Footnote Issues
In these notes, "anchor" means the reference to a footnote, and "footnote" means the information to which the anchor refers. Anchors occur within the main text, while footnotes are grouped in sequence at the end of this eBook. The structure of the original book required some exceptions to this, as explained below.
The original text used chapter endnotes. In this eBook, they have been combined into a single, ascending sequence based on the sequence in which the footnotes (not the anchors) occurred in the original book, and placed at the end of the main text, just before the Concordance.
Four kinds of irregularities occurred in the footnotes:
- Some footnotes are referenced by more than one anchor, so two or more anchors may refer to the same footnote.
- Some anchors were out of sequence, apparently because they were added afterwards or because they are share a footnote with another anchor. They have been renumbered to match the numbers of the footnotes to which they refer.
- Some footnotes have no anchors. These are noted below.
- One footnote was misprinted beyond repair, and the next three footnotes were missing. These are noted below.
Page 1076: Footnote [61] (originally 42) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be in page range [1062]–1064.
Page 1121: Footnote [100] (originally 4) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be in page range [1091]–1093.
Page 1121: Footnote [103] (originally 7) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be in page range 1094–1097. Anchor [99] (originally 3) on page [1094] could be the missing anchor, as that number also is used on page [1091].
Page 1188: Footnote [210] (originally 13) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be on page [1171] or [1172].
Page 1189: Footnote [226] (originally 29) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be on page [1174] or [1175].
Page 1253: Footnote [329] (originally 9) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be in page range [1219]–1226.
Page 1287: Footnote [469] (originally 98) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be on page [1287].
Page 1333: Footnote [758] (originally 21) appears to be misprinted, and the next three footnotes 759–761 (originally 22–24) are missing.