ATTORNEYS AT LAW.

Towns.Names.Native Place.When and where graduated.With whom read Law.Com. prac.General Remarks.
AndoverJohn H. SlackNew LondonDart. 1811J. Harris1814Practised also at Goffstown and Wilmot ashort time, and resided a short time in variousother places, lived at Georgetown,D. C., now in Virginia, on a farm.
Samuel ButterfieldGoffstown—— ——Thomas Jameson1817Practised in Epping till 1821, removed to Andover, Rep. from Andover and P. Master.
Josiah Forsaith
John Harris
Levi Woodbury
BoscawenNathaniel GreenWorcester, Ms.—— ——Peter Green1787Practised also a short time in Hopkinton, removed from the State, d., 1811.
Daniel WebsterFranklinDart. 1801T. W. Thompson1805Practised in Boscawen till 1807, Portsmouth, till 1817. Rep. in Cong. from 1813 to '17, removed to Boston, Rep. in Cong. from 1823 to '27, Sen. from 1827 to '39 and again 1845, Sec. of State of U. S., 1841 to '42. LL.D. Dart., Harv., Coll. N. J., Columb.
Christopher Gore
Ezekiel WebsterFranklinDart. 1804James Sullivan1807Rep. from Boscawen from 1821 to '25 and 1827-28, Sen. 1815, Trustee of D. C. He fell dead while arguing a case in the Court House in Concord, April 10, 1829, a. 49. Brother of Hon. Daniel Webster.
Parker Noyes
Zachariah G. WhitmanHanover, Ms.Harv. 1807B. Whitman1811Practised also in Boston till 1831, then in Hopkinton, d. in 1839.
Francis CogswellDover—— ——Oliver Crosby1817Son of Hon. Amos Cogswell, born April 16, 1790. In Dartmouth Coll. three years, Notary Public.
Frederick SmithGilmantonDart. 1826S. Moody1829Removed to Boston and went into the mercantile business.
S. C. Lyford
Lewis SmithAshford, Ct.—— ——R. M. Field1841Asst. Clerk of House of Reps. 1843 to '45, andalso Clerk in 1845. Resides in Fishersville.
H. Clossen
E. Burke
BradfordWeare TappanEast KingstonDart. 1811Caleb Ellis1814He was born in March, 1790.
H. Newton
B. Chase
James WhittleWeareDart. 1823Artemas Rogers1827Practised also at Loudon and several otherplaces, went South.
S. Fletcher
Mason W. TappanNewport—— ——Weare Tappan1841In partnership with Weare Tappan, Esq.
ChichesterPhilip CarrigainConcordDart. 1794A. LivermoreSee Clerks of Court of Sessions.
Zachariah BatchelderGloucester, Ms.Dart. 1821S. Moody1828Removed to Wolfborough, Solicitor for CarrollCo.
S. C. Lyford
ConcordE. St. L. LivermoreLondonderry—— ——Samuel Livermore1783See Solicitors of Rockingham Co.
Peter GreenWorcester, Ms.—— ——Samuel LivermoreCounsellor 1788-89, removed to Boston, returnedand died at Concord.
Thomas W. ThompsonNewbury, Ms.Harv. 1786James Sullivan1791See Solicitors of Hillsborough Co.
Arthur LivermoreLondonderry—— ——1792See Judges of Superior Court.
Charles WalkerConcordHarv. 1787John Pickering1793See Solicitors of Rockingham Co.
Samuel GreenConcord—— ——Peter Green1793See Judges of Superior Court.
Jonathan Rawson
Arthur RogersConcord—— ——E. St. L. Livermore1793Practised also at Gilmanton, Barrington, andPembroke.
Philip CarrigainConcordDart. 1794A. LivermoreSee Clerks of Court of Sessions.
William PickeringGreenlandHarv. 1797W. K. Atkinson1800See County Treasurers.
Moody KentNewbury, Ms.Harv. 1801William Gordon1804Practised also in Deerfield, and now resides inPembroke.
Charles H. Atherton}
Isaac GatesHarv. 1802He was at Concord in 1814.
Samuel A. KimballConcordDart. 1806Samuel Green1810Practised also at Dover, Clerk of Senate, Dep.Sec., Rep. from Concord.
