' for making the Leader barge in 1558. Acts of the P.C., iv. 362, and vi. 426.
[24] The difference in the spelling is no argument against this, as 'ph' and 'v' are used indifferently in the documents in this surname, Stevens' name being spelt 'Stevyns' and 'Stevins' and 'Stephens' in the rolls.
[25] Pat. Roll 1091.
[26] Officium Naupegiarii sive unius magistrorum factorum Navium et Cimbarum nostrarum.
[27] Pat. Roll 1249. The entry in Pat. Roll 1091 is vacated with an endorsement in the margin, signed by Mathew Baker and William Borough to the effect that the surrender was voluntary and in consideration of the grant to Baker and Addey.
[28] Sometimes spelt Adye, Adie, or Ady.
[29] Pat. Roll 1210. No office is mentioned; all that is conveyed is the 'annuity or annual fee of 12d. sterling a day.'
[30] Nec non in consideratione boni et fidelis servicii per præfatum Willelmum Pett Shipwright antehac impensi ac imposterum impendendi in fabricatione navium nostrarum heredum et successorum nostrorum ac in assistencia sua in causis nostris marinis.
[31] Pat. Roll 1300. In a MS. account of the 'ordinary wages and exchequer fees of his Majesty's Master Shipwrights' (Add. MS. 9299 f. 48) it is stated that this had been given in recompense for building the Ark Royal, but as this ship appears to have been originally built for Ralegh this can hardly have been the reason. The patent only speaks of 'good and faithful service done and to be done.'
[32] Pat. Roll 1342.
[33] Drake's edition of Hasted, History of Kent, p. 41.
[34] Add. MS. 9299. I have not been able to find his patent.
[35] He built the Warspite in 1596 and the Malice Scourge for the Earl of Cumberland, and in 1598 and 1600 received, in conjunction with others, the usual 'rewards' for building merchant ships (Cal. S.P. Dom., 30 July 1596, 24 Sept. 1598, 15 Jan. 1600).
[36] Pat. Roll. 1620.
[39] S.P. Dom. Chas. I, xxxv. 104. Although countersigned by Coke, this warrant is not signed by the Lord High Admiral, so presumably it is a duplicate.
[40] 11 July 1614. He does not mention this in the manuscript.
[41] Probably these amounts should be multiplied by 6.
[42] Thus in November 1591, whilst holding office as Master Shipwright, Chapman, who owned a private yard at Deptford, was paid the bounty of 5s. a ton for building the Dainty of London of 200 tons, 'as an encouragement to him and others to build like ships,' and Phineas was paid the like bounty for building the Resistance. (Cal. S.P. Dom.)
[44] Salisbury MSS. (Hist. MSS.), i. 276.
[47] Rotherhithe, where their Hall was situated.
[48] Probably it was due to the growing resistance of the City Company of Free Shipwrights.
[49] Cal. S.P. Dom., 12 July 1613.
[50] Ibid., 30 Oct. 1613.
[51] See Sharpe, Short Account of the Worshipful Company of Shipwrights. This author has made the mistake of assuming that the Charter of 1605 was granted to the City Company.
[52] It is not even mentioned in Stowe's list of sixty companies attending the Lord Mayor's Banquet in 1531.
[53] Cal. S.P. Dom., 4 Feb. 1632.
[54] Ibid., 17 June 1631. I am indebted to Mr. E. A. Ebblewhite for drawing my attention to the significance of this fact.
[55] Cal. S.P. Dom., 30 June 1637.
[56] Ibid., 10 July 1637.
[57] Ibid., 26 July 1637.
[58] Council Register, No. 50.
[59] Commons Journal, i. 563.
[60] Cal. S. P. Dom. January 21, 1633.
[61] Lords' Journal, vii. 286. Hist. MSS., Sixth Report, p. 51.
[62] Lords' Journals, viii. 232, 286; x. 403.
[63] Hist. MSS., Seventh Report, p. 40.
[64] Cal. S.P. Dom., 25 July 1672.
[65] By the Commissioners for inquiring into the State of the Navy. Cal. S.P. Dom., 22 Feb. 1627.
[66] Bodleian, Rawlinson MSS. A 177.
[67] Cal. S.P. Dom., 21 Aug. 1690.
[68] See Sutherland, Britain's Glory, or Shipbuilding Unvail'd, p. 70.
[69] Vol. xiv. p. 482.
[70] Prince George of Denmark, then Lord High Admiral.
2.—The Family of Pett.
