[106] See Keil, Attische Culte aus Inschriften, Philologus, bd. xxiii., 212, 259, 592, 622; also Weingarten, Histor. Zeitschrift, bd. xlv., 1881, p. 441 ff.
[107] See Tertullian, De Baptismo, chap. v.; and Clem. of Alex., Strom., book v., chap. iv.
[108] Cf. Hatch, Influence of Greek Ideas and Usages upon the Christian Church.
[109] Cf. Clem. of Alex., Exhortation to the Heathen, chap. xii.
[110] Cf. Hatch as above; and Lenormant, in Contemporary Review for September, 1880.
[111] “The objection which Celsus makes (c. Cels., i., 1, Keim, p. 3) to the secrecy of the Christian associations would hardly have held good in the apostolic age. Origen admits (c. Cels., i., 7) that there are exoteric and esoteric doctrines in Christianity, and justifies it by (1) the philosophies, (2) the mysteries. On the rise of this conception of Christian teaching as something to be hidden from the mass, cf. the Valentians in Tert., c. Valent., i., where there is a direct parallel drawn between them and the mysteries; also the distinction of men into two classes—πνευματικοὶ and ψυχικοὶ or ὑλικοί,—among the Gnostics. Yet this very secrecy was naturalized in the Church. Cf. Cyril Hier., Catech., vi., 30; Aug. in Psalm ciii.; Hom., xcvi., in Joan; Theodoret, Quæst. xv., in Num., and Dial., ii., (Inconfusus); Chry., Hom., xix., in Matt. Sozomen’s (i., 20, 3) reason for not giving the Nicene creed is significant alike as regards motive and language.”—Hibbert Lectures, 1888, p. 293 and footnote.
[112] Cf. Hatch, p. 294 ff.
[113] Apol., i., 61.
[114] Cf. Clem. of Alex., Stroma., bk. ii., chap. iii.
[115] Chrysostom, Hom., 85, in Joan, xix., 34.