Lyman B. WalkerBrookfield, Ms.—— ——Phineas Walker1811Practised also at Gilford, Sol. of Strafford Co. from 1819 to 1834, Rep. from Gilford, app'd Att'y Gen'l Jan 10, 1843.
Moses H. BradleyConcordDart. 1807Samuel Green1815Practised in Concord but a short time, removedto Sanbornton and to Bristol, Rep.and Sen. Died in Concord in 1834, a. 52.
Samuel FletcherPlymouthDart. 1810Samuel Green1815Rep. from Concord, Trustee of D. C., Trusteeand Treasurer of Phillips Academy, Andover,where he now resides.
John WhippleHamilton, Ms.Dart. 1812Baruch Chase1817See Registers of Deeds.
Amos A. ParkerFitzwilliamVt. U. 1813Practised before at Epping, afterwards at NewMarket and Kingston, and is now at Fitzwilliam.
George KentConcordDart. 1814Samuel Green1817Rep. from Concord, Trustee of D. C., Cashierof Concord Bank, Ed. of N. H. Statesmanand Concord Register, and of Boston Sun.
William Sullivan
Richard BartlettPembrokeDart. 1815George Sullivan1818Sec. of State, N. H., 1825-'28, Clerk of Senate,Rep. from Concord, removed to N. Y., andd. in 1831.
Samuel D. BellFrancestownHarv. 1816George Sullivan1820Practised in Meredith to 1820, Chester 1830,Concord 1839, Manchester, Rep. 1825, '26.Sol. Rock. Co. 1823 to '28, Com. to reviseStatutes 1841, '42, Judge of the PoliceCourt of Manchester.
Nathaniel P. RogersPlymouthDart. 1816Richard Fletcher1820Practised also at Plymouth, Ed. of Herald ofFreedom. Died Oct. 16, 1846, a. 52.
Parker Noyes
Nathaniel G. UphamRochesterDart. 1820David Barker1823See Judges of Superior Court.
William C. ThompsonSalisburyDart. 1820Samuel Fletcher1824Removed to Plymouth, where he now resides.
Parker Noyes
Stephen C. BadgerWarnerDart. 1823H. B. Chase1826See Clerks of Superior Court.
William W. StickneyEnfieldDart. 1823H. B. Chase1826Practised in Concord till 1827, removed toNew Market, Rep. from New Market 1840,'41, '42.
Ira PerleyBoxford, Ms.Dart. 1822B. J. Gilbert1827Practised also at Hanover, Treasurer of D. C.,Rep. from Concord.
William G. WebsterPlymouthDart. 1822Samuel Fletcher1827Practised also at New Hampton and Rochester.
Ralph MetcalfCharlestownDart. 1823Henry Hubbard1827Practised also at Newport, Claremont, Sec. ofState, N. H. 1831 to '38, Clerk at Washington,resumed the practice at Plymouth,Bristol, Newport, Reg'r of Probate for Sul.Co. 1845.
G. B Upham
James WhittleWeareDart. 1823Artemas Rogers1827See Bradford.
S. Fletcher
Charles H. PeasleeGilmantonDart. 1824S. Moody1827Rep. from Concord, Director and Clerk of C. R. R. Corporation, Adj. Gen. from July 6, 1829, Trustee and Sec. of N. H. Asylum for Insane, Director of Mechanics Bank, Concord, Rep. in Cong. 1847.
Franklin PierceHillsboroughBowd. 1824J. Burnham1827Practised in Hillsborough till 1838, Rep. 1829,'30, Speaker 1831, '32, Rep. in Cong. 1833 to'37, Sen. in Cong. 1837 to '42, Dis. Att'y U.S. 1845, Maj. Gen. U. S. Army.
L. Woodbury
E. Parker
Dane Law School
Hamilton HutchinsConcordDart. 1827Richard Fletcher1830Treasurer of N. H. M. Fire Ins. Co.
George MinotBristolDart. 1828N. G. Upham1831See County Treasurers.
James SullivanExeterDart. 1829George Sullivan1832Practised also in Pembroke, removed toMichigan.
Calvin AinsworthLittleton—— ——Henry A. Bellows1835See Registers of Probate.
J. D. Stoddard
Ephraim EatonCandiaDart. 1833S. Fletcher1837
Asa FowlerPembrokeDart. 1833C. H. Peaslee1837Clerk of Senate from 1835 to '40, Rep. fromConcord.
Arthur FletcherBridgewaterYale. 1836S. Fletcher1840
Josiah MinotBristolDart. 1837H. Hubbard1840Practised also in Bristol.
