JUSTIFIABLE DECEPTION.DECIDEDLY PLEASANT.THE BRITISH ATHLETE'S VADE-MECUM.
- Question. What is the specialité
of a Briton?
- Answer. That given him by
belonging to a race of born
athletes.
- Q. Can any member of the
human family outside the
British Isles do anything in
the shape of sport?
- A. Only imperfectly. However,
Australians are good at
cricket, and Americans have
been known to adequately
train racehorses.
- Q. Can you give any reason
for their partial success?
- A. Yes. Australians are our
first-cousins, and Americans
our first-cousins once removed.
- Q. Then you consider them
of the same stock as the true
Briton?
- A. Quite so. Hence their
prowess in the field.
- Q. What do you think of
foreigners?
- A. That they are typified
by "Moosoo."
- Q. When you speak of
"Moosoo," to whom do you
refer?
- A. To the average French
duffer, who has about as
much knowledge of sport as a
baby in arms.
- Q. Are all foreigners duffers?
- A. All; without exception.
- Q. How do they go out
shooting?
- A. With a horn, a couteau
de chasse, a toy game-bag,
and a decorated poodle.
- Q. Can they row at all?
- A. Not seriously. They can
paddle a little, but have no
more idea of pulling than the
man in the moon.
- Q. And yet, did not a Paris
crew beat a Thames Eight, on
the Seine, early in the present
year?
- A. Yes; but that was because
there was some good
reason or other for the English
defeat.
- Q. It could not have been,
of course, because the French
Eight was better than their
visitors?
- A. Certainly not.
- Q. But is not that the view
you would adopt if you were
dealing with two English
crews?
- A. Why, certainly; but
this was a race between Britons
and Frenchman, and the former
could not naturally be beaten
by the latter on their own
merits.
- Q. Why not?
- A. Because, as a matter of
fact, they couldn't.
- Q. And so your opinion of
the superiority of Britons over
foreigners is unalterable?
- A. Of course. I should
not be a Briton if it were
not so.