TABLE VI. TONE-ACTIVE TOUCH RESULTS. M.
| No. of times tone was | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of | Not | No. of points tone was | Net result | ||||
| Tone | Raised | Lowered | affected | Raised + | Lowered – | + | – |
| 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 31.5 | 0 | 31.5 | |
| 2 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 29 | |
| 3 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 30 | |
| 4 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 32 | |
| 5 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 9.5 | 4.5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | |
| 7 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 22 | |
| 8 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 22.8 | 0 | 22.8 | |
| 9 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 16.8 | 0 | 16.8 | |
| 10 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | |
| 11 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 46.8 | 0 | 46.8 | |
| 12 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | |
| 13 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 13.8 | 0 | 13.8 | |
| 14 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 13.4 | .9 | 12.5 | |
| 15 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 0 | 23 | |
| 16 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 24.2 | 0 | 24.2 | |
| 17 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | |
| 18 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 0 | 28 | |
| 19 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 30 | |
| 20 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | |
| 21 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 7.8 | 0 | 7.8 | |
| 22 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 24 | |
| 23 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | |
| 24 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 42 | |
| 25 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 38 | |
| 26 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | |
| 27 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 22.9 | .6 | 22.3 | |
| Totals, | 365 | 11 | 2 | 640.5 | |||
| Grand Total, 378. | Net raised, | 640.5 | |||||
| Average raising of each tone judgment, | 1.69+ |
| % of judgments of tones lowered, | 11⁄378 = .2+ |
| % of judgments of tones raised, | 365⁄378 = 97+ |
| % of judgments of tones not affected, | 2⁄378 = .5+ |
Transcriber Note
Above table: the Net + raised should be 640.5, not 649.5; with the 'Average raising of each tone judgment,' being 1.69, not 1.71. Changed in table.
| No. of times touch was | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of | Not | No. of points touch was | Net result | ||||
| Touch | Raised | Lowered | affected | Raised + | Lowered – | + | – |
| 1 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 10.8 | 0 | 10.8 | |
| 2 | 6 | 21 | 0 | 3.6 | 12.4 | 8.8 | |
| 3 | 10 | 17 | 0 | 5.8 | 8.5 | 3.5 | |
| 4 | 6 | 21 | 0 | 2.8 | 16.7 | 13.9 | |
| 5 | 14 | 13 | 0 | 8 | 6.5 | 1.5 | |
| 6 | 8 | 19 | 0 | 7.2 | 6.9 | .3 | |
| 7 | 16 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 6.5 | 4.5 | |
| 8 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 13.8 | 3 | 10.8 | |
| 9 | 7 | 20 | 0 | 6.3 | 5 | 1.3 | |
| 10 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 23 | .5 | 22.5 | |
| 11 | 21 | 6 | 0 | 2.1 | 5.4 | 3.3 | |
| 12 | 26 | 0 | 1 | 38 | 0 | 38 | |
| 13 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 48.4 | 0 | 48.4 | |
| 14 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 14.2 | 2.4 | 11.8 | |
| Totals | 239 | 138 | 1 | 149.9 | 29.5 | ||
| Grand Total, 378 | Net raised, | 120.4 | |||||
| Average raising of each active touch judgment, | .31+ |
| % of judgments of active touch lowered, | 138⁄378 = 36+ |
| % of judgments of active touch raised, | 239⁄378 = 63+ |
| % of judgments of active touch not affected, | 1⁄378 = .2+ |
Transcriber Note
Above table: -3.3 Net result lowered from #10 moved to #11 and is now +3.3. No figures affected.
Under combination influences, the average is reduced to 4.14+ for colors, and 3.12 for tones.
The next Table, V, shows the color-tone results for F. as Table IV showed them for M. F.'s average for colors (Table I) alone was 4.35, and was reduced in combination with tones by .26, or to 4.19. So, also, F.'s average for tones alone (Table III), 4.33, was reduced by .74+ to 3.59. The averages in both cases show the same general tendency to a lowering of the appreciation in both series when the series are combined, but the tones are lowered more than the colors.
Table VI shows the effect of combining tones and active touches as reported by M.
The effect of this combination is clear and unmistakeable. The appreciation of the tones is raised 1.71+ points; and of the active touches, .31+ points. This result is the opposite of that shown in Table IV, where colors and tones were combined. There is this agreement, however, that the appreciation of the tones is changed more than that of the other stimuli. Relatively, the appreciation of the touches changes least.
Table VII shows the effects on F. of combining tones and active touches. The same general tendencies appear as in the case of M.; but the changes in appreciation are not so marked. This is not easy to explain, for F. estimated both the active touches and the tones higher when taken alone than did M.
Table VIII shows the effect on F. of combining tones and passive touches. The same general tendency to increased appreciation appears, but the tones are raised more and the touches raised less than in Table VII. This may be explained, perhaps, on the basis of increasing appreciation with increased participation.
Tables IX and X show the effect on M. and F., respectively, of combining colors and active touches. M. estimates both slightly higher, while F. estimates both slightly lower. This difference cannot be explained by the standards for each subject. From Tables I and III we get:
| Standards. | |
|---|---|
| Colors. | Active Touches. |
| M. 4.44 | 4.24 |
| F. 4.35 | 4.55 |
| With M. the colors go up to | 4.87 |
| With F. the colors go down to | 4.22 |
| With M. the active touches go up to | 4.41 |
| With F. the active touches go down to | 4.17 |