J. J. Gilchrist
S. D. Bell
Ira Perley
William ButterfieldGoffstownDart. 1836S. Butterfield1840Practised in Lucas Co., Ohio, and Gilmanton,Asst. Clerk of Senate, 1845, '46, Editor of N.H. Patriot, also of a paper in Lowell, Ms.,and one in Nashua.
George G. FoggMeredithDart. 1839W. Lovell1841Practised first in Gilmanton, Sec. of State, N.H., 1846, Editor of Independent Democrat.
S. C. Lyford
Dane Law School
Sylvester DanaOrfordDart. 1839Pierce & Fowler1842Editor of a paper.
Dane Law School
Chandler E. PotterConcordDart. 1831J. Bartlett1813Removed to Manchester, Editor of ManchesterDemocrat.
Pierce & Fowler
John H. GeorgeConcord—— ——Pierce & Fowler1846In partnership with C. H. Peaslee, Esq.
C. H. Peaslee
DunbartonJeremiah StinsonDunbartonDart. 1798Baruch Chase?1802He died in 1809 aged 36.
Caleb Stark, Jr.Dunbarton—— ——1829Practised also in Pembroke and Concord,Rep. from Dunbarton, previously admittedto the Bar in Ohio.
EpsomBenjamin MoodyW. Newbury, Ms.—— ——Stephen Mooody1801
Jonathan Steele, Jr.PeterboroughWms. 1811Jonathan SteeleSee Solicitors of Rockingham Co.
C. H. Atherton
FranklinParker NoyesSouth HamptonDart. 1796T. W. Thompson1801See Solicitors of Hillsborough Co.
Thomas H. PettingillSalisburyDart. 1804John Harris1808Practised in Canaan till 1822, also inSalisbury, Rep. from Salisbury.
George W. NesmithAntrimDart. 1820Parker Noyes1825Rep. from Franklin, 1831, '2, '4-'6, '8, '9, '44-6,President of N. R. R. Corporation.
Austin F. PikeHebron—— ——G. W. NesmithIn partnership with G. W. Nesmith, Esq.
HennikerJohn KellyWarnerDart. 1804J. H. Woodman1808Practised in Henniker till 1809, Northwoodtill 1831, Exeter, Clerk of the House 1828,Reg. Prob. Rock. Co. 1831 to '42, Rep. fromNorthwood and Exeter, Counsellor 1846,Editor of Exeter News Letter.
Artemas RogersBillerica, Ms.Harv. 1809Joseph Locke1813See Solicitors of Merrimack Co.
T. Rowe
Samuel SmithPeterboroughDart. 1827
John J. PrenticeMont VernonDart. 1834E. Parker1837Practised also at Merrimack, Henniker, andClaremont, P. M. at Claremont.
B. M. Farley
Lewis SmithAshford, Ct.—— ——R. M. Field1841See Boscawen.
H. Clossen
E. Burke
HooksettJohn WhippleHamilton, Ms.Dart. 1812Baruch Chase1817See Registers of Deeds.
Benjamin B. FrenchChester—— ——Daniel French?1823Practised also at Sutton, Clerk of JudicialCourts Sul. Co., Rep. from Newport, Asst.Clerk and Clerk of H. of Reps, in Cong.,Washington, D. C.
Ebenezer FrenchNewtownDart. 18241827Practised also in Sutton and Seabrook,removed from State 1845.
HopkintonStephen ScalesConcord, Ms.Harv. 1763E. Trowbridge1770Practised in Hopkinton till 1772, where hedied, a. 33.
Francis Dana
Baruch ChaseSutton, Ms.Dart. 1786Bradley & Buck1789See Solicitors of Hillsborough Co.
John HarrisHarvard, Ms.Harv. 1791Simeon Strong1794See Judges of Superior Court.
Timothy Bigelow
Joel HarrisHarvard, Ms.Dart. 1804John Harris1807Removed to Mass.
Matthew HarveySuttonDart. 1800John Harris1809Rep. from Hopkinton, Speaker of H. 1818-'20,Pres. of Sen. 1827, Coun. 1828, Rep. inCong. 1821-25, Gov. 1830, District Judge U.S. 1830.
John WhippleHamilton, Ms.Dart. 1812Baruch Chase1817See Registers of Deeds.
Horace ChaseUnityDart. 1814Matthew Harvey1817See Judges of Probate.
Hamilton E. PerkinsHopkinton—— ——M. Harvey1833Removed to Boston, 1845.
H. Chase
William S. Morton—— ——Samuel Fletcher
