Text-book of forensic medicine and toxicology

by R. J. M. Buchanan

SCOTLAND

In Scotland public prosecutors are appointed by the Crown. The chief public prosecutor is the Lord-Advocate; next in rank come the Deputy-Advocates and Procurator-Fiscal. The Lord-Advocate and Deputies take charge of cases in the High Courts of Justiciary, the Procurator-Fiscal in the lower Courts.

The duties of the public prosecutor are to bring all accused persons to a bar of justice; and in addition he acts as the coroner does in England. Any person who is supposed to know anything about the case is interrogated by the Procurator-Fiscal, or is precognosced. The examination is made on oath; the written evidence constitutes the precognitions. Counsel for the accused or for the Crown may precognosce witnesses.

The preliminary examination of the accused takes place before the Sheriff or Justice, and he may commit the person for trial or liberate him, according to the evidence.

The precognitions, in cases of committal, are forwarded to the Crown Counsel in Edinburgh, who may stop the proceedings, or send the accused before the High Court, Circuit Court of Justiciary, or Sheriff, with or without a jury. The Justiciary Courts correspond to the Courts of Assize in England. Should the case be so transferred for trial, the witnesses are summoned by writ. A penalty of £5 may be imposed for disobedience to such writ, or imprisonment pending expression of regret before the Court, and tendering bail for appearance.

Common witnesses and medical witnesses to fact are not allowed in Court except when giving evidence. Expert witnesses may be allowed to remain in Court by mutual consent of counsel. When one expert witness is giving evidence, other experts are required to leave the Court, and no expert witness who may have been present during the examination of common witnesses is allowed to give evidence as to facts.

The verdicts of “Guilty” or “Not guilty” are similar to those given in England, but in addition a verdict of “Not proven” may be given, and all are final. In the case of the last two the accused cannot be tried again.

In Scotland the verdict of a bare majority of the jury holds good, whereas in England the decision must be unanimous. In the case of a suspicious death, or a dead body being discovered, the Procurator-Fiscal, acting as a coroner does in England, but without a jury, may direct a medical man to examine the body and send in a report; but all reports must be certified on soul and conscience, without which they are of no value. Should the medical examiner be satisfied without making an internal examination, he may certify to the Procurator-Fiscal on the result of his external examination.

Should the Procurator-Fiscal consider it requisite to have a complete examination, he issues a warrant to that effect to the medical practitioner who has seen the case, and usually associates with him the most skilled practitioner available in the neighbourhood. The warrant consists of a petition by the Procurator-Fiscal, addressed to the local judge, setting forth the grounds of his application, and craving warrant to the inspectors named to make the necessary examination. This is signed by the Procurator-Fiscal, and countersigned by the Sheriff or local judge, if granted. The receivers of this warrant are empowered to take full custody of the body, and they should be careful to carry the warrant with them, or they may be refused admission pending its production, which may result in great waste of time, and end in a miscarriage of justice. The Procurator-Fiscal may supply to the medical inspectors portions of the precognitions likely to bear on the medical part of the inquiry. Medical men ought to be on their guard against performing dissections in cases evidently judicial without previously warning the proper law authorities, or without a warrant; for instances have occurred where, owing to the want of proper support, obstructions were thrown in the way which might have proved fatal to the value of the investigation; and, besides, the premature disclosure of the results of the inspection might frustrate other important steps of the precognition.

The medical men so engaged will, as a rule, find it to their interest to exclude all visitors, whether lay or professional, from the room during the dissection. The regulations issued by the Crown Office, Edinburgh, direct that no one should be allowed to be present at the examination out of mere curiosity, and recommend that any one not engaged in the inspection, but who is in attendance to give information, or for any other purpose, and who may afterwards become a witness, should remain in an adjoining room. The medical inspection often furnishes good tests of the value of other evidence in the case; therefore, it is desirable that the general witnesses should not have an opportunity of knowing what is observed in the dissection of the body. The notes of a case should be made at the time of inspection or immediately afterwards. In the case of post-mortem examinations it is better that while one inspector conducts the practical details of the examination, the other should take notes of its successive steps, indicating all the points inquired into, with the observations made, the appearances presented, negative as well as positive, stating simple facts alone, without either generalisations or opinions. These notes should be looked over by both inspectors before the body is sewn up, so that omissions in the notes, or in the inspection itself, may be then supplied.