FOOTNOTES:
[3] The part of this record with which Miss Anthony herself was directly connected, and which comprises by far the greater portion of the whole, is given with many personal incidents in her Life and Work. [Husted-Harper.]
ARTICLE XIV.
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law, or deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
[5] Women also had attempted to vote in local and State elections in 1870 and 1871. An account of the trials and decisions which followed will be found in the [History of Woman Suffrage, Vol. II, Chap. XXV].
[6] The most earnest advocates of the constitutional right of women to Federal Suffrage are Mrs. Sallie Clay Bennett, Ky.; Mrs. Clara B. Colby, D. C.; Mrs. Martha E. Root, Mich.; Miss Sara Winthrop Smith, Conn. They have done a large amount of persistent but ineffectual work in the endeavor to obtain a recognition of this right.
[7] Senator John Sherman did at one time introduce a bill for this purpose.
[8] This is precisely what was done in the case of Susan B. Anthony above referred to.
[9] The first report, in 1871, was signed by Representatives Benjamin F. Butler (Mass.) and William A. Loughridge (Ia.): [ History of Woman Suffrage, Vol. II, p. 464].
The second, in 1879, was signed by Senators George F. Hoar (Mass.), John H. Mitchell (Ore.), Angus Cameron (Wis.): [Id., Vol. III, p. 131].
The third, in 1882, was signed by Senators Elbridge G. Lapham (N. Y.), Thomas W. Ferry (Mich.), Henry W. Blair (N. H.), Henry B. Anthony (R. I.): [Id., p. 231].
The fourth, in 1883, was signed by Representative John D. White (Ky.): [Id., p. 263]
For the fifth and sixth, in 1884, see [Chap. III of present volume]; for the seventh and eighth, in 1886, [Id., Chap. V.] (See also, [Chap. VI].); for the ninth and tenth, in 1890, [Id., Chap. X]; for the eleventh, in 1892, [Id., Chap. XII].
It is worthy of notice that from 1879 to 1891, inclusive, Miss Susan B. Anthony was enabled to spend the congressional season in Washington [see [pp. 188], [366]], and during this time nine of these eleven favorable reports were made.
For adverse reports see [History of Woman Suffrage: 1871, Vol. II, p. 461]; 1878, [Vol. III, p. 112]; 1882, [Id., p. 237]; 1884, [present volume, Chap. III] (see also, [Chap. VI]); 1892, [Id., Chap. XII]; 1894, [Id., Chap. XIV]; 1896, [Id., Chap. XVI.]