When Thomas Heywood, in his description of the Sovereign of the Seas written in 1637, referred to the author of this manuscript as 'Captain Phineas Pett, overseer of the work, and one of the principal officers of his Majesty's navy, whose ancestors, as father, grandfather, and great-grandfather, for the space of two hundred years and upwards, have continued in the same name officers and architects in the Royal Navy,' he was, it may be presumed; recording the local tradition of the Pett family. That this tradition was strong and persistent is clear from the fact that Mansell, writing to Thomas Aylesbury[71] in 1620 to propose Peter Pett as builder of the new pinnaces; recommended him on the ground that 'his family have had the employment since Henry the Seventh's time,' while forty years later, Fuller, in his 'Worthies of England,' also referred to it in these words: 'I am credibly informed that that Mystery of Shipwrights for some descents hath been preserved successfully in Families, of whom the Petts about Chatham are of singular regard.'
This tradition, so far as it relates to the descent of the 'mystery' from generation to generation, was no doubt well founded, but there is no evidence that office under the Crown was held by any of Phineas Pett's ancestors earlier than his father, Peter.
The name 'Pett' is said by a modern writer on the history of English surnames to be a Kentish variant of the name 'Pitt.' This would imply a Kentish origin of the family, and this supposition might seem to be strengthened by the fact that the name, as a place-name, only occurs in Kent and on the eastern border of Sussex.[72]
The fact is, however, that 'pet' is simply a Middle-English variant of the familiar word 'pit,' kin to the old Frisian 'pet,' and is found in use throughout the east coast counties from Sussex to Yorkshire, but more frequently in the South than in the North. In the 13th and 14th centuries this surname occurs in the form 'atte Pet' or 'del Pet'; i.e. 'at the pit' or 'of the pit,'[73] which indicates clearly that the bearers had, on the introduction of the hereditary surname from the 12th century onward, taken the name 'Pet'—or had it thrust upon them—because they were known as living near to a pit, and were thereby distinguished from other Walters or Adams dwelling on the heath or by the wood etc. etc. A study of the local distribution of this name in the 14th century shows that the pit in question, though it may occasionally have been a well, a sawpit, or a pitfall for wild beasts, was more usually a place where, owing to the absence of stone from the district, clay or loam had been dug in forming the walls of the rude cottages in which all but the upper strata of society then dwelt. Thus one great centre of the Petts in Suffolk in the 13th and 14th centuries, the district between Thetford and Eye, is a heavy clayland from which stone is absent.[74] By the end of the 16th century this name, in the form 'Pet,' 'Pett,' and 'Pette' was common in Kent, Essex, Suffolk, and South Norfolk.
In 1583, Peter Pett, then Master Shipwright at Deptford, obtained a grant of arms from Herald's College. The original has unfortunately disappeared, but from the reference to it in Le Neve's 'Pedigree of the Knights'[75] it appears that he claimed descent from 'Thomas Pett of Skipton in Cumberland' through John Pett his grandfather and Peter Pett his father, who had been a shipbuilder at Harwich. The fact that there is no Skipton in Cumberland shows that this record is hardly reliable as regards the place of origin of the family. Neither of the existing Skiptons,[76] which are both in Yorkshire, remote from the sea, is likely to have given birth to a family of shipbuilders; and there is no indication that any relations of the Petts were at any time resident in Yorkshire or Cumberland. Moreover, the name was practically unknown at this period in the North.[77] In an attempt to elucidate this matter, Major Bertram Raves put forward in the 'Mariner's Mirror'[78] the suggestion 'that Thomas Pett was of Hopton,[79] in Suffolk, and that Hopton was fudged into Skipton by the Tudor Heralds in the grant of arms to Peter Pett.... Petts about or near to Hopton at the time were yeomen or husbandmen.... The pedigree may, therefore, have seemed to need treatment.' He then goes on to show that Petts were established in the neighbouring villages of Hepworth, Wattisfield, Harling, and Walsham-le-Willows; the Petts at Wattisfield having been in the neighbourhood since the 14th century.[80] One significant fact is the letter which Peter Pett, the half-brother of Phineas, wrote to Sir Bassingbourn Gawdy[81] of Harling, in 1598, in which he apologises for his delay in visiting him and sends his remembrances to Lady Gawdy and others: it is clear from this letter that Peter was well known in the neighbourhood, and was, it may be presumed, related to the Thomas Pett living there at that time.
