| 9. | 10. | 11. | 12. | 13. | 14. | 15. | 16. | ||
| July 8 | 26.2 | 23.8 | 23.2 | 20.3 | 18.7 | 17.5 | 16.8 | 13.7 | |
| July 9 | 63.3 | 65.8 | 67.3 | 69.7 | 70.7 | 73.0 | 70.2 | 72.2 | |
| July 11 | 14.3 | 13.3 | 12.8 | 13.3 | 12.3 | 10.2 | 7.3 | 6.5 | |
| Mean | 34.6 | 34.3 | 34.4 | 34.4 | 33.9 | 33.6 | 31.4 | 30.8 | |
| Mean in w. l. | .692 | .686 | .688 | .688 | .678 | .672 | .628 | .616 | |
| Final mean | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
P.M. OBSERVATIONS.
| 16. | 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. | 8. | |
| July 8 | 61.2 | 63.3 | 63.3 | 68.2 | 67.7 | 69.3 | 70.3 | 69.8 | 69.0 |
| July 9 | 26.0 | 26.0 | 28.2 | 29.2 | 31.5 | 32.0 | 31.3 | 31.7 | 33.0 |
| July 12 | 66.8 | 66.5 | 66.0 | 64.3 | 62.2 | 61.0 | 61.3 | 59.7 | 58.2 |
| Mean | 51.3 | 51.9 | 52.5 | 53.9 | 53.8 | 54.1 | 54.3 | 53.7 | 53.4 |
| Mean in w. l. | 1.026 | 1.038 | 1.050 | 1.078 | 1.076 | 1.082 | 1.086 | 1.074 | 1.068 |
| 1.068 | 1.086 | 1.076 | 1.084 | 1.100 | 1.136 | 1.144 | 1.154 | 1.172 | |
| Final mean | 1.047 | 1.062 | 1.063 | 1.081 | 1.088 | 1.109 | 1.115 | 1.114 | 1.120 |
| 9. | 10. | 11. | 12. | 13. | 14. | 15. | 16. | ||
| July 8 | 71.3 | 71.3 | 70.5 | 71.2 | 71.2 | 70.5 | 72.5 | 75.7 | |
| July 9 | 35.8 | 36.5 | 37.3 | 38.8 | 41.0 | 42.7 | 43.7 | 44.0 | |
| July 12 | 55.7 | 53.7 | 54.7 | 55.0 | 58.2 | 58.5 | 57.0 | 56.0 | |
| Mean | 54.3 | 53.8 | 54.2 | 55.0 | 56.8 | 57.2 | 57.7 | 58.6 | |
| Mean in w. l. | 1.086 | 1.076 | 1.084 | 1.100 | 1.136 | 1.144 | 1.154 | 1.172 | |
| Final mean | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
The results of the observations are expressed graphically in fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
The upper is the curve for the observations at noon, and the lower that for the evening observations. The dotted curves represent one eighth of the theoretical displacements. It seems fair to conclude from the figure that if there is any displacement due to the relative motion of the earth and the luminiferous æther, this cannot be much greater than