TURNER’S SKETCHES
AND DRAWINGS
By
A. J. F I N B E R G
WITH 100 ILLUSTRATIONS
SECOND EDITION
METHUEN & CO. LTD
36 ESSEX STREET W.C.
LONDON
| First Published | . | . | . | July 21st 1910 |
| Second Edition | . | . | . | 1911 |
PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN.
CONTENTS
| PAGE | |
| LIST OF PLATES, | [ix] |
| INTRODUCTORY, | [1] |
| The nature of our subject-matter, | [1] |
| The raw material of art, | [2] |
| The character of our subject-matter, as embryonic forms of artistic expression, prescribes our method of study, | [2] |
| Our difficulties of description and analysis, | [3] |
| The separation of Art-criticism from Aesthetic, | [3] |
| Eight aspects of Turner’s genius, | [4] |
| CHAPTER | |
| [I. SEVEN YEARS’ APPRENTICESHIP—1787-1793,] | [6] |
| Turner’s first drawings, | [6] |
| ‘St. Vincent’s Tower,’ | [6] |
| Copies and imitations, | [8] |
| His debt to art, | [10] |
| Work with Mr. Hardwick, | [10] |
| Oxford sketches, | [11] |
| ‘Radley Hall,’ | [12] |
| Working from the Antique, | [14] |
| The Bristol sketch-book, | [14] |
| End of the apprenticeship, | [16] |
| [II. THE TOPOGRAPHICAL DRAUGHTSMAN—1793-1796,] | [17] |
| Welsh tour of 1793, | [17] |
| ‘St. Anselm’s Chapel,’ | [18] |
| Turner’s topographical rivals, | [18] |
| Midland tour of 1794, | [20] |
| Limitations of topographical and antiquarian art, | [22] |
| ‘Interior of a Cottage,’ | [23] |
| Light and Shade as a means of expression, | [24] |
| The sketch-books of 1795 and their contents, | [25] |
| ‘High Force of Tees’ or ‘Fall of Melincourt’? | [27] |
| [III. THE SUBLIME—1797-1802,] | [29] |
| Change from pure outline to light and shade, | [29] |
| ‘Ewenny Priory,’ | [30] |
| Contrast between ‘Ewenny’ (1797) and ‘Llandaff Cathedral’ (1796), | [30] |
| Transition from Objectivity to Subjectivity, | [31] |
| Growth of taste for the Sublime, | [31] |
| There are no sublime objects, but only objects of sublime feeling, | [32] |
| Therefore no guidance but from Art, | [32] |
| The Wilson tradition, | [33] |
| The two currents in Turner’s work at this period— | |
| (a) Study of Nature; | |
| (b) Study of the Wilson tradition, | [33] |
| In the 1797 sketches these two currents are kept distinct, | [34] |
| The North of England tour (1797) and its record, | [34] |
| ‘Studies for Pictures: Copies of Wilson,’ | [36] |
| The two currents begin to coalesce, | [37] |
| The origin of ‘Jason,’ | [38] |
| Scotch tour (1801), | [38] |
| Swiss tour (1802), | [39] |
| [IV. THE SEA PAINTER—1802-1809,] | [41] |
| Contrast between Marine painting and the Sublime, | [41] |
| Turner’s first sea-pieces, | [42] |
| The ‘Bridgewater Sea-piece,’ | [42] |
| ‘Meeting of the Thames and Medway,’ | [46] |
| ‘Our landing at Calais—nearly swampt,’ | [48] |
| ‘Fishermen upon a Lee Shore,’ | [48] |
| The Dunbar and Guisborough Shore sketch-book, | [48] |
| ‘The Shipwreck,’ | [49] |
| The mouth of the Thames, | [51] |
| ‘Sheerness’ and the ‘Death of Nelson,’ | [53] |
| [V. ‘SIMPLE NATURE’—1808-1813,] | [55] |
| The works of this period an important yet generally neglected aspect of Turner’s art, | [55] |
| Turner’s classification of ‘Pastoral’ as distinguished from ‘Elegant Pastoral,’ | [56] |
| The Arcadian idyll of the mid-eighteenth century, | [57] |
| The first ‘Pastoral’ subjects in ‘Liber,’ | [57] |
| The ‘Windmill and Lock,’ | [57] |
| Events connected with the development of Turner’s deeper and more solemn conception of the poetry of rural life, | [58] |
