A History of Greek Economic Thought

by Albert Augustus Trever

[445]. v. 16; xiii.

[446]. Econ. ix. 11; cf. p. 38, n. 4, on the actual status of slaves at Athens.

[447]. Mem. ii. 8. 4.

[448]. Rev. iii. 2: ὅπου γὰρ ἂν πωλῶσιν αὐτὸ, πανταχοῦ πλεῖον τοῦ ἀρχαίου λαμβάνουσιν.

[449]. Ibid.; cf. Souchon, op. cit., p. 114.

[450]. Rev. iv, especially 7-12; Haney (op. cit., chap. iv) and Simey (“Economic Theory among the Greeks and Romans,” Economic Review, October, 1900, p. 472) point to Rev. iii. 2 as distinguishing between money and wealth, but this hardly balances the above passage. Econ. i. 12-14 means merely that silver is not wealth unless properly used.

[451]. So Brants, Xen. Econ., p. 21; cf. Lenormant é La Monnaie dans l’antiquité, I, 179; III, 3.

[452]. Rev. iv. 8.

[453]. Rev. iii. 4; v. 3; iii. 2; cf. Ingram, History of Political Economy, p. 15; Kautz, op. cit., p. 129; Roscher, p. 12.

[454]. Rev. iv. 5-11.