MINUTE AND RAPID MOVEMENTS.
The crust of the earth is in a state of perpetual tremor. For the most part, these tremors are too minute to be sensible, but are revealed by delicate instrumental devices. Some of them are but the declining stages of sensible vibrations, but others are minute from their inception. Many of them spring from the ordinary incidents of the surface, and claim attention chiefly as obstacles to the study of more significant oscillations. Winds, waves, waterfalls, the tread of animals, the rumble of traffic, the blasts of mines, the changes of temperature, the variations in atmospheric pressure, the weighting of rainfall and the lightening of evaporation, the rupture of rock or ice or frozen earth, and many other processes, make their contributions to local and minute movements. For the greater part, these vibrations are superficial in origin, and are soon damped beyond recognition by dispersal and by the inelastic and discontinuous nature of the looser material of the surface. When a temporary rigid crust is formed by freezing, as in winter, these surface vibrations are transmitted with much less loss, and the distances at which the rumble of winter traffic is heard, is a good illustration of the function of continuity and solidity in the conveyance of vibrations.
Earthquakes.
When the tremors spring from sources within the earth itself and are of appreciable violence, they are recognized as earthquakes. The sources of earthquake tremors are various. The most prevalent is probably the fracture of rocks and the slipping of strata on each other in the process of faulting. The interpretation of movements of this class has now been so far perfected that the length and depth of the fault, the amount of the slip, and the direction of the hade are capable of approximate estimation.[224] To the same class belong the movements due to slumping. They are illustrated by the sliding and arrest of great masses of sediment along the steep fronts of deltas, and of the accumulations of deep-sea oozes on steep submarine slopes. Such slumping is, in reality, superficial faulting. Seismic tremors often attend volcanic eruptions, and are then probably attributable to the sudden fracture and displacement of rock by the penetration of lava, or by rapid and unequal heating. They are perhaps also due sometimes to the sudden generation or cooling of steam in underground conduits, crevices, and caverns, the action possibly being in some cases of the “water-hammer” type. In rare instances, probably, the bursting of beds overlying pent-up non-volcanic gases may give origin to earthquakes. A more superficial source of earthquake vibrations is the collapse of the roofs of subterranean caverns.
Seismic vibrations seem to be in part compressional, in part distortional, in part (on the surface) undulatory, and in part irregular. The distortional are especially significant, as they seem to imply a solid medium of transmission.
Points of origin, foci.—It is probable that nearly or quite all earthquake movements start within the upper ten miles of the crust, and most of them within the upper five. Some of the earlier estimates indeed placed the points of origin as deep as 20 or 30 miles, but in these cases the necessary corrections, discussed below, were neglected. Most of the recent and more accurate estimates fall within the limits given.
The method of estimating the depth of the centers of disturbance consists in observing the directions of throw or thrust of bodies at the surface, and in regarding these as representing the lines of emergence of the earthquake-waves. By plotting these lines of emergence, and projecting them backwards to their underground crossings, a first approximation to the location of the focus is reached (the lines EF′, [Fig. 446]). From the nature of the case, the observations of the angles of emergence cannot be very accurate, but an effort is made to limit the error by making the number of observations great.
Two systematic corrections are to be applied to all such estimates, the one for varying elasticity and density, and the other for varying continuity. Both reduce the estimated depth. In making the correction for varying elasticity, it must be noted that the velocity of vibrations varies directly as the square root of the elasticity, and inversely as the square root of the density. The velocity is also accelerated by increase of temperature. The elasticity, temperature, and density all increase with depth. Theoretically, the increase of velocity due to the increasing elasticity and temperature of increasing depths, overbalances the retardation due to increasing density, and recent observations on the transmission of seismic waves through deep chords of the earth have confirmed this conclusion. The path of the vibration will, therefore, be curved toward the surface, as pointed out by Schmidt and illustrated in [Fig. 446], taken from his discussion.[225] From this it is clear that the focus is not so deep as implied by the simple backward projection of the lines of emergence.
Fig. 446.—Diagram illustrating by closed curves the different rates of propagation of seismic tremors from a focus F, and, by lines normal to these, the changing directions of propagation of the wave-front. It will be seen that the paths of propagation curve upwards in approaching the surface. If the lines of emergence, as at E and E, be projected backwards, as to F′, the points of crossing will be below the true focus.
