[259] Brachet, however, holds that justice and justesse are collateral forms, both from the Latin -itia.
[260] “Archæologia Americana,” ii. pp. 25, 166, 169.
[261] Bleek: “Comparative Grammar of the South African Languages,” pp. 97, 98.
[262] Matthews: “Ethnography and Philology of the Hidatsa Indians” (1877), p. 95.
[263] Buschmann: “Abhand. d. Berliner Akademie” (1869), i. p. 103.
[264] The Sanskrit equivalent of humus, however, has had to submit to the prevailing analogy, and in the form of bhûmi assume what has become the feminine suffix.
[265] “Ethnography and Philology of the Hidatsa Indians,” p. 96.
[266] “Abhandlungen d. Berlin. Akad.” (1869), i. p. 122.
[267] “Eléments de la Grammaire Othomi,” in the “Revue Orientale et Américaine,” p. 21.
[268] Friedrich Müller: “Grundriss der Sprachwissenschaft,” i. 2, p. 27.