Footnote 1101: Ibid., xvi., Introd., p. ii. n.[(back)]
Footnote 1102: Ibid., xv., 870.[(back)]
Footnote 1103: Ibid., xv., 951.[(back)]
Footnote 1104: Original Letters, Parker Society, i., 202. cf. L. and P., xv., 613 [12]. Winchester, says Marillac, "was one of the principal authors of this last marriage, which led to the ruin of Cromwell" (ibid., xvi., 269).[(back)]
Footnote 1105: L. and P., xvi., 1334.[(back)]
Footnote 1106: So says the D.N.B., ix., 308; but in L. and P., xv., 901, Marillac describes her as "a lady of great beauty," and in xvi., 1366, he speaks of her "beauty and sweetness".[(back)]
Footnote 1107: Venetian Cal., v., 222.[(back)]
Footnote 1108: This is the date given by Dr. Gairdner in D.N.B., ix., 304, and is probably correct, though Dr. Gairdner himself gives 8th August in his Church History, 1902, p. 218. Wriothesley (Chron., i., 121) also says 8th August, but Hall (Chron., p. 840) is nearer the truth when he says: "The eight day of August was the Lady Katharine Howard... shewed openly as Queen at Hampton court". The original authority for the 28th July is the 3rd Rep. of the Deputy Keeper of Records, App. ii., 264, viz., the official record of her trial.[(back)]
Footnote 1109: It was popularly thought that Henry called Gardiner "his own bishop" (L. and P., XIV., i., 662).[(back)]
Footnote 1110: 32 Henry VIII., c. 10. Married priests of course would come under this opprobrious title.[(back)]