A second correction must be made for the differences of continuity of the upper rock in the vertical and horizontal directions. In the outer part of the earth, the continuity in horizontal directions is interrupted by vertical fissures. Were these not usually filled with water, they would soon kill the horizontal component of the seismic wave, and the residual portion would be directed almost vertically to the surface, for the width of the fissures is almost always greater than the amplitude of the seismic vibrations. The water restores the continuity, in a measure, but not perfectly, for the elasticity of water is much less than that of rock. It is clear that in horizontal movement there must be a constant transfer from rock to water and from water to rock, and this must retard, as well as partially destroy, the vibrations. In a vertical direction, however, the rocks rest firmly upon one another, and this gives measurable continuity, the only change being from one layer or kind of rock to another. It seems certain, therefore, that the vertical component of the seismic wave will be less damped and less retarded in transmission than the horizontal. It will, therefore, reach the surface sooner and will have the greater effect on bodies at the surface, not only for the reasons given, but also because it emerges more nearly in the line of least resistance and of freest projection. On this account, a second correction must be added to the correction for elasticity, and this must further reduce appreciably the first estimate of the depth of the focus.
Observation shows that in some way a seismic wave becomes separated in transmission into portions of different natures and speeds, but their interpretation is yet uncertain. These separated portions probably consist of the compressional, the distortional, and the undulatory waves, and perhaps of refractions and reflections of these (see [Fig. 448]).
A most important recent achievement is the detection and investigation of seismic tremors that appear to have come through the earth. The transmission of such waves promises to reveal much relative to the nature of the deep interior, when enough data are gathered to warrant conclusions. The rate of propagation in the central parts is found to be greater than in the outer parts, implying high elasticity within.
The amplitude of the vibrations.—From the very disastrous effects of severe earthquakes, it is natural to infer that the distinctive oscillations must have large amplitude, but in fact it is the suddenness of the vibration, rather than its length, that is effective. Instrumental investigations indicate that the oscillations, after they have left their points of origin, are usually only a fraction of a millimeter in amplitude; at most they seldom exceed a few millimeters. A sudden shock with an amplitude of 5 or 6 millimeters is sufficient to shatter a chimney. It is true that estimates assigning amplitudes of a foot or more have been made, but their correctness is open to serious doubt. It should be understood that it is the length of oscillation of the particles of the subsurface rock transmitting the vibrations that is referred to, not the movement of the free surface, or of objects on the surface. The throw at and on the surface is much greater. Just as a slight, quick tap of a hammer on a floor is sufficient to make a marble lying on it bound several inches, so a sufficiently sudden rise of the surface of the earth, though but a fraction of an inch, may project loose bodies many feet.
Fig. 447.—Illustration of the destructive effects of the Charleston earthquake, showing definite direction of throw. (W. J. McGee.)
Destructive effects.—The interpretation of the disastrous results of earthquake shocks has, therefore, its key in the suddenness and strength of rather minute vibrations of the earth-matter, but it is also dependent on the freedom of motion of the bodies affected. The rocks of the deeper zones, where the matter is sensibly continuous, transmit the seismic vibrations without appreciable disruptive effect, so far as known, though the origin of crevices has been assigned to this cause; but bodies at the surface are fractured, overturned, and hurled from their places. The reason is doubtless this: Within a great mass firmly held in place by cohesion and pressure on all sides, the forward motion of a particle develops an equal elastic resistance, and it is quickly thrown back again and the wave passes on. At the surface, where bodies are freer to move, the stroke of the vibration projects the body, and so, instead of vibratory resilience, the chief energy is converted into mass-motion. The tap of a hammer sends an almost imperceptible vibration along the floor, but this vibration may throw a glass ball, beneath which it runs, into the air. So the minute vibrations of earth-matter may travel miles from their origin through continuous substance with little result, and then so suddenly thrust a loose body on the surface, or the base of a column, or the foundation of a house, as to rack it with differential strains, or even to hurl it to destruction. So, too, earth-waves striking the sea-border may thrust the waters off shore by their sudden impact, and the reaction may develop a wave which overwhelms the coast. Such waves may doubtless arise from a sudden stroke of seismic vibrations on the sea-bottom. The great gaping fissures that sometimes open during earthquakes occur oftenest where the surface on one side is less well supported than on the other, as on a slope, or near a bluff-face or a river-channel. When in such situations the earth is once suddenly forced in the direction of least resistance, it is not always met by sufficient elastic resistance to throw it back. Sometimes, however, there is an elastic return, and the fissure closes forcibly an instant after it is opened.