LoudonTimothy DarlingHennikerHarv. 1822Artemas Rogers1826Practised in Hillsborough 1826, Henniker 1827,Loudon till 1833. Studied at Gilm. Theo.Sem., and settled as a minister in Warsaw, N. Y.
Samuel Hubbard
James WhittleWeareDart. 1823Artemas Rogers1827See Bradford.
S. Fletcher
John DoePembrokeDart. 1825B. Stevens1828Died several years since.
Edward S. MorrisGorham, Me.—— ——M. McDonald1844Practised in Loudon in 1844, removed to Pembroke.
New LondonStephen C. BadgerWarnerDart. 1823H. B. Chase1826See Clerks of Superior Court.
Joseph Bell
Walter P. FlandersWarnerDart. 1831G. W. Nesmith1835Rep. from New London 1841, '42.
J. D. Willard
NorthfieldAsa P. CateSanborntonDart. M.A. 1844G. W. NesmithSee Solicitors of Merrimack Co.
Benjamin A. RogersNorthfield—— ——Asa P. Cate1846Removed very soon after commencing practice to Gilmanton.
PembrokeArthur RogersConcord—— ——E. St. L. Livermore1793See Concord.
Moody KentNewbury, Ms.Harv. 1801William Gordon1804See Concord.
C. H. Atherton
Nathaniel DearbornChesterGeorge Sullivan1806Practised also in Deerfield and Northwood.
Boswell StevensPromfret, Ct.Dart. 1804Amos Kent1807See Judges of Probate.
Caleb Stark, Jr.Dunbarton—— ——1829See Dunbarton.
John ParkerBedfordJonas B. Bowman1835Practised also in Hooksett and Bedford.
John E. StanyanPembrokeDart. 1840N. Clifford1844
Edward S. MorrisGorham, Me.—— ——M. McDonald1844See Loudon.
PittsfieldCaleb MerrillAtkinsonDart. 1808Baruch Chase1815Practised also in Chester and Barnstead, andin partnership with A. Kent, Esq.
A. Kent
Moses Norris, Jr.PittsfieldDart. 1828Isaac O. Barnes1831See Solicitors of Merrimack Co.
Ithamar W. BeardLittleton, Ms.Dart. 1837M. Norris, Jr.1839Removed to Lowell, Ms.
Charles H. ButtersPittsfieldDart. 1837L. B. Walker1843
I. Perley
Hayes & Cogswell
James A. E. MerrillPittsfieldDart. 1839C. Merrill1843Removed to Manchester, and died 1846.
I. Perley
George L. MerrillPittsfieldDart. 1840C. Merrill1844Practised a short time previous in Kentucky.
I. Perley
SalisburyThos. W. ThompsonNewbury, Ms.Harv. 1786James Sullivan1791See Solicitors of Hillsborough Co.
Moses EastmanSalisburyDart. 1794T. W. Thompson1797See Clerks of Superior Court.
Thomas W. PettingillSalisburyDart. 1804John Harris1808See Franklin.
Richard FletcherCavendish, Vt.Dart. 1806Daniel Webster1809Removed to Boston, Rep. in General Courtfrom Boston, Rep. in Cong, from Mass.,LL. D. at Dartmouth College.
Samuel I. WellsSherburne, Ms.Dart. 1814Richard Fletcher1819Practised in Salisbury till 1836, removed fromState.
Elbridge F. GreenoughBoscawenDart. 1828E. Webster1831Practised in Danville, Columbia Co., Pa., to1838, went to Salisbury 1843, Rep. fromBoscawen 1843.
R. Fletcher
SuttonHarrison G. HarrisHarvard, Ms.—— ——John Harris1815Practised also in Warner.
Benjamin B. FrenchChester—— ——Daniel French?1823See Hooksett.
Ebenezer FrenchNewtonDart. 18241827See Hooksett.
Ira B. PearsonNewport—— ——Edmund BurkeRemoved to Chester, Vt.
WarnerJeremiah H. WoodmanSanborntonDart. 17941800Practised afterwards at Meredith, now atRochester, Rep. from Rochester.
Parker NoyesSouth HamptonDart. 1796T. W. Thompson1801See Solicitors of Hillsborough Co.
Henry B. ChaseBrookfield, Ms.Dart. M.A. 1823Baruch Chase1804See Registers of Probate.
Harrison G. HarrisHarvard, Ms.—— ——John Harris1815See Sutton.
Herman FosterAndover, Ms.—— ——H. B. Chase1839Practised in Warner to 1841, removed to Manchester,Rep. from Manchester.
WilmotJohn H. SlackNew LondonDart. 1811John Harris1814See Andover.

