[66] Hutchins and Harrison, pp. 209-211.
[67] Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 U. S. 540.
[68] Report 1907, p. 49.
[69] Charities and the Commons, v. 17, p. 839.
[70] Schaezlein v. Cabaniss, 135 Cal. 466.
[71] Buttfield v. Stranahan, 192 U. S. 470, standards of quality of tea; Isenhour v. State, 157 Ind. 517, minimum standards of food and drug preparations, defining specific adulterations; Arms v. Ayer, 192 Ill. 601, determining number and location of fire escapes.
[72] Burcher v. People, 41 Colo. 495. The reasoning of the decision is in some respects obscure, and the case cannot be regarded as typical.
THE ILLINOIS TEN-HOUR DECISION[73]
JOSEPHINE GOLDMARK
National Consumers’ League