PUMPING SYSTEM.

The divisions of power are:

Wind Power. Water Power. Steam Power.

And the methods of supply by:

Reservoir. Stand Pipe. Direct or Holly Plan.

The value of a pumping system recommends itself on the point of economy in construction, for the outlay is in proportion to the existing necessities, which can be increased as the demands require. The original water consumers are not, therefore, taxed so heavily for future exigencies of gravity works. This idea can be better illustrated by the comparative cost of construction and maintenance of gravitation and pumping works:

BALTIMORECHICAGO
GRAVITATION.PUMPING.
Available capacity for daily supply200 millions120 millions
Largest daily consumption in 1880 73 “
Total valuation of works 10 “ 8.8 “
Bonded indebtedness 9 “ 3.9 “
Annual interest440 thousands283 thousands
Annual current expenses 87.5 “206 “
Annual maintenance, including interest at
5 per cent on total valuation of works.
587.5 “646 “
BOSTONCINCINNATI
GRAVITATION.PUMPING.
Available capacity for daily supply 86 millions 36 millions
Largest daily consumption in 1880 28 “ 38 “
Total valuation of works 18 “ 7 “
Bonded indebtedness 12 “ 1.6 “
Annual interest619 thousands108 thousands
Annual current expenses211 “200 “
Annual maintenance, including interest at
5 per cent on total valuation of works.
1,111 “ 50 “

The reservoir system is the most preferable of the three methods, when natural elevation can be secured, for the pumping service is distinct from the distribution; and, where reservoirs of large capacities are obtainable, a closer margin for reserve pumping power can be adopted, besides a storage reservoir provides for contingencies that may arise, and allow cessation of pumping during the turbidity of water source, caused by sudden freshets.

The stand-pipe is adopted where the elevated grounds are not sufficient for reservoir purposes, to give a desirable water pressure; or where reservoirs may not be desired, but to secure the head and provide for a constant and reliable action of the pump that is not obtained by a direct system.

The direct system, commonly called the Holly Plan, does away with reservoir and stand pipe, and delivers the water directly into the mains under a pressure usually fifty pounds per square inch for domestic use, which is increased to one hundred pounds when fires occur. In the Holly Plan, a reserve power is used for fire purposes, besides mechanical device for regulating and controlling the variable pressure.

In either the stand pipe or direct system, a reserve power should be provided equal to the largest daily consumption.

From a compilation of general information concerning water-works of the United States and Canada, published by the Holly Manufacturing Company in 1878, we arrange the following:

188cities and townsuse steam-powerfor water supply.
104have gravity works
32use water-power
10have gravity and steam works
27use steam and water-works
2have gravity, steam, and water-powers

Of the above number of pumping works—

139have reservoir system.
98have direct system.
16have stand-pipe system.
4have direct and reservoir combined.
1has the three systems combined.
1has stand-pipe and direct combined.

The expense of pumping water by steam and water-powers, also the practical yearly duties of various pumping engines, are given in the tables on [pages 61] and [64], compiled from annual reports for 1880:

PRACTICAL DUTIES (WITHOUT DEDUCTIONS) OF PUMPING ENGINES (YEARLY AVERAGE).

(From Annual Reports of 1880.)

NON ROTATIVE.ROTATIVE.
WORTH-CORNISH.HOLLY.LOWHIGH
INGTON.PRESSURE.PRESSURE.
Louisville, Ky.{44189515
{45544384
{56004900
Brooklyn, N. Y.{59550000
{68378000
Albany, N. Y.{
{
Toronto, Canada{38477030
{38726890
Toledo, O.36399973
Boston; high service51063000
Charleston, Mass.52845400
Columbus, O.28758135
Chicago, north side52956684
Chicago, west side
Phila., Schuylkill{24342000
{35360000
{39000000
Phila., Belmont{37900000
{44870000
Phila., Delaware39000000
Phila., Roxborough3828000036280000
Phila., Frankfort27000000
Lawrence, Mass.
Dayton, O.15000000
Cleveland, O.{4239718530361497
{31925636
Lynn, Mass.
Pawtucket, R. I.
Lowell, Mass.59112831
{44304907
Cincinnati, O.{3801428338953517
{45886944
COMPOUND.MISCELLANEOUS.
LEAVITT.MISCELLANEOUS.
Louisville, Ky.{20280502[2]
{19572536
{
Brooklyn, N. Y.{
{
Albany, N. Y.{70991413
{70327595
Toronto, Canada{
{
Toledo, O.
Boston; high service
Charleston, Mass.
Columbus, O.
Chicago, north side
Chicago, west side58808495
Phila., Schuylkill{49726000
{55633000
{
Phila., Belmont{
{
Phila., Delaware
Phila., Roxborough28380000[3]
Phila., Frankfort57160000
Lawrence, Mass.98583176
Dayton, O.
Cleveland, O.{29558769
{
Lynn, Mass.92843506
Pawtucket, R. I.96046816[4]
Lowell, Mass.76108012
{
Cincinnati, O.{21665474[5]
{

Remarks.—

[2] Blake pump;

[3] Knowles;

[4] Corliss;

[5] Low pressure, direct acting.

