That girl that at the door of the great house in Pilchester Square had breathed, “You knew, before I knew, that I loved you,” had been called beautiful. This woman that now was wife and now was mother was beautiful with that girl’s beauty and with her own, matured of years, set upon it. That girl, shaded in her colouring, commonly was sombre in her hue, but with a quick, impetuous spirit beneath her flesh that, flashing, somehow lightened all her tints; this woman, albeit dark, had somehow about her a deep golden hue as of dusk in a deep wood beheld against a sunset. Her face had always had a boyish look and still, with years, was boyish. There was a mirage in her face. The stranger glanced and saw a mother—extraordinarily shielding and maternal and benignant things; and looked again and saw a boy—astonishingly reckless and impetuous and rather boyish, hard and mutinous things. Or glanced and saw a boy, perhaps laughing and eager, perhaps obstinate and petulant; and looked again and only much tenderness was there.
There was a mirage in her face; and with its changes her voice changed. When she was a boy her voice was April; when she was a mother September was her voice.
There were two natures in her and those were their reflections; two lodestars set above her that by turns brightened and drew her gaze; two lodestones set within her that claimed her banners as claim the moon and earth the inconstant sea; one of head, one of heart; one of choice, one of dower; one of will, one of nature.
In that tenth year her married life there stood for the mother in her face three children: Huggo who then was nine; Dora, whom she called Doda because in her first prattle this heart’s delight of hers-“A baby girl! A beloved one, Harry, to be daughter to me, and to be a tiny woman with me as little girls always are, and then budding up beside me and being myself to me again, my baby girl, my daughter, my woman-bud, my heart’s own heart!”—had thus pronounced her name, who then was seven; and last Benjamin, then five, whom she named Benjamin because, come third, come after cognizance of confliction within herself, come after resentment of his coming—called Benjamin because, come out of such, there were such happy tears, such tender, thank-God, charged with meaning tears to greet him, the one the last of three, the little tiny one, so wee beside the lusty, toddling others. Benjamin she told Harry he must be named; Benji she always called him.
Huggo and Doda and Benji! Her children! Her darling ones, her lovely ones! Love’s crown; and, what was more, worn in the persons of these darling joys of hers (when they were growing up to nine and seven and five years old) in signal, almost arrogant in her disdain of precedent to the contrary, that woman might be mother and yet work freely in the markets of the world precisely as man is father but follows a career.
Children! There had been a time when, speaking from the boy that would stand mutinous and reckless in her face, and with her April voice, she had expressed her view on parentage in terms of the old resentment at the old disability, encountered, bedrocked, wherever into life she struck a new trail; in terms of the old invertion of an old conceit wherever with her principles she touched conventional opinion. The catlike attributes, the marriage for a home, here the familiar saw on parenthood—
“They talk about hostages to fortune,” she had expressed her idea, “they talk about a man with young children as having given hostages to fortune. You know, it’s quite absurd. He doesn’t. I don’t say a man to whom the support of children is a financial anxiety hasn’t, by begetting them, placed himself in a position of captivity to fortune, or to the future, or whatever you like to call it. He very much has. He’s backed a bill that any day may fall due and find him without means to meet it; he’s let himself in for blackmail, always over him a threat. But I’m talking about men above the struggle line. They don’t, in their children, give hostages. It’s the woman does that. Men don’t give nor forfeit anything. It’s the woman gives and forfeits. Why, when his friends meet a man who was last met a bachelor a couple or three years ago, what change do they see in him? They don’t see any change at all. There isn’t any change to see. He has to tell them; and he always tells them rather sheepishly or rather boisterously. ‘I’m married, you know,’ he says. ‘Yes, rather. Man alive, I’ve got two kids!’ The other says, ‘My aunt!’—more probably he says ‘My God!’—‘My God, fancy you!’ And they both laugh—laugh!
“Hostages to fortune! To a man and amongst men it’s just a joke. It’s no joke to a woman. Do you suppose a married girl, meeting old friends, has to tell them she’s a mother, or, if she had to tell them, would tell them like that? Can’t they see it at a glance? Isn’t she changed? Isn’t she, subtly perhaps, but unmistakably, altogether different from the unfettered thing she used to be? Of course she is. How otherwise? She’s given hostages to fortune and she’s paying; she’s being bled. She’s giving up things, she’s not going out so much, she’s not reading so much, she’s not playing so much, she’s not interested so much in what used to interest her. How can she? There’s the children. How can she? She’s given hostages to fortune. Oh, happy is the man that hath children for they are as arrows in the quiver of a giant. But it’s the woman is the arrowbearer! It’s the woman pays.”
Lo, there had come to this intolerance the longing—“Here!”—that Anna’s bosom had, the urge to hold a tiny scrap against her breast, to have her heart, bursting for such release, torn out by baby fingers. It had o’erborne the other. She had thrown herself upon its flood; not yielded to it as one drawn in by rising waters, but tempestuously engulfed by it and borne away upon it as swallowed up and borne away in Harry’s arms when “Rosalie! Rosalie!” he had cried to her.
That which the subsidence revealed, adoringly she called her Huggo.