Footnote 622: L. and P., iv., 5611, 5612.[(back)]
Footnote 623: Ibid., iv., 5685, 5694, 5695, 5702.[(back)]
Footnote 624: L. and P., iv., Introd., p. cccclxxv.[(back)]
Footnote 625: Ibid., iv., Introd., p. cccclxxix.[(back)]
Footnote 626: Ibid., iv., 5732, 5734.[(back)]
Footnote 627: Ibid., iv., 3604.[(back)]
Footnote 628: Ibid., iv., 5789.[(back)]
Footnote 629: It was alleged that this adjournment was only the usual practice of the curia; but it is worth noting that in 1530 Charles V. asserted that it was usual to carry on matters so important as the divorce during vacation (ibid., iv., 6452), and that Clement had repeatedly ordered Campeggio to prolong the suit as much as possible and above all to pronounce no sentence.[(back)]
Footnote 630: L. and P., iv., 5703, 5715, 5780.[(back)]
Footnote 631: Ibid., iv., 4564; Sp. Cal., iii., 729.[(back)]