ARTICLE IIIJUDICIAL DEPARTMENTTHE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
- Section 1. The judicial power, courts, judges: Page
- Characteristics and attributes of judicial power [511]
- "Judicial power" [511]
- "Shall be vested" [512]
- Finality of judgment [512]
- Taney doctrine [513]
- Award of execution [514]
- Ancillary powers [515]
- Contempt power; the act of 1789 [515]
- An inherent power [515]
- Contempt power exalted [516]
- Recession of the doctrine [517]
- Bridges v. California [517]
- Summary punishment of contempt; misbehavior of counsel [517]
- Punishment of counsel; The Sacher Case [519]
- Contempt by disobedience of orders [520]
- Criminal versus civil contempts [521]
- Judicial power aids administrative power [521]
- Power to issue writs; the act of 1789 [522]
- Common law powers of the District of Columbia Courts [522]
- Habeas corpus [523]
- Congress limits the inquisition power [523]
- Injunctions under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 [525]
- Rule-making power and powers over process [525]
- Limits to the power [526]
- Appointment of referees, masters, and special aids [527]
- Power to admit and disbar attorneys [527]
- Organization of courts; compensation of judges [528]
- "One supreme court" [528]
- Inferior courts made and abolished [528]
- Abolition of the commerce court [529]
- Compensation [530]
- Diminution of salaries [530]
- Courts of specialized jurisdiction [531]
- Emergency Court of Appeals of 1942 [531]
- Judicial review restrained [532]
- Legislative courts; Canter case [533]
- Other legislative courts [534]
- Powers of Congress over legislative courts [534]
- Status of the Court of Claims [535]
- A judicial paradox [536]
- Status of the courts of the District of Columbia.' [536]
- Section 2. Jurisdiction [538]
- Clause 1. Scope of jurisdiction [538]
- "Cases and controversies" [538]
- Two classes of "cases and controversies" [538]
- Adverse litigants [539]
- Stockholders' suits [541]
- Substantial interest doctrine [542]
- Substantial interest in suits by States [543]
- Abstract, contingent, and hypothetical questions [544]
- Political questions [546]
- Origin of the concept [546]
- Exemplifications of the doctrine [547]
- Recent cases [548]
- Advisory opinions [549]
- Declaratory judgments [551]
- Declaratory Judgment Act of 1934 [551]
- "Case or controversy" test in declaratory judgment proceedings [552]
- Cases arising under the Constitution, laws, and treaties of the United States [553]
- Definition [553]
- Judicial review [554]
- Judicial review and national supremacy [554]
- Judicial review of acts of Congress [556]
- Hamilton's argument [558]
- Marbury v. Madison [559]
- Marshall's argument [559]
- Importance of Marbury v. Madison [560]
- Limits to the exercise of judicial review [561]
- The doctrine of "strict necessity" [562]
- The doctrine of political questions [562]
- The "reasonable doubt" doctrine [563]
- Exclusion of extra-constitutional tests [564]
- Disallowance by statutory interpretation [565]
- Stare decisis in constitutional law [565]
- Allegations of federal question [566]
- Corporations chartered by Congress [568]
- Removal from State courts of suits against federal officials [568]
- Tennessee v. Davis [569]
- Supreme Court review of State court decisions [570]
- Suits affecting ambassadors, other public ministers, and consuls [571]
- When ambassadors, etc., are affected [571]
- Cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction [572]
- Origin and characteristics [572]
- Congressional interpretation of the admiralty clause [572]
- Judicial approval of congressional interpretation [573]
- Two types of cases [573]
- Maritime torts [574]
- Prize cases, forfeitures, etc. [575]
- Proceedings in rem [575]
- Absence of a jury [576]
- Territorial extent of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction [576]
- Admiralty jurisdiction versus State power [578]
- Exclusive of admiralty jurisdiction [578]
- Concessions to State power [579]
- The Jensen case and its sequelae [580]
- Power of Congress to modify maritime law; the "Lottawanna" [582]
- Cases to which the United States is a party; right of United States to sue [584]
- Suits against States [584]
- Immunity of United States from suit [585]
- Waiver of immunity by Congress [586]
- United States v. Lee [587]
- Difficulties created by the Lee case [588]
- Official immunity today [589]
- Classification of suits against officers [590]
- Suits against government corporations [590]
- Suits between two or more States [591]
- Boundary disputes; the law applied [591]
- Modern types of suits between States [592]
- Cases in which the Court has declined jurisdiction [594]
- Problem of enforcement; Virginia v. West Virginia [595]
- Controversies between a State and citizens of another State [596]
- Nonjusticiable controversies [596]
- Jurisdiction confined to civil cases [597]
- Suits by a State as parens patriae; jurisdiction declined [597]
- Suits by a State as parens patriae; jurisdiction accepted [598]
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania Railroad [598]
- Controversies between citizens of different States [599]
- The meaning of "State," Hepburn v. Ellzey [599]
- Extension of jurisdiction by act of 1940 [600]
- Citizenship, natural persons [600]
- Citizenship, corporations [601]
- Black and White Taxicab case [603]
- The law applied in diversity cases; Swift v. Tyson [603]
- Extension of the Tyson case [604]
- The Tyson rule protested [604]
- Erie Railroad v. Tompkins; Tyson case overruled [605]
- Extension of the Tompkins rule [607]
- Controversies between citizens of the same State claiming lands under grants of different States [608]
- Controversies between a State, or the citizens thereof, and foreign States, citizens, or subjects [609]
- Suits by foreign States [609]
- Indian tribes [610]
- Narrow construction of the jurisdiction [610]
- Clause 2. Original and appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court [611]
- Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court [611]
- An autonomous jurisdiction [611]
- Cannot be enlarged; Marbury v. Madison [612]
- Concurrent jurisdiction of the lower federal courts [613]
- Appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court [614]
- Subject to limitation by Congress [614]
- McCardle case [614]
- Power of Congress to regulate the jurisdiction of lower federal courts [616]
- Martin v. Hunter's lessee [616]
- Plenary power of Congress over jurisdiction [616]
- Judicial power under the Emergency Price Control Act [620]
- Legislative control over writs [621]
- Injunctions in labor disputes; Norris-LaGuardia Act [621]
- Judicial power equated with due process of law [622]
- Judicial versus nonjudicial functions [623]
- Federal-State court relations [624]
- Problems raised by concurrency [624]
- Disobedience of Supreme Court orders by State courts [625]
- Worcester v. Georgia [625]
- Conflicts of jurisdiction; comity [626]
- Jurisdiction of the res [626]
- State interference by injunction with federal jurisdiction [627]
- Federal interference by injunction with State jurisdiction [628]
- Federal injunctions against State official action [629]
- Ex parte Young [630]
- State interference by habeas corpus proceedings with federal jurisdiction [631]
- Federal interference, by removal and habeas corpus [632]
- Comity as a principle of statutory construction [633]
- Comity as cooperation [634]
- Early use of State courts in enforcement of federal law [635]
- Retreat from this practice [636]
- Resumption of this practice [636]
- State obligation to enforce federal law [637]
- Right of foreign corporations to resort to federal courts [638]
- Clause 3. Trial by jury. [See pp. [878-880] under Amendment VI] [638]
- Section 3. Treason [638]
- Clause 1. Treason defined [638]
- Definition [638]
- Levying war [639]
- The Burr trial [640]
- Aid and comfort to the enemy; the Cramer Case [640]
- The Haupt Case [641]
- The Kawakita Case [643]
- Doubtful State of the law of Treason today [644]
- Clause 2. Punishment of Treason [645]
- Corruption of blood and forfeiture [645]