| I E | k | g | gh | p | bh | m | w | ||
| S | k, h, kh, sh[A] | k, h[B] | gh, kh, zh | p | m, b, w | m | w, p | ||
| T | k, h, g[B], khsh | k, g[B] | gh, kh, zh | p | b, w | m, b[C] | w, p | ||
| M | k, h, gh[D], sh | k | gh[D] | p | m[F] (b, w) p | ||||
| I E | t | d | dh | n | r, l[E] | y[E] | s | ||
| S | t, n | t, d, n | d | n | n, d | y, z | s, sh, z, zh, t | ||
| T | t, n | t, l, n | l | n | n, l | y, z | s, sh, z, zh, t | ||
| M | t, d | t d[F] (l, n, r) ts | ts, sh, t | ||||||
FOOTNOTES:
[A] Chiefly, probably not always, for Fick's second k, Lith sz (pron sh), Slav s. The k's and g's liable to labialization in Eu. languages appear to be occasionally labialized in Dakotan languages.
[B] In S. hd, Yankton kd, T. gl; S. hn, Y. kn, T. gn or gl; S. hm, Y. km, T. gm.
[C] In S. md, Y. bd, T. bl.
[D] In a previous paper I represented this by kh; and do not know whether it is nearest Dak kh German ch, or Dak gh; I E gh.
[E] Santee d always becomes l in Titon.
[E] Dak y becomes r, d, l or n in the allied languages, except perhaps the Osage, and perhaps in part represents I E r.
[F] In Minnetaree m, interchanges so freely with b and w, and d with l, n, and r, that Matthews represents each group by one letter. The same irregularity occurs largely in Crow, and somewhat also in Mandan.
Ch as in chin very often occurs in Dak as a euphonic modification of k. Otherwise it stands chiefly for d, r, l, n of the allied languages. On the other hand Win and Iowa ch usually represents Dak, and I E t. R is found in all the allied languages, and in Winnebago is more frequent than even in Icelandic. Iowa aspirate th, represents Dak s, and other sibilants. Hayden does not distinguish the subvocal and aspirate th in Omaha. From a small list gathered by my father I judge that the aspirate is probably similar to the Iowa, and that the subvocal represents Dak and I E dentals. F in Iowa represents some Dak p's.