FOOTNOTES:
[710] Bayley v. Manchester, etc., Rw., L. R., 7 C. P. 415.
[711] Ibid.
[712] Phil. & R. Rw. v. Derby, 14 How. 468; Noyes v. Rutland, etc., Rw., 27 Vt. 110; Yarborough v. Bank of England, 16 East. 6.
[713] Roe v. Berkenhead & L. Rw., 7 W. H. & G. 36.
[714] Craker v. Chicago & N. W. Rw., 36 Wis. 657.
[715] Bass v. Chicago & N. W. Rw., 36 Wis. 450; Craker v. C. & N. W. Rw., 36 Wis. 657; Goddard v. G. T. R., 57 Me. 202.
[716] M. & M. R. R. Co. v. Finney, 10 Wis. 388; but see Goddard v. G. T. R., 57 Me. 202; Sanford v. Rw. Co., 23 N. Y. 343.
[717] Goff v. Gt. Northern Rw., 3 E. & E. 672.
[718] Giles v. Taff Vale Rw., 2 E. & B. 822; Moore v. Metropolitan Rw., L. R., 8 Q. B. 36.
[719] Phil. & Read. Rw. v. Derby, 14 How. (U. S.), 468.
[720] Edwards v. London & N. W. Rw., L. R., 5 C. P. 445.
[721] Poulton v. London & S. W. Rw., L. R., 2 Q. B. 534.
[722] Ibid.
[723] N. Y. & Wash. Print. Tel. Co. v. Dryburgh, 35 Penn. St. 298.
[724] McAndrew v. Electric Tel. Co., 17 C. B. 3; Wann v. Western, etc., Tel. Co., 37 Mo. 472.
[725] Lockwood v. Ind. Line of Tel. Co., N. Y., C. P. 1865.
[726] Rittenhouse v. The same, 1 Daly, C. P. 474.
[727] Playford v. United Kingdom Tel. Co., L. R., 4 Q. B. 706; Feaver v. Montreal Tel. Co., 23 U. C. C. P. 150.
[728] Henkel v. Pape, L. R., 6 Ex. 7.
[729] Redfield on Railways, vol. ii., p. 314.
[730] La Grange v. S. W. Tel. Co., 25 La. An. 383.
[731] De Rutte v. Tel. Co., 1 Daly, 547.
[732] McAndrew v. Electric Tel. Co., 17 C. B. 3; but see Tyler v. W. U. Tel. Co., 5 Chi. Leg. News, 550; Wolf v. W. Tel. Co., 62 Pa. St. 83.
[733] N. Y. & Wash. Tel. Co. v. Dryburgh, 35 Penn. St. 298; True v. International Tel. Co., 60 Maine, 9; Sweetland v. Illinois, etc., Tel. Co., 27 Iowa, 433.
[734] Seilers v. W. U. Tel. Co., 3 Am. Law Reg. 777.
[735] Birney v. N. Y. & Wash. Tel. Co., 18 Maryland, 341.
[736] U. S. Tel. Co. v. Gildersleeve, 29 Maryland, 232; Bryant v. Am. Tel. Co., 1 Daly, 575.
[737] Ellis v. Am. Tel. Co., 13 Allen, 226; and Wann v. West. U. Tel. Co., 37 Mo. 472.
[738] La Grange v. S. W. Tel. Co., 25 La. An. 385.
[739] True v. International Tel. Co., 60 Maine, 9.
[740] Squire v. W. U. Tel. Co., 98 Mass. 232.
[741] Camp v. West. Union Tel. Co., 1 Met. (Ky.) 164.
[742] West. Union Tel. Co. v. Carew, 15 Mich. 525; Wolf v. W. Tel. Co., 62 Pa. St. 83; but see Henderson v. Stevenson, L. R., 2 S. & D. 470.
[743] Shepherd v. Bristol & Ex. Rw., L. R., 3 Ex. 189; Mote v. Chicago & N. W. Rw., 1 Am. Rep. 212; 27 Iowa, 22; Burnell v. N. Y. C., 45 N. Y. 187; Rock Island & Pacific Rw. v. Fairclough, 52 Ill. 106.
[744] Bartholemew v. St. Louis, Jacksonville, etc., Rw., 53 Ill. 227.
[745] Inman v. Buffalo & L. H. Rw., 7 U. C. C. P. 325; O’Neill v. Great Western Rw., Ibid. 203; Bowie v. Buffalo, Brantford, & G. Rw., Ibid. 191.
[746] Roth v. Buffalo & State Line Rw., 34 N. Y. 548.
[747] Penton v. Grand Trunk Rw., 28 U. C. Q. B. 367; Campbell v. The same, Hilary Term, 1873 (Ont.).
[748] Minor v. Chicago & North Western Rw., 19 Wis. 40.
[749] Ouimit v. Henshaw, 35 Vt. 605.
[750] Jones v. Norwich & N. Y. T. Co., 50 Barb. 193.