[REASONS FOR GENEALOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS.]

[COMMUNICATED FOR THE REGISTER.]

Perhaps at no time since the settlement of our country, has the public mind been so deeply interested in genealogical research as it is at the present. There is now perceived among all classes, a growing disposition to make inquiries respecting the past. The National and State archives are compelled to surrender the treasures which for centuries have been locked up in their musty embrace. On every side individuals are to be found, who are ransacking the homesteads of their fathers, to acquire materials for biography and to settle the questions respecting their ancestors which inquisitiveness suggests.

Some of these individuals appear to be urged on by curiosity alone. If, through their inquiries, they ascertain that they have descended from an old and celebrated family, the discovered fact seems to repay them for all the toil at the expense of which that fact may be brought to light. To establish their claim to descent from some noted warrior of the age of chivalry, or from some distinguished statesman of a later date, they are willing, not only to spend laborious days and sleepless nights, but their purses are open, and their gratitude is freely expressed, to any one who shall furnish them with a link to perfect the chain which may connect them with their supposed ancestors.

A family pride, either innate or acquired, leads other inquirers to their task. It is the height of their ambition to be able to trace their lineage to the first settlers of our country. To have derived their existence from the noble band who left a home rendered insupportable by religious persecution, and crossed the stormy Atlantic in the frail Mayflower, is to them a source of the highest pleasure. In their efforts to establish this derivation, facts of great importance in the local history of our country have been elicited. These efforts have given birth to most of our town histories, whereby materials, invaluable to our future historiographers and biographers are preserved from the ravages of time. These men in consequence of their researches become the nuclei of associations for historical, genealogical, and biographical pursuits, which, here and there, are springing into existence. These associations are awakening the mass of the people to a sense of the importance of the objects for which they were formed. Many young men, naturally enthusiastic in every thing they undertake, have caught the spirit of antiquarian research. From them we have much to hope. New modes of investigation may be projected, new plans for arranging and preserving historical and genealogical discoveries may be proposed, and new deductions from these discoveries may be made. Such are some of the advantages which may be confidently predicted as the result of these labors in the genealogical field.

Other inquirers are inclined to the study of genealogy from the argumentum ad pecuniam. The vast amount of property which remains in abeyance in the old world, has arrested their attention. Every announcement of estates wanting heirs stimulates anew their investigations; and the presiding genius of the age suggests to them the possibility of finding themselves entitled to this unclaimed property.

How important, then, that a genealogical record should exist, wherein the heirs of families should have a permanent place! How many bitter controversies respecting heirship would thereby be prevented! How many fraudulent distributions of property would thus be defeated! How many of those who have been rendered destitute by the deceptions of false claimants, would be restored to their legal rights, if such a record had been hitherto properly kept!

The disputes of heirs relative to the distribution of estates have frequently occasioned difficulty in our civil courts. In some cases property has been carried to collateral heirs, because lineal descendants could not sufficiently prove their derivation, and in other cases, those who would have inherited at law as the representatives of a deceased parent, are excluded by the intrigues of living co-heirs. Frauds, as the reports of our courts attest, have been perpetrated by those, who, from a similarity of name, though unrelated, have emboldened themselves to step in and exclude others who were legally entitled to the property, but who were unable to furnish sufficient evidence to establish their claim.

The steamers from England often bring news of the extinguishment of European resident heirs to estates in that country; and much money has been expended in the research of ancestry, by our own citizens, who have imagined themselves to be the true heirs to this property. The families, from which the greater number of these estates descend, are old families; branches of which came to this country prior to the commencement of the eighteenth century, and the trans-atlantic branch of the stock has run out. When this is the case, it is of high importance that the American descendants of these families should be able, clearly and conclusively, to prove their derivation. In this view, is it not a matter of surprise, that until the present year, the publication of a journal which could furnish information of so important a character as that which now demands so great a share of the public attention, has been delayed?