| An attempt to define the mood of pictures like the ‘Frosty Morning,’ | [64] |
| The work of art is nothing less than its full significance, | [67] |
| Distinction between mood and character, | [68] |
| [VI. THE ‘LIBER STUDIORUM,’] | [72] |
| Object of this chapter, | [72] |
| The first ‘Liber’ drawings were made at W. F. Wells’s cottage at Knockholt, Kent, | [73] |
| ‘Bridge and Cows,’ | [73] |
| Development of the so-called ‘Flint Castle,’ | [75] |
| ‘Basle,’ | [78] |
| ‘Little Devil’s Bridge, | [80] |
| ‘London from Greenwich,’ | [80] |
| ‘Kirkstall Crypt,’ | [81] |
| Etchings of the so-called ‘Raglan Castle’ and ‘Source of the Arveron,’ | [82] |
| Suggestion for the better exhibition of the ‘Liber Studiorum’ drawings, | [83] |
| [VII. THE SPLENDOUR OF SUCCESS, OR ‘WHAT YOU WILL’—1813-1830,] | [84] |
| Survey of the ground we have covered, | [84] |
| The training of Turner’s sympathies by the Poets, | [85] |
| The limits of artistic beauty, | [86] |
| The predominantly sensuous bent of Turner’s genius, | [86] |
| The parting of the ways, | [87] |
| The influence of the Academy and society, | [88] |
| Turner’s first visit to Italy, | [89] |
| The Naturalistic fallacy, | [95] |
| Turner’s work for the engraver, | [97] |
| [VIII. MENTAL AND PHYSICAL DECAY, AND THE ORIGIN OF IMPRESSIONISM—1830-1845,] | [116] |
| Mental Characteristics of the 1815-1830 period, | [116] |
| Their influence on form and colour, | [117] |
| Colour enrichment a general characteristic of Romantic art, | [118] |
| What further development is required to give the transition to Impressionism? | [118] |
| Turner’s first Impressionistic work, | [119] |
| Vagueness as a means of expression, | [119] |
| Two ways of painting one’s impressions. Turner’s earlier way contrasted with the modern Impressionistic way, | [119] |
| The change after 1830 is it a change in terms of sight or of thought—visual or mental? | [120] |
| The content of Turner’s later work, | [120] |
| Relation of Turner’s later work to Impressionism defined, | [121] |
| The historical development of Turner’s later manner, | [126] |
| The Petworth sketches, | [126] |
| Discovery of the artistic value of the Indeterminate, | [128] |
| ‘Rivers of France,’ | [129] |
| Venetian sketches, | [131] |
| Swiss and Rhine sketches, | [134] |
| The end, | [135] |
| [IX. CONCLUSION,] | [136] |
| The distinction between Art-criticism and Aesthetic, | [136] |
| The aim of this chapter, | [137] |
| Art and physical fact, | [137] |
| The ‘common-sense’ conception of landscape art as evidence of fact, | [137] |
| Mr. Ruskin’s treatment of the relation of Art and Nature, | [138] |
| His confusion of Nature and Mind, | [140] |
| Art as a form of communication implies that the dualism of Nature and Mind is overcome, | [143] |
| What does Art represent? | [144] |
| An individualised psychical content present to the mind of the artist, | [145] |
| Classification of Turner’s sketches and studies from the point of view of their logical content, | [146] |
| The assertions in a work of art do not directly qualify the ordinary real world, but an imaginary world specially constructed for the artist’s purpose, | [150] |
| The ideal of complete definition, | [151] |
| Yet the content must determine the form, | [151] |
| Plea for a dynamic study of Artistic form, | [153] |
| [INDEX], | [155] |
LIST OF PLATES
All the Drawings are in the National Gallery, unless otherwise specified.