Footnote 692: L. and P., iii., 1978.[(back)]
Footnote 693: Ibid., iv., 5231.[(back)]
Footnote 694: Ibid., iv., 5983.[(back)]
Footnote 695: Ibid., iv., 6017.[(back)]
Footnote 696: L. and P., iv., 6199, 6050; cf. iv., 6295, where Henry orders Dacre to treat Wolsey as became his rank; Ven. Cal., 1529, p. 237.[(back)]
Footnote 697: Ibid., iv., 6220.[(back)]
Footnote 698: Ibid., iv., 6018, 6199, 6273, 6738.[(back)]
Footnote 699: De Vaux writes on 8th November, 1530, to Montmorenci, that the King had told him "where and how" Wolsey had intrigued against him, but he does not repeat the information (ibid., iv., 6720), though Bryan's remark (ibid., iv., 6733) that "De Vaux has done well in disclosing the misdemeanour of the Cardinal" suggests that De Vaux knew more than he says.[(back)]
Footnote 700: So Chapuys reports (iv., 6738); that Wolsey had used Agostini to sound Chapuys is obvious from the latter's remark, "were the physician to say all that passed between us, he could not do anything to impugn me".[(back)]
Footnote 701: Cf. Buckingham's remark in L. and P., iii., 1356: "An he had not offended no more unto God than he had done to the Crown, he should die as true a man as ever was in the world".[(back)]