A Register which shall contain "Biographical Memoirs, Sketches, and Notices of persons who came to North America, especially to New England, before Anno Domini 1700; showing from what places in Europe they came, their Families there, and their descendants in this country;" which shall give "full and minute Genealogical Memoirs and Tables, showing the lineage and descent of Families, from the earliest dates to which they can be authentically traced down to the present time, with their branches and connections," cannot but be invaluable. If properly conducted, if the severest scrutiny is exercised by the writers over the materials which come under their notice, in the preparation of genealogical articles, the Register will become an authority in our courts, and will save immense amounts of money to the large number of individuals, who are attempting to trace their descent from European families. The policy of the law which invests, first, lineal descendants with intestate estates, and in the absence of lineal descendants, carries the estates to collateral heirs, in preference to an escheat to the State, is generally admitted. Were it not so, one great incentive to industry would be destroyed. The desire of securing their offspring against want, is a prevalent characteristic of New England parents. Assiduity and energy in the pursuit of wealth, which have overcome so many obstacles in our inhospitable climate, have their origin in the desire to advance the interests of posterity. How desirable, then, in order to carry out these views, does the Genealogical Register become! Such a publication affords the only permanent depository for such records as will serve to insure the correct distribution of the property of deceased persons; and no parent who wishes the avails of his labors to be transmitted to his remote descendants can fail to perceive the utility of such a work, or can decline to furnish such information for its columns, as will enable those who come after him to prove their descent.

The frauds continually practised by those who assume to be heirs to every unclaimed estate, have become a matter of notoriety in English legal practice; and though there are many estates now in abeyance in England for want of discovered legal heirs, the bar and the bench in England are exceedingly distrustful of the evidence forwarded by claimants in this country. No doubt many of these claimants are sincere in the belief that they are true heirs to those estates; but the evidence upon which that belief is founded generally proves to be of too unsatisfactory a character to procure a judgment of the English tribunals in their favor; whereas, had materials been previously collected and given to the world through the columns of an authoritative periodical, the evidence thus furnished would be almost irresistible to any court of law.

We can ask with confidence the attention of all travellers to this journal. Communications relative to the antiquities of the countries they may visit; descriptions of monuments which exist, with the inscriptions thereon; and such information as they may communicate respecting themselves which may be interesting to the families to which they belong: all these will be within the scope of this work. It needs but an announcement of these facts, to obtain from those interested, communications which will not only throw light upon the pedigree of families, but will contain many accounts interesting to genealogists, biographers, and historians, which otherwise would be swept into oblivion; and in this department of the periodical, the public will find amusing, entertaining, and instructive pages. In this view of it, the New England Historical and Genealogical Register should be extensively patronized; and we are happy to learn that thus far it meets with the decided approbation of the community.


[OUR ANCESTORS.]

"Our ancestors, though not perfect and infallible in all respects, were a religious, brave, and virtuous set of men, whose love of liberty, civil and religious, brought them from their native land into the American deserts."—Rev. Dr. Mayhew's Election Sermon, 1754.


"To let the memory of these men die is injurious to posterity; by depriving them of what might contribute to promote their steadiness to their principles, under hardships and severities."—Rev. Dr. E. Calamy's Preface to his Account of Ejected Ministers.


[COMPLETE LIST OF CONGREGATIONAL MINISTERS IN THE EASTERN PART OF ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NEW HAMPSHIRE, FROM ITS SETTLEMENT TO THE PRESENT TIME; TOGETHER WITH NOTES ON THE MINISTERS AND CHURCHES.]

BY THE REV. JONATHAN FRENCH OF NORTH HAMPTON.

(Continued from page 46.)

Towns.Ministers.Native Place.Born.Graduated.Settled.Dismissed or died.
ExeterJohn WheelwrightEnglandab. 1594Cam. Eng.1638rem. to Wells, 1642
Samuel DudleyEngland16061650d. 1683
The present1st ChurchJohn ClarkNewbury, Ms.June 24, 1670Harv. 1690Sept. 21, 1698d. July 25, 1705
John OdlinBoston, Ms.Nov. 18, 1681Harv. 1702Nov. 11, 1706d. Nov. 20, 1754
Woodbridge OdlinExeter, N. H.April 28, 1718Harv. 1738Sept. 28, 1743d. March 10 1776
Isaac MansfieldMarblehead, Ms.1750Harv. 1767Oct. 9, 1776dis. Aug. 22, 1787
William F. RowlandPlainfield, Ct.1761Dart. 1784June 2, 1790dis. Dec. 5, 1828
John SmithWethersfield, Ct.Yale, 1821March 12, 1829dis. Feb. 14, 1838
William WilliamsWethersfield, Ct.Oct. 2, 1797Yale, 1816May 31, 1836dis. Oct. 1, 1842
Joy H. FairchildGuilford, Ct.April 24, 1789Yale, 1813Sept. 20, 1843dis. July 30, 1844
Roswell D. HitchcockE. Machias, Me.Aug. 15, 1817Amh. 1836Nov. 19, 1845