The term, duty of a pumping engine, is a conventional one, used by engineers to measure the relative merits of performance, or effective work, expressed by the ratio of product in foot pounds of the weight water into the height it is lifted, to one hundred pounds of the coal consumed to lift the water. The following tables of expert trials are taken from “Manual for Engineers and Steam Users,” by John W. Hill, M. E. (1878), with a few additions:

PERFORMANCE OF PUMPING ENGINES.

LOCATION.DATE. ENGINE.DESIGNER.
United Mines, CornwallSept.
1842
Cornish single cylinder, jacketedTaylor
Carn Brea, Cornwall1841Cornish compound, jacketedJames Sims
Lynn, Mass.Dec.
1873
Compound beam and fly-wheel, jacketedE. D. Leavitt
Lowell, Mass.June
1875
Compound beam and fly-wheel, jacketedSimpson
Lawrence, Mass.May
1876
Compound beam and fly-wheel, jacketedE. D. Leavitt
Trenton, N. J.Mar.
1876
Compound beam and fly-wheel, jacketedWm. Wright
Milwaukee, Wis.May
1875
Compound beam and fly-wheel, jacketedR. W. Hamilton
Marion, Ind.Feb.
1877
Single cylinder yoke and fly-wheel, condensingDean
Haarlem Meer, HollandJune
1848
Compound beam annual cylinderGibbs & Dean
ChicagoDec.
1874
Single cylinder beam and fly-wheel, unjacketedD. C. Creiger
ChicagoApril
1877
Compound beam and fly-wheel, unjacketedQuintard Works
ChicagoApril
1877
Compound beam and fly-wheel, unjacketedQuintard Works
ChicagoApril
1877
Compound beam and fly-wheel, unjacketedQuintard Works
CincinnatiNov.
1872
Horizontal crank and fly-wheel, two engines coupled, non-condensingShield
LOCATION.DUTY FOR ONE
HUNDRED
POUNDS COAL.
CAPACITY.AUTHORITY.
United Mines, Cornwall114,361,700[6]Pole.
Carn Brea, Cornwall101,702,000[6]Pole.
Lynn, Mass.103,923,2154,938,528Experts’ Contract Trial.
Lowell, Mass.117,350,100[6]Evans’ Annual Report.
Lawrence, Mass.96,201,900Each eng’e
4,979,234
Experts’ Contract Trial.
Trenton, N. J.84,500,0002,086,523Slade.
Milwaukee, Wis.76,955,520Each eng’e
8,683,720
Expert’s Contract Trial.
Marion, Ind.49,231,207Two eng’es
cupled
1,500,000
Cook.
Haarlem Meer, Holland80,000,000[6]200,000,000Appleton’s Dictionary.
Chicago65,824,581Two eng’es
cupled
36,000,000
Experts’ Contract Trial.
ChicagoWest engine
99,082,300
16,160,470Experts’ Contract Trial.
ChicagoEast engine
96,066,800
15,571,970Experts’ Contract Trial.
Chicago75,000,000Theron Skeel.
Cincinnati43,566,1784,702,805Hermany.

[6] Said to be average duty; all others obtained by special tests. The capacity is stated in delivery of gallons per day of twenty-four hours.

PERFORMANCE OF PUMPING ENGINES.

