TABLE XII. COLOR-PASSIVE TOUCH RESULTS. F.
| No. of times color was | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of | Not | No. of points color was | Net Result | ||||
| Color | Raised | Lowered | affected | Raised + | Lowered – | + | – |
| 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 12.4 | 0 | 12.4 | |
| 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 3.6 | 3 | .6 | |
| 5 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 15.2 | 0 | 15.2 | |
| 6 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 2.4 | 2.4 | |
| 7 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 9.1 | .3 | 8.8 | |
| 8 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 9 | |
| 9 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 5.2 | 2.4 | 2.8 | |
| 10 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 12.05 | 4.35 | 7.7 | |
| 11 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 14.9 | .7 | 14.2 | |
| 12 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 2.4 | 6 | 3.6 | |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 6.6 | 1.2 | 5.4 | |
| 15 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4.5 | .5 | 4 | |
| 16 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 3.8 | .2 | |
| 17 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | |
| 18 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 12.55 | .65 | 11.9 | |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 20 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 8.8 | .6 | 8.2 | |
| 21 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 11 | |
| 22 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 1.2 | 12.8 | |
| 23 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 4.7 | 1.1 | 3.6 | |
| 24 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| 25 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 5.8 | 1 | 4.8 | |
| 26 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 1 | |
| 27 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 7.6 | 1.2 | 6.4 | |
| 28 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 10.8 | .2 | 10.6 | |
| Totals, | 226 | 100 | 66 | 161.6 | 6 | ||
| Grand total, 392 | Net raised, 155.6 | ||||||
| Average raising of each color judgment, | .40- |
| % of judgments of colors lowered, | 100⁄392 = 25+ |
| % of judgments of colors raised, | 226⁄392 = 57+ |
| % of judgments of colors not affected, | 66⁄392 = 16+ |
Transcriber Note
Above table.
Total of column Raised, 226 change to 225
Total of column Lowered, 100 change to 101
| No. of times touch was | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of | Not | No. of points touch was | Net Result | ||||
| Touch | Raised | Lowered | affected | Raised + | Lowered – | + | – |
| 1 | 0 | 8 | 20 | 0 | 8 | 8 | |
| 2 | 3 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 15 | 12 | |
| 3 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 14.5 | 2.5 | 12 | |
| 4 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 11.2 | 4.4 | 6.8 | |
| 5 | 21 | 1 | 6 | 27 | 1 | 26 | |
| 6 | 16 | 12 | 0 | 9.6 | 5.8 | 3.8 | |
| 7 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 6 | |
| 8 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 14 | 7 | 7 | |
| 9 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 18.6 | 3.2 | 15.4 | |
| 10 | 15 | 1 | 12 | 15 | 1 | 14 | |
| 11 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 12 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | |
| 13 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 18.3 | 7.9 | 10.4 | |
| 14 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 31.2 | 1.8 | 29.4 | |
| Totals, | 202 | 92 | 98 | 145.8 | 27 | ||
| Grand total, 392 | Net raised, 118.8 | ||||||
| Average raising of each passive touch judgment, | .30+ |
| % of judgments of passive touch lowered, | 92⁄392 = 23+ |
| % of judgments of passive touch raised, | 202⁄392 = 51+ |
| % of judgments of passive touch not affected, | 98⁄392 = 25+ |
Evidently no dynamic explanation of this difference is possible. It has been impossible to reveal the cause of this particular difference; in all other respects, however, the subjects agree in the general tendencies revealed.
There remain the combinations of colors and passive touches. These combinations are shown in Tables XI and XII.
In these tables the same general tendency to estimate both higher when colors and passive touches are combined appears. M. raises the colors more than F., and F. raises the touches more than M. This is perfectly regular, as the following table shows:
| Standards. | Raised in Combination to | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colors. | Passive Touches. | Colors. | Passive Touches. | |
| M. | 4.44 | 5.14 | 5.16 | 5.40 |
| F. | 4.53 | 4.56 | 4.75 | 4.85 |
The whole results are recapitulated for both M. and F. in Table XIII.