Footnote 781: Ibid., v., 27.[(back)]
Footnote 782: Ibid., iv., 6759.[(back)]
Footnote 783: Ibid., iv., 6615; v., 45.[(back)]
Footnote 784: See the present writer's Cranmer, pp. 39-41. Cranmer's suggestion was made early in August, 1529, and on the 23rd Du Bellay writes that Wolsey and the King "appeared to desire very much that I should go over to France to get the opinions of the learned men there about the divorce" (L. and P., iv., 5862). In October Stokesley was sent to France and Croke to Italy (ibid., p. 2684); Cranmer did not start till 1530.[(back)]
Footnote 785: L. and P., iv., 6332, 6448, 6491, 6632, 6636.[(back)]
Footnote 786: L. and P., vii., App. 12.[(back)]
Footnote 787: Ibid., v., 468.[(back)]
Footnote 788: Ibid., iv., 6513.[(back)]
Footnote 789: Cf. L. and P., iv., 6199. Chapuys writes on 6th February, 1530, "I am told the King did not wish the Cardinal's case to be tried by Parliament, as, if it had been decided against him, the King could not have pardoned him".[(back)]
Footnote 790: Ibid., iv., 6488, 6699.[(back)]