But it seems very doubtful whether Skipton really was a wilful substitution for, or a mis-transcription of, an original 'Hopton,' for there is no evidence that anyone of the name ever lived at Hopton, and it seems possible that some earlier Pett may have migrated to Yorkshire and his descendant John have returned to East Anglia.[82]
Of Thomas Pett nothing is known; and of John his son nothing can be stated with certainty.
In 1497 William Pette of Dunwich left by will[83] 'to my brother John Pette, my new boat and all my working tools'; a legacy that implies that the brothers were shipwrights. It is not improbable that this was the John Pett who was engaged in caulking the Regent in 1499. From the entry in the Roll[84] it is clear that John was a master workman or shipbuilder; for the sum paid him, 38l. 1s. 4d., is a fairly large amount for that period, and covered miscellaneous stores besides the caulking of the 'overlop' or deck, and the sides of the ship 'against wind and water.' Unfortunately his account, 'billam suam inde factam,' is no longer in existence. This work was possibly carried out at Portsmouth, where the Regent had been fitted for the Expedition to Scotland in 1497,[85] and where she was again undergoing repair in 1501,[86] but there would have been nothing unusual at that period, when the resources of the Portsmouth district were hardly sufficient, in entrusting such work to a shipbuilder from the eastern counties. In 1485 a master shipwright had been sent from London to Bursledon to superintend the removal of the mast of the Grace Dieu and her entry into dock,[87] and shipwrights were frequently impressed from East Anglia for work in Portsmouth and Southampton. The work may, however, have been carried out at Harwich, where the King's ships sometimes rode.[88]
With Peter, the son of John, we come at length upon sure ground. The will he made in March 1554 is upon record, and shows that he was possessed of a dwelling-house and shipbuilding yard at Harwich, which he bequeathed to his son Peter, the father of Phineas. Possibly he was the Peter Pett noted by Mr. Oppenheim[89] as among the shipwrights pressed from Essex and Suffolk working at Portsmouth in 1523: there can be no doubt that he was the Peter Pett of Harwich who, with other shipwrights, signed a decree of appraisement of a ship in 1540.[90]
His son Peter Pett, who died in 1589 when Master Shipwright at Deptford, entered the royal service some time before 1544, as already noted.
There is no record of the names of the earlier ships built by him, but it is known that in 1573 he built the Swiftsure and Achates, and in 1586 the Moon and Rainbow; all at Deptford. At the time of his death in 1589 he was engaged upon the Defiance and Advantage, which were completed by Joseph Pett, his second and eldest surviving son, who, as already remarked, succeeded to his place as Master Shipwright, his eldest son William Pett of Limehouse, also a Master Shipwright, who built the Greyhound in 1586, having died in 1587. Peter Pett was twice married, and had four sons and one daughter by his first wife, whose name is not known; and six daughters and three sons (of whom Phineas was the eldest) by his second wife, Elizabeth Thornton. These will be found set forth in the subjoined tables, which will serve to illustrate the relationship between them and the other members of the family referred to in the manuscript.
Peter Pett, towards the end of his life, had achieved a great reputation as a shipbuilder and was, as is evident from his will, a man of considerable means. He died possessed of a house at Harwich, where he had also built almshouses; a house at Deptford; land at Frating, near Colchester; the lease of a house at Chatham; and 'ground'—presumably a shipbuilding yard—at Wapping. In addition to this property, he left 20l. to the children of his son Richard;[91] 6l. 13s. 4d. to the child of his daughter Lydia; 100l. each to Phineas and his brothers Noah and Peter; and 100 marks to each of his four daughters by his second wife and to an unborn child that probably did not live. The payments to the children of his second wife were to be made on their attaining the age of twenty-four, but from the statements of Phineas on pages 12 and 13 it would appear that part of the money was embezzled by the Rev. Mr. Nunn and part retained by Phineas' brother Joseph.
Peter Pett, of Wapping, the third son of the above, carried on business as a shipbuilder in the private yard at Wapping which had been left to him by his father. He does not appear to have held any office under the Crown, but seems to have been well known to the Lord High Admiral, for in his letter above referred to be puts off his visit to Gawdy on the ground that he has to be 'next Sunday with the Earl of Nottingham at the Court at Richmond.' In 1599 he published a poem entitled 'Time's Journey to seeke his Daughter Truth; and Truth's Letter to Fame of England's Excellencie,' which he dedicated to Nottingham. He was also the author of a sonnet in three stanzas of seven lines entitled 'All Creatures praise God.'[92]
It is not necessary for our present purpose to pursue the fortunes of this family further, but the reader who is desirous of obtaining information as to the later descendants of Peter Pett of Harwich will find it in an excellent paper in vol. x. of the 'Ancestor,' by Mr. Farnham Burke and Mr. Oswald Barron, entitled 'The Builders of the Navy: a Genealogy of the Family of Pett.'[93]
RELATIONS OF PHINEAS PETT.
