Commentary. We think ourselves called upon in the first place to give some account of the Thermæ, or Public Baths, of the ancients, as an acquaintance with their construction and many matters relating to them is indispensably necessary in order to understand the subject now in hand. We need scarcely mention that the Romans surpassed any nation that has ever existed in the magnificence of their public baths. An ancient Therma consisted of four distinct apartments for as many different purposes: 1, Tepidaria; 2, Laconicum; 3, Calidaria; 4, Frigidaria. The 1st, or Tepidaria, called also Apodyterium, derived its former name from its being filled with tepid air, and the latter from its being the place in which the bathers undressed. The 2d, or Laconicum, called also Sudatorium, was an apartment filled either with heated air or steam, that is to say, it was, according to different usages, an air-bath or a vapour-bath. The 3d, or Calidaria, was a cistern for containing warm water. The 4th, or Frigidaria, was a cistern for cold water. The mode in which the ancients went through the process of bathing was as follows. First they went into the Tepidaria, where they left their clothes, and proceeded to the Laconicum, and there they were carefully scrubbed with the flour of beans, soda, &c., and then went into the hot bath, where they remained for some time, and coming out of it, they took a plunge into the cold-water bath, and then returned to the Tepidaria, where they underwent the Restorative friction, that is to say, were rubbed with oils or ointments, and sprinkled with fragrant powders, and then they resumed their clothes. That the order in which the ancients took the different baths was that which we have described may be inferred from the construction of those now remaining, from a passage in Galen’s works (t. iv, p. 146, ed. Basil), and from Stephanus (Comment. p. 259, t. i, ed. Dietz.) See also Auctores de Balniis pluries, Baccius de Thermis pluries, and Robertellus Lacon. explic. Pisanæ urbis. In the public baths the ancients always made use of common water. The ordinary hour for the bath was about two o’clock in the afternoon, but no one was restricted to any hour from the dawn to sunset. Galen approves of taking the bath in the morning, provided one had supped sparingly. (De Sanit. tuendâ, vi.) All agreed in condemning the use of the bath after a full meal. (Persius, Sat. iii; Juvenal, Sat. i, 143; Horat. Epist. vi, 61; Avicenna, Libel, &c). The ancients had also various other modes of practising the bath in private, some of which we shall briefly notice. The Clibanus, mentioned by Celsus (ii, 17), was probably a portable stove. The Pensiles Balneæ were small baths suspended by ropes from the ceiling of the house, in which luxurious persons were rocked. (Pliny, xxvi, 3.) Hip-baths, either of plain water, or water medicated with herbs, or of oil and water, are repeatedly mentioned by all the medical authors, and are particularly described by Aëtius and Avicenna. The douche or dashing with water is recommended by Aëtius, in ardent fever, ophthalmy, &c.; but he directs that it should not be carried far. Sprinkling with plain water, or the decoctions of emollient herbs, is recommended when the patients are so weak that they cannot bear the bath.
Hippocrates thus explains his views as to the effects produced by baths: The bath of sweet waters humectates and cools, for it imparts moisture to the body. The salt bath is calefacient and desiccative; for, being naturally hot, it attracts moisture from the body. When the body is fasting the hot bath is attenuant and refrigerant; for by its heat it attracts the moisture from the body, and when the flesh is deprived of moisture the body is cooled. Put after a meal it heats and humectates, by expanding to a greater bulk whatever predominates in the body. The cold baths produce the contrary effects; for when the body is fasting they impart heat and moisture to it, and after a meal they abstract moisture, and being cold they fill it with dryness. Unction with oil is calefacient, moistening and emollient. (De Diæta, ii, 36.) In another place he states that the warm bath, in moderation, softens and enlarges the body; but when taken immoderately it humectates dry bodies, and dries humid bodies. (De Affectionibus, c. 47.)
Celsus gives some ingenious reflections on the effects of the bath, especially in fever. He thus states the purposes for which it is applied: “Fere adhibetur, ubi summam cutem relaxari, evocarique corruptum humorem, et habitum corporis mutari expedit.” He recommends friction with oil before going into the bath. (ii, 17.)
Our author copies from Oribasius (Euporist. i, 16.) See a fuller account in Med. Collect. (x, 6); Galen (de Sanitate tuendâ); Aëtius (iii, 169); and Avicenna (i, 3, 2.) Galen particularly recommends the cold bath to persons in the prime of life, and during the summer season. Before going into the bath they are to get well rubbed first with rough towels and then with oil. He recommends them to plunge into the water at once, and not descend gradually. After coming out of the water he directs them to get rubbed with oil, until the skin is warmed. Agathinus forbids infants to be bathed in cold water, but recommends the warm bath for them. (Oribasius, Med. Collect. x, 7.)
Galen and Aëtius direct the bath of oil to be formed by adding the fifth part of heated oil to a bath of water. They recommend it in protracted fevers attended with chills, convulsions, retention of urine, and to relieve lassitude, and nervous pains. The learned Bernard remarks that it must have been the expense with which it is attended that has led to the disuse of the bath of oil. (Ad Nonni Epitom.) Avicenna and his expositor, Gentilis Fulginas, particularly recommend it for retention of urine. Mengus Faventinas pronounces it to be highly anodyne. (Auctores de Balneis.)
Psellus says that the warm bath relaxes, softens, and induces sleep, occasioning plumpness of the body. (Opus Medicum.)
Actuarius forbids the use of the bath to those whose systems are loaded with superfluities and bad humours. (De Diæta, xi.) Averrhoes lays down the same prohibition. (Coll. ii, 4.)
The proper time for the bath, according to Haly Abbas, is after exercise, and before eating. If used before exercise, it proves injurious, by occasioning the distribution of any superfluities which may be remaining indigested in the body, and determining them to improper parts. If used immediately after a meal, he says, it proves hurtful, by promoting the absorption of unconcocted chyle, and sending humours to the head. But if used after exercise, and before a meal, it moistens the body, strengthens the vital heat, promotes digestion, opens the pores, mitigates pain, and dispels flatulence. He adds, a short continuance in the bath, warms and moistens the body, but a long warms and dries it. (Theor. v, 13.) In another place he says that the proper time for the bath is after exercise, yet not immediately, nor until the powers of the system are in some degree recruited; but the body is to be first rubbed with oil, and then the bath is to be taken. (Pract. i, 5.)
The uses of the bath, according to Alsaharavius, are, to moisten the body, open the pores, dispel flatulence, remove repletion, procure sleep, relieve pains, fluxes of the bowels and lassitude, to restore lean bodies to plumpness and obesity, if used after a full diet, to soften contracted limbs, moisten dry bodies, and dry humid. The evil effects of it when misapplied, are prostration of the vital powers, syncope, and determining the humours to weak parts. (Theor. xi, 1.)
Asclepiades, of Bithynia, was a distinguished advocate for the use of the bath. See Pliny (H. N. xxxvi, 3); Celsus (ii, 6); Apuleius (Florid. 4.)