Direction of throw.—Immediately above the point of origin, technically the epicentrum or epi-focal point, bodies are projected upwards. When crushing takes place in such a case, it is due to the upthrust or to the return downfall. At one side of the epicentrum the thrust is oblique in various degrees, and is usually more destructive, if not too far from the epicentrum. The destructiveness commonly increases for a certain distance from the epi-focal point, and then diminishes. Under ideal conditions, the greatest effects are found where the vibration emerges at an angle of about 45°, but various influences modify this result. Lines drawn through points of equal effect (isoseismals) are not usually regular circles or ellipses about the epicentrum, as they would be under ideal conditions. The various divergencies represent differences of effective elasticity, of surface, and of other influences. As most earthquakes originate from lines, planes, or masses, rather than points, there are doubtless differences of intensity of vibration at different points on the lines, planes, or areas of origin, and these differences introduce inequalities in propagation and in surface effects.
Fig. 448.—Illustrations of the records made by earthquake tremors after distant transmission through the earth. The four diagrams represent the same set of tremors as received at Shide, Kew, Bidston, and Edinburgh in Great Britain. The movement was from left to right. (Milne.)
Rate of propagation.—The progress of a seismic wave varies very greatly. Both experimental tests and natural observations give very discordant results. At present, they justify only the broad statement that the velocity of propagation varies from several hundreds to several thousands of feet per second at the surface. The rate seems to be greater for strong vibrations than for weak ones, and hence it is faster near the origin than farther away. The strength of a vibration dies away, theoretically, according to the inverse square of the distance from the point of origin. Practically there is to be added to this the partial destruction of the vibrations by conversion into other forms of motion.
Sequences of vibrations.—Near the source, the main shocks are apt to come suddenly and to be followed by minor tremors. At a distance there are usually “preliminary” vibrations followed by the main tremors, and these by others of gradually diminishing value. This development is assigned to different rates of propagation, and to refractions and reflections not unlike the prolongation of thunder (see [Fig. 448]). This deployment of the vibrations is notably developed in the shocks that pass long distances through the earth. The vibrations of the first phase are regarded as compressional, those of the second as distortional, while the largest oscillations which arise still later perhaps come around the surface, and may be undulatory, though their nature is not yet determined.
There is often, however, a true succession of original shocks caused by a succession of slips or ruptures at the source. Sometimes these are exceedingly persistent, running through days, weeks, or even months. In such cases a slow faulting is probably in progress, and little slips and stops follow in close succession. In one instance as many as 600 shocks in ten days have been reported.[226]
Gaseous emanations.—Vapors and gas frequently issue from earthquake rents, and are popularly made to serve as causes, but they are usually merely the earth gases that are permitted to escape by the rending of the ground, or are forced out by readjustment of the shaken beds. Like other subterranean gases, they are often sulphurous, and they are sometimes hot, especially in volcanic regions. Where the shocks are connected with eruptions, the gases may be truly volcanic.
Distribution of earthquakes.—Over large portions of the globe, severe earthquakes are exceedingly rare, but in certain regions they are unfortunately frequent. For the most part, these are volcanic districts, but this is by no means a universal relation. Earthquakes and volcanoes are only in part associates. In general, it may be said that earthquakes are frequent where geologic changes are in rapid progress, as along belts of young mountains, where the stresses are not yet adjusted, or at the mouths of great streams, where deltas are accumulating, or about volcanoes, where temperatures and strains are changing, or on the great slopes, particularly the submarine slopes, where readjustments in response to inequalities of surface stress are in progress. Not a few, however, occur where the special occasion is not at all obvious.
The Geologic Effects of Earthquakes.
Earthquakes are of much less importance, geologically, than many gentler movements and activities. Disastrous as they sometimes are to human affairs, they leave few distinct and readily identifiable marks which are more than temporary.
Fracturing of rock.—During the passage of notable earthquake waves, the solid rock is probably often fractured (see [p. 509]), though where it is covered by deep soil the fractures are rarely observable at the surface. Elsewhere the crevices are readily seen, especially if they gape. In a few instances surface-rock has been seen to be thoroughly shattered after the passage of an earthquake, as in the Concepcion earthquake of 1835.[227] Joints which were before closed are often opened during an earthquake. Thus in northern Arizona, not far from Canyon Diablo, there is a crevice traceable for a considerable distance, which is said to have been opened during an earthquake. Locally, it gaps several feet. Other notable earthquake fissures have been recorded in India,[228] Japan, and New Zealand. During an earthquake which shook the South Island of New Zealand in 1848, “a fissure was formed averaging 18 inches in width, and traceable for a distance of 60 miles, parallel to the axis of the adjacent mountain chain.”[229] The development of fractures or the opening of joints is sometimes accompanied by faulting. This was the case in Japan during the earthquake of October 28, 1891, when the surface on one side of a fissure, which could be traced for 40 miles, sank 2 to 20 feet. In this case there was also notable horizontal displacement, the east wall of the fissure being thrust locally as much as 13 feet to the north.[230]
Changes of surface.—Circular surface openings or basins are sometimes developed during earthquakes. This was the case during the Charleston earthquake of 1886,[231] and similar effects have been noted elsewhere. These openings often serve as avenues of escape for ground-water, gases, and vapor. They are commonly supposed to be the result of the collapse of caverns, or other subterranean openings, the collapse often causing the forcible ejection of water. Such openings are likely to be formed only where the surface material is incoherent. Sandstone dikes ([p. 514]) may perhaps be associated in origin with earthquakes.