[Click [here] for table image.]
![[here]](#6946530831059842355_i_a_050.jpg.id-9055522301812540705.wrap-0.html.html){kind=link}
| Thomas Pett | |||||||||||||||||||
| John | |||||||||||||||||||
| Peter, of Harwich, = Elizabeth Paynter. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Shipbuilder, | |||||||||||||||||||
| d. (?) 1554. | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) ? | = Peter, of Deptford, | = (2) Elizabeth | Ann = John Chapman. | ||||||||||||||||
| Master Shipwright, | Thornton, | ||||||||||||||||||
| d. 1589. | d. 1597. | ||||||||||||||||||
| William, | = Elizabeth | (1) Margaret | = Joseph, = | (2) Margaret | (1) Ann | = Peter, = | (2) Eliza- | Richard, | Lydia, | ||||||||||
| of Lime- | March. | Curtis, | of Lime- | Humfrey, | Tusam. | of | beth. | of London. | d. 1610. | ||||||||||
| house, | d. 1594. | house, | d. 1612. | Wapping, | |||||||||||||||
| Master | Master | Ship- | |||||||||||||||||
| Shipwright | Shipwright | builder | |||||||||||||||||
| d. 1587. | d. 1605. | d. 1631? | |||||||||||||||||
| Elizabeth. | Lucy. | Margaret. | William. | Joseph. | |||||||||||||||
| Peter, of = Elizabeth | William, Elizabeth = Thomas | Ann | Mary | ||||||||||||||||
| Deptford, Johnson. | Clerk in Barwick. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Master | Holy | ||||||||||||||||||
| Shipwright | Orders, | ||||||||||||||||||
| b. 1592, | d. 1651. | ||||||||||||||||||
| d. 1652. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Jane, | Phineas | Noah, | Peter the | Rachel, = Rev. W. | Abigail, | Elizabeth, | Mary, = (?) Cooper. | ||||||||||||
| Susannah, | (see next | d. 1595. | Younger, | d. 1591? Newman. | d. 1599. | d. 1599. | d. 1626. | ||||||||||||
| d. 1567. | Table). | d. 1600. | |||||||||||||||||
FAMILY OF PHINEAS PETT.
[Click [here] for table image.]
![[here]](#6946530831059842355_i_a_051.jpg.id-6065434009371764457.wrap-0.html.html){kind=link}
| Phineas Pett, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| = b. 1570, d. 1647. = | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) Ann Nicholls, m. 1598, | (2) Susan Yardley, m. 1627, | (3) Mildred Byland, m. 1638, | ||||||||||||||||||
| d. 1627. | née Eaglefield, d. 1637. | née Etherington, d. 1638. | ||||||||||||||||||
| John, = Katherine | Henry, Richard, Joseph, | Peter, | Ann, | Phineas, | Phineas, = Frances | Christo- | ||||||||||||||
| Captain | Yardley | b. 1603, b. 1606, b. 1608, | Commis- | b. 1612. | b. 1615, | Captain | Carre. | pher, | ||||||||||||
| R.N. | d. 1613. d. 1629. d. 1627. | sioner at | d. 1617. | R.N. | Master | |||||||||||||||
| (lost in | Chatham, | (killed in | Shipwright | |||||||||||||||||
| VI | b. 1610, | Tiger), | at | |||||||||||||||||
| Whelp), | d. 1672. | b. 1619, | Woolwich | |||||||||||||||||
| b. 1602, | d. 1666. | and | ||||||||||||||||||
| d. 1628. | Deptford, | |||||||||||||||||||
| Phineas | b. 1620, | |||||||||||||||||||
| Phineas, | (owner of | d. 1668. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Master | the MS., | |||||||||||||||||||
| Shipwright | Mary, | Martha, = John | c. 1670), | |||||||||||||||||
| at | b. 1617, | b. 1617, Hodierne. | b. 1646, | |||||||||||||||||
| Chatham, | d. 1617. | m. 1637. | d. 1694. | |||||||||||||||||
| b. 1628, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| d. 1678. | ||||||||||||||||||||