LOCATION.DATE.ENGINE.DESIGNER.
CincinnatiNov.
1872
Vertical single cylinder crank and fly-wheel, condensingScowden
CincinnatiNov.
1872
Vertical single cylinder crank and fly-wheel, condensingScowden
CincinnatiNov.
1872
Vertical direct acting single cylinder, condensingShield
Louisville1873CornishScowden
Newark, N. J.1870Compound duplexWorthington
Cleveland, O.1873CornishAllaire Works
Jersey City1856CornishW. Point Foundry
Charleston, Mass.1872DuplexWorthington
Providence1874Radial cut offGeo. H. Corliss
Providence1874Compound duplexWorthington
New Bedford, Mass1869Beam and fly-wheelMcAlpine
Brooklyn, No. 11860Single cylinder beamWright
Cleveland, O.1875Compound duplexHenderson
Cincinnati, O.Mar.
1879
Compound direct actingWarden
Columbus, O.Feb.
1876
Crank and fly-wheel, four engines coupledB. Holly
Pawtucket, R. I.Compound beam and fly-wheel, steam jacket Geo.H. Corliss
Buffalo, N. Y.1879Holly, four cylinders, with fly-wheelHolly Co.
LOCATION.DUTY FOR ONE
HUNDRED
POUNDS COAL.
CAPACITY.AUTHORITY.
Cincinnati37,789,9904,651,987Hermany.
Cincinnati34,064,9774,263,297Hermany.
Cincinnati23,580,68711,847,481Hermany.
Louisville37,536,730[7]3,816,575Journal A. S. C. E.
Newark, N. J.77,157,840Bailey.
Cleveland, O.41,774,955[7]5,711,988Journal A. S. C. E.
Jersey City72,115,396Copeland & Worthen.
Charleston, Mass.56,937,643[7]Journal A. S. C. E.
Providence25,865,000Smith, Graff & Reynolds.
Providence53,528,210Smith, Graff & Reynolds.
New Bedford, Mass59,336,497Hoadley & Francis.
Brooklyn, No. 160,798,20015,439,653Smith, Graff & Worthen.
Cleveland, O.31,968,006[7]8,400,000Annual Report.
Cincinnati, O.53,957,9572,000,000Hill.
Columbus, O.24,045,951
Pawtucket, R. I.133,522,090Contract Trial.
Buffalo, N. Y.86,176,3156,502,000Park Benjamin.

(A. S. C. E. is the American Society of Civil Engineers.)

[7] Said to be average duty; all others obtained by special tests. The capacity is stated in delivery of gallons per day of twenty-four hours.

COST OF PUMPING ONE MILLION GALLONS OF WATER,

(From Annual Reports, 1880.)

CITY.MILLIONSAVERAGECOST OFCOST OF PUMPING
ONE MILLION GALLONS.
OF GALLONSLIFTCOALFORFORFOR
PUMPED.IN FEET.PER TON.WAGES.COAL.REPAIRS
St. Louis, Mo.994450.$2.66$1.57$2.85$ .15
St. Louis, Mo.9857225.2.663.178.19.31
Charleston, Mass.3434150.84.812.035.73.09
Boston, Mass.856116.45.074.324.82
Philadelphia, Penn.13232124.3.342.643.72.41
Philadelphia, Penn.7887100.3.341.33.10.35
Columbus, O.912175.1.378.103.48.16
Chicago, Ill.12354104.4.001.733.36.10
Chicago, Ill.864898.3.602.322.67
Dayton, O.387127.2.7016.688.88
Brooklyn, N. Y.11196163.4.403.035.27
Pawtucket, R. I.325262.4.867.575.51
Toledo, O.1193160.2.284.324.63
Montreal, Can.3095165.
Montreal, Can.452165.7.288.853.02
Lowell, Mass.{ 771165.4.403.074.25.20
{ 52166.4.403.745.54
Cincinnati, O.2325171.2.796.535.382.06
Cincinnati, O.4959245.2.864.007.661.59
Cincinnati, O.563293.3.1512.508.492.69
CITY.COST OF PUMPING
ONE MILLION GALLONS.
COST PER
MILLION
REMARKS.
FORTOTAL.ONE HUNDRED
STORES.FT. HIGH.
St. Louis, Mo.$ .18$4.75$9.50Low service.
St. Louis, Mo..3612.035.34High service.
Charleston, Mass..308.155.40
Boston, Mass..479.698.30High service.
Philadelphia, Penn.1.498.276.68Steam.
Philadelphia, Penn..201.981.98Water.
Columbus, O..4112.156.90Holly.
Chicago, Ill..495.685.42North works.
Chicago, Ill..365.155.24West works.
Dayton, O.28.3622.33Holly.
Brooklyn, N. Y.10.846.65
Pawtucket, R. I..5013.585.17
Toledo, O.9.255.77
Montreal, Can.1.981.20Water.
Montreal, Can.1.0520.2012.53Steam.
Lowell, Mass.{ .327.844.73Morris engine.
{ .209.485.69Worthington engine.
Cincinnati, O..4014.378.40Low service.
Cincinnati, O..4213.675.58Middle service.
Cincinnati, O..6524.338.30High service.