Earthquakes are likely to dislodge masses of rock in unstable positions, as on slopes or cliffs. They may also occasion slumps and landslides.[232]
Effects on drainage.—The fracturing of the rock may interfere with the movement of ground-water. After new cracks are developed, or old ones opened or closed, the movement of ground-water adapts itself to the new conditions. It follows that springs sometimes cease to flow after an earthquake, while new ones break out where there had been none before. The character of the water of springs is sometimes changed, presumably because it comes from different sources after the earthquake. Joints may be so widened as to intercept rivulets, and the waters thus intercepted may cause the further enlargement of the opening. Illustrations of this sort are furnished by the earthquakes of the Mississippi valley (Lat. 36° to 38°) in 1811–12. Where faults accompany earthquakes, they occasion ponds or falls where they cross streams. Illustrations of both were furnished by the Chedrang River of India after the earthquake of 1897.[233]
Effects on standing water.—Some of the most destructive effects of earthquakes are felt along the borders of the sea. Thus the great sea-wave of the Lisbon earthquake (1755) and that of the earthquake which affected the coasts of Ecuador and Peru in 1868 are examples. Such waves have been known to advance on the land as walls of water 60 feet in height. They are most destructive along low coasts, for here the water may sweep much more extensively over the land. The great loss of life during an earthquake has usually been the direct result of the great waves. Lakes are also affected by earthquakes, their waters sometimes rising and falling for several hours after the initial disturbance, but lake-waves are much feebler than those of the sea, and are not often destructive.
Earthquake shocks are sometimes remarkably destructive to the life of lakes and seas. Thus during the Indian earthquake of 1897, “fishes were killed in myriads as by the explosion of a dynamite cartridge ... and for days after the earthquake, the river (Sumesari) was choked with thousands of dead fish ... and two floating carcasses of Gangetic dolphins were seen which had been killed by the shock.”[234] This wholesale destruction of life is of interest, since the surfaces of layers of rock, often of great age, are sometimes covered with fossils of fish or other animal forms, so numerous and so preserved as to indicate that the animals were killed suddenly and in great numbers, and their bodies quickly buried. It has been suggested that such rock surfaces may be memorials of ancient earthquake shocks.[235]
Changes of level.—Permanent changes of level sometimes accompany an earthquake. Thus after the earthquake of 1822 “the coast of Chili for a long distance was said to have risen 3 or 4 feet.”[236] Similar results have occurred on the same coast at other times, and on other coasts at various times. Depression of the surface is perhaps even more common than elevation. Thus on the coast of India all except the higher parts of an area 60 square miles in extent were sunk below the sea during an earthquake in 1762. Widespread depression in the vicinity of the Mississippi in Missouri, Arkansas, Kentucky, and Tennessee accompanied the earthquakes of 1811 and 1812. Some of the depressed areas were converted into marshes, while others became the sites of permanent lakes. Reelfoot Lake, mainly in Tennessee, is an example. Change of level is involved wherever there is faulting, and faulting is probably rather common in connection with earthquakes.
Changes of level are not confined to the land. Where earthquake disturbances affect the sea-bottom in regions of telegraph cables, the cables are often broken. In such cases notable changes have sometimes been discovered and recorded when the cables were repaired. Striking examples are furnished by the region about Greece.[237] In one instance (1873) the repairing vessel found about 2000 feet of water where about 1400 feet existed when the cable was laid. In another instance (1878) the bottom was “so irregular and uneven for a distance of about two miles, that a detour was made and the cable lengthened by five or six miles.” In still another case (1885) the repairing vessel found a “difference of 1500 feet between the bow and stern soundings.” These records point to sea-bottom faulting on a large scale.
It is probably no nearer the truth to say that changes of level result from earthquakes than to say that earthquakes result from changes of level. The two classes of phenomena are probably to be referred to a common cause.[238]